Bug#351766: marked as done (cl-iterate: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dh-lisp')

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:47:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351766: fixed in cl-iterate 1.4.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#351769: marked as done (cl-memoization: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dh-lisp')

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:47:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351769: fixed in cl-memoization 20060126 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#351770: marked as done (cl-pg: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dh-lisp')

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:47:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351770: fixed in cl-pg 1:20060207-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#351771: marked as done (cl-series: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dh-lisp')

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:47:15 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351771: fixed in cl-series 1:2.2.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#351772: marked as done (erc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'texinfo, texi2html')

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:47:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351772: fixed in erc 5.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#351810: marked as done (disable-process does not work in sbcl.)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:47:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351810: fixed in cl-portable-aserve 1.2.42+cvs.2006.01.21-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#334235: fixed in visualboyadvance 1.7.2-5

2006-02-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 04:51:02AM -0200, Jose Carlos Medeiros wrote: Well, probably this bug will be solved in another release of G++. I opened a bug against G++ , but didnt received any solution. Ah, I didn't notice that this bug was about memory usage in g++; I assumed it was a C++

Bug#351887: bootcd-mkinitrd does not find usbcore.ko

2006-02-08 Thread Marc Blumentritt
Package: bootcd-mkinitrd Version: 2.51 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, the bug looks like this: ---snip--- retsina:/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-386/kernel/drivers/usb# bootcdmkinitrd Warning: this script assumes the following: - the running kernel is the one that will be

Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel = 2.6.13

2006-02-08 Thread Walter Franzini
Package: pcmcia-cs Version: 3.2.8-6 Severity: grave The kernel for testing is 2.6.12-10 and /etc/init.d/pcmcia refuse to start because it require at least 2.6.13 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')

Bug#350744: gliv_1.9.4-1

2006-02-08 Thread Remco van de Meent
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 23:09 +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: I just uploaded gliv_1.9.4-1 to the archive. Could you please check if this new version resolves your problem with gliv? Unfortunately, no. :-( The same free(): invalid pointer error. I did try to build it using apt-src but got the

Bug#350744: gliv_1.9.4-1

2006-02-08 Thread LUK ShunTim
Remco van de Meent wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 23:09 +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: I just uploaded gliv_1.9.4-1 to the archive. Could you please check if this new version resolves your problem with gliv? Unfortunately, no. :-( The same free(): invalid pointer error. I did try to build it using

Bug#351898: firefox: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up

2006-02-08 Thread Stuart Rowan
Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Okay so maybe i shouldn't have used grave but firefox no longer starts up. I was on 1.5.dfsg or whatever the last one in unstable was. upgraded, run firefox and get nothing. I manually ran

Bug#351899: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15?

2006-02-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: mol-modules-2.6.12 Version: 1:0.9.70+2.6.12+1-2 Severity: grave The mol-modules-2.6.12 package is out of date; the current kernel version in unstable is 2.6.15, not 2.6.12. Please update for the current version. The mol-modules-2.6.12 package is being removed from testing to let the

Bug#351899: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15?

2006-02-08 Thread Sven Luther
clone 351899 -1 reassign -1 mol reassign 351899 ftp.debian.org retitle 351899 please remove mol-modules-2.6.12 from the unstable archive thanks On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:56:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Package: mol-modules-2.6.12 Version: 1:0.9.70+2.6.12+1-2 Severity: grave The

Processed: Re: Bug#351899: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15?

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 351899 -1 Bug#351899: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15? Bug 351899 cloned as bug 351902. reassign -1 mol Bug#351902: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15? Bug reassigned from package

Bug#351729: (no subject)

2006-02-08 Thread Michael Koch
Hello Alexander, After thinking a bit more about your problem and rereading your bug report I more and more get the feeling that this is no Eclipse bug but Eclipse triggers it. The error message makes me suspicious: Fehler beim Mappen des Shared Objects: Die Operation ist nicht erlaubt (Error

Processed: severity of 351899 is normal

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 severity 351899 normal Bug#351899: please remove mol-modules-2.6.12 from the unstable archive Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#351909: 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15

2006-02-08 Thread Hans Ekbrand
Package: linux-image-2.6-powerpc-miboot Severity: grave I tried the following images on a performa 5400. This box normally runs sid and has no problem with any 2.6.15-kernel when booted by quik. So the problem is specific to miboot and 2.6.15.

