Package: kernel-source-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
(Sorry if this is a dupe, i had filled it against
kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic).
Since kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic 2.6.11-4, the kernel-image won't
boot.
The first error message
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2005 02:08:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Was a mistake
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 316476 kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic
Bug#316476: kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.11' to
reassign 316476 kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic
merge 316476 316453
thanks
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
(Sorry if this is a dupe, i had filled it
Package: apache2-mpm-worker
Version: 2.0.54-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
With mpm-worker and cgid, CGIs can't execute, because somewhere compiled
into the code is that path /var/run/cgisock which is quite different
from the /var/run/apache2/cgisock that comes
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
(Sorry if this is a dupe, i had filled it against
kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic).
kernel-source-2.6.11 is probably a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 312513 important
Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
Severity set to `important'.
tags 312513 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
There were no tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
# fixed in CVS
tags 315955 pending
Bug#315955: samba package build fails; DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM is 'linux-gnu' now
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message,
severity 312513 important
tags 312513 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Downgrading, since no one else is reporting this problem with 3.0.14a.
Stephen, does using the posted testparm output as an smb.conf (munged
appropriately for your domain values) get you anywhere with trying to
reproduce this
Package: clusterssh
Version: 3.17.1-1
Severity: grave
When I try to run cssh, I get the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cssh lb
Can't read: at /usr/share/perl5/X11/Protocol.pm line 2301
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Here's my ~/.csshrc :
#terminal = aterm
terminal = uxterm
terminal_options =
Hello,
Update: A new vulnerability has been discovered in squirrelmail. We'll
release one advisory for this one and the new one (to be announced soon).
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 316479 sid
Bug#316479: clusterssh: cssh does not start and complains about X11/Protocol.pm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Thanks for fixing my mess.
I wasn't sure if the kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic one was going
to reach anyone since bugs.debian.org was showing unknown
maintainer.
And kernel-source-2.6.11-amd64-generic was a mistake.
Sorry about that,
won't happen again.
-Pascal
On 7/1/05, Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:48:03PM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
Indeed. To be exhaustive, one should write a command-line parser that
would affect the options to lp or lpr accordingly to their respective
syntax.
That is what I try to do with this patch against the script, but only
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Section C.4 of the Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide is based on notes
I wrote for performing a chroot installation of Debian under an existing
GNU/Linux system.
The current version of the manual has modified this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
reassign 316476 kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-generic
Bug#316476: kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic'
Package: calamaris
Version: 2.99.1.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
1)
calamaris does not work any more. It ends with the message: Couldn't load
package calamaris::calBars3d, maybe it is not installed: No such file or
directory (invoked via /etc/cron.daily/calamaris).
Thanks for the bug report; I'm still trying to reproduce this on my
system. Here are a couple of notes:
* uxterm backgrounds itself after opening the terminal window, and hence
is not going to work with clusterssh at this time. I don't think it's
ever worked, and this is noted in the
Hi!
This vulnerability has been assigned CAN-2005-1774, please mention
that in the changelog.
Thanks!
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Karsten M. Self wrote:
Section C.4 of the Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide is based on notes
I wrote for performing a chroot installation of Debian under an existing
GNU/Linux system.
The current version of the manual has modified this work, but is still
clearly based on the documents I
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
Since kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic 2.6.11-4, the kernel-image won't
boot.
The first error message says something like:
Can't load shared object file libc.so.6
The second error message says it can't find sda1.
Do
Package: gimp
Version: 2.2.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
gimp explicitly build-depends on slang1-dev, even though its only use
of slang is indirect, via aalib. Now that aalib has migrated to slang
2, whose development package conflicts with slang 1's, gimp can
Package: gimp
Version: 2.2.8-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package currently fails to build because you have
conflicting build dependencies: You build depend on slang1-dev
and aalib1-dev. aalib1-dev itself has a dependency on
libslang2-dev, which of course conflicts with slang1-dev.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
priority 284914 grave
Bug#284914: postinstall kill running klogd
Severity set to `grave'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Hi Frederik,
i've just tried kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-k8 with the exact same result...
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
Since kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic 2.6.11-4, the kernel-image won't
boot.
The first error message says something like:
Can't load
Correction to my previous response: uxterm doesn't background itself, it
simply calls the first xterm in the path and not /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
explicitly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:02:19PM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
Hi Frederik,
i've just tried kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-k8 with the exact same result...
This is interesting. You have latest initrd-utils installed, and your
system is up to date?
can you please send your mkinitrd.conf?
Joey, please hear me out. Debian needs to fix this, and your response
to Karsten isn't sufficient or appropriate.
First, Karsten has a reasonable moral claim on Debian for an author
acknowledgement: Compare his Debian Chroot Install notes, which _were_
the first generally available clear
debian-legal and DPL added to distribution.
