Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 299709 digikam: Fails to install depenant on libexif1
Bug#299709: digikam: Fails to install
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:28:24 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299125: libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS:
java.lang.NullPointerException
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: amule
Version: 1.2.6+rc8-2
Followup-For: Bug #299475
apt-get reinstalling the package and/or reconfiguring preferences solved
the problem. Still wondering what the problem were, anyway :)
You can close the bug - thanks for all the fish!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT
Package: jadetex
Version: 3.13-3.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Violates policy 10.7.3
Every time the postinst is called with configure, be it upon upgrade,
install after remove, or dpkg-reconfigure, the file
/etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf is restored. If the file is deleted or
Aprotim Sanyal writes...,
Tested on both testing and unstable. On my (old) dual-P3 system (Asus CUV4X-
D), booting the SMP kernels for 2.6.8 or 2.6.10 causes a hand on boot,
with the message Kernel panic: attempted to kill init! shortly after printi
ng out some IDE bud information.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 299651 sid
Bug#299651: ippl postinst stalls upgrade.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 299709 sid
Bug#299709: digikam: Fails to install depenant on libexif1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 299702 sid
Bug#299702: hugs shouldn't go into sarge yet
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 297203 pending
Bug#297203: kernel-source-2.6.8: race which could allow for privilege
escalation on Radeon
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
severity 299717 important
Bug#299717: hal: Install-time script cranks mixer up while soundcard is in use
Severity set to `important'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
severity 299731 important
Bug#299731: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp: SMP kernel causes krenele panic during
boot
Severity set to `important'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:07:18 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299744: broken package, gimp depends on gimp-data (=
2.2.4-1)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Package: qmailadmin
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I installed the package and used it to modify domains. It was
half-working because, for example:
- qmailadmin searched for the wrong Maildir, for example
Postmaster/Maildir instead of
Package: nuauth
Version: 0.8.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Setting up nuauth (0.8.5-3) ...
chown: cannot access `/var/run/nuauth/': No such file or directory
I don't know if it works for systems where some another nufw package is
previously unpakced/installed/run,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 291408 [fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption
Bug#291408: slapd: Index and Data corruption with openldap2 2.1.30
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 291408 fixed-in-experimental
Bug#291408: [fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:53:59 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line mysqlcc removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:56:35 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:05:28 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
* Achim Bohnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-18 15:43]:
As I tried to explain in my last msg, I would like to upload a dummy
digikamplugins pkg, that just depends on kipi-plugins as 'soon' as
kipi-plugins enters sid (currently still pending in NEW queue).
That's just to smooth upgrade. Some
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line 3dwm removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:36 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:02:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299572: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:41 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299748: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: libnss-mysql
Version: 0.43-2
Followup-For: Bug #299155
i can confirm this bug and was able to track this down to a fault in the
function getpwnam called by the adduser script.
the function getgrnam shows same behaviour.
i am experiencing the problem a long time now and looking forward
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:09:16 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libapache-asp-perl: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:02:48 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line ngspice removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 297981 + fixed
Bug#297981: libapache2-mod-encoding: FTBFS: 'regex_t' undeclared (first use in
this function)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Thanks. I'm not a DD, but I'm willing to adopt this package. The
upstream translation team have released several new versions, and I
need to seperate it into 4 binary packages or more. I'm quite busy now,
and this work is a bit time consuming. So, I can't guarantee when it
will be done.
Again,
Hi,
Beat Bolli:
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4
Followup-For: Bug #299572
Thanks. Please test whether -6 fixes this problem.
People: If you're stracing a server, use strace -f -s 300 -o FILE PROGRAM,
then send FILE as a (possibly gzipped) attachment unless you're very
sure
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 299560 normal
Bug#299560: dsniff: fails due to not finding libnids
Severity set to `normal'.
tags 299560 + pending
Bug#299560: dsniff: fails due to not finding libnids
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
stop
Stopping processing
Package: streamtuner
Version: 0.99.99-3
Followup-For: Bug #299328
The last time I ran streamtuner was about 2 weeks ago,
and it ran fine then. I did do a weekly upgrade in
the mean-time, though.
$ gdb streamtuner
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
[snip]
This GDB was configured as i386-linux...(no debugging
Hey there,
Can you tell me if this project has been orphaned? I cannot reach the
developer, check out from CVS, etc. If it has not been orphaned, may I
orphan it?
