Processed: Re: Easy removals: B

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 362959 grave Bug#362959: bygfoot: hangs at 100% CPU, allocates all memory. Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

2006-05-10 Thread Julien BLACHE
Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The true problem is admin inconsistency ;) Unfortunately :::10.0.0.0/24 is a perfectly valid CIDR notation, but IS NOT what a naive user would expect, because IPV6 CIDR are on a 128bit range. So using that notation indeed open the daemon

Bug#366669: openuniverse_1.0beta3.1-5(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibmesa-glu-dev

2006-05-10 Thread Frederik Schüler
Package: openuniverse Version: 1.0beta3.1-5 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libglut3-dev, debhelper (= 1.1.17), flex, bison, xlibmesa-gl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev, libjpeg62-dev,

Bug#366660: gzip unlinks input before closing output, results in data loss

2006-05-10 Thread Matthew Chapman
Package: gzip Version: 1.3.5-13 Severity: critical Tags: patch Justification: causes serious data loss gzip must check that closing the output file succeeds before removing the input file, since on an NFS filesystem write failures may only be reported at close time (see the close(2) man page).

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

2006-05-10 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:45:49AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The true problem is admin inconsistency ;) Unfortunately :::10.0.0.0/24 is a perfectly valid CIDR notation, but IS NOT what a naive user would expect, because IPV6 CIDR

Bug#366534: marked as done (mysql-dfsg-5.0: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `my_memmem')

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 00:02:40 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366534: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#360881: marked as done (avahi: C# bindings in a core library source package == RM hell)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 03:02:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#360881: fixed in avahi 0.6.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366475: Scanimage on NSLU2 with hplip backend overflows

2006-05-10 Thread Manolis Tzanidakis
So far so good, but unless I can duplicate the problem, or someone sends me a gdb backtrace or something else to help locate the issue, the chances of fixing this bug are close to zero. I understand that. Just give me 2-3 days max and I'll send a gdb backtrace. -- Manolis Tzanidakis [EMAIL

Processed: severity of 362959 is important

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 severity 362959 important Bug#362959: bygfoot: hangs at 100% CPU, allocates all memory. Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#366670: FTBFS: misses gnomeapplet

2006-05-10 Thread Roberto Pariset
Package: deskbar-applet Severity: serious Hi, deskbar-applet_2.14.1.1-3 FTBFS with the following error: checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for DESKBAR... yes checking for gnomeapplet module... no configure: error: gnomeapplet module required to build deskbar make: ***

Bug#338906: bidwatcher: Log details

2006-05-10 Thread Jens Suelwald
Package: bidwatcher Version: 1.3.17-1 Followup-For: Bug #338906 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Bug#362959: Can't reproduce

2006-05-10 Thread Isaac Clerencia
I can't reproduce this bug, I'm lowering the severity. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#366662: cacti: location of log files and RRD data violates FHS

2006-05-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6c-7sarge3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 By default, cacti is logging to /usr/share/cacti/site/log/cacti.log, I suggest it be moved to /var/log/cacti/cacti.log; the RRD files are being written in /usr/share/cacti/site/rra, I suggest it be moved to

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

2006-05-10 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:29:30AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Huh? It's a IPv6 address, followed by a slash, followed by the number of significant bits in decimal. Just like IPv4. Sorry, that's not what I meant.

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#366505: tetex-base: Contains undistributable unmodifiable file: ntimes.sty

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 366521 normal Bug#366521: texlive-lang: Contains undistributable file: ntimes.sty Severity set to `normal'. severity 366505 normal Bug#366505: tetex-base: Contains undistributable unmodifiable file: ntimes.sty Severity set to `normal'.

Bug#366662: cacti: location of log files and RRD data violates FHS

2006-05-10 Thread sean finney
hi, On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:24:34PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By default, cacti is logging to /usr/share/cacti/site/log/cacti.log, I suggest it be moved to /var/log/cacti/cacti.log; the RRD files are being written in /usr/share/cacti/site/rra, I suggest it be moved to

Processed: Re: Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 365464 important Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy Severity set to `important'. tags 365464 - security Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy Tags were: fixed-upstream pending patch confirmed upstream security Tags removed: security

Bug#356311: dosbox: Shifted symbols broken

2006-05-10 Thread Michael Deegan
Package: dosbox Version: 0.63-2 Followup-For: Bug #356311 Also confirming this bug, and that it goes away when I downgrade libsdl1.2debian (and libsdl1.2debian-alsa) to the sarge version. I believe this bug is actually the same as #347709, #358976 and #360872. -- System Information: Debian

