Package: libplexus-classworlds-java-doc
Version: 1.5.0-2
Severity: grave
As the subject says: since libplexus-classworlds-java-doc has a Depends on
classpath-doc, which is not in sid nor provided by any package in sid, the
package is uninstallable.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
**
Build finished at 20100815-0038
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log is attached. Tagging affecting too squeeze as
libyaml-syck-perl will migrate to squeeze today.
The diffs of packages are:
-Setting up debhelper (7.9.3) ...
-Setting up file (5.04-4) ...
+Setting up
Package: installation-reports
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-testing-sparc-CD-1.iso, 8-9-10 build
Date: 08-14-10
Machine: Sun Ultra 10
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred
-peek-perl-1.3400-1'
dh_auto_test: make -j1 test returned exit code 2
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 29
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
**
Build finished at 20100815-0707
FAILED
Source: jruby-joni
Version: 1.1.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: libsysactivity
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering
Source: librspec-ruby
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: bugzilla
Version: 3.6.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: gmp-ecm
Version: 6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian
Source: tokyocabinet-ruby
Version: 1.30-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: libsexp-processor-ruby
Version: 3.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin
Source: solr
Version: 1.4.0+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian
Source: libspring-2.5-java
Version: 2.5.6.SEC02-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using
Source: pybtex
Version: 0.13.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: dpkg-ruby
Version: 0.3.6
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -I. -I/usr/include
Source: hyperestraier
Version: 1.4.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: libfakefs-ruby
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: jifty
Version: 0.91117+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: libinotify-ruby
Version: 0.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: antelope
Version: 3.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian
Source: libimage-size-ruby
Version: 1:0.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: apache2
Version: 2.2.16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering
Source: gcl
Version: 2.6.7-64
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -c -g -Wall -DVOL
Source: libffi-ruby
Version: 0.6.3debian-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: unbound
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
./libtool --quiet --tag=CC
Source: imagemagick
Version: 8:6.6.0.4-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++:
/build
Source: testng
Version: 5.11+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: python-apt
Version: 0.7.96.1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: publican
Version: 2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: diagnostics
Version: 0.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[6]: Entering
Source: libgems-ruby
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: python3.1
Version: 3.1.2+20100707-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: ikiwiki
Version: 3.20100804
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: lusernet.app
Version: 0.4.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/ld: warning
Source: osso-gwconnect
Version: 1.0.12.debian-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin
Source: eucalyptus
Version: 1.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build
Source: ltp
Version: 20091231+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -L
Source: adonthell-data
Version: 0.3.4.cvs.20080529+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: yydebug
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 592981 593032
Bug#592981: FTBFS: failed tests t/TestApp-Plugin-SetupWizard/t/001-basic.t with
libyaml-syck-perl 1.12-1
Bug#593032: jifty: FTBFS: tests failed
Forcibly Merged 592981 593032.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:47:10 +
with message-id e1okzo6-0008jw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#590612: fixed in xmedcon 0.10.5-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590612,
regarding xmedcon: FTBFS on mips* (non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic
symbol
Judging from this bug and the statement that Arte regularly changes its
streaming system, this package is a clear candidate for volatile for
Squeeze+1.
