Bug#307663: marked as done (PostgreSQL Character Conversion and tsearch2 Module Vulnerabilities)
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 22:52:38 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line PostgreSQL Character Conversion and tsearch2 Module Vulnerabilities has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 14:42:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 04 07:42:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTL4b-00043b-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 07:42:01 -0700 Received: from mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com ([2001:470:1f00:907:20d:87ff:fe3c:98c8]) by polaris.galacticasoftware.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DTL4a-hC-UA; Wed, 04 May 2005 09:42:00 -0500 Received: from adamm by mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DTL4r-0007Y5-V6; Wed, 04 May 2005 09:42:17 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PostgreSQL Character Conversion and tsearch2 Module Vulnerabilities X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11 Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 09:42:17 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: postgresql Severity: grave Tags: security sarge From: http://secunia.com/advisories/15217/ Workarounds (aka, fixes :) http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.315 DESCRIPTION: Two vulnerabilities have been reported in PostgreSQL, which can be exploited by malicious users to cause a DoS (Denial of Service) or potentially gain escalated privileges. 1) Missing validation of arguments supplied to the functions supporting client-to-server character set conversion can be exploited by unprivileged users when calling the functions from SQL commands. The vulnerability affects versions 7.3.* through 8.0.*. 2) The contrib/tsearch2 module misdeclares the return type of several functions, which breaks the type safety of internal. The impact has reportedly not been investigated, but can at least crash the backend. The vulnerability affects versions 7.4 and later with the contrib/tsearch2 module installed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages postgresql depends on: ii adduser 3.63Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf 1.4.48 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii dpkg 1.10.27 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcomerr2 1.37-2 common error description library ii libkrb53 1.3.6-3 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libperl5.8 5.8.4-8 Shared Perl library ii libpq3 7.4.7-5 PostgreSQL C client library ii libreadline4 4.3-15 GNU readline and history libraries ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3SSL shared libraries ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent ii postgresql-clien 7.4.7-5 front-end programs for PostgreSQL ii procps 1:3.2.5-1 /proc file system utilities ii python2.32.3.5-2 An interactive high-level object-o ii ucf 1.18Update Configuration File: preserv ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 307663-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 05:52:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 22:52:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVk99-00017Q-00; Tue, 10
Bug#308567: lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing files
Package: lablgtk2 Version: 2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 27 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), ocaml-3.08.3, libncurses5-dev, xlibs|xlib6g, debhelper, libgtk2.0-dev, libgtkgl2.0-dev, libglade2-dev, liblablgl-ocaml-dev (= 1.01-1), librsvg2-dev, libgnomecanvas2-dev, libgtkspell-dev, libgnomeui-dev, libpanel-applet2-dev, dpatch, chrpath [...] dh_movefiles -s dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablgnomecanvas.cmxa not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablgnomeui.cmxa not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablpanel.cmxa not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablrsvg.cmxa not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablgnomecanvas.a not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablgnomeui.a not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablpanel.a not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablrsvg.a not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/rsvg.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/gnomeCanvas.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/gnoCanvas.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/gnomeDruid.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/gnoDruid.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/panel.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 [...] The full log can be found on http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=lablgtk2ver=2.4.0%2B2005.02.18-2arch=s390stamp=1115780682file=logas=raw Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 297706
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 297706 patch Bug#297706: package-removal fails due to failure of post-removal script There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308246: file conflicts in uniconf-tools, fonty-rg
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:44:11AM -0400, Simon Law wrote: Hi Radovan, Can you upload fonty-rg's /usr/bin/uni as /usr/bin/utf8 instead? In UniConf, the /usr/bin/uni tool queries and manages a database, while in fonty-rg, it's used just for switching console-fonts. ok, I'll do a new version Simon -- --- | Radovan Garabík http://kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk/~garabik/ | | __..--^^^--..__garabik @ kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk | --- Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus. Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297706: libapache-mod-witch: patch for postrm problem
Package: libapache-mod-witch
Version: 0.0.4
Followup-For: Bug #297706
sed uses \( and \) for grouping, not ( ). Here's a patch that fixes this
problem.
--- libapache-mod-witch-0.0.4/debian/postrm.orig2002-09-16
11:36:39.0 -0700
+++ libapache-mod-witch-0.0.4/debian/postrm 2005-05-10 23:50:07.0
-0700
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
killconf () {
tmpfile=/etc/apache/httpd.conf.tmp.$$
cat /etc/apache/httpd.conf |\
-sed 's/^(LoadModule.*mod_witch\.so)/#\1/' $tmpfile
+sed 's/^\(LoadModule.*mod_witch\.so\)/#\1/' $tmpfile
mv -f $tmpfile /etc/apache/httpd.conf
ask_restart
}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Versions of packages libapache-mod-witch depends on:
pn apache-commonNot found.
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pn libdb4.1 Not found.
ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Regarding Bug#308495
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 308495 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#308495: general: pmud does not turn off display Changed Bug submitter from Jeffrey B. Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Still affects thee sarge version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 215773 - woody Bug#215773: on fresh install, groups postdrop and postfix created with gid1000 Tags were: woody Bug#162941: postfix: During install groupadd prompts for Password and hangs Tags removed: woody thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302734: marked as done (libgimp-perl: protocol error (1))
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 03:32:19 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302734: fixed in libgimp-perl 2.0.dfsg-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 17:45:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 09:45:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sklave3.rackland.de [213.133.101.23] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHmh4-0003Ru-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 09:45:58 -0800 Received: from andromeda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by sklave3.rackland.de (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with BSMTP id j32Hjswc022386; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:45:54 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by andromeda.dresden.danisch.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-15) id j32HjoK8007058; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:45:50 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Hadmut Danisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgimp-perl: protocol error (1) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.1 Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:45:50 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgimp-perl Version: 2.0.dfsg-4 Severity: important Hi, when I run a simple program like #!/usr/bin/perl use Gimp; Gimp::init(); (or Gimp::main() ) I just get the error message protocol error (1) at /usr/lib/perl5/Gimp/Net.pm line 67. regards Hadmut -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-danisch-p4-intel Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libgimp-perl depends on: ii gimp2.2.4-2 The GNU Image Manipulation Program ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgimp2.0 2.2.4-2 Libraries necessary to run the GIM ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2-perl1:1.061-1Perl interface to the 2.x series o ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii pdl 1:2.4.1-1The perl data language: Perl exten ii perl5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.4] 5.8.4-8 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 302734-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 07:44:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 00:44:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVltM-0004gf-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 00:44:28 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVlhb-000793-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 03:32:19 -0400 From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302734: fixed in libgimp-perl 2.0.dfsg-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 03:32:19 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: libgimp-perl Source-Version: 2.0.dfsg-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libgimp-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libgimp-perl_2.0.dfsg-5.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgimp-perl/libgimp-perl_2.0.dfsg-5.diff.gz libgimp-perl_2.0.dfsg-5.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgimp-perl/libgimp-perl_2.0.dfsg-5.dsc libgimp-perl_2.0.dfsg-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libg/libgimp-perl/libgimp-perl_2.0.dfsg-5_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between
Bug#308390: marked as done (protocol error)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 03:32:19 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#302734: fixed in libgimp-perl 2.0.dfsg-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 22:55:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 15:55:51 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVHAF-0001bY-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 15:55:51 -0700
Received: from clipper.ens.fr (clipper-gw.ens.fr [129.199.1.22])
by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.2/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id j49MtJL9020878
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 00:55:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by clipper.ens.fr (8.13.1/jb-1.1)
id j49MtJ2j007649 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 00:55:19
+0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: clipper.ens.fr: glisse owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:55:19 +0200 (MEST)
From: Marc Glisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: protocol error
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.10
(nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 10 May 2005 00:55:20 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libgimp-perl
Version: 2.0.dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
any example using libgimp-perl fails with a protocol error message, as
shown in 2 other bug reports.
Gimp/Config.pm contains a line:
GIMP = q[],
Net/Net.pm contains:
exec $Gimp::Config{GIMP},
Both do not go well together apparently. Either the GIMP line should be
fixed, or the environment should be querried at some point to look for
gimp. The easiest way around I have found is this:
--- debian/rules.orig 2005-05-10 00:18:00.481533507 +0200
+++ debian/rules2005-05-10 00:07:30.315113340 +0200
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
- $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor PREFIX=/usr
+ $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor PREFIX=/usr GIMP=/usr/bin/gimp
$(MAKE) OPTIMIZE=$(CFLAGS)
touch build-stamp
I must however warn you that I know nothing about either perl or gimp, so
you might want to check it. For me it seems to allow the examples in
/usr/share/doc/libgimp-perl/examples to work properly again (by the way,
these examples should look for perl in /usr/bin and not /opt/bin).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (70, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libgimp-perl depends on:
ii gimp2.2.6-1 The GNU Image Manipulation Program
ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgimp2.0 2.2.6-1 Libraries necessary to run the GIM
ii libglib2.0-02.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2-perl1:1.081-1Perl interface to the 2.x series o
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii pdl 1:2.4.2-2perl data language: Perl extension
ii perl5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.4] 5.8.4-8 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 302734-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 07:44:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 00:44:28 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVltM-0004gf-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 00:44:28 -0700
Received: from
Bug#308575: babel_0.10.2-1 (unstable): FTBFS, java interpreter segfaults
Package: babel
Version: 0.10.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of babel_0.10.2-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 27
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.67), gcc-3.4 | c-compiler, g77-3.4 |
fortran-compiler, g++-3.4 | c++-compiler, kaffe | java-virtual-machine,
kaffe-dev, python, python2.4, python2.4-dev, python2.4-numeric, libltdl3-dev,
gcj-3.4 | java-compiler, fastjar, gjdoc, libxerces2-java, libgetopt-java,
libxalan2-java, libxml2-dev
[...]
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-21
linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.6-3 g++-3.3_1:3.3.6-3
binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.6-3 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.6-3
[...]
cd .. /usr/bin/make am--refresh
make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime'
cd . /bin/sh /build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime/config/disabled autoconf
autoconf has been disabled
make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime'
make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime'
cd . /bin/sh /build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime/config/disabled autoconf
autoconf has been disabled
make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime'
sed -e 's,@@DIR@@,'`pwd`',g' ./libsidl.scl.in libsidl.scl
/bin/sh ../../bin/babel --suppress-timestamp --no-default-repository\
--generate-sidl-stdlib --vpath=. ./sidl.sidl
.../../bin/babel: line 251: 9087 Segmentation fault ${THIS_JAVA}
gov.llnl.babel.CommandLineDriver ${REPOSITORY_PATH} ${args}
make[4]: *** [babel-stamp] Error 139
make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime/sidl'
make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime/sidl'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2'
make: *** [build] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20050511-0808
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
[...]
