Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2020-02-15 Thread Jan Braun
Package: pm-utils Followup-For: Bug #930869 pm-utils is now marked for autoremoval due to this frivolous RC bug. As another satisfied pm-utils user, this worries me. Would someone with more authority please downgrade/close this as invalid, or at least get Michael Biebl to to adress the questions

Processed: Re: Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2019-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #930869 [pm-utils] Don't release with buster Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist' -- 930869: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930869 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2019-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #930869 [pm-utils] Don't release with buster Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' -- 930869: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930869 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2019-06-27 Thread Adam Borowski
Control: severity -1 wishlist On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:00:38PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 24.06.19 um 00:46 schrieb Ivo De Decker: > > acpi-support depends on it, so removal is not possible. And even if it was, > > it > > would probably be too late for that. > > > > Tagging this bug

Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2019-06-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Ivo Am 24.06.19 um 00:46 schrieb Ivo De Decker: > Control: tags -1 buster-ignore > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released >> with buster. > > acpi-support depends on it, so removal

Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2019-06-23 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: tags -1 buster-ignore Hi, On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released > with buster. acpi-support depends on it, so removal is not possible. And even if it was, it would probably be too late

Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2019-06-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:53:32PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 21.06.19 um 20:05 schrieb Adam Borowski: > > But, do we even have an alternative for suspending remotely? > > What do you mean by that? So here we have a computer. No GUI tools. No emulation of GUI tools. And I want to suspend

Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2019-06-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 21.06.19 um 20:05 schrieb Adam Borowski: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Package: pm-utils >> Version: 1.4.1-18 >> Severity: serious >> >> As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released >> with buster. >> pm-utils is a set of

Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2019-06-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: pm-utils > Version: 1.4.1-18 > Severity: serious > > As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released > with buster. > pm-utils is a set of hacks/scripts which back in the days were necessary > to

Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

2019-06-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: pm-utils Version: 1.4.1-18 Severity: serious As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released with buster. pm-utils is a set of hacks/scripts which back in the days were necessary to successfully suspend/hibernate your system. Nowadays, those hacks do more more