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

2006-05-10 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
severity 365464 important tags 365464 - security thanks This is more a configuration issue than a true bug. A proper configured system (i.e. full 128bits CIDR) has no problem at all. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#366512: ted: Fails to display file

2006-05-10 Thread Neil Roeth
On May 9, Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:29:20PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote: On May 9, Chris Waters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hmm, it seems to be complaining that it can't find anything to use as a Helvetica font for that document. What happens

Bug#366181: knights: Can't play against AI (gnuchess, sjeng, crafty)

2006-05-10 Thread Tommaso Moroni
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:03:01PM +0200, Victor-Philipp Busch wrote: | When knights seems to be stuck, does the CPU is at 100%? No, this is not the problem. After 1.e4 (5-Min-Blitz) gnuchess don't know what he should move :( On my PC (an Athlon-XP 2400+), after 1.e4, gnuchess moves after

Bug#335001: marked as done (FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 13:17:39 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of superkaramba 0.36-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366682: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow

2006-05-10 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: nagios Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow in CGI scripts in Nagios 1.x before 1.4 and 2.x before 2.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative content length (Content-Length) HTTP header. See

Bug#360417: kernel-patch-bootsplash: any progress on userspace bootsplash tools?

2006-05-10 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Package: kernel-patch-bootsplash Version: 2.6.16-1 Followup-For: Bug #360417 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm wondering if there's been any progress towards packaging the userspace tools that accompany the kernel patch? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3

Processed: bug 366563 is forwarded to http://bugs.kde.org/126350, tagging 366563

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 forwarded 366563 http://bugs.kde.org/126350 Bug#366563: Kspread losses data Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugs.kde.org/126350. tags 366563 + upstream

Bug#366683: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow in nagios

2006-05-10 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: nagios2 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole Tags: security CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow in CGI scripts in Nagios 1.x before 1.4 and 2.x before 2.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative content length (Content-Length) HTTP header. See

Bug#365163: pload: FTBFS with new X packages: Cannot find -lXaw

2006-05-10 Thread Krystian Wlosek
Package: pload Version: 0.9.5-3.1 Severity: serious Followup-For: Bug #365163 Tag: patch Hi. The patch for this problem: diff -Naur Makefile.orig Makefile --- Makefile.orig 2006-05-10 13:23:44.0 +0100 +++ Makefile2006-05-10 13:24:16.0 +0100 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ DEFINES

Bug#365680: marked as done ([CVE-2006-2148] cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 13:44:44 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in security.d.o has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.

2006-05-10 Thread Edward Welbourne
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810 Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Due to a power outage, I had to re-boot my etch box after some months, during which I'd updated it, so am now using the modern xserver-xorg-* package fragments, where I was using a more

Processed: Update forward address for evolution bugs

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package evolution Ignoring bugs not assigned to: evolution forwarded 362482 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340778 Bug#362482: evolution: hangs reading Groupwise calendar Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Bug#346351: marked as done (mopac7_1.10-1 (ia64/unstable): FTBFS: relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22 against `.rodata.str1.8')

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 06:47:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346351: fixed in mopac7 1.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366528: FTBFS: 2 of 10 tests failed

2006-05-10 Thread Simon Josefsson
Roberto Pariset [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: shishi Severity: serious Hi, shishi_0.0.25-1 FTBFS on amd64 (but seems also on others) by failing tests: Hi Roberto! Thanks for the report, I debugged this and the fix is as below (for gl/md4.c in Shishi). It will be part in the next

Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.

2006-05-10 Thread tomas pospisek
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Edward Welbourne wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810 Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [...] It looks like the package I want is xserver-xorg-video-i810; but, when I tried to install that, it was broken, because it depends on

Bug#366683: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#366683: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow in nagios]

2006-05-10 Thread sean finney
hi ethan, any care to comment on this? i'm really swamped right now and just spent all of last weekend fixing 4 CVE's for mysql, so i would really appreciate it if you (or someone else on the list) could forward my the relevant patch from the 1.x branch if/when it exists so we can prepare an

Bug#366670: marked as done (FTBFS: misses gnomeapplet)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 09:17:17 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366670: fixed in deskbar-applet 2.14.1.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#366723: libsdl-erlang: FTBFS: Build dependency on xlibmesa-glu-dev

2006-05-10 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: libsdl-erlang Version: 0.95.0630-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package currently can't be build because it has a build dependency on xlibmesa-glu-dev which doesn't exist anymore. I believe you should change it to libglu1-mesa-dev (or libglu-dev?) Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: Found

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 366683 2.2-1 Bug#366683: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow in nagios Bug marked as found in version 2.2-1. found 366682 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-13 Bug#366682: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow Bug marked as found in version 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-13. found

Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.

