Bug#294003: php4-lasso: phpapi revision requires a new upload in sid

2005-03-04 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Ven 4 Mars 2005 08:25, Adam Conrad a écrit : Pierre Habouzit said: short googling showed me your are not the only one to experience such things. apparently, SWIG has problems with zts enabled php versions[1]. I'm not sure what can be done though. And it convince me a little more

Bug#298035: libflac++4 does not install

2005-03-04 Thread Mikolaj Menke
Package: libflac++4 Version: 1.1.1-5_i386 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable menek:~# apt-get -f install Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libflac++4 The

Bug#298039: xli: Multiple security problems in xli

2005-03-04 Thread Moritz Mhlenhoff
Package: xli Version: 1.17.0-16 (not installed) Severity: grave Justification: user security hole [Cc:ing security, as Woody should be affected as well] Multiple security problems in xli have been found by the Gentoo Security folks: 1. Shell meta characters are inaccurately escaped in

Bug#294499: php4 wrappers broken for thread-safe php

2005-03-04 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Steve, On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 08:49:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: I'm happy to hack on this bug to get it fixed, but I'm afraid I'm starting from square-one as far as knowledge of swig is concerned. Could you send me a copy of your simple example that I could start from? Not sure if

Bug#298034: sorry I was wrong

2005-03-04 Thread Alexander Gerasiov
Sorry, I didn't find that you updated your package already, cause some bug(?) in apt :( Feel free to close this bug report. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295899: This is RC

2005-03-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:48:41PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Thu, 03 Mar 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: This bug (autoconf-doc trying to overwrite info file--also in pkg autoconf) is definitely RC and requires a Replaces in the autoconf package. The next time, make sure

Bug#298052: libapache2-mod-php4: apache2/php.ini : invalid memory_limit

2005-03-04 Thread Nicolas Champenois
Package: libapache2-mod-php4 Version: 4:4.3.10-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After a dist-upgrade today a few functions of php didn't work anymore. I found the following entry for memory_limit in apache2/php.ini : memory_limit =

Bug#298051: imagemagick: information disclosure from exif thumbnails

2005-03-04 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: imagemagick Version: 6:6.0.6.2-2.1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Imagemagick (at least convert and mogrify) does not delete or update exif thumbnails when changing an image. Therefore the thumbnail might still contain information (like a face) that has

Bug#298053: Race condition related to Set-Cookie header (CAN-2005-0626)

2005-03-04 Thread Joey Hess
Package: squid Version: 2.5.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Please see http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE9-setcookie A race window has been discovered where Set-Cookie headers may leak to another users if the requested server relies on the now (since 1997)

Processed: lowering severity of report

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 298004 normal Bug#298004: capiplugin: CAPI_REGISTER failed Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: eximdoc4: [Dummy bug] Keep exim docs for 4.5x out of sarge until exim4 4.5x itself can propagate

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags #298055 sid Bug#298055: eximdoc4: [Dummy bug] Keep exim docs for 4.5x out of sarge until exim4 4.5x itself can propagate There were no tags set. Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Processed: Re: Bug#298054: mutt remplace   (Percent o) in Subject and Message-ID

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 298054 ssmtp Bug#298054: mutt remplace   (Percent o) in Subject and Message-ID Bug reassigned from package `mutt' to `ssmtp'. retitle 298054 ssmtp mangles messages in transit Bug#298054: mutt remplace   (Percent o) in Subject and Message-ID

Bug#298004: lowering severity of report

2005-03-04 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 298004 normal thanks please install the capiutils package. isdnactivecards should recommend capiutils, but not depend on it. upload pending -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298054: mutt remplace   (Percent o) in Subject and Message-ID

2005-03-04 Thread Marco d'Itri
reassign 298054 ssmtp retitle 298054 ssmtp mangles messages in transit tag 298054 security thanks http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.user/cutoff=21449 BTW, this may be a security problem too and should be investigated as such. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#298055: eximdoc4: [Dummy bug] Keep exim docs for 4.5x out of sarge until exim4 4.5x itself can propagate

2005-03-04 Thread Marc Haber
tags #298055 sid thanks On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:02:10PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: eximdoc4 4.5x must not go into testing if exim 4.5x is not there. This bug will (should) be closed once exim4 4.5x is ready. -- -

Bug#298054: mutt remplace   (Percent o) in Subject and Message-ID

2005-03-04 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2005-03-04 12:28:49, schrieb Marco d'Itri: reassign 298054 ssmtp retitle 298054 ssmtp mangles messages in transit tag 298054 security thanks http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.user/cutoff=21449 BTW, this may be a security problem too and should be investigated as such. For some

