Bug#307663: marked as done (PostgreSQL Character Conversion and tsearch2 Module Vulnerabilities)

Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 22:52:38 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line PostgreSQL Character Conversion and tsearch2 Module Vulnerabilities has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#308567: lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing files

Package: lablgtk2 Version: 2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 27 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0),

Processed: tagging 297706

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 297706 patch Bug#297706: package-removal fails due to failure of post-removal script There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#308246: file conflicts in uniconf-tools, fonty-rg

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:44:11AM -0400, Simon Law wrote: Hi Radovan, Can you upload fonty-rg's /usr/bin/uni as /usr/bin/utf8 instead? In UniConf, the /usr/bin/uni tool queries and manages a database, while in fonty-rg, it's used just for switching console-fonts. ok, I'll do a new version

Bug#297706: libapache-mod-witch: patch for postrm problem

Package: libapache-mod-witch Version: 0.0.4 Followup-For: Bug #297706 sed uses \( and \) for grouping, not ( ). Here's a patch that fixes this problem. --- libapache-mod-witch-0.0.4/debian/postrm.orig2002-09-16 11:36:39.0 -0700 +++ libapache-mod-witch-0.0.4/debian/postrm

Processed: Re: Regarding Bug#308495

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 308495 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#308495: general: pmud does not turn off display Changed Bug submitter from Jeffrey B. Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: Still affects thee sarge version

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 215773 - woody Bug#215773: on fresh install, groups postdrop and postfix created with gid1000 Tags were: woody Bug#162941: postfix: During install groupadd prompts for Password and hangs Tags removed: woody thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#302734: marked as done (libgimp-perl: protocol error (1))

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 03:32:19 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302734: fixed in libgimp-perl 2.0.dfsg-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#308390: marked as done (protocol error)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 03:32:19 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302734: fixed in libgimp-perl 2.0.dfsg-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#308575: babel_0.10.2-1 (unstable): FTBFS, java interpreter segfaults

** Build finished at 20050511-0808 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] [...] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site

Il giorno mar, 10/05/2005 alle 12.34 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto: Hi, could you please send me the list of the zope packages (with version numbers) that you have installed on your system? Here it is: zope-btreefolder2 1.0.1-5 zope-cmf1.41.4.7-4

Processed: Still open in sarge, i want version-tracking in the BTS!

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 308390 Bug#308390: protocol error Bug#302734: libgimp-perl: protocol error (1) Bug#307856: libgimp-perl won't init: protocol error Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 308390 - sid Bug#308390: protocol error Tags were: sarge sid patch

Bug#308556: RM: partimage [!i386] -- RoM; code has issues on a number of platforms

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 02:09:49PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: Why is this bug filed as RoM? Should I change it? You should not say Request of Maintainer when it isn't a request of the maintainer, that's misrepresenting the facts. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site

Hi Alceste, after looking at the source code of CMFCore.TypesTool (line 535 and below) I suspect your problem is caused by one of these packages: zope-exuserfolder 0.50.0-3 zope-psycopgda 1.1.18-1 zope-zwiki 0.37.0-4 ZMS CMFpgForum. Could you

Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site

Il giorno mer, 11/05/2005 alle 10.10 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto: Hi Alceste, after looking at the source code of CMFCore.TypesTool (line 535 and below) I suspect your problem is caused by one of these packages: zope-exuserfolder 0.50.0-3 zope-psycopgda

Bug#308453: marked as done (plone: Fails to add new Plone site)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:38:44 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

Hi all, The technical details of why debconf is not able to present a default value with the readline frontend, when the recommended literm-readline-gnu-perl is not installed, or with the teletype frontend, are already explained in bug #183970. I know of no better Just a silly question: why

Processed: quotatool bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 258289 289812 Bug#258289: quotatool: does not work with xfs if non-xfs quotas are supported by the kernel Bug#289812: quotatool: Assumes XFS quotas if the kernel supports them Merged 258289 289812. tags 289812 fixed-upstream Bug#289812:

Bug#303352: trouble with 'apropos' 'tea'

Package: tea Version: 9.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #303352 It's the curse of 'dak'. The man page still thinks 'teaed' is called 'tea'. % apropos ^tea | grep text tea (1) - small text editor for gnome2 teaed (1)- small text editor for gnome2 Any 'tea' page? % man

