Processed: Re: Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

2021-11-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 997089 minor Bug #997089 [src:libreoffice] libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector' Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

2021-11-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
severity 997089 minor thanks Am 03.11.21 um 17:27 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 03/11/21 at 17:13 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 03.11.21 um 08:05 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: >>> If it's truly a random failure, it might be better to downgrade it but >>> keep it open, >> I don't really

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

2021-11-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/11/21 at 17:13 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Am 03.11.21 um 08:05 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > > If it's truly a random failure, it might be better to downgrade it but > > keep it open, > I don't really like this. I don't like open bugs which definitely will > never get attention. > >

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

2021-11-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 03.11.21 um 08:05 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > If it's truly a random failure, it might be better to downgrade it but > keep it open, I don't really like this. I don't like open bugs which definitely will never get attention. > so that another bug does not get opened in future > rebuilds.

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

2021-11-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 02/11/21 at 17:51 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Am Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:18:19PM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > And interestingly, (after rm'ing the stale unopkg lockfile..) it passed. > > > > Also after a new attempt with manual > > > > $ make clean && make subsequencheck

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

2021-11-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:18:19PM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > And interestingly, (after rm'ing the stale unopkg lockfile..) it passed. > > Also after a new attempt with manual > > $ make clean && make subsequencheck > > in odk worked, too. > > > Just looks like a flaky test... (Even

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

2021-10-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 28.10.21 um 18:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Am 23.10.21 um 18:41 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: >> [...] >> "/<>/instdir/program/unopkg" add -f >> "/<>/workdir/CustomTarget/odk/build-examples_java/out/sdk/LINUXexample.out/bin/Inspector.oxt" >> >>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) >>>

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

2021-10-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
[ sorry for the late answer, needed to get a new laptop as the battery broke badly.. ] Hi, Am 23.10.21 um 18:41 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > make[5]: Entering directory > '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector' >> mkdir -p >>

Bug#997089: libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector'

2021-10-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: libreoffice Version: 1:7.2.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[5]: