Hi Adam, hi Alexander,
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 06:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2021-01-01 at 14:21 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Uplaoding 1.2.1+dfsg-1 + CVE fix cannot work. We have already
> > released 1.2.1+dfsg-2+deb10u1 in the security archives, so any
>
Hi,
On Fri, 2021-01-01 at 14:21 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Uplaoding 1.2.1+dfsg-1 + CVE fix cannot work. We have already
> released 1.2.1+dfsg-2+deb10u1 in the security archives, so any
> version we pick to fix issues need to be highter, no matter if we do
> several rollbacks or only
Hi Alexander,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 08:16:28PM +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 06:31:31 +0100
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 07:57:15PM +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
> > > On Sun, 20 Dec
On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 06:31:31 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 07:57:15PM +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:50:42 +0200
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > this is a regression in 1.2.1+dfsg-2 that is currently in both
> > >
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 07:57:15PM +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:50:42 +0200
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > this is a regression in 1.2.1+dfsg-2 that is currently in both
> > buster-security (which was done on top of 1.2.1+dfsg-2 that
> > introduced the
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:50:42 +0200
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> this is a regression in 1.2.1+dfsg-2 that is currently in both
> buster-security (which was done on top of 1.2.1+dfsg-2 that
> introduced the regression, not on top of 1.2.1+dfsg-1 in buster) and
> in unstable/testing (which currently
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 01:39:13PM +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
> Yep that's my fault I took -2 as the base for security upload instead of -1
> :-(
Everyone makes mistakes.
> I'll take care of this bug as soon as I feel better (feel myself not very
> good because of flu right now).
Hope
Yep that's my fault I took -2 as the base for security upload instead of -1 :-(
I'll take care of this bug as soon as I feel better (feel myself not very good
because of flu right now).
On 20 December 2020 12:50:42 GMT+03:00, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 09:50:53AM +, Chris
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 09:50:53AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Source: minidlna
> Version: 1.2.1+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Purging the package currently fails with the following error:
>
> Purging configuration files for minidlna (1.2.1+dfsg-2) ...
> rm: cannot
Source: minidlna
Version: 1.2.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
Purging the package currently fails with the following error:
Purging configuration files for minidlna (1.2.1+dfsg-2) ...
rm: cannot remove '/var/log/minidlna': Is a directory
dpkg: error processing package minidlna
10 matches
Mail list logo