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

Hi, If you really think we should not mention the default value there that's okay but on the other side I request that the behaviour of the readline frontend is changed to at least present the user the current/default value if the libterm-readline-gnu-perl package is not installed. And make

Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:17:27PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: tags 307816 -sid thanks That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report, the package in sarge is not really usable. Agreed. On Thu,

Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht

Package: ht Severity: grave Tags: security, patch Justification: user security hole Gentoo has reported several security issues in ht: 1. An integer overflow in the ELF segment parsing 2. Some buffer overflows in the PE parser. Fixes: (Please double check) 1:

Bug#308586: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt

Package: python2.3-apt Version: 0.6.11 Severity: serious Tags: experimental -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-apt. Unpacking python2.3-apt (from .../python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing

Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: ... So I suggest letting: * tetex-bin_2.0.2-29 (and packages built from it: libkpathsea3 and libkpathsea-dev) * cweb_3.64.debian-2 into sarge. I agree, this is a better solution than my suggestion. Julian cu Adrian --

Bug#289812: marked as done (quotatool: Assumes XFS quotas if the kernel supports them)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258289: fixed in quotatool 1.4.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#308591: apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near `www-sivut.`

Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.33-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Output from dpkg --configure apache-ssl: Setting up apache-ssl (1.3.33-5) ... Template parse error near `www-sivut.', in stanza #5 of /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache-ssl.templates dpkg: error processing

Bug#258289: marked as done (quotatool: does not work with xfs if non-xfs quotas are supported by the kernel)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258289: fixed in quotatool 1.4.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#308548: marked as done (apache-ssl: dpkg: error processing apache-ssl (--configure))

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 05:02:24 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308548: fixed in apache 1.3.33-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: tagging 308591

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 308591 sid Bug#308591: apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near `www-sivut.` There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing

Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing dependency)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 12:34:57 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing dependency) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp

Package: postgresl-8.0 Version: 8.0.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole The server creates a socket in /tmp, which is unsafe. Any local user can create a similar socket and impersonate the database server. This bug also breaks backwards comaptibility with old

Processed: Re: Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308587 pending Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht Tags were: patch security Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht

tags 308587 pending thanks Hello Moritz! On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:37:10AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Gentoo has reported several security issues in ht: 1. An integer overflow in the ELF segment parsing 2. Some buffer overflows in the PE parser. Fixes: (Please double check) I

Processed: Re: Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 308597 postgresql-8.0 Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp Warning: Unknown package 'postgresl-8.0' Bug reassigned from package `postgresl-8.0' to `postgresql-8.0'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#308282: [phpbb2 #308282] upstream patch

On Tue, May 10, 2005 14:55, Ulf Harnhammar wrote: Protecting against this type of attack is much more complicated than this. As Jeroen noted, HTML entities are interpreted, so you have to protect against things like jav#97;script:. Some browsers allow varying amounts of whitespace inside

Bug#303352: trouble with 'apropos' 'tea'

Please report this as a different bug report. The reason is that bug 303352 was closed, and I do want to take care of the man page. A Costa wrote: Package: tea Version: 9.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #303352 It's the curse of 'dak'. The man page still thinks 'teaed' is called 'tea'. %

Bug#308591: PATCH for apache-ssl.templates

Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.33-5 Followup-For: Bug #308591 OK, here's a short patch which fixes the problem and lets it be installed, although since I don't read Finnish I've got no idea whether I've changed the semantics behind the entry: --- apache-ssl.templates.org2005-05-11

Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing dependency)

Steve, There appear to be a number of undocumented changes, relative to -4, which are not documentation fixes. :/ Would you remind removing them and uploading a -4sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates, or else explain why these changes are warranted during the freeze? Please take my apologies.

Processed: tagging 308567

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 308567 sid Bug#308567: lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing files There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#272726: marked as done (nagat can't find /etc/nagios/nagatcfg.dat)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 07:17:03 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#272726: fixed in nagat 1.0a2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: reassign 308597 to postgresql-8.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reassign 308597 postgresql-8.0 Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp Bug reassigned from package `postgresql-8.0' to `postgresql-8.0'. End of message, stopping

Processed: reopening 301370

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reopen 301370 Bug#301370: quota postrm fails due to missing dependency Bug reopened, originator not changed. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#302771: Win XP file listing bug in smbclient and libsmbclient

I finally managed to build samba packages with current upstream SVN sources, which , according to Jerry Carter, fix the Win XP file listing bug. To the bug submitter : coul dyou please test this with the packages you'll find at: http://www.perrier.eu.org/debian/packages/ signature.asc

Bug#304035: llvm: Conflict with /usr/bin/extract from package extract.

