Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2021-01-16 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Sat, 2021-01-16 at 14:05 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > I was expecting a new upstream release to be incorporated, but I > understand upstream didn't release anything new yet. For whatever > it's worth, your MR doesn't look too weird. Thanks, I've uploaded it to delayed/1 in case someone disagr

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2021-01-16 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sebastian, On 16-01-2021 09:41, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 22:37 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: >> >> Can you do this please? srt is orphaned, your package depend on it, >> could you please help us get us out of this situation? (if this >> happens soon, we'll accept the transitio

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2021-01-16 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Hi Paul, On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 22:37 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Can you do this please? srt is orphaned, your package depend on it, > could you please help us get us out of this situation? (if this > happens soon, we'll accept the transition to fix this). I've created a MR in salsa for this c

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2021-01-15 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 22:37 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:39:24 +0200 Sebastian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dr=F6ge?= > wrote: > > Upstream fixed this now by making the soversion 1.4 and from now on > > guaranteeing that patch versions (1.4.0 -> 1.4.X) do not break ABI.

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2021-01-15 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:39:24 +0200 Sebastian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dr=F6ge?= wrote: > Upstream fixed this now by making the soversion 1.4 and from now on > guaranteeing that patch versions (1.4.0 -> 1.4.X) do not break ABI. > > It would make sense to backport that fix and then rename the

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2021-01-14 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:42:27 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Control: tag -1 patch > > Hi, > > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:52:39 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020 16:38:49 +0300 =?utf-8?q?Sebastian_Dr=C3=B6ge?= > > wrote: > > > 1.4.2 broke ABI by adding some fields to the CBytePerfMon

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2021-01-13 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 patch Hi, On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:52:39 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020 16:38:49 +0300 =?utf-8?q?Sebastian_Dr=C3=B6ge?= > wrote: > > 1.4.2 broke ABI by adding some fields to the CBytePerfMon structure. > > See https://github.com/Haivision/srt/issues/1592 for details

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2021-01-07 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Federico, On Tue, 06 Oct 2020 16:38:49 +0300 =?utf-8?q?Sebastian_Dr=C3=B6ge?= wrote: > 1.4.2 broke ABI by adding some fields to the CBytePerfMon structure. > See https://github.com/Haivision/srt/issues/1592 for details. Any progress on this? The freeze for bullseye is around the corner, and t

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2020-10-06 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Source: srt Version: 1.4.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream 1.4.2 broke ABI by adding some fields to the CBytePerfMon structure. See https://github.com/Haivision/srt/issues/1592 for details. There were also other ABI breakages in previous versions that are not reflected by the binary package na