Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2020-06-24 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Felix Lechner > There may be an alternative for some cases mentioned here. The wolfSSL > encryption library is a FIPS-certified, commercial product with a > fully usable, although incomplete, OpenSSL compatibility layer. Interesting pointer, thanks. For postgresql-12, it fails at the

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2020-06-23 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi, > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger There may be an alternative for some cases mentioned here. The wolfSSL encryption library is a FIPS-certified, commercial product with a fully usable, although incomplete, OpenSSL compatibility layer. The developers are

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2020-02-26 Thread Michael Biebl
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 08:43:32 +0100 Ansgar wrote: > block 952399 by 924937 > thanks > > Ansgar writes: > > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger > > than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps of > > libssl1.1, one can find the following

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2020-02-25 Thread Ansgar
block 952399 by 924937 thanks Ansgar writes: > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger > than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps of > libssl1.1, one can find the following GPL-licensed programs linking it: > > cryptsetup, wesnoth,

Processed: Re: Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2020-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 952399 by 924937 Bug #952399 [kmod] OpenSSL linking without license exception 952399 was not blocked by any bugs. 952399 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 952399: 924937 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2020-02-06 Thread Ansgar
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:31:25 +0100 Ansgar wrote: > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger > than just libpq5 And another one might come up in a few months: +--- | * unify on openssl: | - port sd_id128_get_machine_app_specific() over from khash | - port resolved

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-27 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Re: Ansgar Burchardt 2019-03-20 <751a89074fcaa393f2cc26ff676e9e3434ecd706.ca...@43-1.org> > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger > than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps of > libssl1.1, one can find

Processed: Re: Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #924937 [libpq5] libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies Bug reassigned from package 'libpq5' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions postgresql-11/11.2-2. Ignoring request to alter fi

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-20 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2019-03-20 15:49:07 [+0100], Christoph Berg wrote: > PostgreSQL is BSD-licensed, so there is no problem in PostgreSQL > itself. (We use libedit instead of libreadline in psql to avoid the > libssl problem.) Also unlike the mariadb case, we have been shipping > libpq linked against libssl for at

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:59:40 + Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:31:25 +0100 Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger > > than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps of > >

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 16:31 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger > than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps > of > libssl1.1, one can find the following GPL-licensed programs linking > it: > >

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:31:25 +0100 Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Hi, > > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger > than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps of > libssl1.1, one can find the following GPL-licensed programs linking it: > >

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps of libssl1.1, one can find the following GPL-licensed programs linking it: cryptsetup, wesnoth, mydumper, mupdf, gatling, kopete Also amanda-client,

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-20 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: tag -1 = help Re: Robie Basak 2019-03-20 <20190320142403.ge30...@mal.justgohome.co.uk> > > > It is well understood that the OpenSSL license is not "compatible" with > > > the GPL (either version 2 or 3); and furthermore, Debian has long taken > > > the position that, unless a license

Processed: Re: Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 = help Bug #924937 [libpq5] libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies Added tag(s) help; removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 924937: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924937 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-20 Thread Robie Basak
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:49:06AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Robie Basak 2019-03-18 <20190318165800.gc12...@mal.justgohome.co.uk> > > It is well understood that the OpenSSL license is not "compatible" with > > the GPL (either version 2 or 3); and furthermore, Debian has long taken > > the

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-19 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Re: Robie Basak 2019-03-18 <20190318165800.gc12...@mal.justgohome.co.uk> > It is well understood that the OpenSSL license is not "compatible" with > the GPL (either version 2 or 3); and furthermore, Debian has long taken > the position that, unless a license exception is

Processed: Re: Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #924937 [libpq5] libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 924937: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924937 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2019-03-18 Thread Robie Basak
Package: libpq5 Version: 11.2-2 Severity: serious Affects: bandwidthd-pgsql dballe inspircd libnss-pgsql2 libodb-pgsql-2.4 pmacct r-cran-rpostgresql saga sphinxsearch tora ulogd2-pgsql yubikey-server-c Justification: renders many Debian packages undistributable Hello, It's come to my attention