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site
Il giorno mar, 10/05/2005 alle 12.34 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto: Hi, could you please send me the list of the zope packages (with version numbers) that you have installed on your system? Here it is: zope-btreefolder2 1.0.1-5 zope-cmf1.41.4.7-4 zope-cmfactionicons1:0.9-2 zope-cmfcalendar1.41.4.7-4 zope-cmfcore1.41.4.7-4 zope-cmfdefault1.4 1.4.7-4 zope-cmfformcontroller 1.0.3-3 zope-cmfplone 2.0.4-3 zope-cmfquickinstallertool 1.5.0-2 zope-cmftopic1.4 1.4.7-4 zope-dcworkflow1.4.7-4 zope-epoz 0.9.0-1 zope-exuserfolder 0.50.0-3 zope-filesystemsite1.3-1 zope-formulator1.7.0-5 zope-groupuserfolder 3.1.1-3 zope-kupu 1.1.1-2 zope-plonetranslations 0.6-2 zope-psycopgda 1.1.18-1 zope-pts 1.2-rc1-2 zope-speedpack 0.3-2 zope-zwiki 0.37.0-4 zope2.72.7.5-1 zope2.7-archetypes 1.3.1-1 zope2.7-generator 1.3.1-1 zope2.7-mimetypesregistry 1.3.1-1 zope2.7-portaltransforms 1.3.1-1 zope2.7-validation 1.3.1-1 I've also got two products installed (and stow'ed) from .tar.gz: ZMS2.3.2-b45 - http://www.zms-publishing.com/index_eng.html CMFpgForum 1.0.0-beta - http://www.emergence.com/WhatWeOffer/products/CMFpgForum (Note: there's a .deb package for both, even if the zope-zms one is not updated to the latest version of the software). The problem I've reported persists even if I try to add a Plone site into a clean Zope instance. Regards, and thanks, alceste -- Alceste Scalas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Promotux Informatica - http://www.promotux.it/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Still open in sarge, i want version-tracking in the BTS!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 308390 Bug#308390: protocol error Bug#302734: libgimp-perl: protocol error (1) Bug#307856: libgimp-perl won't init: protocol error Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 308390 - sid Bug#308390: protocol error Tags were: sarge sid patch confirmed Bug#302734: libgimp-perl: protocol error (1) Bug#307856: libgimp-perl won't init: protocol error Tags removed: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308556: RM: partimage [!i386] -- RoM; code has issues on a number of platforms
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 02:09:49PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: Why is this bug filed as RoM? Should I change it? You should not say Request of Maintainer when it isn't a request of the maintainer, that's misrepresenting the facts. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site
Hi Alceste, after looking at the source code of CMFCore.TypesTool (line 535 and below) I suspect your problem is caused by one of these packages: zope-exuserfolder 0.50.0-3 zope-psycopgda 1.1.18-1 zope-zwiki 0.37.0-4 ZMS CMFpgForum. Could you please try to remove those (one for time, this would be better), restart the instance and try to add a plone site? Thanks for your debug, Fabio -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Studio Tranchitella Assoc. Professionale http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site
Il giorno mer, 11/05/2005 alle 10.10 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto: Hi Alceste, after looking at the source code of CMFCore.TypesTool (line 535 and below) I suspect your problem is caused by one of these packages: zope-exuserfolder 0.50.0-3 zope-psycopgda 1.1.18-1 zope-zwiki 0.37.0-4 ZMS CMFpgForum. Yup, the problem was related to CMFpgForum. I've just seen #261207, and installing the latest version of CMFpgForum from .tar.gz (1.0.0rc2, I didn't know about it) solves the problem. Of course it's my fault, since zope-cmfpgforum_1.0.0b-2_all.deb requires zope-cmf (and *not* zope-cmf1.4, maybe it was untested at the time). Sorry, and thanks for you help. Regards, and keep up the good work, alceste -- Alceste Scalas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Promotux Informatica - http://www.promotux.it/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308453: marked as done (plone: Fails to add new Plone site)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:38:44 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 09:51:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 02:51:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from host148-12.pool8291.interbusiness.it (localhost.localdomain) [82.91.12.148] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVRP9-0003Dw-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 02:51:56 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (jabber.promotux.it [192.168.0.10]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBC51A51; Tue, 10 May 2005 11:53:44 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alceste Scalas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: plone: Fails to add new Plone site X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:57:12 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: plone Version: 2.0.4-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When adding a Default or Archetypes Plone site to a Zope instance, I get the following error: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Site Error An error was encountered while publishing this resource. Error Type: AttributeError Error Value: 'str' object has no attribute 'get' Troubleshooting Suggestions * The URL may be incorrect. * The parameters passed to this resource may be incorrect. * A resource that this resource relies on may be encountering an error. For more detailed information about the error, please refer to the error log. If the error persists please contact the site maintainer. Thank you for your patience. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The site error_log reports: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Traceback (innermost last): Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 101, in publish Module ZPublisher.mapply, line 88, in mapply Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 39, in call_object Module Products.CMFPlone.Portal, line 458, in manage_addSite Module Products.CMFPlone.Portal, line 430, in create Module Products.CMFPlone.Portal, line 371, in setupPlone Module Products.CMFPlone.Portal, line 138, in customizePortalTypes Module Products.CMFCore.TypesTool, line 582, in manage_addTypeInformation Module Products.CMFCore.TypesTool, line 551, in listDefaultTypeInformation AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'get' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I'm using Zope 2.7, and I've symlinked all the products from /usr/lib/zope/lib/python/Products/ and /usr/share/zope/Producs/ under /usr/lib/zope2.7/lib/python/Products/. I've got no problems using the plain CMF. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages plone depends on: ii zope-cmfplone 2.0.4-3content management system based on -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 308453-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 08:39:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 01:39:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from diana.kobold.it [81.208.30.142] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVmkb-0002Pf-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 01:39:30 -0700 Received: from matilde.dmgroup.it ([81.208.30.130] helo=[10.3.0.56]) by diana.kobold.it with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.50) id 1DVmkP-0005Iy-45; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:39:18 +0200 Subject: Re: Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site From: Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alceste Scalas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-IKlxSyPFM4IzK7cYN/4E Organization:
Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir
Hi all, The technical details of why debconf is not able to present a default value with the readline frontend, when the recommended literm-readline-gnu-perl is not installed, or with the teletype frontend, are already explained in bug #183970. I know of no better Just a silly question: why debconf permits to select the readline frontend if this package is not installed? It is quite embarrassing. Anyway, I have never heard about this package so far... Ferenc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: quotatool bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 258289 289812 Bug#258289: quotatool: does not work with xfs if non-xfs quotas are supported by the kernel Bug#289812: quotatool: Assumes XFS quotas if the kernel supports them Merged 258289 289812. tags 289812 fixed-upstream Bug#289812: quotatool: Assumes XFS quotas if the kernel supports them There were no tags set. Bug#258289: quotatool: does not work with xfs if non-xfs quotas are supported by the kernel Tags added: fixed-upstream severity 289812 grave Bug#289812: quotatool: Assumes XFS quotas if the kernel supports them Bug#258289: quotatool: does not work with xfs if non-xfs quotas are supported by the kernel Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303352: trouble with 'apropos' 'tea'
Package: tea Version: 9.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #303352 It's the curse of 'dak'. The man page still thinks 'teaed' is called 'tea'. % apropos ^tea | grep text tea (1) - small text editor for gnome2 teaed (1)- small text editor for gnome2 Any 'tea' page? % man tea | wc No manual entry for tea 0 0 0 Howbout 'teaed'? % man teaed | wc 33 1261214 And how does it start? man teaed | head | nl | sed '/^ *$/d' 1 TEA(1) TEA(1) 2 NAME 3 tea - small text editor for gnome2 4 SYNOPSIS 5 tea files ...which is why 'apropos' still lists 'tea'. It's a pity too, tea is a much nicer name than teaed. Maybe a separator or some capitals would improve its look: tea.ed, tea-ed, teaED, teaEd, teaE, tea-argh, ... HTH... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages tea depends on: ii libaspell150.60.2+20050121-2 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti ii libatk1.0-01.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-02.6.4-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir
Hi, If you really think we should not mention the default value there that's okay but on the other side I request that the behaviour of the readline frontend is changed to at least present the user the current/default value if the libterm-readline-gnu-perl package is not installed. And make it very clear that hitting return means submitting an empty value. It does. It prompts as follows: Directory to dump databases: _ Barring some note that tells them there is a default, noone would expect hitting enter to result in some default value here[1]. The convention is that this means there is a default value: Directory to dump databases [/var/backups/slapd-VERSION]: _ Or this: Directory to dump databases: /var/backups/slapd-VERSION_ I suggest that the frontend should explicitly indicate if it cannot handle default values, although the there is one, e.g. like this: Default value: /var/backups/slapd-VERSION *** WARNING! You have to type the default value verbatim to use it! Directory to dump databases: _ I feel important to first display the default value, and then the warning message. (Please rephrase it if needed, as I am not a native English.) Another solution could be if the frontend asks a yes/no question to use the default value, if the question has one. Debconf uses one or the other of these conventions when possible. Only experienced users use these frontends, and experienced users are expected to be aware of these conventions. I use readline frontend because I use debian since 5-6 years, and that time this was the only one with which I could look what happened so far (I do not know whether there are others now). And I was not aware that my frontend do not support default values. Ferenc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:17:27PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: tags 307816 -sid thanks That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report, the package in sarge is not really usable. Agreed. On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:16:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: cweb Severity: grave It might be the best to simply remove the cweb package since the Conflicts/Replaces/Provides in tetex-bin should be enough. That doesn't provide a usable automatic transition from woody, though. cweb in woody recommends tetex-bin. People who had cweb installed without having as well tetex-bin installed fulfill the following two points: - they have not fulfilled recommends on their system - they don't seem to really use cweb They may use it for compiling other people's cweb source code without wanting to pretty-print it. OK, I didn't think of this. Please see my other email on the best fix. Agreed. Julian cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht
Package: ht Severity: grave Tags: security, patch Justification: user security hole Gentoo has reported several security issues in ht: 1. An integer overflow in the ELF segment parsing 2. Some buffer overflows in the PE parser. Fixes: (Please double check) 1: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/hte/HT%20Editor/cplus-dem.c?r1=1.1r2=1.2diff_format=u http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/hte/HT%20Editor/htanaly.cc?r1=1.45r2=1.46diff_format=u http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/hte/HT%20Editor/htcoff.cc?r1=1.14r2=1.15diff_format=u http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/hte/HT%20Editor/htelf.cc?r1=1.17r2=1.18diff_format=u http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/hte/HT%20Editor/htpef.cc?r1=1.6r2=1.7diff_format=u http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/hte/HT%20Editor/htpeimp.cc?r1=1.17r2=1.18diff_format=u 2: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/hte/HT%20Editor/htperes.cc?r1=1.8r2=1.9diff_format=u Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308586: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt
Package: python2.3-apt Version: 0.6.11 Severity: serious Tags: experimental -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-apt. Unpacking python2.3-apt (from .../python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (130, 'unstable'), (120, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-bohr Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages python2.3-apt depends on: pn libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.1Not found. pn libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.9 Not found. ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 pn python2.3Not found. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCgdJI+z+IwlXqWf4RAmAGAJ9PCW58jOYvXn2hQXgdCL6jrTGKQACeJT2Q wBLt/z0UcXkQ5QAlkqOR0N0= =Gq59 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: ... So I suggest letting: * tetex-bin_2.0.2-29 (and packages built from it: libkpathsea3 and libkpathsea-dev) * cweb_3.64.debian-2 into sarge. I agree, this is a better solution than my suggestion. Julian cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289812: marked as done (quotatool: Assumes XFS quotas if the kernel supports them)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258289: fixed in quotatool 1.4.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 08:07:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 00:07:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from belgarion.it.net.au [203.8.116.1] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoH3S-0001AX-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:07:07 -0800 Received: from it.net.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [202.148.68.99]) by belgarion.it.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j0B872ZA016606 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:07:02 +0800 Received: from talen.it.net.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by it.net.au (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j0B86nuk024916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:06:49 +0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by talen.it.net.au (8.13.2/8.13.2/Submit) id j0B86nMD024915; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:06:49 +0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Authentication-Warning: talen.it.net.au: srd set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stephen R. Darragh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: quotatool: Assumes XFS quotas if the kernel supports them X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:06:49 +0800 X-Virus-Scanned: Scanned by F-Secure Antivirus X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 127.0.0.1 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: quotatool Version: 1.4.4-1 Severity: important quotatool assumes that if the kernel supports XFS quotas, then the quota format for all filesystems (XFS or not) is XFS. This breaks its usability on systems (like ours) with mixed filesystems. Or anyone who just happens to have XFS quota support in the kernel without any XFS filesystems. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10it-srd Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages quotatool depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 258289-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 09:54:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 02:54:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVnvV-0001kx-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 02:54:49 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVno6-0007op-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#258289: fixed in quotatool 1.4.7-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: quotatool Source-Version: 1.4.7-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of quotatool, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: quotatool_1.4.7-1.diff.gz to pool/main/q/quotatool/quotatool_1.4.7-1.diff.gz quotatool_1.4.7-1.dsc to pool/main/q/quotatool/quotatool_1.4.7-1.dsc quotatool_1.4.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/q/quotatool/quotatool_1.4.7-1_i386.deb quotatool_1.4.7.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/q/quotatool/quotatool_1.4.7.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Bug#308591: apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near `www-sivut.`
Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.33-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Output from dpkg --configure apache-ssl: Setting up apache-ssl (1.3.33-5) ... Template parse error near `www-sivut.', in stanza #5 of /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache-ssl.templates dpkg: error processing apache-ssl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 255 Errors were encountered while processing: apache-ssl -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9.2010043 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB) Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on: ii apache-common 1.3.33-5 support files for all Apache webse ii debconf 1.4.49 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.10.27 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-18Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libmagic1 4.12-1 File type determination library us ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility ii mime-support3.33-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii openssl 0.9.7g-1 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii perl5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii ssl-cert1.0-11 Simple debconf wrapper for openssl -- debconf information: * apache-ssl/server-name: apu.exley.net * apache-ssl/enable-suexec: false * apache-ssl/document-root: /var/www * apache-ssl/server-admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * apache-ssl/init: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258289: marked as done (quotatool: does not work with xfs if non-xfs quotas are supported by the kernel)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258289: fixed in quotatool 1.4.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2004 18:16:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 08 11:16:41 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vwisb7.vkw.tu-dresden.de [141.30.51.183] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BidRp-00070t-00; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 11:16:41 -0700 Received: from [141.30.51.183] (helo=localhost) by vwisb7.vkw.tu-dresden.de with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BidRm-0004Gu-Ip for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 20:16:38 +0200 Received: by localhost (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:19:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:19:08 +0200 From: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: quotatool: does not work with xfs if non-xfs quotas are supported by the kernel Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.61 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: quotatool Severity: important Hello, quotatool does not work if both kind of quotas are supported by the kernel and the actual filesystem is xfs. The attached patch seems to fix the problem. Best Regards, Torsten -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (986, 'testing'), (87, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 258289-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 09:54:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 02:54:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVnvV-0001kx-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 02:54:49 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVno6-0007op-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#258289: fixed in quotatool 1.4.7-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: quotatool Source-Version: 1.4.7-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of quotatool, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: quotatool_1.4.7-1.diff.gz to pool/main/q/quotatool/quotatool_1.4.7-1.diff.gz quotatool_1.4.7-1.dsc to pool/main/q/quotatool/quotatool_1.4.7-1.dsc quotatool_1.4.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/q/quotatool/quotatool_1.4.7-1_i386.deb quotatool_1.4.7.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/q/quotatool/quotatool_1.4.7.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated quotatool package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:24:21 +0200 Source: quotatool Binary: quotatool Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.4.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: quotatool - tool to edit disk quotas from the command line Closes: 258289 289812
Bug#308548: marked as done (apache-ssl: dpkg: error processing apache-ssl (--configure))
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 05:02:24 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308548: fixed in apache 1.3.33-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 22:33:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 15:33:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from athene.jamux.com [65.222.215.34] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVdI1-0003zm-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 15:33:21 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athene.jamux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628BF3B8ED for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 18:33:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from athene.jamux.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athene [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13666-04-2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 18:33:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by athene.jamux.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F0E063B913; Tue, 10 May 2005 18:33:18 -0400 (EDT) From: John A. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apache-ssl: dpkg: error processing apache-ssl (--configure) X-Debbugs-CC: John A. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Attribution: jam X-Request-PGP: http://www.tux.org/~jam/jam-gpg-keys.html X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5F05 15CF 05D2 E8D3 E7FA 8C6A 504B EFD5 BFE2 5F2F Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 18:33:09 -0400 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary==-=-=; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.33-5 Severity: serious Setting up apache-ssl (1.3.33-5) ... Template parse error near `www-sivut.', in stanza #5 of /var/lib/dpkg/info/= apache-ssl.templates dpkg: error processing apache-ssl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 255 Errors were encountered while processing: apache-ssl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying to recover: Setting up apache-ssl (1.3.33-5) ... Template parse error near `www-sivut.', in stanza #5 of /var/lib/dpkg/info/= apache-ssl.templates dpkg: error processing apache-ssl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 255 Errors were encountered while processing: apache-ssl =2D- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k6 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on: ii apache-common 1.3.33-5 support files for all Apache w= ebse ii debconf 1.4.49 Debian configuration managemen= t sy ii dpkg1.10.27 Package maintenance system for= Deb ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an ii libdb4.24.2.52-18Berkeley v4.2 Database Librari= es [ ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtim= e li ii libmagic1 4.12-1 File type determination librar= y us ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility ii mime-support3.33-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mai= lcap ii openssl 0.9.7g-1 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) bina= ry a ii perl5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extract= ion=20 ii ssl-cert1.0-11 Simple debconf wrapper for ope= nssl =2D- debconf information: apache-ssl/server-name: localhost apache-ssl/server-admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * apache-ssl/enable-suexec: false apache-ssl/init: true apache-ssl/document-root: /var/www --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQBCgTatUEvv1b/iXy8RAvaxAJkBqKQ4u20Kv5nT/1sQsxH6k0TC3wCfa766 ZtsvDbwetS8OQKn1Cn1OE9Y= =9jr3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --=-=-=--
Processed: tagging 308591
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 308591 sid Bug#308591: apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near `www-sivut.` There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing dependency)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 12:34:57 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing dependency) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 12:31:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 04:31:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from s2.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org) [217.158.120.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEnyY-0005PF-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:31:42 -0800 Received: from localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559A5E6D64; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:30:51 + (GMT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03190-17; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:30:51 + (GMT) Received: from hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org (dsl-80-41-7-233.access.as9105.com [80.41.7.233]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FC4E6A9F; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:30:50 + (GMT) Received: from rleigh by hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DEnoG-0001E8-9D; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:21:04 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: quota postrm fails due to missing dependency X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:21:04 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: quota Version: 3.12-4 Severity: important The quota postrm script calls update-inetd without a dependeny on the package containing update-inetd nor a check to see if the script exists. This causes the postrm to fail on systems lacking update-inetd. Suggested fix: 1) Add a netbase dependency or 2) Check if update-inetd exists before trying to run it. In this case (2) is probably the better choice. Regards, Roger -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages quota depends on: ii debconf 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy ii e2fslibs1.37-1 ext2 filesystem libraries ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcomerr2 1.37-1 common error description library ii libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 301370-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 10:35:05 + From michael@fam-meskes.de Wed May 11 03:35:05 2005 Return-path: michael@fam-meskes.de Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVoYS-hs-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 03:35:04 -0700 Received: from p508904D9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de[80.137.4.217] (helo=feivel) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2Dk-1DVoYP26cp-0002og; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:35:01 +0200 Received: by feivel (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 857664AC15; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:34:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:34:57 +0200 From: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-release@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing dependency) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] login:da5cff6069dd6897c77170232368d0ba Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp
Package: postgresl-8.0 Version: 8.0.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole The server creates a socket in /tmp, which is unsafe. Any local user can create a similar socket and impersonate the database server. This bug also breaks backwards comaptibility with old client libraries. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308587 pending Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht Tags were: patch security Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht
tags 308587 pending thanks Hello Moritz! On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:37:10AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Gentoo has reported several security issues in ht: 1. An integer overflow in the ELF segment parsing 2. Some buffer overflows in the PE parser. Fixes: (Please double check) I will, expect an update this evening. Thanks a lot for the fine report, cheers, Flo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 308597 postgresql-8.0 Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp Warning: Unknown package 'postgresl-8.0' Bug reassigned from package `postgresl-8.0' to `postgresql-8.0'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308282: [phpbb2 #308282] upstream patch
On Tue, May 10, 2005 14:55, Ulf Harnhammar wrote:
Protecting against this type of attack is much more complicated than
this. As Jeroen noted, HTML entities are interpreted, so you have to
protect against things like jav#97;script:. Some browsers allow varying
amounts of whitespace inside protocols for some reason, so you have to
protect against java scr ipt : . Upper and lower characters may be an
issue. Finally, some browsers including Mozilla store entities in integers
so they wrap over and start again after 2**32.
So to conclude I think we have to resort to a whitelist of allowed protocols.
kses uses ('http', 'https', 'ftp', 'news', 'nntp', 'telnet', 'gopher',
'mailto') which seems like a reasonable list.
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303352: trouble with 'apropos' 'tea'
Please report this as a different bug report. The reason is that bug 303352 was closed, and I do want to take care of the man page. A Costa wrote: Package: tea Version: 9.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #303352 It's the curse of 'dak'. The man page still thinks 'teaed' is called 'tea'. % apropos ^tea | grep text tea (1) - small text editor for gnome2 teaed (1)- small text editor for gnome2 Any 'tea' page? % man tea | wc No manual entry for tea 0 0 0 Howbout 'teaed'? % man teaed | wc 33 1261214 And how does it start? man teaed | head | nl | sed '/^ *$/d' 1 TEA(1) TEA(1) 2 NAME 3 tea - small text editor for gnome2 4 SYNOPSIS 5 tea files ...which is why 'apropos' still lists 'tea'. It's a pity too, tea is a much nicer name than teaed. Maybe a separator or some capitals would improve its look: tea.ed, tea-ed, teaED, teaEd, teaE, tea-argh, ... HTH... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages tea depends on: ii libaspell150.60.2+20050121-2 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti ii libatk1.0-01.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-02.6.4-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio -- no debconf information -- Regards, Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.Guides.co.il Debian GNU/Linux unstable (SID) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308591: PATCH for apache-ssl.templates
Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.33-5 Followup-For: Bug #308591 OK, here's a short patch which fixes the problem and lets it be installed, although since I don't read Finnish I've got no idea whether I've changed the semantics behind the entry: --- apache-ssl.templates.org2005-05-11 11:54:52.521381145 +0100 +++ apache-ssl.templates2005-05-11 11:55:57.060602985 +0100 @@ -244,8 +244,7 @@ El valor por omisión es establecer este valor a /var/www, en concordancia con el FHS. Si va a utilizar un valor distinto a éste los contenidos de /var/www NO serán modificados o movidos. -Description-fi.ISO-8859-15: Aseta hakemisto, joka sisältää oletusarvoisen apache-ssl-palvelimen -www-sivut. +Description-fi.ISO-8859-15: Aseta hakemisto, joka sisältää oletusarvoisen apache-ssl-palvelimen www-sivut. Oletuksena käytetään tiedostojärjestelmähierarkian (FHS) mukaisesti hakemistoa /var/www. Jos käytät jotain muuta asetusta, hakemiston /var/www sisältöön EI kosketa. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing dependency)
Steve,
There appear to be a number of undocumented changes, relative to -4, which
are not documentation fixes. :/ Would you remind removing them and
uploading a -4sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates, or else explain why these
changes are warranted during the freeze?
Please take my apologies. I was interrupted while working on the package
and simply forgot to remove some parts of the whole patch I applied.
Also I didn't complete the changelog entry. And you probably noticed
that stray patch file lying around in the source tree. Argh!