Al, Hmm, unfortunately, my build machine isn't actually beefy enough to build llvm. :) So this bug will have to wait for someone with more memory than I have to upload. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#308567: this is typical of missing native code compiler support for the arch.

Hello, I believe this is symptomatic of the fact that s390 doesn't have a native code compiler, and indeed looking at the full log i see that those files are listed in : liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev.files without taking in account the non-native-code arches. Samuel, will you fix that ? I

Bug#308614: Please rebuild libchipcard2 against libusb (= 2:0.1.10a-9)

Package: libchipcard2 Severity: grave Tags: sarge sid Justification: renders package unusable A problem has been discovered on libusb, which only affect the ARM architecture. It is a memory alignement problem (__packed was forgotten on some structures). The bug has been fixed in libusb, but all

Bug#305530: re Bug#305530: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-2

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Source-Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ohphone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb to

Bug#308620: pair of security holes

Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: grave Tags: security I'm sure you already know of these, but for the record, firefox is vulnerale to a pair of new security holes: CAN-2005-1477 The install function in Firefox 1.0.3 allows remote web sites on the browser's whitelist, such as

Bug#308567: marked as done (lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing files)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 09:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308567: fixed in lablgtk2 2.4.0+2005.02.18-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#308625: binutils: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing

Package: binutils Version: 2.15-5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole An integer overflow in parsing ELF segment headers has been found that affects several of binutil's binaries, such as nm, strings or objdump and can potentially be exploited to corrupt the heap and

Bug#308624: gdb: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing

Package: gdb Version: 6.3-5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole An integer overflow in parsing ELF segment headers has been found that can potentially be exploited to corrupt the heap and execute arbitrary code. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91398 for a

Bug#290801: marked as done (libflash-mozplugin: crashes with relocation error)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#283408: marked as done (libflash: crashes on epiphany for many sites including blockbuster.com)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#308625: binutils: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: An integer overflow in parsing ELF segment headers has been found that affects several of binutil's binaries, such as nm, strings or objdump and can potentially be exploited to corrupt the heap and execute arbitrary code. See

Bug#282062: marked as done (libflash-mozplugin: crashes mozilla on first use)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#308545: Previous mail really contains translation for slbackup

Argh, please don't be fooled by wrong subject of the bugreport, it *really* contains Czech (cs.po) debconf translation for *slbackup*. /me should not send bugreports so late at night :-( -- Miroslav Kure -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#308545: Previous mail really contains translation for slbackup

You might have the wrong bug number: Bug#308545: azureus: Azureus doesnt start Cheers, Shaun On 5/11/05, Miroslav Kure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Argh, please don't be fooled by wrong subject of the bugreport, it *really* contains Czech (cs.po) debconf translation for *slbackup*. /me

Processed: Re: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308586 patch Bug#308586: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt Tags were: experimental Tags added: patch Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-apt. Unknown command or

Bug#308586: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt

tags 308586 patch Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-apt. Unpacking python2.3-apt (from .../python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite

Bug#308545:

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:04:59AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: You might have the wrong bug number: Bug#308545: azureus: Azureus doesnt start Ah, off by one error. Today's not my day :-( I'm deeply sorry for the noise. -- Miroslav Kure -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Processed: 308634 is a security bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308634 security Bug#308634: kernel-source-2.6.8: A locally exploitable flaw to gain root. There were no tags set. Tags added: security thanks, control, and have a nice day Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#281070: marked as done (libapache-mod-dynvhost: /usr/lib/apache/1.3/510mod_dynvhost.info contains a bad LoadModule line)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#228867: marked as done (mod_dynvhost breaks apaches upgrades)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Processed: please check if they apply to version 3.4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 275394 request-tracker3.4 Bug#275394: Status field not honoured when replying to ticket. Warning: Unknown package 'request-tracker3.2' Bug reassigned from package `request-tracker3.2' to `request-tracker3.4'. reassign 275396

Processed: RoM; Renamed to libsaxon-java

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 122556 libsaxon-java Bug#122556: lib-saxon-java: Saxon is MPL, works with kaffe; please move to main Bug reassigned from package `lib-saxon-java' to `libsaxon-java'. reassign 141334 libsaxon-java Bug#141334: lib-saxon-java: doesn't handle

Bug#288148: marked as done (keep kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64 out of sarge)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:02:51 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#308634: kernel-source-2.6.8: A locally exploitable flaw to gain root.