Thanks,
Jeremiah
Steve Langasek wrote:
Package: aspseek-libmysqldb
Version: 1.2.10-1.1
Severity: grave
Packages connected to
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Beat Bolli:
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4
Followup-For: Bug #299572
Thanks. Please test whether -6 fixes this problem.
Yes. It has been running without problems for a few minutes now. Hey,
and I even found out about incoming.debian.org!
People: If
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Beat Bolli:
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4
Followup-For: Bug #299572
Thanks. Please test whether -6 fixes this problem.
People: If you're stracing a server, use strace -f -s 300 -o FILE PROGRAM,
then send FILE as a (possibly gzipped) attachment unless
Hi Carlos,
I didn't know your intension to adopt the package when I offered on
debian-devel today. It seems you are already working on that, while I
don't even know where the latest upstream release is, the links on the
website [1] are broken. Where did you get the release?
So, I will do
Quoting Mario Lipinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: libnss-mysql
Version: 0.43-2
Followup-For: Bug #299155
i can confirm this bug and was able to track this down to a fault in
the
function getpwnam called by the adduser script.
the function getgrnam shows same behaviour.
i am
Package: checksecurity
Version: 2.0.7-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried to install checksecurity today, and this is what I got:
# apt-get install checksecurity
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Suggested packages:
apt-watch cron-apt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 299811 sid
Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
I was able to upgrade then purge, then reinstall sid's new
checksecurity. So, I think it would be useful if you could make the
postinst set -x and reconfigure it to point out where the problem is.
Thanks,
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Couldn't you just use Replaces: unrar-nonfree? I'm not sure I
understand this bug report though; are there two packages with the
same name? Is there meant to be a seamless upgrade from unrar
(nonfree) to unrar (free)? In that case, why can't one of the just be
renamed?
Justin
--
To
Just as an aside, if you want to get streamtuner working again without
waiting for an update, you can disable the python plugin by running the
following and trying to start streamtuner again:
echo /usr/lib/streamtuner/plugins/python.so
~/.streamtuner/disabled-plugins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:21:34PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
I was able to upgrade then purge, then reinstall sid's new
checksecurity. So, I think it would be useful if you could make the
postinst set -x and reconfigure it to point out where the problem is.
That might work too, but I
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.2.5-3
Severity: grave
Tags: woody, sarge, patch
Hi.
GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys (e.g. for my key in the debian
keyring). Thus, data is encrypted irreversible, i.e. lost.
When discussed on debian-private in February, I was encouraged to file
this bug.
Hi,
Harald Staub:
I tried on one of the servers that has problems, and there, I still have
segfaults, while the mentioned cvs version works fine. I attach an strace.
Gah.
Can you send me
- the output of ifconfig
- the contents of your ntp.conf
Thanks.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:15:48AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:11:00PM -0500, elias humbolt wrote:
Package: mldonkey-server
Version: 2.5.28-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:33:04 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#289362: fixed in gstreamer0.8 0.8.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:18:35 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line #297981 was fixed in NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:02:54 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299589: fixed in munin 1.2.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:37:03PM +0100, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
Can you tell me if this project has been orphaned? I cannot reach the
developer, check out from CVS, etc. If it has not been orphaned, may I
orphan it?
Orphaning Debian packages is handled through the QA team
Peter,
Actually, the only bad thing I noticed is incorrect file I/O.
User interface works pretty fine and stable.
So I believe it will not hard to fix goldedplus for 64-bit system. One just
need to carefully inspect parameters of all fseek/lseek/fread/fwrite/etc. calls.
As of FIDO, it's pretty
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 299498 + sid
Bug#299498: valgrind-callgrind: undefined symbol:
vgPlain_register_compact_helper
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 299498 + sid
thanks
Dear Bruce
Am Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:49:41PM + hat Bruce Stephens getippert:
My apologies. I hadn't noticed that this same version is used in
testing, too. Probably the package works fine with the valgrind in
testing, and is only broken in unstable.
This is
Santiago Vila writes (Bug#263979: userv FTBFS):
Alternatively, you could rewrite debian/rules so that it does not use
bashisms. With a little bit of care, debian/rules does not become a
lot longer.
(Sorry for the delay replying.)
Your patch does make it longer, and I don't think that
Hi,
It's me writing about Cervisia licensing again. We still haven't heard
back from Bernd Gehrmann at this stage, which means there's not really
much that we can do. AFAICT he hasn't been around for a few years now;
does anyone know of a way that we might be able to contact him? I've
already
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:47:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Yes, please, I cannot reproduce this. Can you please do this?
