Bug#976915: service-wrapper-java: FTBFS on ppc64el: [exec] wrapper.c:(.text+0x3598): undefined reference to `pow'

2020-12-16 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:43:55PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 13/12/2020 à 00:38, Markus Koschany a écrit : > > > In this case I believe the RC severity is correct because the arch:any or > > jni > > version of the package FTBFS on ppc64el. We should try to fix the problem on > > ppc64el o

Bug#976915: service-wrapper-java: FTBFS on ppc64el: [exec] wrapper.c:(.text+0x3598): undefined reference to `pow'

2020-12-16 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 13/12/2020 à 00:38, Markus Koschany a écrit : > In this case I believe the RC severity is correct because the arch:any or jni > version of the package FTBFS on ppc64el. We should try to fix the problem on > ppc64el or, if upstream doesn't support ppc64el, remove the architecture from > the list

Bug#976915: service-wrapper-java: FTBFS on ppc64el: [exec] wrapper.c:(.text+0x3598): undefined reference to `pow'

2020-12-12 Thread Markus Koschany
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:41:34 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: service-wrapper-java > Version: 3.5.30-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid,

Bug#976915: service-wrapper-java: FTBFS on ppc64el: [exec] wrapper.c:(.text+0x3598): undefined reference to `pow'

2020-12-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: service-wrapper-java Version: 3.5.30-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail o