Bug#959828: socker-systemctl-replacement NMU with delay-2 to drop Provides: systemd

2020-08-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Dmitry, On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:04:45AM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I think conversation really should happen in #959174 instead. There is some truth in this. However, I think that Ondrej has essentially given the same advice as others: > > Multiple people (Adam, Gunnar, myself) have

Bug#959828: socker-systemctl-replacement NMU with delay-2 to drop Provides: systemd

2020-08-26 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Thursday, 27 August 2020 3:36:58 AM AEST Helmut Grohne wrote: > I think everyone else agrees that Provides: systemd is not a good > technical solution right now. I agree too. > Multiple maintainers are affected by the > resulting breakage. Until a good solution is found, we have a choice of

Bug#959828: socker-systemctl-replacement NMU with delay-2 to drop Provides: systemd

2020-08-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: tags -1 + pending Hi Dmitry, I think everyone else agrees that Provides: systemd is not a good technical solution right now. Multiple maintainers are affected by the resulting breakage. Until a good solution is found, we have a choice of breaking one use case versus breaking others. It