This bug concerns appropriate copyright notice in the Debian Installer
Guide which adapts substantial material originally written by me.
My license allows use under DFSG compliant guidelines, but requests
attribution. I initially requested attribution
merge 316538 316542
thanks
They're obviously the same problem, merging.
And I'd agree, if it doesn't use slang directly, don't build
depend on it.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 316538 316542
Bug#316538: gimp FTBFS: bogus explicit build-dep on slang1-dev
Bug#316542: gimp: FTBFS: Still uses slang1-dev.
Merged 316538 316542.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hi Frederik,
i've just tried kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-k8 with the exact same result...
This is interesting. You have latest initrd-utils installed, and your
system is up to date?
i've initrd-tools 0.1.81.1 ... the latest according to packages.debian.org.
can you please send your
Rick Moen wrote:
I'm disappointed -- as an author and as a Debian user. This is no way
to treat a generous volunteer.
I'm afraid you've misconstrued my email, but since it was directed as
Karsten, I'm not going to bother to expand on it unless he
misunderstands it too. I prefer to write fewer
IANAL, IANADD, but it's hard for me to imagine that there is any
sensible or just way to resolve this other than to credit Karsten with
a significant contribution to the Guide. Such a guide is of course
largely factual and could bear many resemblances to Karsten's without
constituting plagiarism
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 316519 sid
Bug#316519: libpostgis1-pg74: uninstallable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 316362
Bug#316362: security problem with drupal
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags 316362 + sarge, security
Bug#316362: security problem with drupal
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge, security
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Karsten M. Self wrote:
debian-legal and DPL added to distribution.
I'm afraid that by escalating this unnecessarily, as well as resorting
to certian rhetoric (for which I cannot be bothered to do a
point-by-point rebuttal), you've convinced me it's best I bow out of the
discussion, permantly.
reopen 316362
tags 316362 + sarge, security
thanks
Please keep this bug open until an DSA has been released.
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg signed mail preferred
64bit GNU powered
Dropped [EMAIL PROTECTED] What the hell were you thinking? Throwing a tantrum
and screaming at every email address you can find doesn't make your
argument more valid (on the contrary, it suggests that you don't have
much of an argument at all).
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:36:14PM -0700, Karsten
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#316362: security problem with drupal,
which was filed against the drupal package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Hilko Bengen [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:16:29PM -0400, Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Karsten M. Self wrote:
debian-legal and DPL added to distribution.
I'm afraid that by escalating this unnecessarily, as well as resorting
to certian rhetoric (for which I cannot be bothered to do a
on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:34:54PM -0400, Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Dropped [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fair enough for now.
What the hell were you thinking?
That after three years of trying to get appropriate credit I might as
well take this to the top.
Throwing a tantrum and
I was beginning to doubt that this was actually related to a change in
kernel-source so i tried going back to 2.6.11-3.
And it fails just like the others!?
So it seems it's something else that broke it and the kernel-image
package update just trigerred the problem...
Could this be related to
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:34:54PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
The fact that you're trying to coerce a maintainer to include a work
instead of attempting to address his reasons for doing so, is enough for
me to agree with Joey's decision.
That doesn't actually seem to me to be what he's doing.
I'm experiencing the same issue with this package. Here's an strace -f of
the sshd process, starting after I typed my password (password removed).
Process 5023 attached - interrupt to quit
read(6, \0\0\0\21, 4) = 4
read(6, 4\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\10, 17) = 17
write(7, \0\0\0\r\6, 5)
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A past error does not prohibit the maintainer from excising any part
of the work, at his discretion. You don't get to say you made a
mistake in the past, so you're not allowed to remove my work now.
Regardless of what we do in future versions, we're
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:36:14PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
The Debian Project has been distributing this work in violation of my
copyrights. I've previously requested this be remedied in 2003, the
situation remains uncorrected:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 315083 grave
Bug#315083: libgtk2.0-0: breaks mozilla-firefox on amd64
Severity set to `grave'.
retitle libgtk2.0-0: breaks other software: Gdk-WARNING **:
gdk_property_get(): length value has wrapped in calculation (did you pass
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:08:24PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Regardless of what we do in future versions, we're currently
distributing material in violation of a copyright holder's license. Our
choices are pretty much:
a) Remove the material concerned from the installation guide in woody
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:33:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#315955: fixed in samba 3.0.14a-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
I had a similar message from the calamaris cron.daily:
/usr/bin/calamaris: Couldn't load package calamaris::calBars3d,
maybe it is not installed: No such file or directory
There is a simple workaround: install libgd-graph-perl.
/usr/share/perl5/calamaris/calBars3d.pm tries to use parts of
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:34:54 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote:
[...]
- I would prefer attribution to excision.
Being DFSG-free is a prerequisite for being in Debian, but being DFSG-
free does not compel Debian to include a work. Your preferences don't
make excision of a work unacceptable.
