Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 308232 + confirmed
Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share.
Tags were: sid
Tags added: confirmed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 308232 + confirmed
thanks
Indeed, I confirm this is only a 2.18 issue.
The 2.18 package did not entered sarge.
I'll certainly come back to the /var/lib/bugzilla directory for
$datadir, as it was done for the 2.16 package.
Thanks for the report.
--
I tried to build a Debian package for it to minimize work for Gabor,
but the compilation failed with an error I reported to Jerry Carter and
Jeremy. Let's just wait them to wake up if already back to USA from
the SambaXP conference.
More news about this, mostly for Gabor...
The compile
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 1.999.21-1
Severity: serious
I think breaking every dependant package of libapache2-mod-perl2 in
unstable is a Bad Idea.
It would be a lot smoother to keep such a major change in Experimental
until dependant package maintainers have uploaded their changes
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 1.999.23-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Registry.pm is missing from new libapache2-mod-perl2 debian package
(unstable distribution).
This causing errors in apache2/error.log:
failed to resolve handler `ModPerl::Registry': Can't
Package: phpbb2
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
[Upstream's description is not overly verbose; they intent to release
full details in five days; please lower severity if you don't think
it's grave]
phpbb2 2.0.15 has been released and addresses a security issue, which
upstream
Hi Ferenc,
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:21:32AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote:
While I have upgraded my system, slapd upgrade asked some questions,
including directory to dump databases. The text said the default is
/var/backups/slapd-VERSION. Reading that, I simply pushed enter. After
that,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libldap-2.2-7 ldap-utils slapd openldap2.2
tags 303505 + pending
Bug#303505: openldap2.2: [INTL:ja] update Japanese debconf translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Bug#227142:
Package: weechat
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
weechat can't be installed because of weechat-gtk.
The following packages contain unsatisfied dependencies :
weechat: Depends: weechat-gtk (= 0.1.1-1) but it is not installable
E: Erroneous packages
Les paquets
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 03:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300432: fixed in watchdog 5.2.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 308283 sid
Bug#308283: Upgrade to 1.999.23-1 breaks dependant packages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
This patch should fix the problem:
--- main.c.orig 2005-05-09 03:29:59.0 -0400
+++ main.c 2005-05-09 03:30:37.0 -0400
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@
standardise(buf);
*/
- SMTP_write(sock, ht-string);
+ SMTP_write(sock, %s, ht-string);
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 03:32:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#304661: fixed in superkaramba 0.35-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Christian,
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:07:48AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I tried to build a Debian package for it to minimize work for Gabor,
but the compilation failed with an error I reported to Jerry Carter and
Jeremy. Let's just wait them to wake up if already back to USA from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 307275
Bug#307275: phpmyadmin: upgrade breaks included conffiles from other packages
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf
Bug closed, send any
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 308268 experimental
Bug#308268: mboxcheck-applet: Should depend on python-gnome2-extras
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:38:49AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
This patch should fix the problem:
--- main.c.orig 2005-05-09 03:29:59.0 -0400
+++ main.c 2005-05-09 03:30:37.0 -0400
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@
standardise(buf);
*/
- SMTP_write(sock,
tag 308268 experimental
thanks
Le dimanche 08 mai 2005 à 22:06 -0500, Erik Meitner a écrit :
Package: mboxcheck-applet
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ /usr/lib/gnome-panel/mboxcheck
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 308244 serious
Bug#308244: Don't compile on Ubuntu.
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2005 01:36:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in
'*m[vertices]'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 308244 sid
Bug#308244: Don't compile on Ubuntu.
Tags were: sid
Tags added: sid
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 304035 patch
Bug#304035: llvm: Conflict with /usr/bin/extract from package extract.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 304035 patch
thanks
Hi Al,
As Frank correctly identified, an undeclared conflict is a release critical
bug. I've attached a patch that implements the naive solution to this
problem; if I hear no objections from you in the next day or two, I'll plan
to upload an NMU with this patch.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 308244 + fixed
Bug#308244: Don't compile on Ubuntu.
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 05:02:50 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#308225: fixed in pyid3lib 0.5.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:13:46AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: phpbb2
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
[Upstream's description is not overly verbose; they intent to release
full details in five days; please lower severity if you don't think
it's grave]
On lun, 2005-05-09 at 05:47 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please make sure you have:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% ls -lhd /usr/lib32
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2005-05-08 20:01 /usr/lib32 -
/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/
Thank you for the hint ! My system was messed up, indeed. I fixed it
and
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 05:47:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307258: fixed in ace 5.4.2.1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 02:57:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in NMU of enigma 0.91-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 308282 + patch
Bug#308282: phpbb2: Security issue in url/bbcode
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 294346 important
Bug#294346: /usr/share/guessnet/test/test-wireless: line 52: ip: command not
found
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 06:17:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
severity 294346 important
thanks
The maintainer has asserted that this is a missing Recommends:, not a
missing Depends:, and recommends are not considered release-critical.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 06:17:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 308003
Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 290618
Bug#290618: pinfo: timestamp skew issues with pinfo.info during build.