I fixed this and am currently uploading -6 which should be okay. It
still contains two non-doc patches:
diff -ruN tmp/quota-3.12/quotaops.c quota-3.12/quotaops.c
--- tmp/quota-3.12/quotaops.c 2005-05-11 11:58:35.0 +0200
+++ quota-3.12/quotaops.c 2005-05-11 11:58:16.0 +0200
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
#ident $Copyright: (c) 1980, 1990 Regents of the University of California. $
#ident $Copyright: All rights reserved. $
-#ident $Id: quotaops.c,v 1.14 2004/05/24 19:39:15 jkar8572 Exp $
+#ident $Id: quotaops.c,v 1.16 2005/03/31 11:48:02 jkar8572 Exp $
#include rpc/rpc.h
#include sys/types.h
@@ -72,13 +72,13 @@
time_t now;
time(now);
- if (q-dq_dqb.dqb_bsoftlimit toqb(q-dq_dqb.dqb_curspace) =
q-dq_dqb.dqb_bsoftlimit) {
+ if (q-dq_dqb.dqb_bsoftlimit toqb(q-dq_dqb.dqb_curspace)
q-dq_dqb.dqb_bsoftlimit) {
if (!q-dq_dqb.dqb_btime)
q-dq_dqb.dqb_btime = now + q-dq_h-qh_info.dqi_bgrace;
}
else
q-dq_dqb.dqb_btime = 0;
- if (q-dq_dqb.dqb_isoftlimit q-dq_dqb.dqb_curinodes =
q-dq_dqb.dqb_isoftlimit) {
+ if (q-dq_dqb.dqb_isoftlimit q-dq_dqb.dqb_curinodes
q-dq_dqb.dqb_isoftlimit) {
if (!q-dq_dqb.dqb_itime)
q-dq_dqb.dqb_itime = now + q-dq_h-qh_info.dqi_igrace;
}
[...]
This one fixes the bug that grace time was set when reaching the limit
instead of starting it when exceeding the limit.
diff -ruN tmp/quota-3.12/rquota_client.c quota-3.12/rquota_client.c
--- tmp/quota-3.12/rquota_client.c 2004-02-12 10:45:14.0 +0100
+++ quota-3.12/rquota_client.c 2005-05-11 11:58:16.0 +0200
@@ -149,8 +149,10 @@
* Strip off pathname on nfs mounted dir. Ignore entries of any
* automounter.
*/
- if ((pathname = strchr(fsname_tmp, ':')) == (char *)0 || *(pathname +
1) == '(')
+ if ((pathname = strchr(fsname_tmp, ':')) == (char *)0 || *(pathname +
1) == '(') {
+ free(fsname_tmp);
return -ENOENT;
+ }
*pathname++ = '\0';
This one obviously fixes a memory leak. It's not that serious but I
rather have it fixed for sarge too.
Incidentally, I'm puzzled why quota is calling update-inetd at all from the
postrm, since there's no code in the postinst which adds an inetd entry.
That shouldn't be a blocker for sarge, though.
You're right. That's why I removed the line completely.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 308567
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 308567 sid Bug#308567: lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing files There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#272726: marked as done (nagat can't find /etc/nagios/nagatcfg.dat)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 07:17:03 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#272726: fixed in nagat 1.0a2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2004 16:19:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 21 09:19:15 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from natri.puc.cl (smtp.puc.cl) [146.155.99.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C9nMJ-00024y-00; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:19:15 -0700 Received: (qmail 43348 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2004 16:19:12 - Received: from ranco-1.puc.cl ([146.155.1.40]) (envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by natri-smtp.puc.cl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 21 Sep 2004 16:19:12 - Received: from johann by ranco-1.puc.cl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1C9nMG-0004FI-00; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:19:12 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Johann Henriquez L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nagat can't find /etc/nagios/nagatcfg.dat X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:19:11 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Johann Henriquez L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: nagat Version: 1.0a2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable In a working install and configuration of nagios, nagat refuse to import the configuration and complain about missing /etc/nagios/nagatcfg.dat making this package complete unusable. This is the output when importing: Importing configuration files: # Processing file : /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg.. Warning: fopen(/etc/nagios/nagatcfg.dat): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /usr/share/nagat/plugin_default.inc on line 98 Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /usr/share/nagat/plugin_default.inc on line 99 Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /usr/share/nagat/plugin_default.inc on line 100 ok! # Processing file : /etc/nagios/cgi.cfg.. Warning: fopen(/etc/nagios/nagatcfg.dat): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /usr/share/nagat/plugin_default.inc on line 98 Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /usr/share/nagat/plugin_default.inc on line 99 Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /usr/share/nagat/plugin_default.inc on line 100 ok! Read 2 configuration files. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages nagat depends on: ii apache [httpd]1.3.31-6 Versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii debconf 1.4.30.5 Debian configuration management sy ii nagios-text [nagios] 2:1.2-3.5 A host/service/network monitoring ii php4 4:4.3.8-12 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-gd 4:4.3.8-12 GD module for php4 ii php4-mysql4:4.3.8-12 MySQL module for php4 ii wwwconfig-common 0.0.39 Debian web auto configuration -- debconf information: * nagat/configapache: Apache --- Received: (at 272726-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 11:21:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 04:21:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVpHD-0001p3-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 04:21:19 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVpD5-0007c2-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 07:17:03 -0400 From: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#272726: fixed in nagat 1.0a2-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:17:03 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Processed: reassign 308597 to postgresql-8.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reassign 308597 postgresql-8.0 Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp Bug reassigned from package `postgresql-8.0' to `postgresql-8.0'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopening 301370
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reopen 301370 Bug#301370: quota postrm fails due to missing dependency Bug reopened, originator not changed. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302771: Win XP file listing bug in smbclient and libsmbclient
I finally managed to build samba packages with current upstream SVN sources, which , according to Jerry Carter, fix the Win XP file listing bug. To the bug submitter : coul dyou please test this with the packages you'll find at: http://www.perrier.eu.org/debian/packages/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#304035: llvm: Conflict with /usr/bin/extract from package extract.
Al, Hmm, unfortunately, my build machine isn't actually beefy enough to build llvm. :) So this bug will have to wait for someone with more memory than I have to upload. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308567: this is typical of missing native code compiler support for the arch.
Hello, I believe this is symptomatic of the fact that s390 doesn't have a native code compiler, and indeed looking at the full log i see that those files are listed in : liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev.files without taking in account the non-native-code arches. Samuel, will you fix that ? I believe the solution is to have two .files files, and cat the native one to the other if we are on a native supporting arch. The other solution would be to split out the arch -dev package, maybe cleaner in the long run. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308614: Please rebuild libchipcard2 against libusb (= 2:0.1.10a-9)
Package: libchipcard2 Severity: grave Tags: sarge sid Justification: renders package unusable A problem has been discovered on libusb, which only affect the ARM architecture. It is a memory alignement problem (__packed was forgotten on some structures). The bug has been fixed in libusb, but all packages that need these structures also need to be rebuilt. This has been done for most packages by doing an ARM binary NMU, but it is not possible for libchipcard2 as it would make the package uninstallable (-dev package is arch all). Thus, please upload a new version of libchipcard2 depending on libusb (= 2:0.1.10a-9). Thanks, Aurlien -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305530: re Bug#305530: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-2
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Source-Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ohphone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.diff.gz ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.dsc to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.dsc ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb Fixed only in ohphone, not in ohphone-basic. And, I don't undestand, why you dont' add libpt-plugins-alsa or libpt-plugins-oss? I tried call with my sound card. Without this alsa plugin ohphone silently ended without any error. Was not easy to undestand why. Instead you add video plugins. They may be added as recommends. IMHO, I don't need video plugin to work, ophone must work without it. -- Olleg Samoylov smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Bug#308620: pair of security holes
Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: grave Tags: security I'm sure you already know of these, but for the record, firefox is vulnerale to a pair of new security holes: CAN-2005-1477 The install function in Firefox 1.0.3 allows remote web sites on the browser's whitelist, such as update.mozilla.org or addon.mozilla.org, to execute arbitrary Javascript with chrome privileges, leading to arbitrary code execution on the system when combined with vulnerabilities such as CAN-2005-1476, as demonstrated using a javascript: URL as the package icon and a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack on a vulnerable whitelist site. CAN-2005-1476 Firefox 1.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in other domains by using an IFRAME and causing the browser to navigate to a previous javascript: URL, which can lead to arbitrary code execution when combined with CAN-2005-1477. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on: ii debianutils 2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii fontconfig 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidl0 0.8.5-1 library for parsing CORBA IDL file ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkrb53 1.3.6-3 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-3.0.1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxp6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System printing extension ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc 21.6-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308567: marked as done (lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing files)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 09:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308567: fixed in lablgtk2 2.4.0+2005.02.18-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 06:00:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 23:00:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from arabella.fsi.uni-tuebingen.de (mobilewave.waldi.eu.org) [134.2.220.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVkGN-0002mQ-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 23:00:07 -0700 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3155118933; Wed, 11 May 2005 07:59:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:59:15 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing files Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: lablgtk2 Version: 2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 27 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), ocaml-3.08.3, libncurses5-dev, xlibs|xlib6g, debhelper, libgtk2.0-dev, libgtkgl2.0-dev, libglade2-dev, liblablgl-ocaml-dev (= 1.01-1), librsvg2-dev, libgnomecanvas2-dev, libgtkspell-dev, libgnomeui-dev, libpanel-applet2-dev, dpatch, chrpath [...] dh_movefiles -s dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablgnomecanvas.cmxa not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablgnomeui.cmxa not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablpanel.cmxa not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablrsvg.cmxa not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablgnomecanvas.a not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablgnomeui.a not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablpanel.a not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/lablrsvg.a not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/rsvg.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/gnomeCanvas.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/gnoCanvas.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/gnomeDruid.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/gnoDruid.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/lablgtk2/panel.cmx not found (supposed to put it in liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev) make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 [...] The full log can be found on http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=lablgtk2ver=2.4.0%2B2005.02.18-2arch=s390stamp=1115780682file=logas=raw Bastian --- Received: (at 308567-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 13:26:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 06:26:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVrEd-0003vc-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 06:26:47 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVr6J-0008FK-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 09:18:11
Bug#308625: binutils: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing
Package: binutils Version: 2.15-5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole An integer overflow in parsing ELF segment headers has been found that affects several of binutil's binaries, such as nm, strings or objdump and can potentially be exploited to corrupt the heap and execute arbitrary code. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91398 for a crafted test binary (without malicious effects) and pointers to more information. The bug log contains a patch by SuSE's Sebastian Krahmer, which has been applied upstream. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages binutils depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308624: gdb: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing
Package: gdb Version: 6.3-5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole An integer overflow in parsing ELF segment headers has been found that can potentially be exploited to corrupt the heap and execute arbitrary code. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91398 for a crafted test binary (without malicious effects) and pointers to more information. SuSE supposedly has prepared a patch, but I couldn't find it yet. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gdb depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline44.3-15 GNU readline and history libraries -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290801: marked as done (libflash-mozplugin: crashes with relocation error)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 19:44:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 11:44:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqGK5-0008Gt-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:44:29 -0800 Received: from roulaize.skamp-zo.org (localhost.localdomain) [82.67.109.46] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqGK3-0001Nt-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:44:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 From: Arno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libflash-mozplugin X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:44:25 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libflash-mozplugin Version: 0.4.11-2 Severity: important Hello, I've installed libflash-mozplugin but when I lunch mozilla-firefox on an url with flash, firefox crash. Here is a copy past of what happened : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su Password: tostaky:/home/arno# apt-get update Atteint http://ftp.fr.debian.org sarge/main Packages Atteint http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages Atteint http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Release Atteint http://ftp.fr.debian.org sarge/main Release Atteint http://ftp.fr.debian.org sarge/main Sources Atteint http://ftp.fr.debian.org sarge/main Release Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait tostaky:/home/arno# apt-get dist-upgrade Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait Calcul de la mise à jour... Fait 0 mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 0 non mis à jour. tostaky:/home/arno# apt-get install libflash-mozplugin Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait Les paquets supplémentaires suivants seront installés : libflash0 Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés : libflash-mozplugin libflash0 0 mis à jour, 2 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 0 non mis à jour. Il est nécessaire de prendre 0o/72,8ko dans les archives. Après dépaquetage, 264ko d'espace disque supplémentaires seront utilisés. Souhaitez-vous continuer ? [O/n] Lecture des champs des paquets... Fait Lecture de l'état des paquets... Fait Récupération des rapports de bogue... Fait Sélection du paquet libflash0 précédemment désélectionné. (Lecture de la base de données... 77504 fichiers et répertoires déjà installés.) Dépaquetage de libflash0 (à partir de .../libflash0_0.4.11-2_i386.deb) ... Sélection du paquet libflash-mozplugin précédemment désélectionné. Dépaquetage de libflash-mozplugin (à partir de .../libflash-mozplugin_0.4.11-2_i386.deb) ... Paramétrage de libflash0 (0.4.11-2) ... Paramétrage de libflash-mozplugin (0.4.11-2) ... tostaky:/home/arno# mozilla-firefox [url with flash, i don't put the url of the website i've visited because it's a phone operator and i don't want to make any ad for him :-) ] *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource NP_Initialize New open dsp: Aucun périphérique de ce type SetWindow /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox-bin: relocation error: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflash-mozplugin.so: undefined symbol: XtWindowToWidget tostaky:/home/arno# -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libflash-mozplugin depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libflash0 0.4.11-2 GPL Flash (SWF) Library - shared l -- no debconf information --- Received: (at
