Bug#841329: node-hosted-git-info: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-hosted-git-info Version: 2.1.5-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841330: node-is-dotfile: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-is-dotfile Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841332: node-isexe: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-isexe Version: 1.1.2-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841334: node-map-cache: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-map-cache Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841335: node-map-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-map-visit Version: 0.1.5-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841331: node-is-primitive: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-is-primitive Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841338: node-repeat-element: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-repeat-element Version: 1.1.2+github-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841333: node-isobject: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-isobject Version: 2.1.0-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841337: node-pascalcase: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-pascalcase Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841336: node-normalize-path: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-normalize-path Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841320: node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-collection-visit Version: 0.2.3-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841321: node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-collection-visit Version: 0.2.3-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841324: node-extend-shallow: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

Package: src:node-extend-shallow Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#841316: gcc: the last 6.2.0-7 broke the virtualbox build

Source: gcc Version: 6.2.0-7 Severity: serious As said, I built virtualbox correctly with 6.2.0-6 and then uploaded on unstable. The new gcc 6.2.0-7 broke the build with the following error: kmk_builtin_rm -f -- /«PKGBUILDDIR»/out/obj/VBoxVMM/dtrace/dtrace/VBoxVMM.h.dep

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 841316 src:gcc-6 Bug #841316 [src:gcc] gcc: the last 6.2.0-7 broke the virtualbox build Warning: Unknown package 'src:gcc' Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc' to 'src:gcc-6'. No longer marked as found in versions gcc/6.2.0-7. Ignoring

Bug#841285: freemat: FTBFS (cannot find -lclangTidyReadabilityModule)

Hi Santiago >Ok, I could agree that freemat is probably not to be blamed for this. as an llvm team member, I can say that we are already working on removing 3.6 from testing. Yesterday 3.8 migrated, and today we already opened 4 bugs against ftp.debian.org to make llvm-defaults migrate too.

Processed: Re: Bug#841307: docker-compose: Wrong dependency version for python-docker

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #841307 [docker-compose] docker-compose: Wrong dependency version for python-docker Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 841307: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841307 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: severity of 841082 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 841082 serious Bug #841082 [epiphany-browser] epiphany-browser: bump dependency on epiphany-browser-data Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#840853: Workaround

Neil, while working a bit on libguestfs 1.34 the other day, I noticed that the problem exists there, too. Whereas installing the sgabios package gives us somewhat meaningful console output, linuxboot_dma.bin is still missing. I suppose that the newer qemu version wants to use linuxboot_dma.bin

Bug#841316: gcc: the last 6.2.0-7 broke the virtualbox build

Hi, On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:47:48 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Source: gcc > Version: 6.2.0-7 > Severity: serious > > As said, I built virtualbox correctly with 6.2.0-6 and then uploaded on > unstable. > The new gcc 6.2.0-7 broke the build with the

Bug#841313: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: FTBFS: Create .afm and .pfa fonts from dg. \n Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Hi Chris It looks like a problem with the wftodm binary. This is an important piece in the creation of the fonts. I will only have access to my PC next week Thursday (27 October 2016) to check the C source code and replicate it on amd64. Please bear with me for a while. Thanks for your bug

Processed: Tidy up. Stage one

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 841321 node-define-property Bug #841321 [src:node-collection-visit] node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy) Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-collection-visit' to 'node-define-property'. No longer marked as

Bug#841299: patsy: FTBFS (AssertionError)

d affects, so that this is still visible in the page for this package. BTW: If you are looking for some build-depends to blame, "patsy" used to build ok in stretch on 20161010, so it would be some package that entered testing between 20161010 and 20161019. Thanks.

Bug#841292: gcc-6: flexible array support broken

forwarded 841292 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR78039 tags 841292 + upstream clone 841292 -1 reassign -1 glibc retitle -1 invalid code in glibc tests severity 841292 important thanks According to upstream this is invalid code, and the change won't be reverted for GCC 7. There is still discussion upstream

Bug#841274: node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module 'wrappy'

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Chris Lamb wrote: > affects 841274 node-is-accessor-descriptor node-is-descriptor > node-is-extendable node-is-number node-to-regex-range > thanks Hi. The quoted text above is the reason I didn't see any of those bugs. I was looking here:

Bug#841274: node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module 'wrappy'

Santiago Vila wrote: > Thanks and sorry for the noise. Really don't worry about it; was just an FYI. :) > Assuming that this one is the real cause for all the bugs I reported, > I'm going to merge them all into this one. Awesome - great work. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris

Processed (with 1 error): Tidy up. Stage two

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 841274 841321 841322 841323 841324 841325 841326 841327 841328 > 841329 841330 841331 841332 841333 841334 841335 841336 841337 841338 Bug #841274 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module

Processed: Tidy up. Stage three

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 841274 node-define-property Bug #841274 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module 'wrappy' Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-define-property' to 'node-define-property'. No longer marked as

Bug#841338: node-repeat-element: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:17:20PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi, > > > node-repeat-element: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy) > > This (and others) appears to be a duplicate of #841274. I used > "affects" there, perhaps incorrectly, but at least it avoids > duplicates. Do you mean