Bug#341398: racoon: This bug is still present in 0.6.4-1

2006-02-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du jeudi 26 janvier 2006, vers 11:57, je disais: I have just upgraded to 0.6.4-1 and the bug is still here. This seems to be fixed in 0.6.5-1. -- BOFH excuse #148: Insert coin for new game pgpLhZRbRjaRN.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#351909: 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15

2006-02-08 Thread Sven Luther
severity 351909 important retitle 351909 [powerpc,oldworld] 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15 reassign 351909 linux-2.6 thanks Thanks Hans for your report, i lowered the severity since we are about to move 2.6.15 to testing, and oldworld has been a not fully working subarch previously, but this does

Processed: Re: Bug#351909: 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 351909 important Bug#351909: 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15 Severity set to `important'. retitle 351909 [powerpc,oldworld] 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15 Bug#351909: 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15 Changed Bug title. reassign 351909 linux-2.6

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#351899: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15?

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 351902 RM: mol-modules-2.6.12 -- RoM; out-of-date Bug#351902: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15? Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#351909: 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15

2006-02-08 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:53:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: severity 351909 important retitle 351909 [powerpc,oldworld] 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15 reassign 351909 linux-2.6 thanks Thanks Hans for your report, i lowered the severity since we are about to move 2.6.15 to testing, and

Bug#351879: adduser bug

2006-02-08 Thread Blars Blarson
This is an adduser bug, recently partly fixed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314671: marked as done (zynaddsubfx: freezes the system if run as root)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 05:17:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#314671: fixed in zynaddsubfx 2.2.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#351898: firefox: me too (was: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up)

2006-02-08 Thread Gregor Zattler
Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #351898 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Stuart Rowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08. Feb. 2006]: Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Okay so maybe i

Bug#351919: postgresql-common: configuration script uses already-occupied group id 110 (110 is dirmngr)

2006-02-08 Thread Seph Soliman
Package: postgresql-common Version: 42 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable as root: # apt-get install postgresql-common (...) Setting up postgresql-common (42) ... groupadd: GID 110 is not unique adduser: `/usr/sbin/groupadd -g 110 postgres' returned error code 4. Aborting.

Bug#351729: (no subject)

2006-02-08 Thread Michael Koch
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 01:35:33AM +0100, Alexander Bahlo wrote: Package: libswt3.1-gtk-jni Version: 3.1.1-8 Subject: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: libswt-pi-gtk-3139.so cannot be mapped and refuses Eclipse to start Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When starting Eclipse,

Bug#337495: fixed in 2sarge1

2006-02-08 Thread Blars Blarson
tags 337495 + fixed thanks While investigating to do an NMU, I found this security bug CVE-2005-3523 has already been fixed in gpsdrive 2.09-2sarge1. The non-security patch for friends.c was not inclued. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Processed: fixed in 2sarge1

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 337495 + fixed Bug#337495: friendsd2: Insecure handling of network data Tags were: patch security Tags added: fixed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#351878: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n: not installable in sid

2006-02-08 Thread Ricardo Mones
tags 351878 confirmed thanks Hi Laurent, On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 07:49:56 +0100 Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n Version: 1.9.100-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install

Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel = 2.6.13

2006-02-08 Thread Per Olofsson
tag 351888 moreinfo thanks Walter Franzini: The kernel for testing is 2.6.12-10 and /etc/init.d/pcmcia refuse to start because it require at least 2.6.13 pcmcia-cs should always start _except_ if the kernel is 2.6.13 or higher and udev is enabled. Are you sure that you haven't mixed it up with

Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel = 2.6.13

2006-02-08 Thread Walter Franzini
Per Olofsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tag 351888 moreinfo thanks Walter Franzini: The kernel for testing is 2.6.12-10 and /etc/init.d/pcmcia refuse to start because it require at least 2.6.13 pcmcia-cs should always start _except_ if the kernel is 2.6.13 or higher and udev is enabled.

