Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2021-01-03 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Michel Le Bihan writes: > Hello, > > I opened a merge request, but merging all branches into your repo > might cause issues in the upstream branch in the future due to the > merge commits. Instead, it will be best to pull all branches from my > repo into branches of your repo, but without adding

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-23 Thread Michel Le Bihan
Hello, I opened a merge request, but merging all branches into your repo might cause issues in the upstream branch in the future due to the merge commits. Instead, it will be best to pull all branches from my repo into branches of your repo, but without adding merge commits or at least without

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-22 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Michel Le Bihan writes: > Le mardi 22 décembre 2020 à 17:35 +0530, Vasudev Kamath a écrit : >> Jonas Smedegaard writes: >> >> > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 17:15:29) >> > > Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a >> > > écrit : >> > > > Quoting Michel Le Bihan

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-22 Thread Michel Le Bihan
Le mardi 22 décembre 2020 à 17:35 +0530, Vasudev Kamath a écrit : > Jonas Smedegaard writes: > > > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 17:15:29) > > > Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a > > > écrit : > > > > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 16:06:27) > > > > > A

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-22 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Jonas Smedegaard writes: > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 17:15:29) >> Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 16:06:27) >> > > A quick summary of the differences between both repos: >> > >> > Thanks, that is no doubt

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 17:15:29) > Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 16:06:27) > > > A quick summary of the differences between both repos: > > > > Thanks, that is no doubt helpful! > > > > [ beware:

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
[ replying to bugreport - please keep conversation public ] Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 16:57:36) > Yes. I wasn't able to find doc on that on my own. tarpman and wRAR > from #debian-mentors helped me with that and pointed me to >

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-20 Thread Michel Le Bihan
Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 16:06:27) > > A quick summary of the differences between both repos: > > Thanks, that is no doubt helpful! > > [ beware: commenting without actually having looked at the code! ] Please

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 16:06:27) > A quick summary of the differences between both repos: Thanks, that is no doubt helpful! [ beware: commenting without actually having looked at the code! ] > 2. Aluaces package might be missing man pages. Upstream is now using > Sphinx instead of

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 12:06:44) > It took me some time to understand how source of this package is > imported in the Salsa repo, I didn't look (still too busy elsewhere, please wait for Vadudev), just wanted to share what I have begun adding to packages that I maintain:

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-20 Thread Michel Le Bihan
A quick summary of the differences between both repos: 1. Source is imported differently. I tried to import source the same way it was done previously. 2. Aluaces package might be missing man pages. Upstream is now using Sphinx instead of Pandoc. I added a patch to build man and updated control.

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Vasudev Kamath (2020-12-15 09:35:35) > > Hi Alberto, > > > I have checked that current upstream (9.0) builds flawlessly, and > > made my release available at > > https://salsa.debian.org/aluaces-guest/biboumi . > > That is great. > > > Can I be sponsored so we can upload to at least

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Michel, Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 12:06:44) > I'm interested in joining the VoIP team to maintain this package long > term. I'm running it on my personal server and using it. I can't > become the only maintainer because I'm not a DM and all my uploads > will need to be sponsored.

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-20 Thread Michel Le Bihan
Hello, I'm interested in joining the VoIP team to maintain this package long term. I'm running it on my personal server and using it. I can't become the only maintainer because I'm not a DM and all my uploads will need to be sponsored. Sorry for the delay. It took me some time to understand how

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-19 Thread Michel Le Bihan
Hello, I updated the sources the same way you did and made a new release. Could you please check if everything is fine and sponsor my NMU? https://salsa.debian.org/mimi8/biboumi Michel Le Bihan On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:18:46 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-17

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-17 Thread Michel Le Bihan
Hello, I noticed that https://salsa.debian.org/aluaces-guest/biboumi/-/commits/upstream doesn't have upstream imported the same way you have it. I think that I imported it correctly in https://salsa.debian.org/mimi8/biboumi/-/commits/upstream . However, I don't know how you generated the hash

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-17 14:37:38) > > @Michel: If you are interested in joining the VoIP team generally, > > then please join the mailinglist and request membership to the Salsa > > group - links are at https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/VoIP > > Sorry, but I'm not really interested in

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-17 Thread Michel Le Bihan
@Michel: If you are interested in joining the VoIP team generally, > then > please join the mailinglist and request membership to the Salsa group > - > links are at https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/VoIP Sorry, but I'm not really interested in VoIP software nor have much experience with it. I'm

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-17 12:58:39) > It's not possible to open merge requests against > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-voip-team/biboumi . They seem disabled for > that repo. That's probably true: I generally disable merge requests for git repos that I manage, because I am

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-17 Thread Michel Le Bihan
Hello, It's not possible to open merge requests against https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-voip-team/biboumi . They seem disabled for that repo. Michel Le Bihan

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hi Alberto, > I have checked that current upstream (9.0) builds flawlessly, and made > my release available at https://salsa.debian.org/aluaces-guest/biboumi > . That is great. > Can I be sponsored so we can upload to at least experimental? Sure, please raise a merge request against biboumi

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-12-09 Thread Alberto Luaces
Package: biboumi Followup-For: Bug #957037 I have checked that current upstream (9.0) builds flawlessly, and made my release available at https://salsa.debian.org/aluaces-guest/biboumi . Can I be sponsored so we can upload to at least experimental? Thanks!

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread Florent Le Coz
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:57:04 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:biboumi > Version: 8.3-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-10 > > Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it > was filed for. If a fix in