2006-05-10 Thread David Nusinow
reassign 366695 xdm merge 366695 366599 thanks On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810 Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Due to a power outage, I had to re-boot my etch box after some

Bug#366588: CVE-2006-2120: denial of service (crash) via a crafted TIFF image

2006-05-10 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Name: CVE-2006-2120 URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-2120 http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1065 Thank you for the report. I have recently become aware of this and am expecting to prepare a fix on Thursday.

Bug#366728: tla: FTBFS when using sudo: $(PWD) reset

2006-05-10 Thread Michael Banck
Package: tla Version: 1.3.3-3.2 Severity: serious Since the sudo behaviour change to strip most environment variables, $(PWD) no longer is set during package build, but debian/rules relies on it: | /usr/bin/sudo debian/rules binary-arch |dh_testdir |dh_testroot |dh_clean -k |dh_installdirs

Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.

2006-05-10 Thread Edward Welbourne
Remove the individual i810 driver package, it wouldn't install, so that was be a no-op ! the xserver-xorg package in testing includes the driver you want. when I dpkg-reconfigure it, it starts by asking whether I want to let it autodetect: and says that it can't recognize what it finds. If

Bug#365186: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 07:32:20 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365186: fixed in fml 4.0.3.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in upload of lirc 0.8.0-1 to experimental

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 339544 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#339544: lirc: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation Tags were: pending l10n patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 348390 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#348390: lirc: Irman driver stopped to work

Processed: Re: Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 366695 xdm Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch. Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-video-i810' to `xdm'. merge 366695 366599 Bug#366599: xdm looks for /usr/bin/X, but I have

Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.

2006-05-10 Thread Edward Welbourne
http://packages.debian.org/xserver-xorg-core Yes, I know that package is not available on testing. That's why I submitted the bug against xserver-xorg-video-i810, not against xserver-xorg-core. http://packages.debian.org/xserver-xorg-video-i810 says it's available on testing. It * appears to

Processed: reopening 346351

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 reopen 346351 Bug#346351: mopac7_1.10-1 (ia64/unstable): FTBFS: relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22 against `.rodata.str1.8' Bug reopened, originator not changed. End of message,

Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.

2006-05-10 Thread Stepan Golosunov
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810 Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Due to a power outage, I had to re-boot my etch box after some months, during which I'd updated it, so am now

Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.

2006-05-10 Thread Edward Welbourne
This is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365134 It still failed, now saying that it couldn't make sense of the hardware ... Then I remembered that xorg had recently gone into many-package form, so went looking for a suitable xserver-xorg-video-* for the hardware reported to

Bug#360386: marked as done (erlang: Missing binary packages.)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 20:13:53 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line erlang: Missing binary packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#346351: marked as done (mopac7_1.10-1 (ia64/unstable): FTBFS: relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22 against `.rodata.str1.8')

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 11:02:30 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346351: fixed in mopac7 1.11-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#358653: marked as done (FTFBS on mips/mipsel (and others): 'hipe_arch_name' undeclared)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 20:12:10 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FTFBS on mips/mipsel (and others): 'hipe_arch_name' undeclared has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#347111: marked as done (rasmol: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 11:17:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347111: fixed in rasmol 2.7.2.1.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#342289: marked as done (xpdf security problems partially affect pdftohtml as well)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 20:37:17 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 0.36-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#359642: marked as done (pexts - FTBFS: build depends against not available package)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 11:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#359642: fixed in pexts 0.2.0-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#364758: marked as done (Upstream release 0.99.0 fixes several bugs and security issues)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 20:38:59 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 0.99.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#350431: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on pike7.2)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 11:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350431: fixed in pexts 0.2.0-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366736: xpm2wico - FTBFS: Missing build dependency

2006-05-10 Thread Bastian Blank
[...] checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for X... no configure: error: Your X libraries and/or headers were not found. make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060510-1447 FAILED

Bug#366733: gcc-4.1: Ada unit duplicated in libgnatvsn and libgnatprj

2006-05-10 Thread ludovic
Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch Sorry about this, but I just discovered that one Ada unit consisting of two files, fname.ads and fname.adb, incorrectly appears in both libgnatvsn and libgnatprj (it should only be in libgnatvsn). As a result, GNAT refuses to

Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation?

