Package: php4-auth-pam
Version: 0.4-6
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian packages.
Package: php4-dbtcp
Version: 0.1.17-4.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian packages.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:19:37PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:53:52AM +0100, Helmut Toplitzer wrote:
Do the dietlibc-people know about the problem.
Could not find any bugreport about that.
I do not know. I have not checked yet. I'll file a bugreport
about
Package: turck-mmcache
Version: 2.4.6-10
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
Package: php4-sqlrelay
Version: 1:0.35-6.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
Package: php4-rrdtool
Version: 1.04-10
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
Package: php4-ps
Version: 1.3.1-5
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packages.
Package: php4-mcrypt
Version: 3:4.3.10-0.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
Package: php4-lasso
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
Package: php4-gpib
Version: 3.2.03-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian packages.
Package: php4-idn
Version: 1.1-1.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian packages.
Package: php4-imagick
Version: 0.9.11-0.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and
various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the
PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in
the Debian
Package: php4-sqlite
Version: 1.0.2-6
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
Package: php4-spplus
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packages.
Package: php4-syck
Version: 0.42-7
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian
packages.
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:46:13 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Binary rebuild for mipsel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 286636 libimlib2-dev,illuminator
Bug#286636: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sed: can't read
/usr/lib/libltdl.la: No such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package `illuminator' to `libimlib2-dev,illuminator'.
retitle 286636 Package
Steve Langasek wrote:
Package: php4-lasso
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various
bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has
made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS
reassign 286636 libimlib2-dev,illuminator
retitle 286636 Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found
tags 286636 -sid
thanks
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:56:06PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
Now the error is:
checking LIBXML2_LIBS... -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lm
checking for imlib2 =
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:43:04 -0300
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 300440 +patch
thanks
Hi Stefan,
I've tracked this bug and with the vorlon and fatalerror help
i reproduced it this way:
- Install dhelp package;
- Install doc-linux-it package;
- Remove or move
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 286636 patch
Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
severity 296518 grave
Bug#296518: libimlib2-dev: pkg-config description with wrong Requires field
Severity set to `grave'.
severity 286636 grave
Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@',
tags 286636 patch
thanks
Ok, well, that was easy enough; there are simply no references anywhere in
the current imlib2 code that would replace '@requirements@' with a proper
value. So the best solution here, AFAICT, is to simply remove that line
from imlib2.pc.in. Patch attached.
Cheers,
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
reassign 286636 libimlib2-dev
Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found
Bug reassigned from package `libimlib2-dev,illuminator' to `libimlib2-dev'.
merge
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:08:29 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gstreamer0.8: FTBFS in sarge: failed to make documentation?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi,
Relatedly: when /etc/network/run exists as a symlink to
/dev/shm/network, but /dev/shm/network doesn't exist (which for some
reason was the case here), the script fails with `The canonical path of
/etc/network/run could not be determined. Aborting'.
Removing the symlink seems to have solved
Package: xmpi
Version: 2.2.3b8-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
xmpi failed to build from source on a sparc buildd. This problem was
NOT duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. There may be insufficiently
strict build dependancies.
Making install in src
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 05:47:17 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300534: fixed in libgnumail-java 1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Hello Kurt,
Your package is failing to build on various arches because the
libical directory is using a very old version of
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:20:05 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301337: fixed in syck 0.42-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Steve,
Please rebuild turck-mmcache to match with a build-dependency on
php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please
accept our apologies for the inconvenience.
Hehe, yep, so it obviously caused you guys as much stress as it did me
then ;-)
No problem, I'll
Package: rxtx
Severity: serious
When building 'rxtx' in a clean chroot, I get the following error:
344. throw new gnu.io.PortInUseException(
^^
*** Semantic Error: You need to modify your classpath, sourcepath,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for
util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds
still fail on at least hppa, powerpc, and mipsel, since the dietlibc
linking fails. See
As a user who used x3270 I am very displeased about the disappearance of x3270
from Debian. I read here about the events that caused this and I'm amazed. It
seem to me the the situation can be cleared by sending few emails and instead
the pacage was removed. If the package maintainer did not
Package: icecast2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Several security issues have been reported for Icecast2. Please refer to
the CAN Ids in the changelog when fixing them:
CAN-2005-0838:
Multiple buffer overflows in the XSL parser may cause DoS and possibly
remote
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-15
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Kernels before 2.6.11 do not properly restrict access to the N_MOUSE line
disciple for TTYs, which allows local users to inject mouse or keyboard
events into other's users sessions and possibly gain extended privileges.
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:32:06 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301330: fixed in lasso 0.6.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:55:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:45:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for
util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:45:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for
util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds
still fail on at least
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 300168 + pending
Bug#300168: arpack++: fails to comple simple.cc example given in nonsym
examples directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:55:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
The workaround for sparc wouldn't be necessary if the diet wrapper is
called with the -Os option (this adds -mcpu=supersparc), a good idea
anyway for all
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 300117 important
Bug#300117: revelation: Don't start
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
severity 300117 important
thanks
This bug only affects compatibility with old versions of packages from
testing, and therefore is not release-critical.
