gt; If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
> send it to 964...@bugs.debian.org.
>
> Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>
> --
> 964815: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Somebody hacking me
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jul 2020 18:04:12 +0300
with message-id <20200711150412.GA23784@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be
distributed with a GPL-2 work
has caused the Debian Bug report #964815,
regarding it looks like dprof2calltree
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:33:32 -0400 Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
[...]
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> >>...
> >> * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be
> >> used to endorse or promote products
* Nicholas D. Steeves:
> Hi,
>
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:48:31PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>
>>> it would still not be DFSG-free, because it
>>> fails the "desert island test" for snail mail. Were OmniTI Computer
>>> Consulting would accept email, it would
Hi,
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:48:31PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
>> it would still not be DFSG-free, because it
>> fails the "desert island test" for snail mail. Were OmniTI Computer
>> Consulting would accept email, it would also fail the "dissident test".
>
>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:48:31PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Nicholas,
>...
> Did you read the text at that link?
yes.
> "it *does* cause practical
> problems, including incompatibility with the GNU GPL [emphasis mine]"
DFSG free code does not have to be GPL
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:33:32PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk writes:
>> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> >>...
>> >> * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be
>> >> used
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:33:32PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> >>...
> >> * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be
> >> used to endorse or promote
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>...
>> * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be used
>> to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific
>> prior written permission.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>...
> * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be used
> to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific
> prior written permission.
>
> I'm not 100% certain that bundling
At the very least, it appears that the advertising clauses make
dprof2calltree not DFSG-free, because they fail the "desert island
test".
Package: kcachegrind-converters
Version: 4:17.08.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Forwarded: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424078
While preparing to import the new upstream release
(https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/kcachegrind/-/merge_requests/3) I did
a copyright review, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
