Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/issues/61
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 9:12 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> On 14/12/20 at 14:36 -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >
> >
> > > === RUN TestRuleAddAndLoad
> > > seccomp_test.go:588: Sysca
On 14/12/20 at 14:36 -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>
> > === RUN TestRuleAddAndLoad
> > seccomp_test.go:588: Syscall should have returned error code!
> > --- FAIL: TestRuleAddAndLoad (0.00s)
>
>
> Source code is here:
> https://sources.debian.org/src/golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-g
> === RUN TestRuleAddAndLoad
> seccomp_test.go:588: Syscall should have returned error code!
> --- FAIL: TestRuleAddAndLoad (0.00s)
Source code is here:
https://sources.debian.org/src/golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang/0.9.1-2/seccomp_test.go/#L529-L589
This test is basically load
Source: golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on ppc64el. At the same time,
4 matches
Mail list logo