Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #919798 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #919800 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #919801 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #919831 {Done: Ole Streicher <oleb...@debian.org>}
[openjdk-11-jdk-headless] libcds-moc-java: FTBFS (The code being documented
uses packages in the unnamed module)
Bug #919874 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #919875 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #919876 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #919878 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #919883 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #919895 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #919968 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
Bug #920020 {Done: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com>} [openjdk-11-jdk-headless]
javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
are in the unnamed module
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+9-1.
--
919798: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919798
919800: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919800
919801: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919801
919831: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919831
919874: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919874
919875: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919875
919876: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919876
919878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919878
919883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919883
919895: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919895
919968: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919968
920020: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
