❦ 14 December 2021 09:13 GMT, Jeff Blake:
> Unless there are licensing or technical objections, I would suggest building
> with upstream
> bundled clang to avoid all sorts of incompatibilities and obviate the need
> for extra patching
> (stable's clang is often too old and upstream currently
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:08:28 +0100 Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:13:42 +, Jeff Blake wrote:
> [...]
> > Inspector and convertutf are the worst offenders in terms of being
> > unnecessary and complex. The disable/catapult.patch could also be dropped,
> > since
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:13:42 +, Jeff Blake wrote:
[...]
> Inspector and convertutf are the worst offenders in terms of being
> unnecessary and complex. The disable/catapult.patch could also be dropped,
> since profiling might be desirable to some users.
convertutf at least is
On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 19:43:10 +0100 Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> On 06.12.21 20:43, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:58:17PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on
> d-release that it was removed from testing
On 06.12.21 20:43, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:58:17PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on d-release
that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a discussion
about ending security support for
5 matches
Mail list logo
