Bug#923500: snapd: non-classic snap not confined

2021-02-23 Thread Michael Vogt
Just a quick update - we looked at this and we think the apparmor support in Debian is sufficient to enable it in snaps by default. This is being worked on in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9936 and once that lands I will upload to Debian. The goal is within this week. In addition to the

Bug#923500: snapd: non-classic snap not confined

2021-02-15 Thread intrigeri
Hi, James Henstridge (2021-02-16): > 2. As for why Debian is not being considered for "full" support, > I suspect this is down to the out-of-tree patches to enable access > control for unix domain sockets. This will likely resolve itself > when snapd moves to use the new AppArmor 3.0 network

Bug#923500: snapd: non-classic snap not confined

2021-02-15 Thread James Henstridge
I work on some parts of snapd at Canonical, so thought I'd weigh in. I've got a few of points to add: 1. In the "snap debug confinement" output, it says "policy:downgraded". This indicates that snapd didn't detect enough AppArmor features to enforce the full "strict confinement" sandbox, so it