Package: libmeep-mpi-dev
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev ship `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/meep.pc'
but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the
same environment:
dpkg: error processing
Package: id-utils
Version: 3.2d-11
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do
not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same
environment:
dpkg: error processing
Package: libbusiness-ups-perl
Version: 1.13-4
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl ship
`/usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz' but do not conflict or add a
diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
Package: interchange
Version: 5.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl ship
`/usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz' but do not conflict or add a
diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
dpkg:
Package: libuser
Version: 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do
not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same
environment:
dpkg: error
Package: libmeep-dev
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev ship `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/meep.pc'
but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the
same environment:
dpkg: error processing
Package: synce-kde
Version: 0.9.1-1+b1
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both synce-kde and vdccm ship `/usr/bin/vdccm' but do not conflict or
add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
dpkg: error processing
Package: vdccm
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both synce-kde and vdccm ship `/usr/bin/vdccm' but do not conflict or
add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
dpkg: error processing
Package: pgapack
Version: 1.0.0.1-4.2
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both openmpi-dev and pgapack ship `/usr/include/mpi.h' but do not
conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the
same environment:
dpkg: error processing
Package: openmpi-dev
Version: 1.1-2.2
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both openmpi-dev and pgapack ship `/usr/include/mpi.h' but do not
conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the
same environment:
dpkg: error processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
# wrong unsatisfiable dependencies
severity 403874 serious
Bug#403874: ghextris: depends on python, uses #! /usr/bin/python2.3
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
End of
hi,
after some investigation it seems like interchange ships Business::UPS:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/qa$ dpkg -c interchange_5.4.1-1_amd64.deb | grep Business
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-06-07 15:07
./usr/lib/interchange/auto/Business/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-06-07 15:07
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
package ndisc6
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ndisc6
tags 404007 + pending
Bug#404007: file conflict between ndisc6 and sofia-sip-bin
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403974 normal
Bug#403974: loop-aes-source: build error on kernel 2.6.20-rc1
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
hi,
please take a look at another related bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403797
to resume:
Some changes have been done in theme handling. Please take a look
at /usr/share/doc/kdm/README.Debian
desktop-base installs /etc/default/kdm.d/10_desktop-base . It
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
found 403952 0.28-1
Bug#403952: rlwrap: empty package on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)]
Bug marked as found in version 0.28-1.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Le jeudi 21 décembre 2006 07:55, Michael Ablassmeier a écrit :
hi,
Hi !
both gnome-peercast and ibpeercast0-dev ship usr/lib/libpeercast.a' but
do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same
environment:
Gnome peercast ship a customised peercast server
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:32:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403937: fixed in tkinfo 2.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 403896 important
Bug#403896: screen: copyright file is not up-to-date
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
hi,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:33:42AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Ok, I'll add a conflict on libpeercast0-dev ASAP.
But to me, gnome-peercast should not ship any libpeercast.a since no one is
supposed to link staticaly on libpeercast using gnome-peercast...
indeed, if there is no reason
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 08:20:21AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
Package: z88dk-bin
Version: 1.6.ds1-1
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both z80asm and z88dk-bin ship `/usr/share/man/man1/z80asm.1.gz' but do
not conflict or add a diversion, thus
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 07:53 schrieb Michael Ablassmeier:
both ggz-game-servers and ggzd ship etc/ggzd/rooms/entry.room but do not
conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same
environment:
Neither a conflict nor a diversion is the right solution. Instead, this
Package: gzip
Version: 1.3.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Unpacking replacement gzip ...
Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ...
install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing
INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file.
No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file
Hi,
I have tested the package on ppc and can confirm that 401530 is indeed fixed,
thanks!
regards,
Holger
pgpHjBXzvDDp4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:21:22 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 00:02 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The solution is that the behaviour is changed and an extra configuration
parameter has been added. Is this suitable for sarge? See also patch.
What functionality is referred to by Bad IP Allow/Deny checking? It is a
black list
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 401047 -1
Bug#401047: imagemagick: [AMD64] FTBFS with recent libpng.