Well, perhaps this is a good idea, we have time to see ;-)
Fortunately, Arte may stick with the current streaming system for some
times now
The kq and kq-data packages were removed from Debian because of
the unlicensed music: http://bugs.debian.org/575739
Meanwhile, the upstream KQ developers are tracking the music
licenses in their wiki. So far, the composer of aa_arofl.xm has
granted permission to distribute that file but not to
Package: libfeedtools-ruby1.9.1
Version: 0.2.29+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/feed_tools.rb:26:in `initialize': No such file or directory
- /usr/share/rails (Errno::ENOENT)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/feed_tools.rb:26:in `new'
Package: libfacets-ruby1.9.1
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/facets/string/start_with.rb:34:in `alias_method': undefined
method `ends_with?' for class `String' (NameError)
from
Package: libstomp-ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
$ ruby1.9.1 -e 'require stomp'
internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require':
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/stomp.rb:289: syntax error, unexpected tLABEL (SyntaxError)
Package: libgettext-activerecord-ruby1.9.1
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
$ ruby1.9.1 -e 'require gettext_activerecord'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/gettext/runtime/locale_path.rb:56:in `default_path_rules':
undefined method `all_load_paths' for
Package: libramaze-ruby1.9.1
Version: 2010.06.18-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
$ ruby1.9.1 -e 'require ramaze'
internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29: stack level too deep
(SystemStackError)
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
Package: libxml-parser-ruby1.9.1
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
$ ruby1.9.1 -e 'require xmldigest'
internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require': no such file to load --
rubygems (LoadError)
from
On 2010-08-15 09:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libsysactivity
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
Package: udev
Version: 160-1
Severity: critical
Tags: squeeze sid
Reproduce bug:
Upgrade udev to 160-1, reboot.
During booting, you will get errors saying udeverror- udev already running
acpi_fakekeyd will also not run with an error message.
At the login screen, mouse, keyboard will not work.
If
Package: libdataobjects-ruby1.9.1
Version: 0.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require': no such file to load --
addressable/uri (LoadError)
from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require'
On Aug 15, Vikram Vincent vincentvik...@gmail.com wrote:
During booting, you will get errors saying udeverror- udev already running
This cannot happen in normal conditions.
I believe your initramfs is broken in some way, what happens if you
force rebuilding it?
Solution:
Boot into single user
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package mc
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'mc'
Limit currently set to 'package':'mc'
unarchive 556922
tags 556922 +fixed
Bug #556922 {Done: Patrick Winnertz win...@der-winnie.de} [mc] Console resize
freezes mc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 579790 important
Bug #579790 [dpkg] courier-authdaemon: uninstallation fails: exec:
/usr/sbin/courierlogger: cannot execute: No such file or directory
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
2010/8/12 Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org:
On Do, 2010-08-12 at 11:10 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
0,1% is reserved for packages depending multiarch style on
package:{any,native} - which isn't official allowed by now.
IIRC, :native is not part of the spec at all, and no one ever
On 15/08/10 at 12:31 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2010-08-15 09:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libsysactivity
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 572920 1.6.2-1
Bug #572920 {Done: Daniel Kobras kob...@debian.org} [mpg123] libltdl3:
Security update breaks mpg123
Bug #579466 {Done: Daniel Kobras kob...@debian.org} [mpg123] mpg123 wrongly
searches for output modules.
Ignoring
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 572920 1.6.2-1
Bug #572920 {Done: Daniel Kobras kob...@debian.org} [mpg123] libltdl3:
Security update breaks mpg123
Bug #579466 {Done: Daniel Kobras kob...@debian.org} [mpg123] mpg123 wrongly
searches for output modules.
Bug Marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 575339 1.6.2-4
Bug #575339 [pyscrabble-server] pyscrabble-server: broken in lenny due to no
python 2.5 zodb support
Bug Marked as fixed in versions pyscrabble/1.6.2-4.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 586956 0.62-4
Bug #586956 [wmnut] wmnut: FTBFS with /lib-using nut package
Bug Marked as fixed in versions wmnut/0.62-4.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586956:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 546262 important
Bug #546262 [kdm] kdm crash (due to a bug in libx11-6 o xserver in unstable?)
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
546262:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfixed 586389 0.4.4-4.1
Bug #586389 {Done: James Andrewartha tr...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au}
[service-discovery-applet] service-discovery-applet crashes immediately
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions 0.4.4-4.1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfixed 591796 0.2-1
Bug #591796 {Done: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org} [vocproc] vocproc:
Vocproc fails to load
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions vocproc/0.2-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:00:19PM -0400, ylsdd wrote:
The 'greylistd-setup-exim4' script added a section 'deny' to
/etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt.
