control: fixed -1 8.0.1+dfsg-1
Hello,
On Thu 15 Aug 2019 at 06:50PM +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Thanks. My intention is to just update ocrmypdf to a newer release.
Ah, wait, this FTBFS is reported against stretch. My apologies.
I do not wish to support oldstable myself, but I would take a
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 8.0.1+dfsg-1
Bug #934035 [src:ocrmypdf] ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)
Marked as fixed in versions ocrmypdf/8.0.1+dfsg-1.
--
934035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934035
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hello,
On Tue 06 Aug 2019 at 12:31pm -07, James R Barlow wrote:
> The issue here is that we have an old version of ocrmypdf (4.3.5) with a
> backported version of Ghostscript (9.26) and the latter's behavior has
> changed in a way that breaks the test.
>
> I recommend disabling the test and
The issue here is that we have an old version of ocrmypdf (4.3.5) with a
backported version of Ghostscript (9.26) and the latter's behavior has
changed in a way that breaks the test.
I recommend disabling the test and documenting a caveat that certain
metadata may not be preserved in output
Package: src:ocrmypdf
Version: 4.3.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch but it failed:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with python3,sphinxdoc
5 matches
Mail list logo