Bug#934035: ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)

2019-08-16 Thread Sean Whitton
control: fixed -1 8.0.1+dfsg-1 Hello, On Thu 15 Aug 2019 at 06:50PM +01, Sean Whitton wrote: > Thanks. My intention is to just update ocrmypdf to a newer release. Ah, wait, this FTBFS is reported against stretch. My apologies. I do not wish to support oldstable myself, but I would take a

Processed: Re: Bug#934035: ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 8.0.1+dfsg-1 Bug #934035 [src:ocrmypdf] ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests) Marked as fixed in versions ocrmypdf/8.0.1+dfsg-1. -- 934035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#934035: ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)

2019-08-15 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Tue 06 Aug 2019 at 12:31pm -07, James R Barlow wrote: > The issue here is that we have an old version of ocrmypdf (4.3.5) with a > backported version of Ghostscript (9.26) and the latter's behavior has > changed in a way that breaks the test. > > I recommend disabling the test and

Bug#934035: ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)

2019-08-06 Thread James R Barlow
The issue here is that we have an old version of ocrmypdf (4.3.5) with a backported version of Ghostscript (9.26) and the latter's behavior has changed in a way that breaks the test. I recommend disabling the test and documenting a caveat that certain metadata may not be preserved in output

Bug#934035: ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)

2019-08-06 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:ocrmypdf Version: 4.3.5-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch but it failed: [...] debian/rules build-indep dh build-indep --with python3,sphinxdoc