Processed: Re: Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel = 2.6.13

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 351888 moreinfo Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel = 2.6.13 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Re: Bug#351878: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n: not installable in sid

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 351878 confirmed Bug#351878: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n: not installable in sid There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#346317: marked as done (file conflicts)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 07:02:27 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346317: fixed in gnat 3.15p-19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel = 2.6.13

2006-02-08 Thread Per Olofsson
severity 351888 wishlist merge 351888 351671 thanks Walter Franzini: I think you are right. I've seen an error message related to pcmcia and I've failed to notice it's from pcmciautils. I'm sorry. OK, don't worry. I'll merge this bug with the one about adding an item in NEWS.Debian so

Processed: Re: Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel = 2.6.13

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 351888 wishlist Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel = 2.6.13 Severity set to `wishlist'. merge 351888 351671 Bug#351671: Should explain about pcmciautils dependency in NEWS.Debian Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does

Bug#351898: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898: firefox: me too (was: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up)

2006-02-08 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:39:27PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #351898 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Stuart Rowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08. Feb. 2006]: Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1

Bug#351898: firefox: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up

2006-02-08 Thread Daniel 'NebuchadnezzaR' Dehennin
Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #351898 I have quite the same problem, I have no message from firefox, it just stop without notice, looking at strace I see that: open(/usr/lib/firefox/components/compreg.dat.tmp, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0664) = -1

Bug#351898: firefox: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up

2006-02-08 Thread Björn Heide
Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #351898 Hello, same here: I upgraded firefox to latest unstable and it stopped working. When starting firefox from the shell prompt it immediatley exits, no window opened, no segfault, no coredump, nothing; but I found some

Bug#351898: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898: firefox: me too (was: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up)

2006-02-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:27:10AM -0500, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:39:27PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #351898 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Stuart Rowan

Bug#351898: bactrace (was: Re: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898)

2006-02-08 Thread Gregor Zattler
Hi Justin, * Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08. Feb. 2006]: On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:39:27PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: * Stuart Rowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08. Feb. 2006]: Okay so maybe i shouldn't have used grave but firefox no longer starts up. I was on 1.5.dfsg or whatever the last

Bug#351942: csync2: modifies conffile of another package (/etc/services)

2006-02-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: csync2 Version: 1.29-3 Severity: serious Hello, csync2.postinst does: if ! grep -q ^csync2 /etc/services ; then echo csync2 30865/tcp /etc/services fi But /etc/services is a conffile of the netbase package, so this is a policy violation. Please remove

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2006-02-08 Thread Robert Luberda
Max Alekseyev wrote: Hi, Please check if this version works for you on amd64. No. It reports: upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned char]: Assertion `(int)d == d' failed. Sorry about the delay. As I wrote last time, I can't reproduce the bug myself. I

Bug#308503: libapache2-mod-perl2: similar issues as #308281 and #308503

2006-02-08 Thread niraj
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 Version: 2.0.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #308503 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp Locale:

Bug#344152: webmagick: Workaround for problem loading 'fixed'

2006-02-08 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Package: webmagick Version: 2.02-8 Followup-For: Bug #344152 Hello, The following alternative way of running webmagick fixes the problem: webmagick --thumbfont false However, any other setting for thumbfont like '10x20' also produces an error message like that reported by the

Bug#351898: strace log

2006-02-08 Thread Stuart T. R. Rowan
strace -o foo /usr/bin/firefox attached, gzipped as it's large. I do have other mozilla software installed if that makes a difference? Stu. firefox-log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Processed: ethereal-dev: Two missing header files

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 344011 serious Bug#344011: ethereal-dev: Two missing header files Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: ethereal-dev: Two missing header files

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package ethereal-dev Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ethereal-dev tag 344011 +patch Bug#344011: ethereal-dev: Two missing header files There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#351919: postgresql-common: configuration script uses already-occupied group id 110 (110 is dirmngr)

2006-02-08 Thread Martin Pitt
reassign 351919 adduser thanks Hi Seph, hi adduser maintainers! Seph Soliman [2006-02-08 15:02 +0100]: groupadd: GID 110 is not unique That's interesting. Have there been multiple groups with id 110 before? adduser: `/usr/sbin/groupadd -g 110 postgres' returned error code 4. Aborting.