On Wed, 11 May 2005 19:40:15 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole A locally exploitable flaw has been found in the Linux ELF binary format loader's core dump function that allows local users to gain root

Bug#266291: marked as done (request-tracker3.2: NOT FOR SARGE)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:01:03 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line RT 3.2 removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#298343: marked as done (request-tracker3.2: Apache2 forks leek memory)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:01:03 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line RT 3.2 removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#306739: marked as done (jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:03:08 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#307098: KDE 3.4 conflics with Gnome 2.10

On Wednesday 11 May 2005 19:53, Adeodato Simó wrote: * cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) [Wed, 11 May 2005 19:33:07 +0200]: off-topic context=there was a CDD devcamp[1] in Valencia last week, where I met, adeo, and lots of other Debianers Hey cobaco! :) hola (see I learned some Spanish :) /me

Bug#308410: marked as done (fails to uninstall)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308410: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#308409: marked as done (missing dependency)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308409: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper

Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.28-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of cdbs_0.4.28-1 on mix by sbuild/i386 1.170.5 Build started at 20050511-1353 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-xsl

Bug#249106: marked as done (FTBFS: Refuses to build as root)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 22:16:00 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing bugs fixed in NMUs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#246566: marked as done (Rcs missing build dependency on autoconf.)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 22:16:00 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing bugs fixed in NMUs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#305156: marked as done (amule: linked against libssl)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305156: fixed in amule 2.0.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#307782: marked as done (amule: fails to install due to unmet dependencies)

Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307782: fixed in amule 2.0.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#308620: pair of security holes

Well aware. Of course Mozilla's silly security policies prevent me from viewing the bug's making a release before MoFo does. But as soon as 1.0.4 is released I'll have it packaged in short order. * Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: grave

Bug#308667: License does not allow modifications, yet source code is modified

Hello Udi, May Debian redistribute binaries built from modified source code? The Debian Free Software Guidelines state that The license must explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source code. but it seems to me this must apply to software in the non-free archive as well.

Bug#308591: marked as done (apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near `www-sivut.`)

Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 10:28:46 +1000 (EST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308591: apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near `www-sivut.` has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#308181: marked as done (nec: FTBFS: couldn't open the intermediate file)

Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line nec: FTBFS: couldn't open the intermediate file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#308724: CAN-2005-1263: ELF core dump privilege elevation

Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.11.9 The relevent changes for this CAN appear to be solely in ./fs/binfmt_elf.c. There is also a memset in ./drivers/char/drm/drm_ioctl.c

Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing dependency)

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:34:57PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: There appear to be a number of undocumented changes, relative to -4, which are not documentation fixes. :/ Would you remind removing them and uploading a -4sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates, or else explain why these changes

Bug#308246: file conflicts in uniconf-tools, fonty-rg

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 08:57:50AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:44:11AM -0400, Simon Law wrote: Can you upload fonty-rg's /usr/bin/uni as /usr/bin/utf8 instead? In UniConf, the /usr/bin/uni tool queries and manages a database, while in fonty-rg, it's used just

Bug#278495: perl can be in an unusable state during upgrade

Ok, after further analysis on IRC, it seems that the error in Bill's upgrade happens only because the packages are being removed, and apt removed some packages in an order that was not consistent with the declared dependencies. Since there's no reason to think apt is playing fast and loose with

Bug#308733: rsync 2.6.4 server fails with rsync error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(570)

Package: rsync Version: 2.6.4-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I upgraded from 2.6.4-2 to 2.6.4-4 on my local network server and now my client gets an error: $ rsync mydesktop:: rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data

Bug#308620: pair of security holes

* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Eric Dorland wrote: Well aware. Of course Mozilla's silly security policies prevent me from viewing the bug's making a release before MoFo does. But as soon as 1.0.4 is released I'll have it packaged in short order. BTW, do you know if these only

Bug#308664: marked as done (cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper)

: Automatic build of cdbs_0.4.28-1 on mix by sbuild/i386 1.170.5 Build started at 20050511-1353 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-xsl, xsltproc, springgraph, ocaml-native-compilers | ocaml, realpath, fakeroot, python-dev [...] -e s