Bug 401047 cloned as bug 404043.
reassign -1 graphicsmagick
Bug#404043: imagemagick: [AMD64] FTBFS with recent libpng.
Bug reassigned from package `imagemagick' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 403611 etch-ignore
Bug#403611: xemacs21-basesupport: xsl mode interprets delete key inconsistently
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
I don't necessarily need a patch on the soap configuration, just a pointer
to the places where I find it in Jean latest package.
debian/template :
Template: wwsympa/fastcgi
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Do you want
Package: gnome-peercast
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.4
gnome-peercast ships a static library file libpeercast.a.
This is bad for the following reasons:
* It conflicts with libpeercast0-dev and hence trigered bug #404000
* No package should be built against gnome-peercast unless it
severity 403998 wishlist
retitle 403998 Please package newer version
thanks
Hello,
From: Jonny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: It is not installable
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:53:09 +0900
Package: gzip
Version: 1.3.9-1
Severity: grave
I do not see version 1.3.9-1 of gzip
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:32:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#404013: fixed in zope2.9 2.9.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 404000 gnome-peercast
Bug#404000: file conflict between libpeercast0-dev and gnome-peercast
Bug reassigned from package `peercast' to `gnome-peercast'.
retitle 404000 gnome-peercast: Badly ships a static library file in a
non-devel package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403998 wishlist
Bug#403998: It is not installable
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
retitle 403998 Please package newer version
Bug#403998: It is not installable
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
reassign 404020 libuser
thanks
Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: id-utils
Version: 3.2d-11
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do
not conflict
$ findpkg -b bin/lid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 404020 libuser
Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
Bug reassigned from package `id-utils' to `libuser'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
tags 403932 etch-ignore
Bug#403932: xgammon: install a file in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/
Tags were: patch pending
Tags added: etch-ignore
tags 403934 etch-ignore
Bug#403934: xvier:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 402259 patch
Bug#402259: sysv-rc-bootsplash: fails to install or remove
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Package: sysv-rc-bootsplash
Version: 1.0.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #402259
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
$ patch --dry-run ../rc-bootsplash.patch
patching file rc.sysv-rc
Hunk #1 succeeded at 12 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 85.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 337 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #10
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:47:15PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
currently debian/copyright mentions that the package is licensed under
plain GPL. This is apparently wrong as for example src/cfft.h state
(other files too):
[... GPL boilerplate ...]
** Software using this code must display the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
merge 404020 404021
Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
Bug#404021: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
Merged 404020 404021.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 392357
Bug#392357: fails to stop; postinst goes into infinite loop
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping
Package: libmotif-dev
Version: 2.2.3-1.5
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev ship
`/usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz' but do not conflict or add a
diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
dpkg: error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
reassign 404020 libuser
Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
Bug#404021: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
Bug reassigned from package `libuser' to
reopen 392357
thanks
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:47:15PM -0700, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
* debian/pcscd.init: really commit a local patch that should already be in
1.3.2-2. Closes: #392357 fails to stop; postinst goes into infinite
loop
Sorry, this still does not work (I missed
Package: gzip
Version: 1.3.9-1
Severity: grave
gzip fails to install and when you try to install other packages with
apt-get it first tries to setup gzip and fails. As not every one is
install-info expert grave seams to be adequate.
# apt-get install gzip
Reading package lists... Done
Building
severity 403955 important
thanks
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:46:26PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.7-1
Severity: serious
The daemon trys to create and use a logfile /razor-agent.log which
should go to /var/log!
But presumably it fails to create it, therefore
Package: lesstif-doc
Version: 1:0.94.4-2
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev ship
`/usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz' but do not conflict or add a
diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
dpkg: error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 404020 file conflict with id-utils: Must rename lid.1.gz - lid.8.gz
Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403955 important
Bug#403955: Try to create logfile razor-agent.log in root
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
ok I understand : it's coherent, it's just a strange and unpleasant
behavior. Now, to test the effect of what you've just changed to the
appearance, you have to restart kdm using /etc/init.d (and losing your
session), starting a new session from the menu is not enough any more,
very discouraging.
tags 403454 + pending
thanks
Hi Matija,
Thank you for reporting this bug and for giving the pointers below.