Processed: Re: Bug#351919: postgresql-common: configuration script uses already-occupied group id 110 (110 is dirmngr)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 351919 adduser Bug#351919: postgresql-common: configuration script uses already-occupied group id 110 (110 is dirmngr) Bug reassigned from package `postgresql-common' to `adduser'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#349442: good patch

2006-02-08 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Frank, Your patch is good, in my opinion. I've created pkg1 and pkg2 with the virtual packages vpkg1 and vpkg2, with the dependencies of your diagram. I could reproduce the problem. Then I've tested again with your patch. It solves the problem. It breaks the cycle, and pkg1 and pkg2 are

Bug#351950: Please use guile-1.6, not guile-core

2006-02-08 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Package: gnurobots Severity: serious I'm about to remove guile-core, because it's long since been superseded by guile-1.6 (#338407). It looks like this package manually has once already been built with guile-1.6 (i386 only of 1.0D-6), but that was due to the build environment of the uploader, and

Bug#336736: marked as done (libgtop should have bumped shlibs in 2.12)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:31:12 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gnome-system-monitor: should depend on libgtop2-5 = 2.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: severity of 340118 is serious

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 340118 serious Bug#340118: gnobog: please try building with guile-1.6-dev Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#351729: (no subject)

2006-02-08 Thread Alexander Bahlo
Am Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2006 15:59 schrieb Michael Koch: Can it be that you use an extra partition for /home and this partition is mounted with noexec ? You can easily check this with executing mount on the command line. Yes, this is true. Of course, /home ought to be mounted read-only. I

Bug#351949: powersaved fails to start at boot time

2006-02-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: powersaved Version: 0.9.25-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm not sure if it should be filed against dbus or powersaved. By default powersaved is started in runlevel 2 at S25 whereas dbus is started at S20. powersaved fails to start at this order. Manual stop

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2006-02-08 Thread Robert Luberda
Max Alekseyev wrote: So could you please send me the file on which 'upx -d' fails? Testcase is attached to this message. $ unzip test.zip Yeah, I should have asked you about the file at the very beginning. It's win32/pe executable, not linux/i386 which I assumed... Thanks a lot! Now I can

Bug#351898: bactrace (was: Re: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898)

2006-02-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:42:10PM +0100, Gregor Zattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: O.K. I have no clue about bactraces and such. Here is, what I did to produce a bactrace: 1. purged mozilla-browser and mozilla-firefox pit:/usr/lib# aptitude purge mozilla-browser mozilla-firefox 2.

Bug#351958: xtel: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency: mime-codecs

2006-02-08 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: xtel Version: 3.3.0-5.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'xtel' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Package mime-codecs has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for

Bug#351960: heimdal-kdc: policy violation: some configuration files not in /etc

2006-02-08 Thread Warren Turkal
Package: heimdal-kdc Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.2 The kdc.conf and kadmind.acl in /var/lib/heidal-kdc/ are config files that should go in /etc or use the technique in the Debian Policy Manual 10.7.2. wt -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers

Bug#351949: powersaved fails to start at boot time

2006-02-08 Thread Michael Biebl
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Package: powersaved Version: 0.9.25-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm not sure if it should be filed against dbus or powersaved. By default powersaved is started in runlevel 2 at S25 whereas dbus is started at S20. powersaved fails to

Processed: Re: Bug#351729: (no subject)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 351729 minor Bug#351729: libswt-pi-gtk-3139.so cannot be mapped and refuses Eclipse to start Severity set to `minor'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#351729: (no subject)

2006-02-08 Thread Michael Koch
severity 351729 minor thanks Hello Alexander, I believe the bug is resolved with this. Do you know a way to work around this issue? I don't want to mount /home executable. Do I have an influence on where those things are written to? Why does Eclipse write Shared Libraries and so on to

Bug#351949: powersaved fails to start at boot time

2006-02-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Thursday 09 Feb 2006 01:47, Michael Biebl wrote: powersaved has to be started after dbus, because it uses dbus. So the ordering is correct. The problem must be something else. Can you investigate this a little further? Here's what I've gathered from bootlogd: Thu Feb 9 00:43:06 2006:

Bug#347479: Seems to not handle VG creation correctly

2006-02-08 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Tuesday 07 February 2006 18:31, you wrote: The attached patch adds some basic checks so we do not just go ahead Sorry. Attached the wrong patch. This one is better. Well, even though I'm not fond of new strings so late in the release process, I

Bug#351949: powersaved fails to start at boot time

2006-02-08 Thread Michael Biebl
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Thursday 09 Feb 2006 01:47, Michael Biebl wrote: powersaved has to be started after dbus, because it uses dbus. So the ordering is correct. The problem must be something else. Can you investigate this a little further? Here's what I've gathered from bootlogd:

Bug#351898: bactrace (was: Re: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898)

2006-02-08 Thread Stuart T. R. Rowan
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 20:19 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:42:10PM +0100, Gregor Zattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: O.K. I have no clue about bactraces and such. Here is, what I did to produce a bactrace: 1. purged mozilla-browser and mozilla-firefox

Processed: your mail

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 351960 ! Bug#351960: heimdal-kdc: policy violation: some configuration files not in /etc Changed Bug submitter from Warren Turkal [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Warren Turkal [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: Oops

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 351902 mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15? Bug#351902: RM: mol-modules-2.6.12 -- RoM; out-of-date Changed Bug title. retitle 351899 RM: mol-modules-2.6.12 -- RoM; out-of-date Bug#351899: please remove

Bug#351981: muine: Fails to start

2006-02-08 Thread Benjamin Seidenberg
Package: muine Version: 0.8.3-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Muine fails to start after freshly being installed on my system. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ muine ** (muine:19775): WARNING **: No GConf default audio sink key and osssink doesn't work Unhandled Exception:

Bug#347479: Seems to not handle VG creation correctly

2006-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 22:07, Christian Perrier wrote: Well, even though I'm not fond of new strings so late in the release process, I guess we can't avoid it (I wouldn't say so if this was a real final release with a hard string freeze). I agree, but as: - this is a new component - it

Bug#347479: Seems to not handle VG creation correctly

2006-02-08 Thread Jens Seidel
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:07:32PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I have some changes to suggest to the templates text: +Template: partman-auto-lvm/new_vg_name_exists +Type: string +_Description: Name of the volume group for the new system: Colons

Bug#351898: bactrace (was: Re: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898)

2006-02-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:09:24PM +, Stuart T. R. Rowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 20:19 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:42:10PM +0100, Gregor Zattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: O.K. I have no clue about bactraces and such. Here is, what I

Bug#351898: bactrace (was: Re: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898)

2006-02-08 Thread Stuart T. R. Rowan
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 22:28 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: snip Mike, it's not obvious how to backtrace that shell script so go a little easier mebe? ;) I thought you were running firefox-bin in the first place, which would explain your crash if it uses mozilla-browser's libs. if i do

Bug#327290: marked as done (remembrance-agent: remem.el misplaced)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:47:42 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327290: fixed in remem 2.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#351949: marked as done (powersaved fails to start at boot time)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 9 Feb 2006 03:17:11 +0530 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#351949: powersaved fails to start at boot time has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#351898: bactrace (was: Re: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898)

2006-02-08 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:58:30PM +, Stuart T. R. Rowan wrote: On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 22:28 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: snip Mike, it's not obvious how to backtrace that shell script so go a little easier mebe? ;) I thought you were running firefox-bin in the first place, which

Bug#310713: valgrind noise from mlview

2006-02-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Package: mlview Version: 0.7.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #310713 This may be a similar problem, I'm not sure. Load this trivial XML file in mlview, agree to load the DTD, and then try to click on anything in the element view. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/space/fsf/target-registers/xml% cat gdb-target.dtd

Bug#183047: reduce body fat

2006-02-08 Thread Bryan Ford
Hey 66684, Barnes tole me that you were looking to get your bo dy back like when u were 20. If so, then visit www.mmh.H.edrfws.org/n2/?id=havoc and f ill out their 50 sec short- f orm and wou'll be likely pleased. I've been with them for months and so has Dennis and Ross and we're all happy with

Bug#261996: Get that summer body here

2006-02-08 Thread Bobby Jenkins
Hey 261996, Howard tole me that you were looking to get back into sh ape. If this is correct, you'll wanna check out www.dsa.10eU.edrfws.org/n2/?id=havoc and f ill out their 30 sec short- f orm and you won't re grt it. I've been with them for couple weeks and so has Eric and Ward and we're all

Processed: Fixed in NMU of joy2key 1.6.1-2

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 349611 + fixed Bug#349611: joy2key: ships broken example doc-base file There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Merge

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 351681 grave Bug#351681: adduser tries to re-use existing GID Severity set to `grave'. severity 351609 grave Bug#351609: hal fails to install: group 108 already exists Severity set to `grave'. merge 351681 351609 351919 Bug#351609: hal