Bug#296459: pinfo is uninstallable.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 06:47:21 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#276103: fixed in kcdlabel 2.13-KDE3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hello Anibal,
I have added your patch and send this message as test:
--
This message will test the Subject for
Subject: [Test-Mail] %c %i %o %t
--
Hi Torsten,
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
including directory to dump databases. The text said the default is
/var/backups/slapd-VERSION. Reading that, I simply pushed enter. After
that, the preinst script have failed, rendering slapd unconfigured.
Meanwhile, apt has upgraded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package wmaker
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmaker
severity 279489 grave
Bug#279489: wmaker: restarts on window resize
Severity set to `grave'.
tags 279489 patch
Bug#279489: wmaker: restarts on window resize
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
close 301782
Bug#301782: goobox: Ripping to ogg causes segfault
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 308234 debconf
Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting
slapd/dump_database_destdir
Bug reassigned from package `slapd' to `debconf'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:17:34 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#308253: fixed in roxen-fonts-iso8859-2 0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:17:33 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#308250: fixed in roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
reassign 308234 debconf
thanks
Hi guys,
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:20:23AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:21:32AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote:
While I have upgraded my system, slapd upgrade asked some questions,
including directory to dump databases. The text
OK, it works correctly.
Patch can officialy applyed to ssmtp (woody).
Thank
Michelle
Am 2005-05-09 12:57:57, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
Hello Anibal,
I have added your patch and send this message as test:
--
This
reopen 290618
thanks
Hi Bas,
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:13:49PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Please consider pinfo 0.6.8-5 (currently in incoming) for Sarge.
It fixes a serious bug (#290618, #296459) that made the package
uninstallable in some cases.
The other fixes are trivial changes like
Package: patchutils
Version: 0.2.30-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Current version of patchutils makes use of PATH_MAX which isn't defined
on some systems (like GNU/Hurd).
The attached patch fixes this.
Best regards,
Chris
-- System Information:
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#230875: fixed in pam-pgsql 0.5.2-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#230875: fixed in pam-pgsql 0.5.2-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#230875: fixed in pam-pgsql 0.5.2-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
# not a release arch
severity 308316 important
Bug#308316: patchutils: FTBFS on the Hurd
Severity set to `important'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
I also have tripped over this bug. It doesn't really effect
anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go to
completion.
I am curious as to how this proposed fix of yours is going to
work. All 3 reports of this bug in the bug system, are from
people running i386 architecture
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
|
| Jerry, I grabbed SAMBA_3_0 from svn 2 hours ago
| and, while trying to recompile a Debian
| package from it (to get it tested by our bug submitter):
|
...
| python/py_spoolss_printers_conv.c:294: error:
|parse error
Hi Steve!
You wrote:
Well, I don't think you've fixed this RC bug at all: instead, by removing
doc/pinfo.info in debian/rules, you've ensured that makeinfo is required for
*all* builds of the package, and by not adding a build-depends on texinfo,
it will be missing when building on all of
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 08:47:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 08:47:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:16:45AM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
I also have tripped over this bug. It doesn't really effect
anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go to
completion.
I am curious as to how this proposed fix of yours is going to
work. All 3 reports
Hi,
Can you do me a favor and upload the illuminator package you built?
Otherwise I'll try to figure out how to re-queue it on the sparc buildd
(I've been meaning to learn how to do this for some time).
Thanks.
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 23:08 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Blars
Package: kcdlabel
Version: 2.13-KDE3-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge
This package has a (mostly) dead upstream, and my c++ is just not good
enough to take over being upstream. I do not want to see it release
with sarge in this state of maintainership. I have had an offer of
comaintainership, and
On Monday 09 May 2005 07:32, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:16:45AM -0600, Gordon Haverland
wrote:
I also have tripped over this bug. It doesn't really effect
anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go
to completion.
I am curious as to how this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 308232 + pending
Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share.
Tags were: confirmed sid
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hello,
according to bugzilla this bug is fixed in version 2.4.3-20050321+2, but
debian sarge still has version 2.4.3-20050321+1 affected by this bug.
Could you please upload a fixed version to sarge?
Maxi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unpacking ia32-libs (from .../ia32-libs_1.3.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ...
Setting up lib32gcc1 (4.0.0-1) ...
Setting up ia32-libs (1.3.0.0.1.gcc4) ...
Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
tags 308232 + pending
thanks
Bug closed in the SVN repository:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-bugzilla/trunk/bugzilla-2.18/debian/changelog?op=filerev=0sc=0
I now use /var/lib/bugzilla for the root dir of every data files,
which is FHS compliant.
Thanks for the report.
Regards.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 308257 grave
Bug#308257: doesn't clean up properly due to syntax error in postrm
Severity set to `grave'.
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
wxwidgets2.5 has been removed from debian and no other package is
providing wxpython. I've created an updated package at
http://siretart.tauware.de/debian/londonlaw, which depends on
libwxgtk2.4-python, as you suggested.