Bug#298067: vlc: broken dependency for pure64(x86_64 == amd64) port

2005-03-04 Thread Jung-hoon Han
Package: vlc Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I use debian/pure64 port on my amd64 pc. although it's still unofficial port, thru the DWN I saw a similar articles that it's headed to the official support!? now it had been broken package as loss of libflac4. but latest new

Bug#295007: marked as done (aspell-no: Support for pending Aspell 0.60)

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 04 Mar 2005 07:47:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295007: fixed in norwegian 2.0-19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#297858: marked as done (drivel: FTBFS: Error running update-desktop-database)

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 04 Mar 2005 08:02:20 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297858: fixed in drivel 1.2.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#298072: does not contain any examples, tutorials and documentation

2005-03-04 Thread Jan Alonzo
Package: libjava-gnome-doc Version: 2.8.3-3.1 Severity: grave Hi, Shouldn't libjava-gnome-doc contain the examples, tutorials, and documentation? Unless i'm going blind, then I can't see any docs/examples/tutorial in /usr/share/doc/libjava-gnome-doc: --- [EMAIL

Bug#297470: marked as done (cacti: rrd location in /var/cache not compliant with fhs)

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:46:54 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line new version in unstable closes this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#298039: xli: Multiple security problems in xli

2005-03-04 Thread Graham Wilson
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 09:53:13AM +0100, Moritz Mhlenhoff wrote: Multiple security problems in xli have been found by the Gentoo Security folks: Actually, one of these at least has been around for some time. But I just noticed them as well due to the Gentoo security announcement. One I test

Bug#298080: freebsd-sendpr: FTBFS: Makefile errors

2005-03-04 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: freebsd-sendpr Severity: serious Version: 3.113+5.3-3 From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... make DESTDIR=/tmp/buildd/freebsd-sendpr-3.113+5.3/debian/freebsd-sendpr BINDIR=/usr/bin -f debian/rules reverse-config /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk, line 68: Need an

Bug#208040: marked as done (libident-dev: static library is not compiled with -D_REENTRANT)

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:47:02 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#208040: fixed in libident 0.22-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#286758: kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc: Same openpic hang on PowerBook

2005-03-04 Thread spam-me
Hi Martin, kernel-image-2.6.10-powerpc (2.6.10-3) is working without this issue on my Powerbook G4 1.5 GHz, ATI Mobility Radeon 128 MB. On 2.6.8 I haven't seen this bug, but another one: It seems to be impossible to configure X so that it isn't flickering at all. Either you use

Bug#280266: opustex: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper'

2005-03-04 Thread Frank Küster
Dear Anthony, Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: opustex Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'opustex' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 Please add the

Bug#209057: marked as done (libident: Fail to build on several autobuilders)

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:47:02 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#209057: fixed in libident 0.22-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: another issue

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 286758 kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc Bug#286758: Boot process hangs after openpic: exit Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc' to `kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc'. severity

Bug#295060: wwwoffle: patch for part of this bug

2005-03-04 Thread Paolo
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:20:32PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: Hi *! The easier part of this problem is addressed by the attached patch: wwwoffle.config tries to preseed the debconf db with yes/no for boolean values which expect true/false. The overwwrites local config part is way harder.

Bug#298094: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-04 Thread Andreas Barth
/sparc 1.170.5 Build started at 20050304-1026 ** [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-20 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 g++-3.3_1

Bug#291274: Fails to build with 2.4.29: missing Makefile

2005-03-04 Thread Håkan Lindqvist
I would just like to add that this problem seems to remain in 2.3.0-2. (I was trying to build the package for the 2.6.11 kernel.) Regards, Håkan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#298066: ipw2200-source: previously working, now unable to load firmware

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 298066 important Bug#298066: ipw2200-source: previously working, now unable to load firmware Severity set to `important'. tag 298066 unreproducible Bug#298066: ipw2200-source: previously working, now unable to load firmware There were no tags

Bug#298094: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-04 Thread sean finney
hi andreas, On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 06:05:55PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: Package: cacti-cactid Version: 0.8.6d-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental this is fixed in 0.8.6d-2, which has already been uploaded to unstable. cacti and cacti-cactid can both be removed from experimental.