Bug#350883: tsclient: fails to build from source

2006-02-08 Thread Sjoerd Simons
tag 350883 +pending thanks, On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 12:50:27AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: In file included from /usr/include/panel-2.0/panel-applet.h:37, from applet.c:23: /usr/include/panel-2.0/GNOME_Panel.h:40: error: syntax error before 'struct'

Processed: Re: Bug#350883: tsclient: fails to build from source

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 350883 +pending Bug#350883: tsclient: fails to build from source There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks, Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#347937: More information on -S aka sparse truncation

2006-02-08 Thread Scott Edwards
I've seen the same issue. At home I made some disk images for qemu. $ dd if=/dev/zero of=drivec.img count=0 seek=4096 bs=1M 0+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes transferred in 0.000228 seconds (0 bytes/sec) $ ls -la total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 supaplex supaplex 4096 2006-02-08 16:53 .

Bug#351997: synergy: postinst failure because of doc-base syntax error

2006-02-08 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Package: synergy Version: 1.2.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problam: Setting up synergy (1.2.8-1) ... syntax error in control file: # Format: debiandoc-sgml at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 601, IN line 9. dpkg: error processing synergy

Bug#350883: tsclient: fails to build from source

2006-02-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:57:01AM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: tag 350883 +pending thanks, On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 12:50:27AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: In file included from /usr/include/panel-2.0/panel-applet.h:37, from applet.c:23:

Bug#351919: postgresql-common: configuration script uses already-occupied group id 110 (110 is dirmngr)

2006-02-08 Thread Seph Soliman
I ran an upgrade and adduser was on the list of upgrades. And surprise - now it works with installing postgresql-common :) I thank you for a fast response. Regards, Seph Martin Pitt wrote: reassign 351919 adduser thanks Hi Seph, hi adduser maintainers! Seph Soliman [2006-02-08 15:02

Processed: Re: [Adduser-devel] Processed: Merge

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 351681 important Bug#351681: adduser tries to re-use existing GID Bug#351609: hal fails to install: group 108 already exists Bug#351919: postgresql-common: configuration script uses already-occupied group id 110 (110 is dirmngr) Severity set

Bug#351564: marked as done (mesa: FTBFS: No makedepend)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:06:46 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing, fixed in -0.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#351898: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898: firefox: me too (was: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up)

2006-02-08 Thread Clint Adams
It works just fine for me... Not for me. Neither with my old ~/.mozilla and ~/.firefox nor with them moved out of the way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#351898: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898: firefox: me too (was: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up)

2006-02-08 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:53:56PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: It works just fine for me... Not for me. Neither with my old ~/.mozilla and ~/.firefox nor with them moved out of the way. Let me guess, Clint runs a 2.6 kernel and Mike does not? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#351898: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898: firefox: me too (was: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up)

2006-02-08 Thread Clint Adams
Let me guess, Clint runs a 2.6 kernel and Mike does not? I am on 2.6.15. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#351898: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898: firefox: me too (was: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up)

2006-02-08 Thread Justin Pryzby
retitle 351898 firefox 1.5.0.1 fails to start with 2.6 kernels thanks On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:00:11PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: Let me guess, Clint runs a 2.6 kernel and Mike does not? I am on 2.6.15. Proof enough for me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processed: Re: Bug#351898: the firefox-doesn't-start bug Re: Bug#351898: firefox: me too (was: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up)

2006-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 351898 firefox 1.5.0.1 fails to start with 2.6 kernels Bug#351898: firefox: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#351981: muine: Fails to start

2006-02-08 Thread Dave Beckett
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:57 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote: Package: muine Version: 0.8.3-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Muine fails to start after freshly being installed on my system. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ muine ** (muine:19775): WARNING **: No GConf

Bug#351981: muine: Fails to start

2006-02-08 Thread Benjamin Seidenberg
Dave Beckett wrote: On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:57 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote: Package: muine Version: 0.8.3-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Muine fails to start after freshly being installed on my system. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ muine ** (muine:19775):

Bug#341398: racoon: This bug is still present in 0.6.4-1

2006-02-08 Thread Ganesan Rajagopal
Vincent Bernat wrote: OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du jeudi 26 janvier 2006, vers 11:57, je disais: I have just upgraded to 0.6.4-1 and the bug is still here. This seems to be fixed in 0.6.5-1. Thanks for the info. Can the others who've faced the problem confirm that their

  1   2   >