Processed: tag

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 291265 + sarge sid Bug#291265: gnumeric: Silent data loss when saving in a directory with iso8859-1 name Tags were: upstream confirmed Tags added: sarge, sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Processed: capi4hylafax report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 291559 sid Bug#291559: Capi4hylafax segfaults during send and receive There were no tags set. Tags added: sid severity 291559 grave Bug#291559: Capi4hylafax segfaults during send and receive Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping

Bug#291663: hamlib3-tcl: depends on hamlib*2*

Package: hamlib3-tcl Version: 1.2.3-1 Severity: grave The hamlib3-tcl package mysteriously depends on hamlib2, only on i386. This makes the package uninstallable in unstable. It's likely that the package build picked up an existing version of libhamlib.so in /usr/lib on the maintainer's machine

Processed: build still fails, same error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 291140 Bug#291140: poedit: FTBFS: Missing dependency? Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#290966: marked as done (sffview: FTBFS: Missing build dependency?)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 04:03:05 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#290966: fixed in sffview 0.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#289217: alsaplayer-common: Uninstallable, please rebuild with libflac-dev 1.1.1-1

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:42:51 +0100 Artur R. Czechowski wrote: The alsaplayer-common depends on libflac4 which is unavailable on unstable since Jan 7th 2005. To solve the problem please rebuild the package with libflac-dev 1.1.1 I have rebuilt this package according to the guidelines in

Bug#230113: I think this bug can be closed

Package: amavis-ng Version: 0.1.6.9-1 Followup-For: Bug #230113 I checked this bugs. I cannot reproduce it on the bug amavis-ng version (1.6.2) beacause I wasn't able to make it work on unstable ;) But I tried to reproduce it on the latest version without success (in the strace, Fabian Fagerholm

Bug#291559: RESOLVED: partially... it's not a capi4hylafax problem....

The problem appears only with the latest version of hylafax-server For the maintainer: downgrading to version hylafax-server 4.2.0-10 the problem is disappeared Anyway tx, and excuse me for the erroneous report. Diaolin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#278495: Update, please

Hi. What is happening with this bug? It's still rated RC and there hasn't been any visible (in the log) activity for a couple of months now. -- Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#265285: Really RC?

Hi. I was looking at the bug logs and it isn't obvious to me why this bug is rated RC. What's the status of this bug? Can it be downgraded? -- Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#291140: marked as done (poedit: FTBFS: Missing dependency?)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291140: fixed in poedit 1.3.1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#208403: marked as done (ucd-snmp: FTBFS with libtool 1.5)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:37 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#208403: fixed in ucd-snmp 4.2.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#291680: firehol: insecure temporary directory handling

Package: firehol Version: 1.214-1 Severity: critical Tags: security sarge Both firehol and firehol-wizard use known temporary file names in a predictably named temporary directory (PID-based). Neither program ensures that those directories are safe before blasting the contents of files within.

Bug#291566: libavcodec-dev: Multiple integer overflows, some of them may lead to arbitrary code execution

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: libavcodec-dev Version: 0.cvs20050106-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole [Cc'ing security@, as at least xine-lib embeds libavcodec, there may be more, I haven't investigated whether they are affected, but I assume it's

Bug#291233: mozilla-firefox: does not start (seg fault)

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:37:25 -0500, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Bruno Lellis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-2 Just seg faults when it starts loading any site as a normal user. When I start it as root, I can browse any site (the same

Bug#291605: marked as done (gcc-4.0: GCC4 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:20:59 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291605: gcc-4.0: GCC4 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#278495: Update, please

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 11:20:15AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: Hi. What is happening with this bug? It's still rated RC and there hasn't been any visible (in the log) activity for a couple of months now. In 279232 (merged bug) there is a proposal for changing the perl dependencies to solve

Bug#290597: fails to configure because gs-common is not configured

On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:48:28PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I don't quite understand how this would be gs-gpl's fault, it's either gs-common (because of an error during the configuration) or apt/dpkg, isn't it? Do you have a

Bug#290811: Re; meld crashes on start

Hi Bas, I can't reproduce this problem on a current sid or sarge system. Do you have any GTK-related packages installed from experimental? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#291658: nessus-plugins: non-free

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 291658 normal Bug#291658: nessus-plugins: non-free Severity set to `normal'. retitle 291658 nessus-plugins: Some NASL plugins in release 2.2.2a (and later) are non-free Bug#291658: nessus-plugins: non-free Changed Bug title. thanks

Bug#291658: nessus-plugins: non-free

severity 291658 normal retitle 291658 nessus-plugins: Some NASL plugins in release 2.2.2a (and later) are non-free thanks On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:26:39AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: Upstream claims that large parts of nessus-plugins has never been licensed under the GPL. The copyright

Bug#291700: broken check for peer prevents startup

Package: postgresql Version: 7.2.1-2woody6 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, The check for peer database type in /usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postgresql-startup is not strict enough and it catches databases that just so happen to be called -- peer. Please fix the regexp match to include a $ at the

Bug#291701: ntop: FTBFS: Can't satisify build dependencies.

