Le 19/04/2020 à 20:57, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
> 11.0.7+0-2 still FTBFS on arm64 & mips*, will you still file the RM bugs
> for openjfx & zeroc-ice to unblock the testing migration or shall I?
Yes go ahead with the RM, thank you for the help.
Emmanuel Bourg
On 4/13/20 7:48 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 13/04/2020 à 19:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
>
>> It looks like the changes in openjfx (11.0.7+0-2) won't be enough to fix
>> the FTBFS on mips* as well.
>
> I've noticed a segfault in the build log on mips64el. I have no idea how
> to address
Le 13/04/2020 à 19:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
> It looks like the changes in openjfx (11.0.7+0-2) won't be enough to fix
> the FTBFS on mips* as well.
I've noticed a segfault in the build log on mips64el. I have no idea how
to address this, this sounds like a compiler bug.
> Will openj
On 4/13/20 12:19 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> The recent update to 11.0.7+0-1 fails to build and several architectures,
> most importantly on all making the openjfx package uninstallable, and in
> turn preventing the josm build in unstable:
It looks like the changes in openjfx (11.0.7+0-2) won't be
Source: openjfx
Version: 11.0.7+0-1
Followup-For: Bug #956585
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
Decreasing jfx.gradle.version.min from 4.8 to 4.4 in build.properties
per the attached patch works for me.
Kind Regards,
Bas
>From 499d1db3bf478e39a0f577b38e3eda7197662e1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2
Source: openjfx
Version: 11.0.7+0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: affects -1 src:josm
Dear Maintainer,
The recent update to 11.0.7+0-1 fails to build and several architectures,
most importantly on all making the openjfx p
6 matches
Mail list logo