2006-05-10 Thread Martin Kittel
Hi, just a quick update of the situation: Upstream is still using Word documents as the basis for the HTML docs. I have asked about the possibility of a license exemption but am not expecting an answer anytime soon. This still leaves the discussion open as to whether the HTML would qualify as

Processed: fixed in nmu, now incorporated

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 239576 Bug#239576: [CAN-2004-0176, CAN-2004-0365, enpa-sa-00013] Several potential crash/arbitrary code execution issues identified 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations

Processed: severity of 304476 is serious

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 severity 304476 serious Bug#304476: devmapper - should assign correct[tm] permissions to devices Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: severity of 316883 is serious

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 severity 316883 serious Bug#316883: lvm2: creates device nodes as root:root 600, breaking amanda Bug#329409: group and perms wrong in /dev/mapper Bug#341901: udev: Ownership and

Bug#366475: Scanimage on NSLU2 with hplip backend overflows

2006-05-10 Thread Manolis Tzanidakis
Trying to run scanimage under gdb: # gdb scanimage GNU gdb 6.4-debian [snip] This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnu...(no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library /lib/libthread_db.so.1. I'm running on a usb stick so it's kinda difficult for me to re-compile scanimage with

Bug#358942: marked as done (depends on removed package)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 14:19:46 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#358942: fixed in raccess4vbox3 0.2.8.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#211765: Where have these files gone?

2006-05-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 10:32:25PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: With the modular split of Xorg 7, these files have probably scattered to different packages. Can someone suggest a good strategy for figuring out which packages currently contain the affected files? I don't want to download

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xfingerd 0.6-4.1

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 361377 + fixed Bug#361377: xfingerd: missing dependency on inetd? There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#366756: AMD64: nvidia-glx deadlock (Xorg 7.0)

2006-05-10 Thread Johannes Graumann
Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.8178-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Subject: AMD64: nvidia-glx deadlock upon upgrade to x11-common Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.8178-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm left with a deadlock situation - and

Bug#365547: manpage issues

2006-05-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Denis Barbier wrote: reassign 365547 manpages-dev,glibc-doc thanks On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:22:29AM +0200, Roberto Pariset wrote: Hello, I wish glibc mantainers could take a look at #365547 and eventually decide together with Michael Kerrisk what to do about this manpage conflict. As

Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation?

2006-05-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Martin, On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:33:18PM +0200, Martin Kittel wrote: just a quick update of the situation: Upstream is still using Word documents as the basis for the HTML docs. I have asked about the possibility of a license exemption but am not expecting an answer anytime soon.

Bug#365547: manpage issues

2006-05-10 Thread Denis Barbier
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:58:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:17:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I agree. Moreover, manpages from manpages-dev are DFSG compliant whereas ones from glibc-doc are not. Therefore I suggest to upload a new manpages-dev package

Bug#365547: manpage issues

2006-05-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:17:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I agree. Moreover, manpages from manpages-dev are DFSG compliant whereas ones from glibc-doc are not. Therefore I suggest to upload a new manpages-dev package with a conflict on glibc-doc 2.3.6-7. Replaces: glibc-doc ( 2.3.6-7)

Processed: severity of 366629 is serious

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 366629 serious Bug#366629: powersaved: doesn't *require* libpowersave10, but needs it to start Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Re: Bug#366475: Scanimage on NSLU2 with hplip backend overflows

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 366475 important Bug#366475: Scanimage on NSLU2 with hplip backend overflows Severity set to `important'. found 366475 hplip/0.9.7-4 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. clone 366475 -1 -2 Bug#366475: Scanimage on NSLU2 with

Bug#366475: Scanimage on NSLU2 with hplip backend overflows

2006-05-10 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
severity 366475 important found 366475 hplip/0.9.7-4 clone 366475 -1 -2 onwer -1 ! owner -2 ! severity -1 wishlist severity -2 wishlist retitle -1 Please provide -dbg packages retitle -2 Please provide -dbg packages reassign -2 sane-backends thanks Severity downgraded as this does not affect many

Bug#366756: AMD64: nvidia-glx deadlock (Xorg 7.0)

