Bug#503571: Unable to reproduce - Bug#503571 aqualung: does not run: crashes after start

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Purcell
Package: aqualung Followup-For: Bug #503571 Ben, Adam, I am unable to reproduce here, aqualung works fine under lenny. Mark -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU

Processed: tagging 503571

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 503571 unreproducible Bug#503571: aqualung: does not run: crashes after start There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#503631: dx: Visual Program Editor doesn't shows networks

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Purcell
Package: dx Followup-For: Bug #503631 tags 503631 unreproducible severity 503631 important subscribe 503631 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks David, Daniel, I am unable to reproduce this RC bug on lenny. I obtain an empty window titled Untitled which allows me to add network components. As such I am

Processed (with 1 errors): Bug#503631: dx: Visual Program Editor doesn't shows networks

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: dx Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dx Followup-For: Bug #503631 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. tags 503631 unreproducible Bug#503631: dx: Visual Program Editor doesn't shows networks There were no tags set. Tags added:

Bug#503571: Unable to reproduce - Bug#503571 aqualung: does not run: crashes after start

2008-10-28 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hello Mark, Ben I'm unable to reproduce this issue on my up to date lenny box either. Ben, are you sure you don't have sid/experimental parts or unofficial packages ? Regards, Adam. Mark Purcell a écrit : Package: aqualung Followup-For: Bug #503571 Ben, Adam, I am unable to reproduce

Bug#503367: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#503367: plink: file conflict with putty-tools

2008-10-28 Thread Teodor
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steffen Möller wrote: Teodor happened to have nicely explained my objections to rename plink. Except what he said is wrong, puttygen hasn't been renamed. Yes, puttygen hasn't been renamed. It was a wrong assumption from me ..

Bug#503735: gnome-chess: menus only work in English language locales

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Purcell
severity 503735 important tags 503735 l10n thanks On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:05:04 Peter De Wachter wrote: Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The File/New/Programs and the File/New/Servers menus don't work in non-English locales. This makes it impossible to play

Bug#503367: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#503367: Bug#503367: plink: file conflict with putty-tools

2008-10-28 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Teodor a écrit : I still believe it is best to rename 'plink' to 'puttylink' in putty-tools binary package. Anyway, this should be fixed for squeeze since in lenny there is no conflict (plink is not included in lenny). Hi all, Upstream documented

Bug#502725: gvfs hangs for mounts after heavy use

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Purcell
On Monday 20 October 2008 00:16:23 Thomas Viehmann wrote: Package: gvfs Version: 0.2.5-1 Severity: serious Reasoning: cripples things that might wait for it Thomas, I suspect that your report might be a duplicate of #496269 which has just been fixed by the upload of version 0.2.5-1.1 by

Bug#501997: NMU?

2008-10-28 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim, 2008-10-26 at 10:17 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On dim, 2008-10-26 at 09:10 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Hey, as I'm working on splashy, I guess he'll just do a quick NMU for this bug. Or are you working on a MU anyway? Attached intended debdiff. I've uploaded the

Bug#500482: Segmentation fault in grub-probe (1.96+20081026-1)

2008-10-28 Thread Zrin Ziborski
Hi, thank you for the 1.96+20081026-1 binary - I just extracted the grub-probe binary and tested it on the target system. The output is somewhat different now, but it still ends with a segfault: whg:~/tmp# ./grub-probe -vvv -d /dev/md0 /home/fz/grub/grub2-1.96+20081026/kern/disk.c:220: Opening

Bug#503311: monit: Client Certificate authentication fails with openssl-engine error

2008-10-28 Thread Georges Toth
Quoting Martin Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please can you provide your monit configuration? (the set httpd ... part is sufficient). set httpd port 28000 and use address 123.123.123.123 ssl enable pemfile /etc/ssl/ca_priv_pub.pem clientpemfile

Bug#496954: [Re:] bind9: acl-related segfaults upgrading from bind 9.3.4 to 9.5.0-P2

2008-10-28 Thread Emmanuel Bouthenot
tags 501800 +patch thanks After further discussions with upstream authors : Evan Hunt wrotes : --8 Thanks to Emmanuel Bouthenot for the assistance, I was able to reproduce the issue with his instructions. It turned out to be a bug that was fixed in 9.5.1b2.

