Control: severity -1 important
Quoting Paul Gevers (2020-12-04 22:14:44)
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:07:27 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Of course, I'm biased since I'm the maintainer of doc-rfc, but I think
> > > it's a fair assesment.
> >
> > For the record it is not a PDF file but a (quit
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #970878 [src:ghostscript] ghostscript breaks doc-rfc autopkgtest:
segmentation fault
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
970878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970878
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
Hi Jonas,
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:07:27 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Of course, I'm biased since I'm the maintainer of doc-rfc, but I think
> > it's a fair assesment.
>
> For the record it is not a PDF file but a (quite large and allegedly)
> PostScript file that causes Ghostscript to segf
Control: tag 970878 + patch
Hi Jonas (2020.10.23_03:07:27_-0700)
FWIW I found the offending upstream commit and reverting it seems to do
the trick. I prefer fixing problems to reverting changes, but the bug
wasn't obvious to me, and the commit doesn't seem critical.
The commit is "txtwrite - bet
Processing control commands:
> tag 970878 + patch
Bug #970878 [src:ghostscript] ghostscript breaks doc-rfc autopkgtest:
segmentation fault
Added tag(s) patch.
--
970878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970878
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #970878 [src:ghostscript] ghostscript breaks doc-rfc autopkgtest:
segmentation fault
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
970878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970878
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Quoting Iustin Pop (2020-10-23 00:02:11)
> On 2020-10-10 13:34:16, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> > Dear Maintainer,
> > tried to have a look at this one, found the segfault [1],
> > and can point to the place where the pointer gets overwritten [2].
> > Unfortunately Valgri
On 2020-10-10 13:34:16, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
> tried to have a look at this one, found the segfault [1],
> and can point to the place where the pointer gets overwritten [2].
> Unfortunately Valgrind or ASAN gave me not more details.
Thanks for this information. To me, this
Dear Maintainer,
tried to have a look at this one, found the segfault [1],
and can point to the place where the pointer gets overwritten [2].
Unfortunately Valgrind or ASAN gave me not more details.
Kind regards,
Bernhard
[1]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7fa54364fc1
Quoting Paul Gevers (2020-09-24 21:31:38)
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/d/doc-rfc/7163820/log.gz
> autopkgtest [06:12:23]: test pspdf-parsing: [---
> Tests that all files are parseable by p*t*xt,
> in order to suport dhelp integration.
> - testing rfc11
Source: ghostscript, doc-rfc
Control: found -1 ghostscript/9.53.1~dfsg-2
Control: found -1 doc-rfc/20191026-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of gh
11 matches
Mail list logo
