tony mancill:
> Hi Chris!
Hello again Tony :)
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 05:43:17AM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
>> Chris Knadle:
>>> For what it's worth, I used a clean cowbuilder sid chroot that was fully
>>> upgraded to build openjfx 11.0.7+0-4 and the package built fine. The build
>>> log
>>>
Hi Chris!
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 05:43:17AM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Chris Knadle:
> > For what it's worth, I used a clean cowbuilder sid chroot that was fully
> > upgraded to build openjfx 11.0.7+0-4 and the package built fine. The build
> > log
> > is about 808kB -- I'll send it to the
Chris Knadle:
> For what it's worth, I used a clean cowbuilder sid chroot that was fully
> upgraded to build openjfx 11.0.7+0-4 and the package built fine. The build log
> is about 808kB -- I'll send it to the bug report if desired. Offhand I'm not
> sure what's going on either. It's probably
For what it's worth, I used a clean cowbuilder sid chroot that was fully
upgraded to build openjfx 11.0.7+0-4 and the package built fine. The build log
is about 808kB -- I'll send it to the bug report if desired. Offhand I'm not
sure what's going on either. It's probably wishful thinking that the
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Source: openjfx
> Version: 11.0.7+0-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> openjfx (11.0.7+0-3) FTFBS everywhere due to issues with the
Source: openjfx
Version: 11.0.7+0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Dear Maintainer,
openjfx (11.0.7+0-3) FTFBS everywhere due to issues with the gstreamer support.
The buildlog shows may "multiple definition of" issues.
The
6 matches
Mail list logo
