Bug#987643: ne10 FTBFS with gcc 10

2021-05-09 Thread Wookey
Wookey wrote:: > Testing it now. Nope, that doesn't actually fix the problem, although it appears to have reduced the number of instances of complaint (that may just be an artifact of parallel=1) Not totally clear what's going on here (the function and prototype seems to match to me). I'll

Bug#987643: ne10 FTBFS with gcc 10

2021-05-06 Thread Wookey
On 2021-04-29 09:04 +0200, Michael R. Crusoe wrote: >I found a PR that someone else sent to upstream to fix this at >https://github.com/projectNe10/Ne10/pull/260 (I haven't tested it, though) That does indeed look like the right fix. Cheers for finding that. Testing it now. Wookey --

Bug#987643: ne10 FTBFS with gcc 10

2021-04-29 Thread Michael R. Crusoe
I found a PR that someone else sent to upstream to fix this at https://github.com/projectNe10/Ne10/pull/260 (I haven't tested it, though)

Bug#987643: ne10 FTBFS with gcc 10

2021-04-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: ne10 Version: 1.2.1-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bullseye/arm64/ne10.html ... cd /build/ne10-1.2.1/obj-aarch64-linux-gnu/test && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/NE10_imgproc_unit_test_static.dir/link.txt