Bug#283408: marked as done (libflash: crashes on epiphany for many sites including blockbuster.com)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2004 20:26:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 28 12:26:09 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CYVcX-0007rd-00; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:26:09 -0800 Received: from train.is-a-geek.org ([24.245.9.227]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id 2004112820253801100ld7kpe; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:25:38 + Received: from overrun.is-a-geek.org ([10.0.0.130] helo=localhost) by train.is-a-geek.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CYVbj-0005sM-3h; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:25:19 -0600 Received: from cheako by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CYVbs-XO-5j; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:25:28 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mike Mestnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libflash: crashes on epipany for many sites including blockbuster.com Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:25:27 -0600 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Mike Mestnik) (The Archmage Forever [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libflash-mozplugin Version: 0.4.11-2 Severity: important NP_Initialize New SetWindow epiphany: relocation error: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflash-mozplugin.so: undefined symbol: XtWindowToWidget -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (980, 'unstable'), (900, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libflash-mozplugin depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libflash0 0.4.11-2 GPL Flash (SWF) Library - shared l -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 282062-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 14:57:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 07:57:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVsei-0006tx-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 07:57:48 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVsUY-0001TO-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400 From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: libflash Source-Version: 0.4.11-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libflash, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libflash-dev_0.4.11-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash-dev_0.4.11-4_i386.deb libflash-mozplugin_0.4.11-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash-mozplugin_0.4.11-4_i386.deb libflash-swfplayer_0.4.11-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash-swfplayer_0.4.11-4_i386.deb libflash0_0.4.11-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash0_0.4.11-4_i386.deb libflash_0.4.11-4.diff.gz to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash_0.4.11-4.diff.gz libflash_0.4.11-4.dsc to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash_0.4.11-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL
Bug#308625: binutils: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: An integer overflow in parsing ELF segment headers has been found that affects several of binutil's binaries, such as nm, strings or objdump and can potentially be exploited to corrupt the heap and execute arbitrary code. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91398 for a crafted test binary (without malicious effects) and pointers to more information. The bug log contains a patch by SuSE's Sebastian Krahmer, which has been applied upstream. No, a different patch was applied upstream. I am not clear on whether the other patches are still necessary. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#282062: marked as done (libflash-mozplugin: crashes mozilla on first use)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2004 13:41:17 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 19 05:41:16 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mailgate1.ctxuk.citrix.com (lonximss01.eu.citrix.com)
[195.153.38.121]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CV90m-000544-00; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:41:16 -0800
Received: from LONPEXCH5IM01.eu.citrix.com ([10.30.224.191]) by
lonximss01.eu.citrix.com with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Fri, 19 Nov
2004 13:44:25 -
Received: from canisp.cam.eu.citrix.com ([10.70.129.117]) by
LONPEXCH5IM01.eu.citrix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2656.59)
id WY989S6M; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:40:38 -
From: Toby Speight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libflash-mozplugin: crashes mozilla on first use
X-Debbugs-CC: Toby Speight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:40:37 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lines: 27
Organization: Citrix Systems URL:http://citrix.com/
X-Face:
T,QK^R4['}UwA]bf:YD$2mZF\1%}\FEd/]Io%5T3[|~HUaR:!WOLCic7XE4H`cdc{f|][4bL}yxhypxGygoO0nTK1(t-~7!uKq?qf+UI#D76MmTC%,]?1JK0$75:?
=?Mqf;eq,jx!\!s'e/@$a6CKIM8-
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libflash-mozplugin
Version: 0.4.11-2
Severity: important
/
| $ mozilla http://www.eliica.com/eliica_com.swf
| NP_Initialize
| New
| SetWindow
| /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin: relocation error:
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflash-mozplugin.so: undefined symbol:
XtWindowToWidget
\
I've tried reinstalling the plugin with no success.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB
Versions of packages libflash-mozplugin depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libflash0 0.4.11-2 GPL Flash (SWF) Library - shared l
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 282062-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 14:57:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 07:57:49 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVsei-0006tx-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 07:57:48 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVsUY-0001TO-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400
From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: libflash
Source-Version: 0.4.11-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libflash, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libflash-dev_0.4.11-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash-dev_0.4.11-4_i386.deb
libflash-mozplugin_0.4.11-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash-mozplugin_0.4.11-4_i386.deb
libflash-swfplayer_0.4.11-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash-swfplayer_0.4.11-4_i386.deb
libflash0_0.4.11-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash0_0.4.11-4_i386.deb
libflash_0.4.11-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash_0.4.11-4.diff.gz
libflash_0.4.11-4.dsc
to pool/main/libf/libflash/libflash_0.4.11-4.dsc
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
Bug#308545: Previous mail really contains translation for slbackup
Argh, please don't be fooled by wrong subject of the bugreport, it *really* contains Czech (cs.po) debconf translation for *slbackup*. /me should not send bugreports so late at night :-( -- Miroslav Kure -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308545: Previous mail really contains translation for slbackup
You might have the wrong bug number: Bug#308545: azureus: Azureus doesnt start Cheers, Shaun On 5/11/05, Miroslav Kure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Argh, please don't be fooled by wrong subject of the bugreport, it *really* contains Czech (cs.po) debconf translation for *slbackup*. /me should not send bugreports so late at night :-(
Processed: Re: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308586 patch Bug#308586: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt Tags were: experimental Tags added: patch Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-apt. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Unpacking python2.3-apt (from .../python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb) ... Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb (--unpack): Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308586: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt
tags 308586 patch Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-apt. Unpacking python2.3-apt (from .../python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so', which is also in package python-apt dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Ok, that's my fault. In my tree I've splitted the python 2.3 stuff out of python-apt into its own package. python-apt is now contains only documentation and depends on python2.3-apt. The problem is that we are missing a versioned conflict against older versions of python-apt, which contains the same files as python2.3-apt does now. As a workaround you can upgrade to the latest version of python-apt from experimental, that will pull in python2.3-apt automatically and fix the error you discribe. While we're at it, should we add a Suggests: line for python-apt to python2.3-apt and python2.4-apt? A fix (added Conflict: python-apt ( 0.6.11) to python2.3-apt), is available as [EMAIL PROTECTED]/python-apt--debian--0.6--patch-13 at URL:http://greek0.net/~greek0/archives. Sorry for the problems the missing conflict has caused. Cheers, Greek0 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308545:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:04:59AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: You might have the wrong bug number: Bug#308545: azureus: Azureus doesnt start Ah, off by one error. Today's not my day :-( I'm deeply sorry for the noise. -- Miroslav Kure -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 308634 is a security bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308634 security Bug#308634: kernel-source-2.6.8: A locally exploitable flaw to gain root. There were no tags set. Tags added: security thanks, control, and have a nice day Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#281070: marked as done (libapache-mod-dynvhost: /usr/lib/apache/1.3/510mod_dynvhost.info contains a bad LoadModule line)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2004 17:46:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 13 09:46:58 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from relay-6m.club-internet.fr [194.158.104.45] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CT1zG-0004mo-00; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 09:46:58 -0800 Received: from yoko (l07v-5-69.d1.club-internet.fr [62.34.164.69]) by relay-6m.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6443925616; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:46:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from alain by yoko with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CT1za-0004ed-00; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:47:18 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alain Cabiran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libapache-mod-dynvhost: /usr/lib/apache/1.3/510mod_dynvhost.info contains a bad LoadModule line X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:47:17 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libapache-mod-dynvhost Version: 0.9.6-1 Severity: important -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR Versions of packages libapache-mod-dynvhost depends on: ii apache-common 1.3.31-7 Support files for all Apache webse ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.14.1.25-17Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li -- no debconf information /usr/lib/apache/1.3/510mod_dynvhost.info contains two LoadModule lines. It makes it unconfigurable. Just suppress the first one (loading module in /usr/lib/apache/modules/mod ...) and package works fine. hope this helps, best regards, Alain Cabiran [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 228867-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 18:59:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 11:59:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVwQJ-Rr-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:59:11 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id A8A7964D4F; Wed, 11 May 2005 18:59:02 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADEC24F0C1; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This package has been removed from Debian because its functionality is already in mod_rewrite. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#228867: marked as done (mod_dynvhost breaks apaches upgrades)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2004 12:33:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 21 04:33:28 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hesperos.realmtech.net (hesperos.ertius.org) [216.17.101.96] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AjHY0-0005li-00; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 04:33:28 -0800 Received: from localhost (unknown [203.33.171.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN leserver.ertius.org, Issuer Rob Weir (verified OK)) by hesperos.ertius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FE230DFF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:33:21 +1100 (EST) Received: from ooder.ertius.org (ooder.ertius.org [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN ooder.ertius.org, Issuer Rob Weir (verified OK)) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id F092C7143A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:33:16 +1100 (EST) Received: by ooder.ertius.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66240418C1D; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:42:16 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:42:14 +1100 From: Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_dynvhost breaks apaches upgrades Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 X-Spam-Level: --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libapache-mod-dynvhost Version: 0.9.6-1 Severity: normal Hi, when upgrading apache to 1.3.29.0.1-3 I get the following error: Error: 510mod_dynvhost.info does not have a valid LoadModule entry. Error: the above error list does not permit a safe use of modules-config. Please refer to the documentation on how to fix it or report it to Debian Apache Maling List debian-apache@lists.debian.org if in doubt on how to proceed --=20 Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Do I look like I want a= CC? Words of the day: condor FSF spy International Criminal Court LLNL csys= tems --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFADnOmvQ+DhR5zt80RApoMAJ9pCX72fLMVBh1kiGv+fZ6Bg8s8TQCgmTtk Ai1TsLhqRCm3h3IdbjwPio0= =wIeG -END PGP SIGNATURE- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk-- --- Received: (at 228867-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 18:59:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 11:59:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVwQJ-Rr-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:59:11 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id A8A7964D4F; Wed, 11 May 2005 18:59:02 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADEC24F0C1; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This package has been removed from Debian because its functionality is already in mod_rewrite. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: please check if they apply to version 3.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 275394 request-tracker3.4 Bug#275394: Status field not honoured when replying to ticket. Warning: Unknown package 'request-tracker3.2' Bug reassigned from package `request-tracker3.2' to `request-tracker3.4'. reassign 275396 request-tracker3.4 Bug#275396: Action Notify Requestors and Ccs only notifying Requestors Warning: Unknown package 'request-tracker3.2' Bug reassigned from package `request-tracker3.2' to `request-tracker3.4'. reassign 276522 request-tracker3.4 Bug#276522: request-tracker3.2: rt-setup-database should notice when not run as root Warning: Unknown package 'request-tracker3.2' Bug reassigned from package `request-tracker3.2' to `request-tracker3.4'. reassign 293202 request-tracker3.4 Bug#293202: request-tracker3.2: Display problems with non-englisch languages due to Unicode Characters Warning: Unknown package 'request-tracker3.2' Bug reassigned from package `request-tracker3.2' to `request-tracker3.4'. reassign 298343 request-tracker3.4 Bug#298343: request-tracker3.2: Apache2 forks leek memory Warning: Unknown package 'request-tracker3.2' Bug reassigned from package `request-tracker3.2' to `request-tracker3.4'. reassign 306561 request-tracker3.4 Bug#306561: request-tracker3.2: exim 4.50-6 has pipe_transport unset in system_aliases router Warning: Unknown package 'request-tracker3.2' Bug reassigned from package `request-tracker3.2' to `request-tracker3.4'. reassign 272630 request-tracker3.4 Bug#272630: config hints for /usr/share/doc/rt3.2-clients/README.Debian Warning: Unknown package 'rt3.2-clients' Bug reassigned from package `rt3.2-clients' to `request-tracker3.4'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: RoM; Renamed to libsaxon-java