Bug#503645: jhead: CVE-2008-4640, CVE-2008-4641 command injection via filename and insecure file handling

2008-10-28 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ludovic, * Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-27 16:47]: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Matthias Wandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So what is the security vulnerability? You can use it to delete files, but

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#503735: gnome-chess: menus only work in English language locales

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 503735 grave Bug#503735: gnome-chess: menus only work in English language locales Severity set to `grave' from `grave' On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 06:35:15PM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. On

Bug#503735: gnome-chess: menus only work in English language locales

2008-10-28 Thread Philipp Kern
severity 503735 grave On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 06:35:15PM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote: On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:05:04 Peter De Wachter wrote: Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The File/New/Programs and the File/New/Servers menus don't work in non-English

Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Purcell
severity 500418 important thanks On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:57:39 Thiemo Seufer wrote: severity 500418 serious [...] Please add hppa mips mipsel to the allowed architectures in debian/control. Thiemo, Whilst I agree is is important for hppa mips mipsel to be supported architectures I

Bug#393837: More informations..

2008-10-28 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi all ! The issue can be isolated in this line: window.openDialog('chrome://pippki/content/deletecert.xul', , 'chrome,centerscreen,modal', params); in certManager.js. If you remove this line, and comment the next if, then you simply remove the confirmation box.

Bug#503790: lucene2: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: lucene2 Version: 2.4.0+ds1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503769: aspectwerkz2: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: aspectwerkz2 Version: 2.0.dfsg.2-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be

Bug#503782: jcc: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: jcc Version: 1.9-8 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older

Bug#503804: tinylaf: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: tinylaf Version: 1.3.8-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503780: electric: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: electric Version: 8.07-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503802: weka: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: weka Version: 3.5.8-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older

Bug#503797: solr: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: solr Version: 1.2.0+ds2-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503775: glassfish: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: glassfish Version: 1:2ur2-b04-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used

Bug#503786: libjgroups-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libjgroups-java Version: 2.6.3.GA+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which

Bug#503783: libcodemodel-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libcodemodel-java Version: 2.0-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be

Bug#503799: libhamcrest-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libhamcrest-java Version: 1.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used

Bug#503770: carmetal: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: carmetal Version: 2.8.9.dakbug-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be

Bug#503785: java-access-bridge: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: java-access-bridge Version: 1.23.0-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be

Bug#503788: libcobra-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libcobra-java Version: 0.98.2-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used

Bug#503789: libxstream-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libxstream-java Version: 1.3-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used

Bug#503773: azureus: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: azureus Version: 3.1.1.0-3.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503795: libjdic-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libjdic-java Version: 0.9.5-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used

Bug#503791: javassist: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: javassist Version: 1:3.8.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503776: freeguide: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: freeguide Version: 0.10.9-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503772: easymock: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: easymock Version: 2.4+ds1-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503796: sat4j: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: sat4j Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older

Bug#503774: commons-csv: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: commons-csv Version: 0.1-SNAPSHOT+svn678580-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which

Bug#503771: coco-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: coco-java Version: 20081001-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used

Bug#503793: liquidlnf: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: liquidlnf Version: 2.9.1-6 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503798: libjboss-serialization-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libjboss-serialization-java Version: 1.0.3.GA+dak1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50,

Bug#503778: dom4j: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: dom4j Version: 1.6.1+dfsg-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503792: mina: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: mina Version: 1.1.7.dfsg-4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503800: libgdata-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libgdata-java Version: 1.20.0+dak1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be

Bug#503779: groovy: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: groovy Version: 1.5.6-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503801: josm: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: josm Version: 0.0.0.20080713-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used

Bug#503777: imagej: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: imagej Version: 1.41n-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503781: dbus-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: dbus-java Version: 2.5-4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503784: freecol: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: freecol Version: 0.7.4.dfsg+1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used

Bug#503803: simplyhtml: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: simplyhtml Version: 0.12.3+dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be