# Deny if blacklisted by greylist
deny
message = $sender_host_address is blacklisted from delivering \\
Your message dated Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:32:11 +
with message-id e1okefv-kx...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#591594: fixed in ezmlm-browse 0.10-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #591594,
regarding ezmlm-browse: installation fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 328472 + pending
Bug #328472 [tint] tint: doesn't remove score file on purge
Added tag(s) pending.
tags 590208 + pending
Bug #590208 [tint] Buffer overflows in tint
Added tag(s) pending.
tags 591590 + pending
Bug #591590 [tint] tint:
Package: oggz-tools
Version: 0.9.8-1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/oggz-chop
Justification: renders package unusable
This is what I get: segmentation fault
Doesn't work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
tags 590765 +patch
thanks
Hi
This only happens on sparc as src/osdep/byteorder.h tries to include
sys/byteorder.h when __sparc__ is defined thinking it must be Solaris.
You can fix this by changing this to checking for __sun__ and __sparc__
instead of __sparc__ (as __sun__ is only defined on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 590765 +patch
Bug #590765 [src:aircrack-ng] aircrack-ng: FTBFS: error: sys/byteorder.h: No
such file or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
590765:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 03:45:55PM -0400, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
Versions of OpenConnect before 2.25 do not verify that the server SSL
certificate matches the server hostname, which enables an attacker to
perform an MITM attack on the connection. This can be fixed by upgrading
to
On 15 August 2010 17:19, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote:
On Aug 15, Vikram Vincent vincentvik...@gmail.com wrote:
During booting, you will get errors saying udeverror- udev already running
This cannot happen in normal conditions.
I believe your initramfs is broken in some way, what happens
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:58:34AM +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org writes:
While I agree it's potentially harmful, I think fixing it has a very
high risk of breaking user scripts. It's definitely not something to do
in a stable security update, and I'm not
Package: gretl
Version: 1.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
gretl produces uninstallable packages when it is binNMUed.
This recently happened for the mpfr - mpfr4 transition. The generated
gretl package has a dependency on gretl-common (= 1.9.1-1+b1) which
cannot be satisfied as gretl-common is
-powerpc-linux-gnu'
dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
make: *** [build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
Build finished at 20100815-1312
FAILED [dpkg
=powerpc
scilab_5.2.2-2
Watcher: Terminating.
Watcher: Removing lock
Build finished at 20100815-1446
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died
* Marcos Talau ta...@users.sourceforge.net [2010-08-14 15:27]:
The BUG related on armel was already correct solved [1].
I don't think disabling some option is the best fix. I searched
around and found http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466
which explains why the code in ziproxy is
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/user-ikiwiki_3.20100804-amd64-I1dN7b/ikiwiki-3.20100804
Package: gnustep-gui
Version: 0.18.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
gnustep-gui FTBFS on hppa. From the build log:
/usr/share/GNUstep/Makefiles/mkinstalldirs GSspell.service/Resources
(echo {; echo ' NOTE = Automatically generated, do not edit!;'; \
echo NSExecutable = \GSspell\;; \
On 15 August 2010 at 16:34, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| Hi,
|
| gretl produces uninstallable packages when it is binNMUed.
|
| This recently happened for the mpfr - mpfr4 transition. The generated
| gretl package has a dependency on gretl-common (= 1.9.1-1+b1) which
| cannot be satisfied as
On Aug 15, Vikram Vincent vincentvik...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe your initramfs is broken in some way, what happens if you
force rebuilding it?
I simply upgraded my kernel version, headers and all to the one currently in
unstable (2.6.32+28).
This is not what I asked you. See
Package: ziproxy
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: normal
FYI: Current buildd log:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ziproxyarch=armelver=3.1.1-1stamp=1281879748file=logas=raw
Cheers
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:32:21AM +0900, Jun Kaneko wrote:
Sorry to get back to you late.
I am wishing to replace these flash files
by more generic solution such as JavaScript and/or HTML5
at some future MT5 milestone.