Bug#840425: marked as done (mkosi: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (debian/mkosi.1: No such file or directory))

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:51:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#840425: fixed in mkosi 0~20161012-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #840425, regarding mkosi: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (debian/mkosi.1: No such file or

Bug#839791: marked as done (qtcreator: builds with clang support on armel)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:55:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#839791: fixed in qtcreator 4.1.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #839791, regarding qtcreator: builds with clang support on armel to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#835752: marked as done (dolphin: FTBFS: dh_install: missing files, aborting)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:53:04 +0200 with message-id <20161019165304.bgtsfayewrtnc...@gnuservers.com.ar> and subject line Re: Bug#835752: dolphin: FTBFS: dh_install: missing files, aborting has caused the Debian Bug report #835752, regarding dolphin: FTBFS: dh_install: missing

Bug#841343: rakudo: FTBFS on arm64, powerpc and ppc64 - testsuite errors

Source: rakudo Version: 2016.09-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch Hi, rakudo FTBFS on arm64, powerpc and ppc64 with errors in the testsuite. arm64 times out during the 't/04-nativecall/02-simple-args.t' test. For powerpc the errors are: t/04-nativecall/01-argless.t . ok

Bug#841307: marked as done (docker-compose: Wrong dependency version for python-docker)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:37:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#841307: fixed in docker-compose 1.8.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #841307, regarding docker-compose: Wrong dependency version for python-docker to be marked as done.

Bug#835726: marked as done (kate: FTBFS: dh_install: missing files, aborting)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:55:50 +0200 with message-id <20161019165550.bzcl3j3dmgtb6...@gnuservers.com.ar> and subject line Re: Bug#835726: kate: FTBFS: dh_install: missing files, aborting has caused the Debian Bug report #835726, regarding kate: FTBFS: dh_install: missing files,

Bug#806613: marked as done (eclipse: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (dh_install: eclipse-jdt missing files))

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:40:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#806613: fixed in eclipse 3.8.1-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #806613, regarding eclipse: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (dh_install: eclipse-jdt missing

Processed: Tidy up. Stage four

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 841274 0.2.5-1 Bug #841274 [node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module 'wrappy' Bug #841321 [node-define-property] node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy) Bug #841322

Bug#841274: node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module 'wrappy'

Hi. The bugs I filed should now all be merged into this one, and I've used affects with src: so that any clone of myself in a parallel universe can see them and not file more duplicates. If anybody reading this could tell me how we arrived at having so many one-day-old unbuildable packages in

Bug#841352: libnftnl: FTBFS (testsuite error) on Big Endian Architectures

Source: libnftnl Version: 1.0.6-2 Severity: serious Hi, as you know, the current package is not migrating because of testsuite failures on BE architectures. Unfortunately I don't have a patch, but in Ubuntu we are excluding them from the testsuite diff -Nru libnftnl-1.0.6/debian/rules

Bug#841340: marked as done (invalid code in virtualbox sources)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:36:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#841340: fixed in virtualbox 5.1.8-dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #841340, regarding invalid code in virtualbox sources to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#841274: node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module 'wrappy'

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote: > If anybody reading this could tell me how we arrived at having so many > one-day-old unbuildable packages in unstable, I'm still curious about it. Because node-once was updated to a new upstream release which now requires

Processed: Re: ocaml: Please build libasmrun.a with -fPIC

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #837359 [src:ocaml] ocaml: Please build libasmrun.a and libcamlrun.a with -fPIC Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > affects -1 + botch Bug #837359 [src:ocaml] ocaml: Please build libasmrun.a and libcamlrun.a with -fPIC Added

Bug#779551: marked as done (devtodo: FTBFS, should Build-Depends on libtool-bin)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:19:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#779551: fixed in devtodo 0.1.20-6.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #779551, regarding devtodo: FTBFS, should Build-Depends on libtool-bin to be marked as done. This

Bug#841285: marked as done (freemat: FTBFS (cannot find -lclangTidyReadabilityModule))

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:37:43 +0200 with message-id <8668d564-370f-24e6-d18b-467be1272...@debian.org> and subject line freemat: FTBFS (cannot find -lclangTidyReadabilityModule) has caused the Debian Bug report #841285, regarding freemat: FTBFS (cannot find

Bug#757536: marked as done (eclipse: FTBFS with Java 8: Duplicate methods named spliterator with the parameters () and ())

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:40:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#757536: fixed in eclipse 3.8.1-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #757536, regarding eclipse: FTBFS with Java 8: Duplicate methods named spliterator with the parameters ()

Bug#841274: node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module 'wrappy'

reassign 841274 node-once found 841274 1.4.0-1 retitle 841274 node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a lot of packages to FTBFS thanks On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:47:35PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote: > > If

Processed: Re: node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module 'wrappy'

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 841274 node-once Bug #841274 [node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot find module 'wrappy' Bug #841321 [node-define-property] node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy) Bug #841322

<    1   2