Bug#502725: gvfs hangs for mounts after heavy use

2008-10-28 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi Mark, thank you for looking into the bug I filed. On 2008-10-28 08:47:49.00 Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suspect that your report might be a duplicate of #496269 which has just been fixed by the upload of version 0.2.5-1.1 by Clint Adams. Can you confirm that 0.2.5-1.1 fixes

Bug#503787: libwoodstox-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libwoodstox-java Version: 1:3.9.2.dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which

Bug#503807: protobuf: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: protobuf Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503794: pylucene: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: pylucene Version: 2.3.1-1.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by

Bug#503623: python-support: Fails during the Setting Up step of installation

2008-10-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 11:38 +1100, Tim Lyth a écrit : iU python-gobject 2.14.2-1 Python bindings for the GObject library iU python-gtk22.12.1-6

Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa

2008-10-28 Thread Philipp Kern
Mark, am Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 07:09:02PM +1100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: Whilst I agree is is important for hppa mips mipsel to be supported architectures I don't think the build of istanbul on these arches is release critical for lenny nor does it make the package unfit for release,

Bug#393837: More informations..

2008-10-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:17 +0200, Romain Beauxis a écrit : Hi all ! The issue can be isolated in this line: window.openDialog('chrome://pippki/content/deletecert.xul', , 'chrome,centerscreen,modal', params); in certManager.js. If you remove this line,

Bug#503784: marked as done (freecol: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch)

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:49:02 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Bug#503784: freecol: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch has caused the Debian Bug report #503784, regarding freecol: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch to be marked as

Bug#503781: dbus-java: java bytecode / java runtime version

2008-10-28 Thread Matthew Johnson
close 503781 thanks On Tue Oct 28 09:26, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: dbus-java Version: 2.5-4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6

Processed: Re: Bug#503781: dbus-java: java bytecode / java runtime version

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 503781 Bug#503781: dbus-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping

Bug#449497: foo2zjs dispute

2008-10-28 Thread Steffen Joeris
reassgin 449497 tech-ctte,foo2zjs thanks Dear Technical Committee Members Currently, there is a dispute about a certain part of the foo2zjs package. Unfortunately, we do not seem to be able to solve it and thus require your assistance. We have tried to get a paragraph together to state the

Bug#503735: gnome-chess: menus only work in English language locales

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:02:02 Philipp Kern wrote: Did you even try it?   Philipp, Yes I have tried the menus do work. I can setup a number of remote servers with the Preferences menu. Then when I click on File/New/Servers it presents the list of servers I setup. Selecting one attempts

Bug#393837: More informations..

2008-10-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:44:49AM +0100, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:17 +0200, Romain Beauxis a écrit : Hi all ! The issue can be isolated in this line: window.openDialog('chrome://pippki/content/deletecert.xul', ,

Bug#478105: seperate issue?

2008-10-28 Thread Johan Walles
Will do. /J 2008/10/27 sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 478105 1.06-7 thanks hi johan, as far as i can tell, your problem seems to be an entirely different issue. i downloaded the latest funguloids and both by default and with your config it worked for me, so it seems something

Processed: creating a bug for the tech-ctte as requested via http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 449497 -1 -2 Bug#449497: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware Bug 449497 cloned as bugs 503813-503814. reassign -1 foo2zjs Bug#503813: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware Bug reassigned from package `foo2zjs' to

Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:39:16 Philipp Kern wrote: The maintainer of the package worked around some buildd problem, Philipp, I agree. The question remains, is it RC, ie serious, or important for the maintainer to restore the missing archs - hppa mips mipsel. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#503571: Unable to reproduce - Bug#503571 aqualung: does not run: crashes after start

2008-10-28 Thread Benjamin Scherrer
Hi, thanks for your feedback. Sorry for not reporting this - I'm using Debian testing and the Debian multimedia (deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ testing main) packages - maybe it's related to these libraries... I just compiled Aqualung R-1032 from source and it works fine for me. So if

Bug#503571: Unable to reproduce - Bug#503571 aqualung: does not run: crashes after start

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:11:20 Benjamin Scherrer wrote: So if it's not an issue in the Debian testing but rather a compatibility issue with multimedia and testing, I am using testing multimedia as well and have no issue. Adam, If you could close the report that would help the lenny

Bug#501306: update-grub fails silently with wrong device.map

2008-10-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Robert Millan wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:45:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: Attached is now an ugly patch which would display the grub-probe error Check your device.map if it fails. Else I had the idea to make an environment variable like

Bug#393837: More informations..