Processed: tagging 296006

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 296006 fixed Bug#296006: Cryptsetup not installable on sid - missing dependency Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: Re: Bug#298102: cacti: upgrading fails using default php settings

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 298102 moreinfo Bug#298102: cacti: upgrading fails using default php settings There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#298102: cacti: upgrading fails using default php settings

2005-03-04 Thread sean finney
tags 298102 moreinfo thanks hi root :) On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:46:58PM -0300, root wrote: The update process described in the docs use the /install directory of the cacti installation. The install fails while including ../include/config.php (located at

Bug#298114: Nvi: Improved init.d recover file that fixes security bugs

2005-03-04 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Package: nvi Version: 1.79-21 Priority: grave Tags: security patch woody sid Justification: local DoS (Note: The bugs I talk about in this report have been present in Debian's nvi for ages. Actually, OpenBSD provides an alternate 'recover' implementation (attached) written in Perl that fixes most

Bug#295310: gnome-cups-manager: Still not working

2005-03-04 Thread baptiste13
Hi, first of all, thanks for your additional information from ~/.xsession-errors, this saved me a lot of time in understanding this bug. The bug is related to the interaction between gnome-cups-manager and gksu. With old versions of gksu (like my old 1.0.3-2), it went that way:

Bug#298034: marked as done (New critical update avaible from phpbb.com)

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 4 Mar 2005 21:17:52 +0100 (CET) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Upload already closed this has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#298054: mutt rempla ce   (Percent o) in Subject and Message-ID

2005-03-04 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
package ssmtp tags 298054 woody thanks On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:56:43PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: Now I am using 2.61 as backport from SID on a WOODY machine and gotten the first two responses from: 1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems tha the Bug

Processed: mkfs.vfat doesn't work for lvm devices

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 286219 grave Bug#286219: mkfs.vfat doesn't work on dm-crypt devices Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#167345: cheops: Discovery process still broken

2005-03-04 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
Hi, I've tested the stuff a little bit. With this options: [automap 1] [remember 1] [portscan 1] [trim 1] [queso 1] [revdns 1] [addroutes 0] [useicmp 0] [visible 1] [release 1] [xterm xterm] [savehosts 0] [saveconnects 0] [savealiases 0] [needlogfile 1] [sendemail 0] [ctimeout 30] [iretry 0]

Processed: Re: Bug#292401: kdm_config override /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc which is a conffile

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 292401 serious Bug#292401: kdm_config override /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc which is a conffile Severity set to `serious'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#296976: sgml2x: FTBFS: Permission denied in ELinks

2005-03-04 Thread Matt Brubeck
Unfortunately, today's upload of sgml2x didn't fix the problem. I didn't have any problem building the latest sgml2x in a chroot. What was the exact error? To get a similar error outside a chroot, I can run 'dpkg-buildpackage ... /dev/null', which causes elinks to output an error message

Bug#296494: webmin-ldap-useradmin cannot create new user(no structural object class)

2005-03-04 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
Hi, I've created a patch for fixing this problem. Regards, Matthijs Mohlmann --- ldap-useradmin/save_user.cgi.orig 2005-03-04 23:02:11.547390992 + +++ ldap-useradmin/save_user.cgi 2005-03-04 23:02:34.210945608 + @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ $shadow = shadow_fields(); # Add to the ldap

Bug#267799: Ping about nvidia packages that fails to auto-load kernel module

2005-03-04 Thread Randall Donald
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 14:29 +0100, Pierre Machard wrote: Hi Randall, do you plan to fix this bug in a near future ? I installed a Sarge Yes I do. I'm hoping on adding some mechanics to nvidia-kernel-common -- Randall Donald [EMAIL

Bug#292401: kdm_config override /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc which is a conffile

2005-03-04 Thread Riku Voipio
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:48:36PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: If you prefer, read http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt: (which is the official definition of RC) 3. Configuration files Packages must not modify their own or other packages conffiles programmatically.

Bug#296166: marked as done (Depends on non-existent libnjb2)

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:11:23 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296166: apt-cache show libnjb2 does not give any response on my computer has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#293153: marked as done (neutrino: is not installable)

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:11:23 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296166: apt-cache show libnjb2 does not give any response on my computer has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#298102: marked as done (cacti: upgrading fails using default php settings)

2005-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2005 00:17:36 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298102: fixed in cacti 0.8.6c-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#296693: help with bug 296693

2005-03-04 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:16:20PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Bug 296693 is a grave bug which reports a catastrophic guile crash in gnucash. However, it doesn't happen for me. The user told me that it did happen even for other machines of his. Yet, nobody else has reported it.