Wait
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:08:24PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
a) Remove the material concerned from the installation guide in woody
and sarge and get new versions uploaded to the archive. Apologise
profusely. Potentially still be sued.
d) Add
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
apt was upgraded and now seems to use GPG checks for installing packages.
apt-build doesn't handle this change, a priori, according to this log :
- Moving packages to repository -
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:01:26 -0700 Michael K. Edwards wrote:
IANAL, IANADD, but it's hard for me to imagine that there is any
sensible or just way to resolve this other than to credit Karsten with
a significant contribution to the Guide. Such a guide is of course
largely factual and could
Package: libnss-db
Version: 2.2-6.3
Severity: grave
The last NMU moved /var/lib/misc/Makefile to /var/lib/db/Makefile.
It's not mentioned in the changelog, it breaks existing scripts.
sorry, that's just bad style for a NMU.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
package apt-move
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: apt-move
severity 316492 serious
Bug#316492: Unmet dependencies of apt-move in latest unstable...
Severity set to `serious'.
merge
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:58:07PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Sure. That's fairly equivalent to (a).
Just in case I wasn't clear, the point was that the fix for past stable
releases, and the fix for unstable and the next release, are unrelated;
it's reasonable to do entirely different things,
And the real question is, why did an NMU change it in the first place.
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:11:48AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libnss-db
Version: 2.2-6.3
Severity: grave
The last NMU moved /var/lib/misc/Makefile to /var/lib/db/Makefile.
It's not mentioned in the changelog,
Aleksey I Zavilohin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, where fix in stable? I think you can`t upload new version in
sarge. Maybe need contact with Security Team?
I have done that. Alas, there hasn't been any response yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.0ds1-11
Severity: serious
When I tried to rebuild gcc-4.0, it failed as follows:
baseline_name=`basename
/tmp/buildd/gcc-4.0-4.0.0ds1/src/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/i486-linux-gnu`; \
baseline_parentdir=`dirname
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 12:17:43AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
Wait one second...
Of course excision is possible, but is it really a good idea?
I don't think so.
That's not d-legal's decision, or the DPL's. It's the maintainer's
decision. There are procedures in place to overrule a
Package: fam
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Fam was installed via dependancies of the gnome virtual package. Since
it was running it appears to have kept an open handle on one of my
compact flash cards when it was attached to the system and thus it was
inadvertantly
on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:08:27PM -0500, Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:36:14PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
The Debian Project has been distributing this work in violation of my
copyrights. I've previously requested this be remedied in 2003, the
This one time, at band camp, Glenn Maynard said:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:58:07PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
So you think it's acceptable to have a work in main, whose license is
if you're Debian, you're never allowed to remove this work, or I'll
sue you for an unrelated,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:16:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Karsten M. Self wrote:
debian-legal and DPL added to distribution.
I'm afraid that by escalating this unnecessarily, as well as resorting
to certian rhetoric (for which I cannot be bothered to do a
point-by-point rebuttal), you've
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 09:02:46PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
Do you really not understand actual license issues? There is, as I
understand it, a currently released work, which knowingly incorporates a
substantial amount of Karsten's work, and violates his license in doing
so. This is not
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:58:07PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Yes. And?
So you think it's acceptable to have a work in main, whose license is
if you're Debian, you're never allowed to remove this work, or I'll
sue you for an unrelated,
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:23:29 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316487: debian-installer-manual: Missing copyright credit:
Karsten M. Self for section C.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: uptimed
Version: 1:0.3.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
uptimed failed to build from source on a sparc buildd, duplicated on
my sparc pbuilder. It also failed to build on some other buildds.
dh_testdir
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory
Hi,
It would be nice if there was such an option, but I see no hint of it
in 'man apt-get' or 'apt-get --help'.
pbuilder needs to work with multiple releases, so if there was such a
new option that did not work in woody, sarge, etch and sid it souldn't
be used. (or pbuilder could be
I think this bug's severity should be set to wishlist, losing routes
temporarily because of a daemon restart does not count as data
loss.
Nearly every daemon gets restarted after installation, dh_installinit
(debhelper) defaults to that anyway.
Nevertheless, please consider restarting quagga
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 315703 security
Bug#315703: cacti: remote vulnerabilities (CAN 2005-{1524,1525,1526})
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: security
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:36:14PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
This bug concerns appropriate copyright notice in the Debian Installer
Guide which adapts substantial material originally written by me.
My license allows use under DFSG compliant guidelines, but requests
attribution. I
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:15:36PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
Ok, change committed. You are now attributed in the administrivia section.
Thanks for the great doc.
You suck. You know you just ended a potentially great and entertaining
flamewar by leaving one side without arguments? ;-)
(jk, of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.15
reassign 295213 upgrade-reports
Bug#295213: general: Upgrade removed /usr/local (symlink)
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `upgrade-reports'.
End of message, stopping
76 matches
Mail list logo