Gruesse,
Reinhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with
sexp-conv.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Radovan,
Can you upload fonty-rg's /usr/bin/uni as /usr/bin/utf8 instead? In
UniConf, the /usr/bin/uni tool queries and manages a database, while in
fonty-rg, it's used just for switching console-fonts.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with
sexp-conv.
Another alternative is not including the nettle-lfib-stream program at
all in the lsh package.
Well, that
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 12:02:45 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298939: fixed in xfree86 4.1.0-16woody6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 282274 + fixed
Bug#282274: phpdoc: FTBFS: openjade keeps running.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 13:32:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298294: fixed in baghira 0.6f-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade.
Still no change:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32
ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-get install ia32-libs
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 302854 + fixed
Bug#302854: libcgicc-doc: Cannot install -doc: cannot create .dhelp file
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: wesnoth-ei
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
When I upgraded today:
S'est seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prviament no seleccionat.
S'est desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: s'ha produt un error en processar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 307794 + fixed
Bug#307794: xosd: FTBFS: X11 not threadsafe
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade.
Still no change:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32
ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-get install
On Monday, 9 de May de 2005 20:05, Jordi Mallach wrote:
You probably miss some replaces somewhere.
Yes, it misses a Replaces: wesnoth-data 0.9.1, I will fix it soon.
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
reopen 308225
Bug#308225: python-id3lib: uninstallable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: python-id3lib
Version: 0.5.1-3
Followup-For: Bug #308225
My installation gives this error:
Unpacking replacement python-id3lib ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/python-id3lib_0.5.1-4_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyid3lib.so',
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 1.999.23-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
After upgrading to 1.999.23-1, apt tried to restart Apache and died with
the error:
[Mon May 09 17:47:26 2005] [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /u
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 15:49:16 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#303352: fixed in tea 9.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
# removal bugs are RC
severity 297706 serious
Bug#297706: package-removal fails due to failure of post-removal script
Severity set to `serious'.
End of message, stopping processing
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:53:20PM +0100, Daniel Hulme wrote:
After upgrading to 1.999.23-1, apt tried to restart Apache and died with
the error:
[Mon May 09 17:47:26 2005] [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /u
sr/local/share/perl/5.8.4
Package: libapache-mod-encoding
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
libapache-mod-encoding.prerm contains the following code:
for i in apache apache-ssl apache-perl; do
if [ -e /etc/$i/httpd.conf ]; then
modules-config $i enable mod_encoding
fi
done
You
El dom, 08-05-2005 a las 20:48 -0700, Rick Younie escribi:
reopen 292337
thanks
doc++ builds ok but segfaults when run
during libupnp_1.2.1-1 build.
This bug arises from time to time, depending on the m68k buildd being
used. I am not sure that the problem is in the package itself, or it
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:45 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#305530: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hi Mike,
Does fixing this bug actually require the new upstream version? If so, it
will have to be removed from sarge. If not, would you like to upload an
0.3.15-3 version of the package to testing-proposed-updates that has the
proper dependencies?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:43:27AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Otherwise I'll try to figure out how to re-queue it on the sparc buildd
(I've been meaning to learn how to do this for some time).
By emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] But that isn't going to do any good,
the sparc autobuilder is *not*
Package: cl-cclan
Severity: serious
cl-cclan uncoditionally calls programs from common-lisp-controller
in both its postinst and prerm. It only recommends it though, so
the installation may fail with:
Setting up cl-cclan (1.86-2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/cl-cclan.postinst: line 27:
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:50:08AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
This package has a (mostly) dead upstream, and my c++ is just not good
enough to take over being upstream. I do not want to see it release
with sarge in this state of maintainership. I have had an offer of
comaintainership, and if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 308358 sid
Bug#308358: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:35:23PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
S'està seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prèviament no seleccionat.
S'està desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar
Hello Sven
Thank you for the response. When I click Diffs on any topic I
open a link that looks like:
https://twiki/cgi-bin/twiki/rdiff/Systems/SystemData?rev1=1.29rev2=1.24
Assuming you have taint checking turned on, this sort of link will
always produce the error with the original RDiff.pm,
Package: libgimp-perl
Version: 2.0.dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
any example using libgimp-perl fails with a protocol error message, as
shown in 2 other bug reports.
Gimp/Config.pm contains a line:
GIMP = q[],
Net/Net.pm contains:
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 19:02:52 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299814: fixed in gnupg 1.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 19:02:52 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300859: fixed in gnupg 1.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:11:06PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Find attached a diff made against 2.0.15 and our last sid version.
| + $text = preg_replace('#(script|about|applet|activex|chrome):#is',
\\1#058;, $text);
It looks like this patch can be applied to close the bug.
Ok, based
Package: crosshurd
Version: 1.7.13
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Renders package unusable
Second stage of native-install on hurd-i386 aborts with the following
error:
cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/sysvinit/inittab': No such file or directory
This is before fstab is setup and all.
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
