severity: -1 normal
Buster is released, so I guess it's okay to reduce the severity to let
it migrate to testing again.
I'll try to backports to stable and sloppy later.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT -3 Curitiba
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Hi,
Antoine Beaupré:
> On 2019-05-03 17:15:59, intrigeri wrote:
>>> 1. maintain through backports (seems to have been the option taken for
>>> stretch)
>>
>> That might be viable if the AppArmor profiles are disabled by default.
> Why would we disable apparmor profiles?
See the "2." part
On 2019-05-03 17:15:59, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (slightly reordering quoted text)
>
> Antoine Beaupre:
>> So what will be the way forward for Debian users in buster?
>
>> TL;DR: TBL in backports or install by hand from TPO, AFAIK.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> What does Tails do with this?
>
> Tails only
Hi,
(slightly reordering quoted text)
Antoine Beaupre:
> So what will be the way forward for Debian users in buster?
> TL;DR: TBL in backports or install by hand from TPO, AFAIK.
Agreed.
> What does Tails do with this?
Tails only uses the torbrowser-launcher source package as a way to get
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 07:14:38PM +0100, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
> Source: torbrowser-launcher
> Version: 0.3.1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> for basically the same reasons that made us not include
> torbrowser-launcher in Stretch, IMO it should not be part of Buster
> either:
[...all
Source: torbrowser-launcher
Version: 0.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
for basically the same reasons that made us not include
torbrowser-launcher in Stretch, IMO it should not be part of Buster
either:
1. This downloader package requires updates, from time to time, to
cope with changes in how
6 matches
Mail list logo