Package: ntop Version: 2:3.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, It seems rrdtool changed it's dependency again, now from libgd2-xpm-dev to libgd2-noxpm-dev, and you're build depending on libgd2-xpm-dev, and those conflict. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processed: Re: Processed: fet FTBFS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 290772 normal Bug#290772: FTBFS on arm: Running ldd on fet binary fails Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#290772: Processed: fet FTBFS

Sending this bug without any investigate is not appropriate action. ^^^ Reassigning Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#290772: Processed: fet FTBFS

At the end of the build log i see fet is being built. Where can I see that build log? http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=fetver=3.9.20-1arch=armstamp=1104807080file=logas=raw Looks the same as the sparc ldd bug, but that could be just a coincidence. I don't think so. sparc ldd problem is

Bug#289600: openswan: can't fulfill the build dependencies

reopen 289600 tags 289600 + sarge thanks This is still affecting sarge, and the fixed version seems to have other problems. You can close this when the fixed version reaches sarge. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#291701: ntop: FTBFS: Can't satisify build dependencies.

Hello On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 04:02:10PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: ntop Version: 2:3.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, It seems rrdtool changed it's dependency again, now from libgd2-xpm-dev to libgd2-noxpm-dev, and you're build depending on libgd2-xpm-dev, and those conflict.

Bug#291680: marked as done (firehol: insecure temporary directory handling)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:32:20 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291680: fixed in firehol 1.214-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#291709: asterisk-chan-misdn_0.0.3rc2-4(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared library

Package: asterisk-chan-misdn Version: 0.0.3rc2-4 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of asterisk-chan-misdn_0.0.3rc2-4 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 Build started at 20050122-1629 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied

Processed: Re: Bug#291619: systraq: FTBFS: Tries to download sources outside the debian archive.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 291619 +pending Bug#291619: systraq: FTBFS: Tries to download sources outside the debian archive. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#267799: nvidia module not autoloading

Why can't the package just be modified so that the postinst does an 'echo nvidia /etc/modules' if it is not already in there? -Roberto -- Roberto Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#291697: marked as done (aolserver4-dev: Missing depends on zlib1g-dev?)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:47:07 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291697: fixed in aolserver4 4.0.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#290597: fails to configure because gs-common is not configured

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:02:54PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:48:28PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I don't quite understand how this would be gs-gpl's fault, it's either gs-common (because of an

Processed: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen #291680 Bug#291680: firehol: insecure temporary directory handling Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#230113: marked as done (AMaViS resets connection on MAIL FROM)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:12:17 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#230113: I think this bug can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#284117: marked as done (remotely exploitable buffer overflow (CAN-2004-1120))

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:02:05 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#284117: fixed in prozilla 1:1.3.7.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Patched

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # I've committed a patch to upstream CVS (both HEAD and gnumeric-1-4 branch) # to address this. When upstream's feedback to this patch is positive, I'll # update the Debian packages. tags 291265 + fixed-upstream patch Bug#291265: gnumeric: Silent

Bug#291750: bible-kjv: FTBFS: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions.

Package: bible-kjv Version: 4.16 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following error: cc -Wall -Wformat -Werror -Wshadow -W -Wtraditional -Wmissing-declarations -Wmi ssing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wbad-function-ca st

Bug#291750: marked as done (bible-kjv: FTBFS: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions.)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:02:02 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291750: fixed in bible-kjv 4.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#291757: evolution: Upgrade from 1.4.6 to 2.0.3 fails and Evolution is *UNUSABLE*

Package: evolution Version: 2.0.3-1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I am logging this bug report into BTS, because if I was aware of this bug in Ximain's bugzilla, I would not have upgraded this package. http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=69566 The

Bug#288550: eroaster patch

Hi, You recently submitted a bug on eroaster, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=288550. I'm unable to reproduce this; could you add debugging statements to show what are the value of version[1], len(version[1]), and range(len(version[1]))? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#290809: Couldn't reproduce it, with almost the same setup

Hi, I've the same video card: :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x] (rev a4) The same video drivers: nvidia-kernel-2.6.9-2-386: Installed: 1.0.6629+1-1 I've tried with my XF86Config-4 and with the one posted here, and I couldn't reproduce

Bug#290811: I can't reproduce it either

I've been trying to reproduce this bug as well, with no luck. I have the same versions of meld and its dependencies as the ones listed in the bug report. However, I also have the complete GNOME environment, and because of what's stated in the rest of this mail I'm inclined to think that Bas

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 289590 + pending Bug#289590: kernel-patch-2.4.27-hppa: FTBFS Tags were: confirmed Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#291618: marked as done (ldaptor: FTBFS in sarge: dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend on python.))

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291618: fixed in ldaptor 0.0.34 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#291776: gnunet: Should depend on libltdl3.

Package: gnunet Version: 0.6.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 For some reason, I did not have libextractor installed. Libextractor depends on libltdl3, but gnunet does not. Therefore I did not have libextractor installed as well. Updating gnunet leads to the following error

Bug#291785: uw-imap_7:2002edebian1-5(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: dh_installlogrotate error

Package: uw-imap Version: 7:2002edebian1-5 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of uw-imap_7:2002edebian1-5 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 Build started at 20050122-1716 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package

Bug#291784: zopeinterface_3.0.0-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends?

Package: zopeinterface Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of zopeinterface_3.0.0-2 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5 Build started at 20050122-2118 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends

Processed: Re: xt-aterm_2.0.5-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: debian/rules issues?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 291715 important Bug#291715: xt-aterm_2.0.5-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: debian/rules issues? Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#291715: xt-aterm_2.0.5-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: debian/rules issues?

severity 291715 important thanks Hi LaMont, Since this bug only occurs on 64-bit architectures where the package has not been built, it doesn't appear to fit the criteria for serious bugs. You're right that this is a bug in debian/rules: configure is being called with a --with-64bit argument,