2006-05-10 Thread Randall Donald
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 14:21 -0700, Johannes Graumann wrote: I'm left with a deadlock situation - and non-functional X setup - after initiating the upgrade to x11-common (Xorg 7.0). nvidia-glx can't be upgraded since it depends on nividia-kernel-1.0.8756, which is unavailable. Until I

Bug#362482: broken dependencies

2006-05-10 Thread Scott Anderson
--- �ystein Gisn�s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This may be a clue to my crash problem. Aptitude (GUI mode, I usually just use the command line), shows evolution-plugins with broken dependencies. * evolution-plugins depends on libgnutls13 (= 1.3.5) * evolution-plugins

Processed: setting package to abiword abiword-common abiword-gnome abiword-help abiword-plugins abiword-plugins-gnome ... ... ... ...

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 package abiword abiword-common abiword-gnome abiword-help abiword-plugins abiword-plugins-gnome Ignoring bugs not assigned to: abiword-common abiword-plugins abiword abiword-help

Bug#366629: marked as done (powersaved: doesn't *require* libpowersave10, but needs it to start)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 15:59:00 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line binNMU for powersaved (cdbs breakage) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366773: fails to install, no /var/lib/nfs/state

2006-05-10 Thread Joey Hess
Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.0.7-13 Severity: serious Reproducing this after someone reported it broke installs on debian-boot.. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-get install nfs-common Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed:

Bug#288770: marked as done (abcmidi: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): unrecognized command line option -Wformat-non-literal)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 16:17:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#288770: fixed in abcmidi 20060422-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: block 361810 with 366475

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 block 361810 with 366475 Bug#361810: hplip: HPLIP 0.9.8+ is not stable yet, keep it out of Debian Etch Was blocked by: 360017 Blocking bugs added: 366475 End of message, stopping

Bug#366776: aide: configuration syntax error

2006-05-10 Thread Craig Small
Package: aide Version: 0.11a-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I had an old version of aide and upgraded to this one and got the following erorr messages # aideinit Running aide --init... 36:syntax error: 36:Error while reading configuration: Configuration error cp:

Bug#366662: cacti: location of log files and RRD data violates FHS

2006-05-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
On Wed May 10, 2006 at 04:21:27 -0400, sean finney wrote: hi, On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:24:34PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By default, cacti is logging to /usr/share/cacti/site/log/cacti.log, I suggest it be moved to /var/log/cacti/cacti.log; the RRD files are being written in

Bug#365157: multi-aterm: FTBFS with new X packages: xpm not found in /usr/X11R6

2006-05-10 Thread Mohammed Adnène Trojette
tag 365157 patch pending thanks dude On Fri, Apr 28, 2006, Daniel Schepler wrote: Warning, xpm not found in /usr/X11R6 xpm needed to have colored icons and background image Here is a patch fixing the FTBFS. I intend to NMU the package too, as we are in 0-day NMU policy. I hope it will help.

Processed: Re: multi-aterm: FTBFS with new X packages: xpm not found in /usr/X11R6

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 365157 patch pending Bug#365157: multi-aterm: FTBFS with new X packages: xpm not found in /usr/X11R6 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending thanks dude Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#353101: marked as done (bindgraph: FTBFS: can't parse dependency)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 17:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#353101: fixed in bindgraph 0.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#352785: marked as done (couriergraph: FTBFS: can't parse dependency)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 17:47:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#352785: fixed in couriergraph 0.24-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#365875: No Text in Gtk widgets of xmms

2006-05-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 11:46:45AM +0530, Toufeeq Hussain wrote: On 5/6/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 06:42:11PM +0530, Toufeeq Hussain wrote: Ok. And do you still have font files installed under /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/ ? Did you edit your xorg.conf

Processed: /var/log/bacula problems

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 366768 pending Bug#366768: Install error. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending severity 366768 grave Bug#366768: Install error. Severity set to `grave'. merge 366768 303862 Bug#303862: postinst - chmod: failed to get attributes of

Bug#366768: /var/log/bacula problems

2006-05-10 Thread John Goerzen
tags 366768 pending severity 366768 grave merge 366768 303862 thanks Uwe, This was fixed in my NMU upload of 1.38.8-0.1, which is sitting in NEW at the moment. Please see #303862 for more. Thanks, -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#355774: marked as done (abiword: Please document licenses for included libraries sources in debian/copyright)

2006-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 21:47:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#355774: fixed in abiword 2.4.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now