-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am Samstag, dem 27.08.2022 um 19:40 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> Yes, Ghostscript contains a script update-gsfonts which makes use of
> it.
I see, thank you . So, I'll keep the file.
Do you guys think I will have to post a heads-up to debian-d
Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2022-08-27 18:51:04)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> @Jonas: Is the file /etc/ghostscript/fontmap.d/10fonts-urw-base35.conf
> [1] even necessary now that the font files are directly symlinked in
> the libgs9-common package?
Yes, Ghostscript contai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
@Jonas: Is the file /etc/ghostscript/fontmap.d/10fonts-urw-base35.conf
[1] even necessary now that the font files are directly symlinked in
the libgs9-common package?
Cheers,
- Fabian
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-urw-base35/-/bl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am Freitag, dem 26.08.2022 um 09:52 +0200 schrieb Roland Rosenfeld:
> Just go for it.
I have just uploaded fonts-urw-base35_20200910-2 to experimental which
takes over the gsfonts and gsfonts-x11 packages. So, if you guys could
check if the transiti
Hallo Roland,
Am 26.08.2022 09:52, schrieb Roland Rosenfeld:
To say the truth, I still not fully understand how fonts work nowadays
(my knowledge is stuck in 1999), so I'm not sure whether the
fonts.scale/fonts.alias stuff in gsfonts-x11 is nowadays okay or an
ugly workaround.
For me it's the
Hi Fabian!
On Fr, 26 Aug 2022, fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
> Am 25.08.2022 19:23, schrieb Roland Rosenfeld:
> > I was curious, whether this is possible and so I just tried to patch
> > gsfonts-x11 to use fonts-urw-base35 instead of gsfonts and it worked
> > for me. I kept all font names in fonts
Hi Roland,
Am 25.08.2022 19:23, schrieb Roland Rosenfeld:
I was curious, whether this is possible and so I just tried to patch
gsfonts-x11 to use fonts-urw-base35 instead of gsfonts and it worked
for me. I kept all font names in fonts.scale and fonts.alias and only
changed the referenced file n
Hi!
On Do, 25 Aug 2022, I wrote:
> I also think about updating gsfonts-x11 to use fonts-urw-base35 (.t1
> files) instead of gsfonts (.pfb files), but I'm not fully sure how to
> map the fonts since the full names in the fonts files look quite
> different (but both contain 35 fonts, so a mapping s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:21:17 +0200 Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
> > Maybe now is the time?
> Indeed my plan is to tackle this issue in about four weeks.
I currently despair of the format of the fonts.scale and fonts.alias
files that are provided by the
Jonas Smedegaard
, Paul Gevers Betreff: Re: Bug#977765:
[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#977765: src:gsfonts: package
superseded by fonts-urw-base35 * Fabian Greffrath
[220727 23:01]:[..]> My stance on this: In theory it should be technically
possible to replace> the gsfonts (and gsfonts-x11) package
* Fabian Greffrath [220727 23:01]:
[..]
> My stance on this: In theory it should be technically possible to replace
> the gsfonts (and gsfonts-x11) package with fonts-urw-base35 and I believe
> this would be the right step, given that the latter font set is actively
> maintained and extended - and
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 bullseye-ignore
Bug #977765 [src:gsfonts] src:gsfonts: package superseded by fonts-urw-base35
Added tag(s) bullseye-ignore.
--
977765: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: tag -1 bullseye-ignore
Hi,
On 09-02-2021 09:36, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> So, to summarize: Yes, I think we should replace gsfonts+gsfonts-x11
> with fonts-urw-base35 at a given time and this transition is already
> prepared for the most part.
To be fair, I think the commented out part
Hi all,
Am 07.02.2021 22:51, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Added now explicitly.
well, thanks. I can't wait to participate in this discussion.
My stance on this: In theory it should be technically possible to
replace the gsfonts (and gsfonts-x11) package with fonts-urw-base35 and
I believe this
Quoting Paul Gevers (2021-02-07 22:04:25)
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On 07-02-2021 13:44, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Paul Gevers (2021-02-07 12:07:08)
> >> With "quite some work" I mean that there are > 20 packages in testing
> >> that need to change (are bugs already filed?). I understand from you
Hi Jonas,
On 07-02-2021 13:44, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Paul Gevers (2021-02-07 12:07:08)
>> With "quite some work" I mean that there are > 20 packages in testing
>> that need to change (are bugs already filed?). I understand from your
>> explanation that we already have a "Provides" in
Quoting Paul Gevers (2021-02-07 12:07:08)
> On 07-02-2021 11:05, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> And what are the consequences of that? Please assume I have no clue
> >> how fontconfig works at all.
>
> [...] (elaborate explanation, thanks)
>
> >>> Feel free to lower severity or repurpose as a wish
Hi Jonas,
On 07-02-2021 11:05, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> And what are the consequences of that? Please assume I have no clue
>> how fontconfig works at all.
[...] (elaborate explanation, thanks)
>>> Feel free to lower severity or repurpose as a wishlist request to
>>> document what is notable
Hi Paul,
Quoting Paul Gevers (2021-02-07 07:00:34)
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 15:35:04 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > Setting severity to serious, as this package is not fit for
> > > > release.
> > >
> > > Why do you think the package is not fit for release? Because it
> > > did not have a
Hi Jonas,
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 15:35:04 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Setting severity to serious, as this package is not fit for release.
> >
> > Why do you think the package is not fit for release? Because it did
> > not have a maintainer upload for the last 10 years? It is static font
Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2020-12-21 15:01:21)
> Am Sonntag, den 20.12.2020, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > This package has been superseded by fonts-urw-base35, which contains
> > the same fonts but a newer release and using policy-compliant
> > package name.
>
> indeed, I have prepa
Hi Jonas,
Am Sonntag, den 20.12.2020, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> This package has been superseded by fonts-urw-base35, which contains
> the
> same fonts but a newer release and using policy-compliant package
> name.
indeed, I have prepared fonts-urw-base35 to take over both gsfonts a
Package: src:gsfonts
Version: 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.5
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Fonts Task Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
This package has been superseded by fonts-urw-base35, which contains the
same fonts but a newer release and using policy-compliant pa
23 matches
Mail list logo