2008-10-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:05 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:17 +0200, Romain Beauxis a écrit : If you remove this line, and comment the next if, then you simply remove the confirmation box. Could be a workaround perhaps if nothing better can be find

Bug#393837: More informations..

2008-10-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:36 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : Idea #1: use the confirm() Javascript function instead. Idea #2: for epiphany, provide a certManager2.xul that has the changes so that Iceweasel is not affected. Idea #3: override certManager.xul with a custom version in

Bug#393837: More informations..

2008-10-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:40:29AM +0100, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:36 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : Idea #1: use the confirm() Javascript function instead. Idea #2: for epiphany, provide a certManager2.xul that has the changes so that

Bug#503408: #503408: mxallowd: doesn't preserve local changes to /etc/mxallowd.conf

2008-10-28 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 09:17:04PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: I'm leaving the local changes one at 'serious' because it affects upgrades from earlier versions like the one currently in Ubuntu (1.5a-1). I just tested the upgrade, and it indeed ignores local changes. I don't think 'important' is

Bug#503311: monit: Client Certificate authentication fails with openssl-engine error

2008-10-28 Thread Martin Pala
Georges Toth wrote: Quoting Martin Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please can you provide your monit configuration? (the set httpd ... part is sufficient). set httpd port 28000 and use address 123.123.123.123 ssl enable pemfile /etc/ssl/ca_priv_pub.pem clientpemfile

Processed: Re: Bug#503770: carmetal: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 503770 Bug#503770: carmetal: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping

Bug#503770: carmetal: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Yves Combe
Hello, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: carmetal Version: 2.8.9.dakbug-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for

Bug#503770: carmetal: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

2008-10-28 Thread Matthew Johnson
close 503770 thanks On Tue Oct 28 10:35, Yves Combe wrote: This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older jvms. Binary packages explicitely

Bug#393837: More informations..

2008-10-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:32:44AM +0100, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:05 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:17 +0200, Romain Beauxis a écrit : If you remove this line, and comment the next if, then you simply remove

Bug#503571: Unable to reproduce - Bug#503571 aqualung: does not run: crashes after start

2008-10-28 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Mark Purcell a écrit : On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:11:20 Benjamin Scherrer wrote: So if it's not an issue in the Debian testing but rather a compatibility issue with multimedia and testing, I am using testing multimedia as well and have no issue. Adam, If you could close the

Bug#503367: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#503367: Bug#503367: Bug#503367: plink: file conflict with putty-tools

2008-10-28 Thread Steffen Möller
Charles Plessy schrieb: Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Teodor a écrit : I still believe it is best to rename 'plink' to 'puttylink' in putty-tools binary package. Anyway, this should be fixed for squeeze since in lenny there is no conflict (plink is not included in lenny).

Bug#503367: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#503367: Bug#503367: Bug#503367: plink: file conflict with putty-tools

2008-10-28 Thread Peter Palfrader
Steffen Möller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 28. Oktober 2008: To summarise things up: the renaming of the executable of plink to snplink renders the plink package inferior to a manual installation of plink under the proper name. What I'll do now unless I hear some objections that I am mentally

Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa

2008-10-28 Thread Thiemo Seufer
severity 500418 serious thanks Mark Purcell wrote: severity 500418 important thanks On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:57:39 Thiemo Seufer wrote: severity 500418 serious [...] Please add hppa mips mipsel to the allowed architectures in debian/control. Thiemo, Whilst I agree is is

Processed: Re: Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 500418 serious Bug#500418: Please re-enable istanbul builds on mips/mipsel Severity set to `serious' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#503821: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64: Kernel crash in Dom0 (Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1))