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 122556 libsaxon-java Bug#122556: lib-saxon-java: Saxon is MPL, works with kaffe; please move to main Bug reassigned from package `lib-saxon-java' to `libsaxon-java'. reassign 141334 libsaxon-java Bug#141334: lib-saxon-java: doesn't handle single curly braces Bug reassigned from package `lib-saxon-java' to `libsaxon-java'. reassign 143346 libsaxon-java Bug#143346: lib-saxon-java: pleave move 10MB of API docs to -doc pkg Bug reassigned from package `lib-saxon-java' to `libsaxon-java'. reassign 151007 libsaxon-java Bug#151007: lib-saxon-java: Changes the namespace of attributes Bug reassigned from package `lib-saxon-java' to `libsaxon-java'. reassign 154155 libsaxon-java Bug#154155: lib-saxon-java: package well behind current stable version Bug reassigned from package `lib-saxon-java' to `libsaxon-java'. reassign 176763 libsaxon-java Bug#176763: please make a -doc package for lib-saxon-java Bug reassigned from package `lib-saxon-java' to `libsaxon-java'. reassign 188460 libsaxon-java Bug#188460: Change name lib-saxon-java to libsaxon-java Bug reassigned from package `lib-saxon-java' to `libsaxon-java'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288148: marked as done (keep kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64 out of sarge)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:02:51 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2005 22:05:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 01 14:05:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lowpingbastards.de (defiant.lowpingbastards.de) [213.178.77.227] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CkrNi-0006yk-00; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:05:55 -0800 Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j01M4tGA008274; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:04:56 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) id j01M4tD8008270; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:04:55 +0100 Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:04:55 +0100 From: Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: keep kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64 out of sarge Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=QNDPHrPUIc00TOLW Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --QNDPHrPUIc00TOLW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64 Version: 2.6.9-4 Severity: grave This package should not be in sarge. Please leave this RC bug report open= =20 until sarge freezes. Kind regards Frederik Schueler --=20 ENOSIG --QNDPHrPUIc00TOLW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB1x6H6n7So0GVSSARApE2AKCkVQ/OJ59t8pdSaofxpXL/O8ge4QCfeSK7 i/whO1cXYZcpu+Bg/AhFpM4= =kprT -END PGP SIGNATURE- --QNDPHrPUIc00TOLW-- --- Received: (at 288148-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 19:03:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 12:03:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVwU1-pg-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:03:01 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 45F3D64D50; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:02:55 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6ED24F0C1; Wed, 11 May 2005 20:02:51 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:02:51 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Removed from unstable. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308634: kernel-source-2.6.8: A locally exploitable flaw to gain root.
On Wed, 11 May 2005 19:40:15 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole A locally exploitable flaw has been found in the Linux ELF binary format loader's core dump function that allows local users to gain root privileges and also execute arbitrary code at kernel privilege level. Version: 2.2 up to and including 2.2.27-rc2, 2.4 up to and including 2.4.31-pre1, 2.6 up to and including 2.6.12-rc4 Exploit, and futher information: http://www.isec.pl/vulnerabilities/isec-0023-coredump.txt Rumor has it, this is CAN-2005-1263. I'll commit the patch (http://mouth.voxel.net/~dilinger/core_dump_vul.patch) to svn once I'm someplace that I can actually log in..
Bug#266291: marked as done (request-tracker3.2: NOT FOR SARGE)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:01:03 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line RT 3.2 removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 12:10:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 05:10:12 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.167] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bx2n6-0007aL-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 05:10:12 -0700 Received: from scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.166] helo=localhost) by tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bx2n4-0001F7-J6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:10:10 +0100 Received: from rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.165]) by localhost (scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 04556-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:10:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bx2n4-0001F2-5j; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:10:10 +0100 Received: from mizar.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.107]) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bx2n4-0006jh-3z; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:10:10 +0100 Received: from stephen by mizar.oucs.ox.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bx2n4-00022y-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:10:10 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: request-tracker3.2: NOT FOR SARGE X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:10:10 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: request-tracker3.2 Version: 3.2.1-1 Severity: normal We do not consider this package to be better than beta quality software at this time. We do not want it to be considered for the next stable release (sarge). There are likely to be many more releases and it would not be good to have a frozen early version of RT3.2 in sarge for its lifetime. The package request-tracker3 is a much more stable, reliable and robust system at this point in time. Stephen Quinney -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 266291-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 19:01:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 12:01:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVwSO-dp-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:01:20 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 24DC364D4F; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:01:13 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BFF654F0C1; Wed, 11 May 2005 20:01:03 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:01:03 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RT 3.2 removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: RT 3.2 has been removed from Debian. Please either use the request-tracker3 or request-tracker3.4 package. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298343: marked as done (request-tracker3.2: Apache2 forks leek memory)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:01:03 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line RT 3.2 removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 20:57:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 12:57:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chthon.slipgate.za.net [67.18.198.18] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D82op-0005oc-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:57:43 -0800 Received: by chthon.slipgate.za.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D110AFE819; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:59:18 + (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Colin Alston [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: request-tracker3.2: Apache2 forks leek memory X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:59:18 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Slipgate-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Slipgate-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: request-tracker3.2 Version: 3.2.2-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Apache2 MPM prefork begins to leek memory at an alarming rate - forks reach around 35MB each at start up expanding to around 50MB in some cases in a few minutes even when request-tracker is not in use. This causes severe problems (obviously) -- Package-specific info: Changed files: etc/request-tracker3.2/RT_Config.pm etc/request-tracker3.2/RT_SiteConfig.pm usr/share/doc/request-tracker3.2/INSTALL.Debian.gz usr/share/doc/request-tracker3.2/README.Debian.gz usr/share/doc/request-tracker3.2/README.gz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-bf2.4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages request-tracker3.2 depends on: ii apache2-mpm-prefork [apache2 2.0.52-3Traditional model for Apache2 ii libapache-dbi-perl 0.94-2 Connect apache server to database ii libapache-mod-perl 1.29.0.3-4 integration of perl with the Apach ii libapache-request-perl 1.1-0.1 Generic Apache Request Library ii libapache-session-perl 1.60-2 Perl modules for keeping persisten ii libapache2-mod-perl2 1.999.20-1 Integration of perl with the Apach ii libcache-cache-perl 1.03-1 Managed caches of persistent infor ii libclass-returnvalue-perl0.52-1 A return-value object that lets yo ii libdbd-mysql-perl2.9003-3A Perl5 database interface to the ii libdbi-perl 1.46-6 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu ii libdbix-searchbuilder-perl 1.22-1 Encapsulate SQL queries and rows i ii libexception-class-perl 1.20-1 a module that allows you to declar ii libfcgi-perl 0.67-1 FastCGI Perl module ii libfreezethaw-perl 0.43-2 converting Perl structures to stri ii libhtml-mason-perl 1:1.26-1HTML::Mason Perl module ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.45-1 A collection of modules that parse ii libhtml-scrubber-perl0.08-1 Perl extension for scrubbing/sanit ii liblocale-maketext-fuzzy-per 0.02-1 Maketext from already interpolated ii liblocale-maketext-lexicon-p 0.47-1 Lexicon-handling backends for Loc ii liblog-dispatch-perl 2.10-1 Dispatches messages to multiple Lo ii libmailtools-perl1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs ii libmime-perl 5.417-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libmldbm-perl2.01-1 Store multidimensional hash struct ii libmodule-versions-report-pe 1.02-1 Report versions of all modules in ii libparams-validate-perl 0.76-1 validate parameters to Perl method ii libregexp-common-perl2.119-1 Provide commonly requested regular ii libterm-readkey-perl 2.21-1.3A perl module for simple terminal ii libtest-inline-perl 0.16-1
Bug#306739: marked as done (jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:03:08 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 07:36:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 00:36:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c156142.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.156.142] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DR3ZU-00084h-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:36:28 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DR3ZU-0001Mr-EZ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:36:28 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:36:28 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: jakarta-log4j Version: 1.1.3-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch When trying to build 'jakarta-log4j' in a clean chroot with sun-j2sdk1.5 installed, I get the following error: [javac] /jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/src/java/org/apache/log4j/test/Finalize.java:76: as of release 1.5, 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier [javac] (try -source 1.4 or lower to use 'enum' as an identifier) [javac] ((org.apache.log4j.Appender) enum.nextElement()).close(); [javac]^ [javac] 15 errors BUILD FAILED Please change the Build-Depends in debian/control from 'java2-compiler', which includes 'sun-j2sdk1.5', to 'j2sdk1.4' to make it clear that the package does not build with j2sdk1.5. Alternatively, the sources could be fixed to replace all uses of 'enum' as an identifier with something else like 'en'. Please also change debian/rules to support the correct JAVA_HOME_DIRS which are used by the packages created with make-jpkg from java-package. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/debian/control 2005-04-28 09:25:25.878644990 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-04-28 09:25:06.379609294 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: contrib/libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), java2-compiler, libxerces-java +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, j2sdk1.4, libxerces-java Standards-Version: 3.5.10 Package: liblog4j-java diff -urN ../tmp-orig/jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/debian/rules2005-04-28 09:25:25.879644838 +0200 +++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-28 09:21:07.951855822 +0200 @@ -11,9 +11,8 @@ export VER=1.1.3 -#export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jdk1.1 -export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.3/ -#export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4 +JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown +export JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do [ -d $$j ] echo $$j exit 0; done) export JSHARE=/usr/share/java export BUILDFILE=build/build.xml @@ -26,7 +25,7 @@ #export CLASSPATH=$(JAVA_HOME)/lib/tools.jar:$(ANT_JAR):$(PARSER_JAR) export CLASSPATH=$(JAVA_HOME)/lib/tools.jar:$(ANT_JAR):$(PARSER_JAR) -export BUILD=/usr/bin/java -classpath $(CLASSPATH) \ +export BUILD=$(JAVA_HOME)/bin/java -classpath $(CLASSPATH) \ org.apache.tools.ant.Main -buildfile $(BUILDFILE) export JDEST=debian/liblog4j-java/usr/share/java --- Received: (at 306739-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 19:03:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 12:03:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVwUJ-vf-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:03:19 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 6E8AF64D4F; Wed, 11 May 2005 19:03:17 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05D924F0C1; Wed, 11 May 2005 20:03:09 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:03:08 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307098: KDE 3.4 conflics with Gnome 2.10