Looking at the mailing list thread it looks like the patch listed in
both the mailing list thread and in trac ticket 100 is the same and did
not work because you wrote in the mailinglist
Package: libasm-dev
Version: 0.123-2
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev ship
`/usr/lib/libasm.a' but do not conflict or add a
diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
dpkg: error processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403998 serious
Bug#403998: Please package newer version
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.2-2.2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch, fixed-upstream
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
There is a typo on line 113 in /usr/lib/perl5/Apache2/SizeLimit.pm,
mod_perl 2.0.2, which under some conditions, i.e. Apache2::SizeLimit
is used and configured
On Dec 19, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole check for lo being up based on /etc/network/run/ifstate seems
less than ideal; it could instead check whether the actual interface is
up, that seems less likely to have false positivies.
Looks like a good idea. I would also be more
Package: libelfsh0-dev
Version: 0.65rc1-1
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev ship
`/usr/lib/libasm.a' but do not conflict or add a
diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
dpkg: error processing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.2.2-3
Severity: important
snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query.
Here's a sample testcase, running snmpwalk from another box ('dogma'):
Could you retest this with 5.2.3-5? One bug was
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 403454 + pending
Bug#403454: mindi does rm -Rf /home !
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
We're seeing corruption of LUKS partition headers on ARM. I've
confirmed this on two different ARM platforms (IXP4xx and IOP32x) and
with 2.6.17 and 2.6.18.
Basically, when you create a LUKS partition on a PC and then connect
it to an ARM box and open it, you get an automatic header conversion
Hi,
The bug in cpphs is fixed but haskell-uulib still FTBFS because the
package is missing a Build-Depends-Indep on hugs. I will upload a fixed
version later today.
Greetings Arjan
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
tags 403611 etch-ignore
thanks
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 06:32:20AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
On December 18, 2006 at 2:09PM +0100,
peter_e (at gmx.net) wrote:
Package: xemacs21-basesupport
Version: 2006.05.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: release criterion 5.(e)
The xsl
Package: axyl
Version: 2.1.11
Severity: serious
hi,
axyl fails to install if /etc/apache is missing:
Setting up axyl (2.1.12) ...
mkdir: created directory `/var/lib/axyl'
mkdir: created directory `/var/lib/axyl/system'
mkdir: created directory `/var/log/axyl'
Unix user account axyl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 403998 Package is not installable
Bug#403998: Please package newer version
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
retitle 403998 Package is not installable
thanks
Hello,
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
severity 403998 serious
thanks
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:41:22PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
From: Jonny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: It is not installable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 404048 grave
Bug#404048: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 404048 grave
thanks
Hi,
this bug is actually grave because gzip is uninstallable in sid now.
Andreas
pgp5ZHBuzZSwS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
so I decided to fetch eclipse from the debian-svn and build it locally
as I thought I saw a xulrunner.dpatch.
It turned out that patch just changed the dependecy, but there is the
firefox and firefox2 patches which include a fix to use the new API from
xulrunner. I just copied over parts of
severity 404055 important
thanks
Hi,
I've added a conflict in libasm-dev, so this atleast isn't RC anymore.
It seems you only have libasm.a on a few arches?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/21/06, Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.2.2-3
Severity: important
snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query.
Here's a sample testcase, running snmpwalk from another box
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 404055 important
Bug#404055: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi Mark,
On St, 2006-12-13 at 10:08 -0800, Mark Symonds wrote:
Possible DoS attack in the wild? I wouldn't think so but it's been the same
thing on four different servers in a week... I'm going to post to some lug
mailing lists later today to see if anyone else is seeing this.
Did you
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#404054: fixed in elfutils 0.123-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 19, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole check for lo being up based on /etc/network/run/ifstate seems
less than ideal; it could instead check whether the actual interface is
up, that seems less likely to have false positivies.