2008-10-28 Thread Lars Michael Jogback
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 Version: 2.6.26-9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm trying to run Xen in Lenny with the new 2.6.26-kernel as Dom0. It seems to be some problems on the amd64 architecture. After approx 10-20 hours of uptime, the Dom0 crash (even

Bug#501306: grub: diff for NMU version 0.97-47.1

2008-10-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
tags 501306 + patch thanks Hello, here's the patch that I announced sooner. I tested here by changing device.map to not reference my /boot and / partitions. Running udpdate-grub still works but it displays one line more saying that device.map got regenerated. I don't think that find_device()

Bug#503408: mxallowd: doesn't preserve local changes to /etc/mxallowd.conf

2008-10-28 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Niko, * [28.10.08 11:29]: One more problem is that the package both ships /etc/mxallowd.conf as a dpkg conffile and modifies it with maintainer scripts. This is explicitly forbidden by the policy, see section 10.7.3. Thanks for the hint. I'll rebuild the package later without the entry in

Processed: grub: diff for NMU version 0.97-47.1

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 501306 + patch Bug#501306: update-grub fails silently with wrong device.map There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#502757: marked as done (nut-cgi: piuparts test fails: chmod: cannot access `/etc/nut': No such file or directory)

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:30:32 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#502757: fixed in nut 2.2.2-6.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #502757, regarding nut-cgi: piuparts test fails: chmod: cannot access `/etc/nut': No such file or directory to be marked as

Bug#482140: marked as done (docbook-xml: Package does not install: update-xmlcatalog: error: entity already registered)

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:27:36 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#482140: fixed in docbook-xml 4.5-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #482140, regarding docbook-xml: Package does not install: update-xmlcatalog: error: entity already registered to be marked

Bug#502781: marked as done (docbook-xml: upgrading from etch to lenny - need to remove this package)

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:27:36 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#482140: fixed in docbook-xml 4.5-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #482140, regarding docbook-xml: upgrading from etch to lenny - need to remove this package to be marked as done. This

Bug#503571: Unable to reproduce - Bug#503571 aqualung: does not run: crashes after start

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 21:30:12 Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: Do you mean I should close the bug right now, even Ben has still this issue ? No if Ben still has the issue, then we shouldn't close, but from the tone of his last email I was under the impression that the problem has gone away.

Bug#484838: [sysprof-module-source] Fixed upstream

2008-10-28 Thread Lutz Lehmann
Package: sysprof-module-source Version: 1.0.10-1 Hi, I informed Soeren Sandmann, the upstream author of the package. He indicated that the bug should be fixed in the now available version 1.0.11 of the package. With kind regards, Lutz Lehmann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#421332: marked as done (epiphany-extensions: can't delete certificate using certificate manager)

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:47:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#393837: fixed in epiphany-browser 2.22.3-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #393837, regarding epiphany-extensions: can't delete certificate using certificate manager to be marked as done.

Bug#393837: marked as done (epiphany-extensions: Unable to edit or delete certificates)

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:47:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#393837: fixed in epiphany-browser 2.22.3-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #393837, regarding epiphany-extensions: Unable to edit or delete certificates to be marked as done. This means

Bug#503645: jhead: CVE-2008-4640, CVE-2008-4641 command injection via filename and insecure file handling

2008-10-28 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Ludovic, * Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-28 12:27]: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-27 16:47]: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Matthias Wandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So what is the

Processed: severity of 503821 is important

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 severity 503821 important Bug#503821: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64: Kernel crash in Dom0 (Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)) Severity set to `important' from `grave'

Bug#503367: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#503367: Bug#503367: Bug#503367: plink: file conflict with putty-tools

2008-10-28 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Steffen! Disclaimer: I'm a biologist [1] and I performed genome-wide analyses. On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:00:02 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: Steffen Möller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 28. Oktober 2008: To summarise things up: the renaming of the executable of plink to snplink renders the plink

Processed: tagging 503750

2008-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 tags 503750 + experimental Bug#503750: Save directory defaults to /tmp/balazar3_v0.1_saves Tags were: security Tags added: experimental End of message, stopping processing here.

  1   2   3   >