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 19:53, Adeodato Simó wrote: * cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) [Wed, 11 May 2005 19:33:07 +0200]: off-topic context=there was a CDD devcamp[1] in Valencia last week, where I met, adeo, and lots of other Debianers Hey cobaco! :) hola (see I learned some Spanish :) /me really missing the good wether from Valencia as it's raining here ;-( /off-topic - having this shared file owned by _any_one_ of the desktops is bound to lead to endless bickering and flamewars (not to mention that it will effectively force everyone to install the core of that desktop), Yup, Christopher has already moved the file in svn, good to hear :) and I'm really hoping that the GNOME packagers will move theirs too. has anyone talked to them about it yet? the right place to put this is probably the menu-xdg package, as that's the package that's supposed to deal with the freedesktop menu standard in Debian AIUI hm, just realized that this is a specific case of a more general problem we'll have more and more in the future: 1) freedesktop standarizes certain stuff 2) different desktops come with different defaults settings for the standarized stuff 3) defaults from different desktops now conflict when installed on the same machine luckily freedesktop base spec allows for different configuration sets besides (or on top of) each other (see below) This probably needs being pushed upstream, right? I see 2 (theoretically) possible ways of pushing this upstream: 1) take defaults away from the domain of desktops into the hands of some neutral 3th party (I really don't think that is gonna fly) 2) have upstream provide an xdg base-dir with their view on good default settings (as far as standarized stuff goes) in some place different then /etc/xdg and leave it up to the distribution/the admin(or distributor) to activate any and/or all available config sets - Debian doesn't need to wait for upstream to do 2 above (just move anything upstream $DE places under /etc/xdg into /usr/share/$DE/xdg-default-config or somesuch during packaging) needs to wait for desktop-profiles to go into Debian first though without it there is no good standard way for the admin to control which set(s) of defaults gets activated (in what order) [1] see Sergio's blog at http://mixinet.net/stoblog/debian/20050510-cdd-dev-camp for an overview of what happened [2] see http://developer.skolelinux.no/~cobaco/desktop-profiles (you have to plug your own package whenever possible right? :), should enter Debian soon now -- Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) 1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB) 2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam) pgpki6wZgTBMW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#308410: marked as done (fails to uninstall)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308410: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 02:08:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 19:08:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVKAl-0007sS-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 19:08:35 -0700 Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.lenk.info with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DVKCp-0001pH-SM for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 04:10:43 +0200 Received: from p54a3bb62.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.187.98] helo=feynman.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DVKDf-0007Vf-BH for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 04:11:35 +0200 Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DVKA8-00067Z-0z for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 04:07:58 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fails to uninstall X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 04:07:55 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pdns-backend-mysql Severity: serious When installing and then deinstalling the package in a clean chroot I get the following error: Removing pdns-backend-mysql ... sed: can't read -: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing pdns-backend-mysql (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: pdns-backend-mysql E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 308410-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 20:08:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 13:08:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVxVV-0003Rc-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:08:37 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVxHA-Bz-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400 From: Debian PowerDNS Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#308410: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-12 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: pdns Source-Version: 2.9.17-12 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pdns, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pdns-backend-geo_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-geo_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-ldap_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-ldap_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-mysql_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-mysql_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-pgsql_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-pgsql_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-pipe_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-pipe_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-sqlite_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-sqlite_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-doc_2.9.17-12_all.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-doc_2.9.17-12_all.deb
Bug#308409: marked as done (missing dependency)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308409: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 02:00:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 19:00:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVK2W-0006IG-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 19:00:04 -0700 Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.lenk.info with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DVK4a-0001ld-LK for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 04:02:12 +0200 Received: from p54a3bb62.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.187.98] helo=feynman.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DVK5Q-0007U6-4b for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 04:03:04 +0200 Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DVK1z-0006XD-IU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:59:31 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: missing dependency X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 03:59:31 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pdns-server Severity: serious Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package pdns-server. Unpacking pdns-server (from .../pdns-server_2.9.17-11_i386.deb) ... Creating user and group pdns.../var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 23: addgroup: command not found dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/pdns-server_2.9.17-11_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127 Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 308409-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 20:08:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 13:08:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVxVY-0003Rq-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:08:40 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVxHA-Bx-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400 From: Debian PowerDNS Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#308409: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-12 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: pdns Source-Version: 2.9.17-12 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pdns, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pdns-backend-geo_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-geo_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-ldap_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-ldap_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-mysql_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-mysql_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-pgsql_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-pgsql_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-pipe_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-pipe_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-backend-sqlite_2.9.17-12_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-sqlite_2.9.17-12_i386.deb pdns-doc_2.9.17-12_all.deb to
Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper
Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.28-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of cdbs_0.4.28-1 on mix by sbuild/i386 1.170.5 Build started at 20050511-1353 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-xsl, xsltproc, springgraph, ocaml-native-compilers | ocaml, realpath, fakeroot, python-dev [...] -e s/$/\/g \ debian/control.in | /bin/sh debian/control dpkg-checkbuilddeps -B test -x debian/rules test `id -u` = 0 if test -n test != .; then rmdir ; fi if test . != .; then rmdir .; fi for i in ./test/autotools/config.guess ./test/autotools/config.sub ; do \ if test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \ mv $i.cdbs-orig $i ; \ fi ; \ done dh_clean make: dh_clean: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#249106: marked as done (FTBFS: Refuses to build as root)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 22:16:00 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing bugs fixed in NMUs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 02:37:40 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 14 19:37:40 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOp3U-0001Wn-00; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:37:40 -0700
Received: from localhost (host-66-81-31-51.rev.o1.com [66.81.31.51])
by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i4F2bXMa020818
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BOewt-8J-QW
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 May 2004 08:50:11 -0700
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 08:50:11 -0700
From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Refuses to build as root
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: rcs
Version: 5.7-13.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
This package fails to build from source:
...
ALL_CFLAGS=' -Dhas_conf_h -I. -I. -O2 -I/usr/include/bsd' \
CC='gcc' \
COMPAT2='0' \
DIFF3='/usr/bin/diff3' DIFF3_BIN='1' \
DIFF='/usr/bin/diff' DIFFFLAGS='-an' DIFF_L='1' \
DIFF_SUCCESS='0' \
DIFF_FAILURE='1' \
DIFF_TROUBLE='2' \
ED='/bin/ed' \
LDFLAGS='-s' LIBS='' \
RCSPREFIX='/usr/bin/' \
SENDMAIL='/usr/sbin/sendmail' \
/bin/sh -x ./conf.sh 31 a.h 2conf.err
./conf.sh: testing permissions ...
./conf.sh: This command should not be run with superuser permissions.
make[2]: *** [conf.h] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/rcs-5.7/src'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/rcs-5.7'
make: *** [build] Error 2
pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package
...
The attached patch fixes this by removing the check for superuser
permissions.
--
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch
diff -Nru rcs-5.7-old/src/conf.sh rcs-5.7/src/conf.sh
--- rcs-5.7-old/src/conf.sh 1995-06-15 23:19:24.0 -0700
+++ rcs-5.7/src/conf.sh 2004-05-14 08:37:51.0 -0700
@@ -73,17 +73,6 @@
ech='echo -n' dots='... '
esac
-$ech 3 $0: testing permissions $dots
-rm -f a.d
-date a.d
-chmod 0 a.d
-{ test -w a.d || cp /dev/null a.d 2/dev/null; } {
- echo 3 $n$0: This command should not be run with superuser
permissions.
- exit 1
-}
-echo 3 OK
-rm -f a.d || exit
-
$ech 3 $0: testing compiler for plausibility $dots
echo 'main() { return 0; }' a.c
rm -f a.exe a.out || exit
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--
---
Received: (at 249106-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 20:15:50 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 13:15:50 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from yeast.orebokech.com [82.67.41.165] (romain)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVxcU-0004e8-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:15:50 -0700
Received: from pacem.orebokech.com (pacem.orebokech.com [192.168.1.3])
by yeast.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B7A12CF8;
Wed, 11 May 2005 22:15:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pacem.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 75A7DB309A; Wed, 11 May 2005 22:16:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Romain Francoise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing bugs fixed in NMUs
Organization: The Debian Project
Mail-Copies-To:
Bug#246566: marked as done (Rcs missing build dependency on autoconf.)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 22:16:00 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing bugs fixed in NMUs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2004 16:50:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 29 09:50:13 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BJEjl-00053N-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:50:13 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DA4B388164 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:50:10 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0266A388158 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:50:10 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 18ACA166C8D; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:50:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:50:06 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Rcs missing build dependency on autoconf. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: rcs Version: 5.7-13.1 It does not have a build dependency on autoconf but it's using it. It fails with: /usr/bin/make CFLAGS=-O2 -I/usr/include/bsd LDFLAGS=-s make[1]: Entering directory `/home/kurt/src/rcs-5.7' cd . autoconf /bin/sh: line 1: autoconf: command not found Kurt --- Received: (at 246566-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 20:15:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 13:15:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from yeast.orebokech.com [82.67.41.165] (romain) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVxcU-0004e8-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:15:50 -0700 Received: from pacem.orebokech.com (pacem.orebokech.com [192.168.1.3]) by yeast.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B7A12CF8; Wed, 11 May 2005 22:15:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pacem.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 75A7DB309A; Wed, 11 May 2005 22:16:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Romain Francoise [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Closing bugs fixed in NMUs Organization: The Debian Project Mail-Copies-To: nobody Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 22:16:00 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 These bugs were fixed in various NMUs and never acknowledged, I am now closing them. -- ,''`. : :' :Romain Francoise [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305156: marked as done (amule: linked against libssl)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305156: fixed in amule 2.0.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2005 10:33:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 18 03:33:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from on.debian.linux.org.pl (localhost.localdomain) [80.48.213.222] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DNTZE-0004Oa-00; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 03:33:24 -0700 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E21C3BBF3; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:33:21 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amule: linked against libssl X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:33:21 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amule Version: 1.2.6+rc8-3 Severity: serious Justification: uknown -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. Amule seems to be linked with OpenSSL library being at the same time GPLed. These are not compatible licenses and you should either use some GPLed crypto library or ask authors to add exception about OpenSSL. More details can be found at: http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html regards fenIo - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages amule depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcurl3 7.13.2-2Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libreadline5 5.0-10 GNU readline and history libraries ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwxgtk2.5.32.5.3.2 wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCY4zxhQui3hP+/EARAnqUAKC9tLtkz+2G04cZ8qi3ToioE74uGACdEmOF 9prKbk7WDlfb7RYn+tYNHgo= =sSqN -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 305156-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 21:08:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 14:08:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVyR5-0005ok-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:08:07 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVyLX-0005zU-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400 From: Julien Delange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#305156: fixed in amule 2.0.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level:
Bug#307782: marked as done (amule: fails to install due to unmet dependencies)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307782: fixed in amule 2.0.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 13:27:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 06:27:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unet-lmtp.univie.ac.at (imap.unet.univie.ac.at) [131.130.221.38] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTgOT-000459-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 06:27:57 -0700 X-Spam-Flags: [EMAIL PROTECTED][62.178.74.188:chello062178074188.25.11.univie.teleweb.at]gmx.at Received: from landsteiner.zifotronic (chello062178074188.25.11.univie.teleweb.at [62.178.74.188]) by imap.unet.univie.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j45DRlaZ045402; Thu, 5 May 2005 15:27:51 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Boris Kleibl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amule: fails to install due to unmet dependencies X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 15:27:58 +0200 X-DCC-ZID-Univie-Metrics: mx7.univie.ac.at 4248; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amule Version: 1.2.6+rc8-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Installing this package causes the following error message from apt: The following packages have unmet dependencies: amule: Depends: libwxgtk2.5.3 (=2.5.3.2) but it is no installable E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages amule depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcurl3 7.13.2-2Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12.1GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libreadline5 5.0-10 GNU readline and history libraries ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 pn libwxgtk2.5.3Not found. ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 307782-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 21:08:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 14:08:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVyR4-0005mX-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:08:06 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVyLX-0005zZ-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400 From: Julien Delange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#307782: fixed in amule 2.0.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: amule Source-Version: 2.0.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