Looks like a good idea. I
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:17:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403091: fixed in haskell-uulib 0.9.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#as discussed in the IRC channel.
retitle 403776 kdm: Theme option doesn't work
Bug#403776: kdm seems to violate FHS
Changed Bug title.
severity 403776 normal
Bug#403776: kdm: Theme option doesn't work
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
thanks
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403952: fixed in rlwrap 0.28-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Thursday 21 December 2006 02:46, Steve Langasek wrote:
You could argue that the package is unfit for release (= sev:
serious), but then I don't see how that's consistent with asking for an
etch-ignore tag. If it's ignorable for etch, I don't see why it
wouldn't also be ignorable for lenny
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 404048 patch
Bug#404048: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:02:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403952: fixed in rlwrap 0.24-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Re: Romain Beauxis 2006-12-21 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnome-peercast ships a static library file libpeercast.a.
This is bad for the following reasons:
* It conflicts with libpeercast0-dev and hence trigered bug #404000
* No package should be built against gnome-peercast unless it states in
his
tags 404048 patch
thanks
Hi,
here's a simple patch that fixes this problem:
diff -Nur gzip-1.3.9.old/doc/gzip.texi gzip-1.3.9/doc/gzip.texi
--- gzip-1.3.9.old/doc/gzip.texi2006-12-08 19:45:37.0 +0100
+++ gzip-1.3.9/doc/gzip.texi2006-12-21 15:04:50.0 +0100
@@ -28,14
Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
tags 370132 + help moreinfo
thanks
Hi Aurelien,
snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query.
I have got the same exact problem on s390. Given that this bug renders
I tested this in a chroot on merulo and raptor by running snmpd as user
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:43 -0700 (MST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 1.3.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:43 -0700 (MST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 1.3.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:43 -0700 (MST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 1.3.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Gunnar seems to have been a little sleepy yesterday. For his patch to
work you also need to manually create debian/compat with the single
line:
--snip--
4
--snap--
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x77c20e60 in getmntent_r () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x77c20e60 in getmntent_r () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x77c20738 in getmntent () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0x77e9f196 in init_disk ()
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 400627 serious
Bug#400627: apache2 refuse to start when kolab-webadmin is installed
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hi Aurelien,
using the libc6-dbg package, I have seen that the getmntent() function
is called with a NULL pointer. This may be due to the fact that on s390
there is in the build log:
checking for mount table location... unknown
whereas on architecture there is:
checking for mount
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:32:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#404048: fixed in gzip 1.3.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
Hi Aurelien,
using the libc6-dbg package, I have seen that the getmntent() function
is called with a NULL pointer. This may be due to the fact that on s390
there is in the build log:
checking for mount table location... unknown
whereas on architecture there
Hi,
A question. Isn't it possible to solve this issue by a
m4_ifdef(
[AM_PROG_MKDIR_P],
[AM_PROG_MKDIR_P],// automake = 1.8
[...old solution...] // automake = 1.7
)
Maybe you could forward this to upstream.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given the discussion has died down.
I am proposing to release digikam[imageplugins] 0.8.2 to unstable in the
next couple of days to overcome the lack of an libexiv2 transition.
From what I can see, this is fine. bugs.d.o doesn't report anything
unusual,
Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:46 +, Alex Owen wrote:
This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply
this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is
the better option if we wnat to fix this for etch.
It's not clear
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#379628: fixed in linux-ntfs 1.13.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libcurl3-gnutls
Version: 7.15.5-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Given that trustworthiness of certificate authorities is not evaluated,
no package should depend on ca-certificates. To do so forces the user
to trust everything in ca-certificates.
I suggest setting this Depends
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
openoffice.org crashes when loading the exploit from [1]. There is inconclusive
information whether this may be used to execute arbitrary code [2,3]. If this is
a mere DoS you may of
Package: libcurl3
Version: 7.15.5-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Given that trustworthiness of certificate authorities is not evaluated,
no package should depend on ca-certificates. To do so forces the user
to trust everything in ca-certificates.
I suggest setting this Depends to
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:32:30AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:46 +, Alex Owen wrote:
This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply
this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is
the better option if we wnat to fix
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo