Control: close -1
Hi. I was asked to take a look at #940034 and ended up reading this
bug too. According to message #191 here, from the maintainer,
| I can no longer reproduce the breakage that you reported.
That this now works is a consequence of #935910 having been fixed by
apt in bullseye.
Simon,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I think I have finally got to the bottom of this. As you suspected it is apt's
> invocation of dpkg. See #935910.
This is now resolved in apt version 1.8.4 which is in both sid and bullseye.
I can no longer reprod
On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 06:51:16PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > > Would you, please, start a new bug for this unless you really think
> > > it is the same issue (apt being broken by continuing to uninstall
> > > libsystemd0 after systemd pr
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 06:51:16PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > Would you, please, start a new bug for this unless you really think
> > it is the same issue (apt being broken by continuing to uninstall
> > libsystemd0 after systemd prerm fails) and I will be happy to help.
>
> I re
On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > I'm interested in this, but my systems (unstable and testing) are
> > in a slightly different state. Let's take unstable, for example:
>
> Thanks for this. However, I really d
Cristian,
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> I'm interested in this, but my systems (unstable and testing) are in a
> slightly different state. Let's take unstable, for example:
Thanks for this. However, I really don't see it as relating to Simon's origi
On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> Removing the pending tag as I don't think there is anything for
> elogind to do to fix this.
Hi,
I'm interested in this, but my systems (unstable and testing) are in a
slightly different state. Let's take unstable, for example:
,
| # apt-cache
Control: tags -1 - pending
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 04:30:00PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > On irc he also said there was little point in adding the Breaks: as apt
> > doesn't
> > rexec itself.
>
> Yes, even a Pre-Depends would not achieve anythi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - pending
Bug #934491 [libelogind0] libelogind0: failing to switch from systemd to
sysvinit-core/elogind results in libsystemd.so.0 disappearing
Removed tag(s) pending.
--
934491: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934491
Debian Bug Tracking
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On irc he also said there was little point in adding the Breaks: as apt
> doesn't
> rexec itself.
Yes, even a Pre-Depends would not achieve anything TTBOMK.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.d
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 08:36:53PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> Simon,
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I think I have finally got to the bottom of this. As you suspected it is
> > apt's
> > invocation of dpkg. See #935910.
>
> T
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #934491 [libelogind0] libelogind0: failing to switch from systemd to
sysvinit-core/elogind results in libsystemd.so.0 disappearing
Added tag(s) pending.
--
934491: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934491
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
Control: tags -1 pending
Simon,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> I think I have finally got to the bottom of this. As you suspected it is apt's
> invocation of dpkg. See #935910.
This has now been fixed in apt 1.9.4 (experimental).
I propose to add
Breaks: apt (
13 matches
Mail list logo
