"Rules-Requires-Root?"
"No"
"You Worm. You Scum. You Lowly User. REJECTED!!! Upper Case Is
Reserved For Your Betters. Do You Think You Are My Equal?"
"no."
"What Was That? Did You Just Use Punctuation? Do You Deserve To Use
Punctuation?"
"nope"
"What!?!? You Need Discipline. A GNU Kind Of
Quoting Barak A. Pearlmutter (2020-11-16 10:06:05)
> "That's Better. Now I'm Sending You For A Session With The Multi-Arch Hinter.
> I Expect You To Be On Your Best Behavior."
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759099
;)
signature.asc
Description: signature
"Rules-Requires-Root?"
"No"
"You Worm. You Scum. You Lowly User. REJECTED!!! Upper Case Is
Reserved For Your Betters. Do You Think You Are My Equal?"
"no."
"What Was That? Did You Just Use Punctuation? Do You Deserve To Use
Punctuation?"
"no"
"That's Better. Now I'm Sending You For A Session With
Guillem Jover:
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, 2020-10-24 at 11:54:54 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Rather, I suspect the issue is that Rules-Requires-Root is set to "No"
>> rather than "no". AFAICT, only "no" has been defined and it is
>> interpreted case sensitively.
>
> Right, and even though this is
Hi!
On Sat, 2020-10-24 at 11:54:54 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Rather, I suspect the issue is that Rules-Requires-Root is set to "No"
> rather than "no". AFAICT, only "no" has been defined and it is
> interpreted case sensitively.
Right, and even though this is described in the deb822(5) man
ack
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:49:46 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: xournal
> Version: 1:0.4.8.2016-6
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> xournal fails to build from source on buildds, because it wrongly
> declares that it doesn't need root while in fact it does issue
> dh_testroot. Dropping the
Source: xournal
Version: 1:0.4.8.2016-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
xournal fails to build from source on buildds, because it wrongly
declares that it doesn't need root while in fact it does issue
dh_testroot. Dropping the R³ line from control should fix that.
Helmut
8 matches
Mail list logo
