Guillem Jover wrote...
> On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 12:12:06 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Sylvestre Ledru wrote...
> > > I don't think renaming is the right approach against an MS-DOS
> > > software (and I still think that Debian's policy is too binary for
> > > this).
> >
> > As there is a very s
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 15:01:01 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 02/09/2022 à 13:18, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 12:12:06PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > > Sylvestre Ledru wrote...
> > >
> > > > I don't think renaming is the right approach against an MS-DOS
> > > > so
Le 02/09/2022 à 13:18, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 12:12:06PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Sylvestre Ledru wrote...
I don't think renaming is the right approach against an MS-DOS
software (and I still think that Debian's policy is too binary for
this).
As there is a very s
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 arcanist
Bug #919697 [arc,arcanist] arcanist: file conflict with arc
Bug #930722 [arc,arcanist] arc, arcanist: Both ship arc binary
Bug reassigned from package 'arc,arcanist' to 'arcanist'.
Bug reassigned from package 'arc,arcanist' to 'arcanist'.
Ignorin
Control: reassign -1 arcanist
Hi!
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 07:46:43 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 02/09/2022 à 01:10, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> > So we have reached the point at which arc is getting autoremoved from
> > testing as the RC is still filed against it too. :(
> >
> > Could some arc
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 12:12:06PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Sylvestre Ledru wrote...
>
> > I don't think renaming is the right approach against an MS-DOS
> > software (and I still think that Debian's policy is too binary for
> > this).
>
> As there is a very small chance users would want t
Sylvestre Ledru wrote...
> I don't think renaming is the right approach against an MS-DOS
> software (and I still think that Debian's policy is too binary for
> this).
As there is a very small chance users would want to install *both*
packages, can't we just resolve this with a Breaks: on both si
Le 02/09/2022 à 01:10, Guillem Jover a écrit :
Hi!
On Wed, 2022-08-10 at 01:29:27 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
[ The bug has been (correctly) bumped back to serious. Sorry that I
have not engaged about this bug in the past, but the reply to simply
ignore policy looked rather off-putting, I
Hi!
On Wed, 2022-08-10 at 01:29:27 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ The bug has been (correctly) bumped back to serious. Sorry that I
> have not engaged about this bug in the past, but the reply to simply
> ignore policy looked rather off-putting, I just noticed the reply
> below, which seeme
Hi!
[ The bug has been (correctly) bumped back to serious. Sorry that I
have not engaged about this bug in the past, but the reply to simply
ignore policy looked rather off-putting, I just noticed the reply
below, which seemed encouraging! :) ]
On Sat, 2019-01-26 at 11:20:13 +0100, Sylvestr
Package: arcanist
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy §10.1
This package ships /usr/bin/arc, which is also shipped by unrelated
package arc.
Policy says: “Two different packages must not install programs with
different functionality but with the same filenames.”
--
Jakub Wilk
11 matches
Mail list logo