Stefan, the problem here is that you depend on a series of
python2.3-specific packages (python (= 2.3), python2.3-crypto,
libxml2-python2.3),
The new craze is finnally here - one of the bast
sites that can give you the things you've allways
wanted to get - watchees, repliccas to be correct,
of the bast brand s in the world! Impress you're lady
with tag heur, roleex, and more. You naame it - We
got it for you!
m show me more
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 301378 serious
Bug#301378: geneweb: near 100% memory utilisation and slow system
Severity set to `serious'.
tags 301378 sid -experimental
Unknown tag/s: -experimental.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 301267 patch
Bug#301267: libant1.6-java: FTBFS: Jikes could not find package java.lang
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 301267 patch
thanks
Since a few months SableVM's class library is compressed, so the
/usr/share/sablevm/sablevm-classpath does not contain it. The
preferred interface for finding the boot class path has always
been `cat /usr/share/sablevm/classlib.pth`, while the rules
had the path
Package: libjavascript-perl
Version: 0.52-4
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried to simulate 'document.write()', so I wrote a simple package Document.pm:
-- cut --
package Document;
sub new {
my $self = {};
bless $self;
return $self;
}
sub
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 05:44:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:23:01PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
It most certainly is *not* a good idea; it's contraindicated by policy to
build binaries with -Os
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:26:41AM +, Paul Brossier wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:38:27AM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
it works perfectly on powerpc, a much nicer solution indeed. and
the first patch was wrong, the image was slightly more redish.
Great. We're getting closer, it
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:03:24 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#289182: fixed in kino 0.75-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:31:00PM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's also trying to make a shared library without using -fPIC.
This also causes build failures on other arches and is probably
the result of not using
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301193: fixed in sylpheed 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301352: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:03:24 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301243: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: libant1.6-java
Version: 1.6.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #301267
Here is a full patch to solve the problem.
Have fun!
Etienne
--
Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC:
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:47:38 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301200: fixed in sylpheed-claws 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301267 patch
Bug#301267: libant1.6-java: FTBFS: Jikes could not find package java.lang
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
#299939 and #218014 likely have the same cause. Someone might
consider downgrading #299939 and/or merging them.
It seems that both are caused by a user-trigged disconnect event while
in a state when disconnect should be disallowed. A proper solution
probably requires glib synchronization, but
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301038 confirmed
Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 301038 patch
Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
tag 301038 patch
thanks
It appears that the imagefs crash can be avoided by pre-creating the
file. It will crash if the file doesn't exist, but seems to succeed
if you /usr/bin/touch the file beforehand.
There's something wrong with the constructor CImage::CImage. When you
try to create a
Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1
Version: 2.4.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgtkmm-2.4-1: Depends: libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0) but 1.8.0-4 is to be
installed
E: Broken packages
I've tried 2 italian mirror, but situation is
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:47:58 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300662: fixed in qalculate 0.7.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Le 24/03/05 à 16:31 Achim Bohnet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait :
Sorry for the delay to answer.
I have hundred mails to read. Could you please tell me what I've to do
for showimg ?
Thanks.
On Thursday 24 March 2005 15:41, Mark Purcell wrote:
[...]
I intend to upload libkexif1 and rebuilt
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:47:14 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301331: fixed in php4-mcrypt 3:4.3.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Severity 301416 grave
Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies
Severity set to `grave'.
Merge 301416 298517
Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries
Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies
Mismatch - only
Severity 301416 grave
Merge 301416 298517
Tags 298517 +pending
Thanks
I guess there's no way to fix this mistake but to downgrade with an epoch.
Should be uploaded soon.
-Original Message-
From: Debian BTS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debian Bug
Tracking System
Sent:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Severity 301416 serious
Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies
Severity set to `serious'.
Merge 301416 298517
Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries
Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies
Merged 298517
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:32:08 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300587: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Discussion on IRC about fixing this for release:
vorlon joeyh: we have non-security-related RC bugs in the sparc kernel
that aren't fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-6. Is
rebuilding d-i for a sparc update only better or worse than
rebuilding for everything? (Can
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 300527 patch
Bug#300527: libgnome-vfsmm-2.6-dev: missing dependencies.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tags 300527 patch
thanks
I'm uploading an NMU for this bug, which consists of a changelog and a
rebuild against fresh libs. The changelog entry is attached. :)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u gnome-vfsmm2.6-2.8.0/debian/changelog
gnome-vfsmm2.6-2.8.0/debian/changelog
Package: libchewing
Version: 0.2.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: Policy 7.6, FTBFS
The Build-Depends should be automake1.9 instead of automake-1.9. With
this typo libchewing FTBFS due to unsatisfied dependency.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
Matt Brown said:
- Uncomment mod_ssl and the segfault vanishes
- Comment either of the modules in php.in and the segfault vanishes
- Remove virtual host and the segfault vanishes
- Remove config_log_module or dir_module and the segfault vanishes
Hrm, on my system, I got the segv even with a
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:47:47 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#296905: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:17:06 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298517: fixed in gtkmm2.4 1:2.4.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:17:06 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298517: fixed in gtkmm2.4 1:2.4.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
90 matches
Mail list logo