But I believe that we are looking for the immediate solution for MT4.3x.
However, to mimic the old behavior, it also needs to add
OnTitlebar Mouse1 :Raise
Hmm -- that's not right either. If I add this, then I can't switch
between tabs by clicking on them in the title bar. I'm not sure how to
fix that at all.
--Ken
--
Chanoch (Ken) Bloom. PhD candidate.
For the record: I personally don't consider this bug fix-worthy for stable.
First of all: The title is not completely accurate:
APT removes as requested the required package 'mawk' -
(the command used is not provided in the report, but as nothing can
conflict with a required package and required
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/15/2010 03:48 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: adonthell-data
Version: 0.3.4.cvs.20080529+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
tags 593112 + patch
thanks
On 0, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
Patch?
In case you wonder how you should fix it, here is a patch.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
diff -Nru gretl-1.9.1/debian/changelog gretl-1.9.1/debian/changelog
--- gretl-1.9.1/debian/changelog 2010-06-25
block 593124 with 592751
thanks
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
gnustep-gui FTBFS on hppa.
Yes, that's the same bug which I reassigned to gnustep-base.
Still no clues about the problem, unfortunately :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 593124 with 592751
Bug #593124 [gnustep-gui] gnustep-gui: FTBFS on hppa (make_services:
malloc.c:3097: sYSMALLOc: Assertion ... failed)
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 593124: 592751
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 593112 + patch
Bug #593112 [gretl] gretl: Not bin-NMU safe
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
593112: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593112
Debian Bug
On 15 August 2010 at 20:24, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
| tags 593112 + patch
| thanks
Nice, thanks -- applied to my sources too. I am surprised lintian hadn't
flagged me for that wrong use of binary:version.
Dirk
| On 0, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
|
| Patch?
|
|
| In case you
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:25:24PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: speedy-cgi-perl
Version: 2.22-11
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100602 qa-ftbfs
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2~svn28788-1
Severity: serious
Ruby's test suite (make test-all) hangs on sparc. I had to do a manual
upload after disabling the test suite.
There's an history of sparc problems with ruby 1.9.*. See #545345 and
#565765.
Since it works fine on amd64, armel, i386,
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2~svn28788-1
Severity: serious
Ruby's test suite fails on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64, and then hangs.
i386:
Loaded suite ./test/runner
Started
/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.2~svn28788-1-kfreebsd-i386-8LdWDu/ruby1.9.1-1.9.2~svn28788/lib/timeout.rb:50:
[BUG]
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2~svn28788-1
Severity: serious
Ruby's test suite segfaults on hppa:
Loaded suite ./test/runner
Started
/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.2~svn28788-1-hppa-HqbNKl/ruby1.9.1-1.9.2~svn28788/lib/drb/extservm.rb:82:
[BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-07-30)
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2~svn28788-1
Severity: serious
Ruby's test suite segfaults on ia64:
Loaded suite ./test/runner
Started
/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.2~svn28788-1-ia64-di4imI/ruby1.9.1-1.9.2~svn28788/test/ruby/test_float.rb:249:
[BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.2dev
Hello,
sorry for the stupid question but does this patch also goes into Squeeze? I'm
also in the situation that i'm not able to build a Squeeze system using Debian
live-helper when the mdadm is included in the live system. I think this is
essential to be included in Squeeze.
Regards
Volker
Package: chrony
Version: 1.24-2
Severity: serious
Oh dear
Setting up chrony (1.24-2) ...
Starting /usr/sbin/chronyd...
/usr/sbin/chronyd failed to start.
invoke-rc.d: initscript chrony, action start failed.
dpkg: error processing chrony (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation
On 15/08/10 at 21:45 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:25:24PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: speedy-cgi-perl
Version: 2.22-11
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:11:12 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Could you get a full backtrace? The function causing the illegal instruction
seems unused and upstream wants to know what called it, but looking at
empathy,
clutter, clutter-gtk and libchamplain I can't find it.
(Sorry for
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
