Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-23 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:31:08AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:25 AM Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > [...] > did you read https://github.com/moxie0/sslstrip/issues/16 where they > declared the project useless and dead, with a new fork at >

Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-22 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:25 AM Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:39:41PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Package: sslstrip > > Severity: serious > > > > Hello, > > i think sslstrip should be removed from Debian: > > > > * python2 only app > > * low popcon > > * only r-dep is

Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-22 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:39:41PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Package: sslstrip > Severity: serious > > Hello, > i think sslstrip should be removed from Debian: > > * python2 only app > * low popcon > * only r-dep is websploit, recently removed from testing, and which doesnt use > sslstrip

Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: sslstrip Severity: serious Hello, i think sslstrip should be removed from Debian: * python2 only app * low popcon * only r-dep is websploit, recently removed from testing, and which doesnt use sslstrip anymore in the latest upstream release * last upstream release and debian upload in