# export DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer
# apt-get install --reinstall checksecurity
Reinstalling works without errors. I did some debugging and came up
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:15 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299753: fixed in control-center 1:2.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:31 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298473: fixed in fwanalog 0.6.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: openslp
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
SuSE Security has found several buffer overflows and out-of-memory access
possibilities during a code audit. Neither the original SuSE nor the Mandrake
advisory contain detailed information, openslp.org lacks usable
Hi,
On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:22, Ben Burton wrote:
It's me writing about Cervisia licensing again. We still haven't
heard back from Bernd Gehrmann at this stage, which means there's not
really much that we can do.
I know that Bernd was about to change his job some months ago, but I can
This bug has been marked pending for 8 days. I hope an upload can be
made soon.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: luxman
Severity: grave
Tags: security
DSA-693-1 claimed that the security hole CAN-2005-0385 was fixed in
unstable in luxman 0.41-20, but it's been two days and I do not see that
version has been uploaded.
Some details on the hole from the DSA:
Kevin Finisterre discovered a buffer
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:28:42PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
This bug has been marked pending for 8 days. I hope an upload can be
made soon.
I've been waiting on the security team to do an upload for stable.
However, you are correct. I'll upload the fixed version for unstable
this evening.
--
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
There is a local integer overflow vulnerability in the sys_epoll_wait()
call. See following for detail:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12763/
Apologies if already reported.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I can confirm that this problem exists with a fresh install.
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:47:06 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299811: fixed in checksecurity 2.0.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: ppp
Version: 2.4.2+20040428-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
hello pppeople,
i've encountered serious problems with pppd and days of monitoring the
issues lead me to the assumption that pppd is to blame. feel free to
tell me otherwise and i'll happily forward
There is a small mistake in the new package that makes this bug not fully
closed. You have missed to add -u $UGID for restart in the init script. Other
than that 4.2.0a+stable-6 works fine for me, good work!
/Pär
--- ntp-server 2005-03-15 23:40:18.0 +
+++ ntp-server 2005-03-17
Hi.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster)
Subject: Bug#299762: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:18:52 +0100
Every time the postinst is called with configure, be it upon upgrade,
install after remove, or dpkg-reconfigure, the file
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:47:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298039: fixed in xli 1.17.0-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:48:44PM +, Qingning Huo wrote:
Hi Carlos,
I didn't know your intension to adopt the package when I offered on
debian-devel today. It seems you are already working on that, while I
don't even know where the latest upstream release is, the links on the
website
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 298600 + patch
Bug#298600: copyright file refers to LGPL 2.1, but points to LGPL-2 file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
The attached patch fixes this problem and is the contents of the NMU
Unknown command or malformed arguments to
tag 298600 + patch
The attached patch fixes this problem and is the contents of the NMU
that I will be doing shortly.
--- bzflag-2.0.0.20050118/debian/changelog 2005-01-17 21:50:09.0
-0600
+++ /tmp/changelog 2005-03-16 23:46:19.503772768 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+bzflag
Max Alekseyev:
So I believe it will not hard to fix goldedplus for 64-bit system. One
just need to carefully inspect parameters of all
fseek/lseek/fread/fwrite/etc. calls.
If you have any insight into what might cause the problem (especially if you
have fixes for them), I would be very happy
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:12:28PM -0500, Markus Kienast wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a question for my personnal information : is there already a
mldonkey user ? ( because it could explain that mldonkey is running as
mldonkey:user ). If so, i think
Surely this is not the entire patch?
Justin
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:01:29AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
tag 298600 + patch
The attached patch fixes this problem and is the contents of the NMU
that I will be doing shortly.
--- bzflag-2.0.0.20050118/debian/changelog2005-01-17
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Harald Staub:
I tried on one of the servers that has problems, and there, I still have
segfaults, while the mentioned cvs version works fine. I attach an strace.
Gah.
Can you send me
- the output of ifconfig
- the contents of your ntp.conf
Thanks.
Cheers
Harry
eth0
I assume that you have seen this:
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.11.4
If not .. tag patch:) In less than 100 lines, even!
Justin
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:54:56AM +0100, Christian wrote:
Package: ppp
Version: 2.4.2+20040428-6
Severity: critical
Justification:
Including a patch from kernel.org. Given the size of the patch, you
may not trust it, but that's what I got ..
http://www.kernel.org/diff/diffview.cgi?file=%2Fpub%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fv2.6%2Fpatch-2.6.11.4.bz2;z=15
If I understand the situation correctly, this needs to be reassigned
and cloned to
81 matches
Mail list logo
