Bug#948180: found 948180 in 4.1.2+dfsg-5, closing 948180

2020-01-05 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Markus, On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 02:15:41PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > > Am 05.01.20 um 13:39 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > > Hi Markus, > > > > On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 01:26:37PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> Am 05.01.20 um 06:44 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > >>> found 948180

Bug#948180: found 948180 in 4.1.2+dfsg-5, closing 948180

2020-01-05 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 05.01.20 um 13:39 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > Hi Markus, > > On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 01:26:37PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >> Am 05.01.20 um 06:44 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: >>> found 948180 4.1.2+dfsg-5 >>> close 948180 4.2.0+dfsg-1 >>> thanks >> >> You could have kept the bug

Bug#948180: found 948180 in 4.1.2+dfsg-5, closing 948180

2020-01-05 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Markus, On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 01:26:37PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 05.01.20 um 06:44 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > > found 948180 4.1.2+dfsg-5 > > close 948180 4.2.0+dfsg-1 > > thanks > > You could have kept the bug report open until the issue is really fixed > in unstable. I

Bug#948180: found 948180 in 4.1.2+dfsg-5, closing 948180

2020-01-05 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 05.01.20 um 06:44 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > found 948180 4.1.2+dfsg-5 > close 948180 4.2.0+dfsg-1 > thanks You could have kept the bug report open until the issue is really fixed in unstable. I didn't see the new version in experimental until after I filed the bug report but sometimes

Bug#948180: found 948180 in 4.1.2+dfsg-5, closing 948180

2020-01-04 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
found 948180 4.1.2+dfsg-5 close 948180 4.2.0+dfsg-1 thanks