Le 09/08/2019 à 11:06, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> Point releases exist to fix bugs like this one, so I don't see why I
> would have to stop reporting them.
If you do so, please amend the existing bugs instead of opening new ones
(in this case #909216 should have been unarchived and modified to
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:43:53AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> If a build issue appeared *after* the release, due to a regression
> caused by a point release, then yes I think the issue is worth reporting
> (but I wouldn't bother reporting minor test failures that can be easily
> skipped to
Le 06/08/2019 à 15:09, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> In a general sense, the DFSG requires that packages build in the same
> distribution as they are present, so we can't fix a FTBFS in stretch
> (still a supported distribution) by fixing the bug only in buster.
>
> Release Policy says that packages
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 02:01:27PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 06/08/2019 à 12:45, Santiago Vila a écrit :
>
> > Dear maintainer:
> >
> > I tried to build this package in stretch but it failed:
>
> Hi Santiago,
>
> I'm not sure to understand why you are reporting a test failure in
>
Le 06/08/2019 à 12:45, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> Dear maintainer:
>
> I tried to build this package in stretch but it failed:
Hi Santiago,
I'm not sure to understand why you are reporting a test failure in
oldstable. This is a duplicate of #909216 which was fixed in buster.
Personally I don't
Package: src:libjaxen-java
Version: 1.1.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch but it failed:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
test -x debian/rules
mkdir -p "."
6 matches
Mail list logo