Bug#308620: pair of security holes
Well aware. Of course Mozilla's silly security policies prevent me from viewing the bug's making a release before MoFo does. But as soon as 1.0.4 is released I'll have it packaged in short order. * Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: grave Tags: security I'm sure you already know of these, but for the record, firefox is vulnerale to a pair of new security holes: CAN-2005-1477 The install function in Firefox 1.0.3 allows remote web sites on the browser's whitelist, such as update.mozilla.org or addon.mozilla.org, to execute arbitrary Javascript with chrome privileges, leading to arbitrary code execution on the system when combined with vulnerabilities such as CAN-2005-1476, as demonstrated using a javascript: URL as the package icon and a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack on a vulnerable whitelist site. CAN-2005-1476 Firefox 1.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in other domains by using an IFRAME and causing the browser to navigate to a previous javascript: URL, which can lead to arbitrary code execution when combined with CAN-2005-1477. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308667: License does not allow modifications, yet source code is modified
Hello Udi, May Debian redistribute binaries built from modified source code? The Debian Free Software Guidelines state that The license must explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source code. but it seems to me this must apply to software in the non-free archive as well. The modifications are minor bug fixes and can be seen here: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/g/glimpse/glimpse_4.18.0-3.diff.gz On a seperate note, have you considered licensing glimpse under an Open Source Initiative license, such as the GPL? Thanks, Shaun On 5/11/05, Göran Weinholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: glimpse Version: 4.18.0-4 Severity: serious This is the license of glimpse and as you can see it does not allow any modifications: --- Copyright 1997, Arizona Board of Regents. Glimpse was developed by Udi Manber, Sun Wu, and Burra Gopal at the University of Arizona, Department of Computer Science. It is currently maintained and licensed by Internet Workshop. Permission is granted to copy this software, to redistribute it on a nonprofit basis, and to use it for any purpose, subject to the following restrictions and understandings. 1. Any copy made of this software must include this copyright notice in full. 2. All materials developed as a consequence of the use of this software shall duly acknowledge such use, in accordance with the usual standards of acknowledging credit in academic research. In particular, if you use glimpse in any way on any WWW site, you should include a link to Glimpse home page at http://webglimpse.org 3. The authors have made no warranty or representation that the operation of this software will be error-free or suitable for any application, and they are under under no obligation to provide any services, by way of maintenance, update, or otherwise. The software is an experimental prototype offered on an as-is basis. 4. Any commercial use of this software will require a license. Contact Internet Workshop e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://webglimpse.net/licensing.html Fax: (520) 620-6841 Phone: (520) 620-6878 --- Yet you modify these source code files under the above license in glimpse_4.18.0-4.diff.gz: glimpse-4.18.0/split.c glimpse-4.18.0/index/glimpse.c The same license presumably applies to the manpages and the Makefile you've trivially modified. Unless you have obtained permission to modify the above files it seems Debian is in violation of the license. Regards, -- Göran Weinholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian developer, sysadmin, netadmin
Bug#308591: marked as done (apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near `www-sivut.`)
Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 10:28:46 +1000 (EST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308591: apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near `www-sivut.` has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 09:57:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 02:57:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVnyF-0002MG-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 02:57:40 -0700 Received: from guided-naafi.demon.co.uk ([80.176.225.25] helo=Apu.exley.net) by anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1DVnxs-0009Nv-Jh for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 May 2005 09:57:24 + Received: from exleym by Apu.exley.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DVnxj-0002Hn-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:57:07 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthew Exley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near `www-sivut.` X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11 Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:57:06 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Matthew Exley [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-apu-MailScanner-Information: Customised by [EMAIL PROTECTED]; please ask Matthew for help with these headers X-apu-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.33-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Output from dpkg --configure apache-ssl: Setting up apache-ssl (1.3.33-5) ... Template parse error near `www-sivut.', in stanza #5 of /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache-ssl.templates dpkg: error processing apache-ssl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 255 Errors were encountered while processing: apache-ssl -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9.2010043 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB) Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on: ii apache-common 1.3.33-5 support files for all Apache webse ii debconf 1.4.49 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.10.27 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-18Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libmagic1 4.12-1 File type determination library us ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility ii mime-support3.33-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii openssl 0.9.7g-1 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii perl5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii ssl-cert1.0-11 Simple debconf wrapper for openssl -- debconf information: * apache-ssl/server-name: apu.exley.net * apache-ssl/enable-suexec: false * apache-ssl/document-root: /var/www * apache-ssl/server-admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * apache-ssl/init: true --- Received: (at 308591-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 00:29:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 17:29:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from loki.0c3.net [69.0.240.48] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DW1Zl-0005uZ-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 17:29:17 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.0c3.net ident=www-data) by loki.0c3.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DW1ZG-0008W8-8x for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 May 2005 18:28:46 -0600 Received: from 130.194.13.101 (SquirrelMail authenticated user adconrad) by mail.0c3.net with HTTP;
Bug#308181: marked as done (nec: FTBFS: couldn't open the intermediate file)
Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line nec: FTBFS: couldn't open the intermediate file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2005 16:35:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 08 09:35:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DUokA-0004L5-00; Sun, 08 May 2005 09:35:02 -0700 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A41AB487; Sun, 8 May 2005 18:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-11-105.mnet-online.de [82.135.11.105]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFC990E48; Sun, 8 May 2005 18:34:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5381E100442A3; Sun, 8 May 2005 18:34:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nec: FTBFS: couldn't open the intermediate file Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 18:34:55 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: nec Version: 2-9 Severity: serious Tags: sarge Hi, building the package nec in a clean sarge build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2' rm -f `find . -name *~` rm -rf debian/tmp `find debian/* -type d ! -name CVS ` debian/files* core rm -f debian/*substvars dpkg-source -b nec-2 dpkg-source: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) dpkg-source: building nec using existing nec_2.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: building nec in nec_2-9.diff.gz dpkg-source: building nec in nec_2-9.dsc debian/rules build test -f debian/rules /usr/bin/make FC=fort77 F77=fort77 make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2' for subdir in somnec nec; do \ (cd $subdir /usr/bin/make all) || exit 1; \ done make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2/somnec' fort77 -O2 -c -o somnec.o somnec.f MAIN somnec: Warning on line 19: non-character datum lcomp initialized with character string Compiler error line 202 of : start_formatting: couldn't open the intermediate file /usr/bin/fort77: aborting compilation make[2]: *** [somnec.o] Error 25 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2/somnec' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2' make: *** [build] Error 2 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. --- Received: (at 308181-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 00:34:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 17:34:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DW1ee-0006U2-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 17:34:21 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j4C0YIPW029144 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:18 +0200 Received: from mail.irb.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j4C0YGXV029133 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j4C0YGrS029132 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200 Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200 From:
Bug#308724: CAN-2005-1263: ELF core dump privilege elevation
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.11.9 The relevent changes for this CAN appear to be solely in ./fs/binfmt_elf.c. There is also a memset in ./drivers/char/drm/drm_ioctl.c which should probably be added, among lots of other should-be-fixed things. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing dependency)
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:34:57PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: There appear to be a number of undocumented changes, relative to -4, which are not documentation fixes. :/ Would you remind removing them and uploading a -4sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates, or else explain why these changes are warranted during the freeze? Please take my apologies. I was interrupted while working on the package and simply forgot to remove some parts of the whole patch I applied. Also I didn't complete the changelog entry. And you probably noticed that stray patch file lying around in the source tree. Argh! I fixed this and am currently uploading -6 which should be okay. Indeed it is; I've approved it for sarge. Thanks for your work on this. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308246: file conflicts in uniconf-tools, fonty-rg
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 08:57:50AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:44:11AM -0400, Simon Law wrote: Can you upload fonty-rg's /usr/bin/uni as /usr/bin/utf8 instead? In UniConf, the /usr/bin/uni tool queries and manages a database, while in fonty-rg, it's used just for switching console-fonts. ok, I'll do a new version Great! This is an RC bug, so it would suck if either of us got kicked out of sarge. Can you upload with priority=high? Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#278495: perl can be in an unusable state during upgrade
Ok, after further analysis on IRC, it seems that the error in Bill's upgrade happens only because the packages are being removed, and apt removed some packages in an order that was not consistent with the declared dependencies. Since there's no reason to think apt is playing fast and loose with dependencies on *upgrade*, and even if it is that's not a perl bug, I think we can ignore that case for now. I think we should go ahead and fix doc-base to only depend on Essential, and consider this issue closed. Adam, do you have any objections to Colin's patch? If not, do you want to upload it, or should I go ahead with an NMU? I'd like to get this resolved in the next day or two, so that we can send out the call for serious upgrade testing. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308733: rsync 2.6.4 server fails with rsync error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(570)
Package: rsync Version: 2.6.4-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I upgraded from 2.6.4-2 to 2.6.4-4 on my local network server and now my client gets an error: $ rsync mydesktop:: rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(570) _exit_cleanup(cope=3D12), file=3Dio.c, line=3D570): about to call exit(12) Also, I've upgraded my server to 2.6.4-5 and have same error. So, I've downgraded my server to 2.6.4-2 and now can rsync ok. I've tried all 3 versions (2.6.4-2,4,5) on my client, and all work ok on the client side. The only server that I can get working is 2.6.4-2. With this version, I successfully use the following rsync commands: $ rsync mydesktop:: $ rsync -avz --progress --delete mydesktop::rootdir/home/golfbuf/work/ work/ $ rsync -avz --progress mydesktop::rootdir/home/golfbuf/myfile.txt mydir/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US (charmap=3DISO-8859-1) Versions of packages rsync depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters -- no debconf information
Bug#308620: pair of security holes
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Eric Dorland wrote: Well aware. Of course Mozilla's silly security policies prevent me from viewing the bug's making a release before MoFo does. But as soon as 1.0.4 is released I'll have it packaged in short order. BTW, do you know if these only impact firefox, or do they also affect mozilla? I doubt CAN-2005-1477 is also in mozilla, but CAN-2005-1476 could very possibly be. I don't know for certain though. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308664: marked as done (cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper)
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 22:39:11 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 20:02:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 13:02:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVxPW-yj-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:02:26 -0700 Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92A316DF7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:02:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A436F906A4; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:02:25 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:02:25 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.28-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of cdbs_0.4.28-1 on mix by sbuild/i386 1.170.5 Build started at 20050511-1353 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-xsl, xsltproc, springgraph, ocaml-native-compilers | ocaml, realpath, fakeroot, python-dev [...] -e s/$/\/g \ debian/control.in | /bin/sh debian/control dpkg-checkbuilddeps -B test -x debian/rules test `id -u` = 0 if test -n test != .; then rmdir ; fi if test . != .; then rmdir .; fi for i in ./test/autotools/config.guess ./test/autotools/config.sub ; do \ if test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \ mv $i.cdbs-orig $i ; \ fi ; \ done dh_clean make: dh_clean: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 --- Received: (at 308664-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 04:39:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 21:39:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DW5Td-00057r-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 21:39:13 -0700 Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A58C16EA6; Wed, 11 May 2005 22:39:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDD1F906A4; Wed, 11 May 2005 22:39:11 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 22:39:11 -0600 From: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:31:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Build-Depends-Indep: , autotools-dev, type-handling (= 0.2.5), debhelper (= 4.1.0), docbook-xsl, xsltproc, springgraph, ocaml-native-compilers | ocaml, realpath, fakeroot, python-dev Any idea what's happening here? Not sure quite what's happening there - probably related to something else I had going on the same machine... Given that, this bug can be closed, since it's clearly build-depend-indep debhelper. hrmpf. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
