close 901293 0.31.1+dfsg-1
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 901293 0.31.1+dfsg-1
Bug #901293 [src:matrix-synapse] matrix-synapse: Improper event filtering in
get_missing_events handler
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #901293 to the same values
previously set
Bug #901293
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 0.31.1+dfsg-1
Bug #901293 [src:matrix-synapse] matrix-synapse: Improper event filtering in
get_missing_events handler
Marked as fixed in versions matrix-synapse/0.31.1+dfsg-1.
--
901293: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901293
Debian Bug
Source: matrix-synapse
Version: 0.30.0+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch security upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/3371
Control: fixed -1 0.31.1+dfsg-1
From
https://matrix.org/blog/2018/06/08/synapse-0-31-1-released/
> v0.31.1 fixes a security bug in the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 899478 + sid buster
Bug #899478 [src:culmus-fancy] culmus-fancy: Invalid maintainer address
debian-hebrew-pack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Added tag(s) buster and sid.
> tags 899441 + sid buster
Bug #899441 [src:aspell-ar] aspell-ar: Invalid
package: src:chromium-browser
severity: grave
version: 68.0.3440.7-1
The version just uploaded to experimental causes an internal compiler
error in gcc on arm [0].
Best wishes,
Mike
[0]https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=chromium-browser=experimental
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.7.1+dfsg1-4
Bug #901041 {Done: Anton Gladky } [libviennacl-doc]
libviennacl-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite
/usr/share/doc/libviennacl-dev/README.gz
Marked as found in versions viennacl/1.7.1+dfsg1-4; no longer marked as fixed
Followup-For: Bug #901041
Control: found -1 1.7.1+dfsg1-4
You fixed the wrong problem. The Breaks+Replaces may still be needed,
but the underlying problem is not fixed - both libviennacl-dev and
libviennacl-doc ship these files:
usr/share/doc/libviennacl-dev/README.gz
On 2018-06-08 17:51, Matthias Klose wrote:
> you should not run piuparts against outdated binaries.
These tests take everything available in the Packages files ...
> I filed #899045
> to remove these packages, but that didn't get yet processed. Closing
> this issue now.
Interestingly these
Hi Rene,
On 2018-06-10 11:10, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:56:31AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> libreoffice-dictionaries/experimental FTBFS:
> Yes, I have seen this. I *do* look at buildlogs after uploads.
Unfortunately not everone does ... Anyway, I just needed a bug
Why use bash at all if e.g.,
$ checkbashisms /usr/sbin/update-exim4.conf.template
could not find any possible bashisms in bash script
/usr/sbin/update-exim4.conf.template
means one can just use #!/bin/sh ?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source spip
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'spip'
Limit currently set to 'source':'spip'
> tags 899895 + pending
Bug #899895 [src:spip] spip: Invalid maintainer address
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 900597 important
Bug #900597 [src:golang-github-prometheus-client-golang]
golang-github-prometheus-client-golang/0.9.0~pre1+git20180417.82f5ff1-2 breaks
golang-github-docker-go-metrics
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
>
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 23:06:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#898024: fixed in nodejs 10.4.0~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #898024,
regarding trying to overwrite '/usr/include/nodejs/common.gypi', which is also
in package nodejs-dev 10.0.0~dfsg-2
to be marked
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 04:04:13PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2018-06-10 Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 03:03:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> I have tried debugging the issue to get a minimal testcase. I have had
> >> some success. The issue is triggered by
I'm guessing it's the same for nm-applet. I got no network manager
applet and trash applet either. System/Preferences is kinda empty too.
It may be the reason why I have to login and "startx" now (well...
sudo ifconfig eth0 up, sudo dhclient, and then startx).
Some interesting logs/crash.
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 22:04:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#898468: fixed in debian-installer 20180610
has caused the Debian Bug report #898468,
regarding debian-installer: black screen/long delay in graphical installer
after switching from linux 4.15 to 4.16
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2018-06-10 22:04:43)
> 2018-06-10 20:14 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard :
> > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2018-06-10 16:51:14)
> > > 2018-06-10 10:26 GMT+02:00 Andreas Beckmann :
> > > > The 8 -> 10 upgrade path does not work either:
> > > >
> > > > Selecting previously unselected package
I also note /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf got overwritten without
asking the user Y/N.
I also note exim4-config contains #!/bin/bash scripts without Depends: bash.
D> Be sure the package passes Checkbashisms!
JN> Which package? Is there a particular bashism you noticed?
All the shell
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 17:03:38 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#897242: chromium: FTBFS on armhf: linker runs out of
memory
has caused the Debian Bug report #897242,
regarding chromium: FTBFS on armhf: linker runs out of memory
to be marked as done.
This means that
version: 67.0.3396.62-2
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 22:11:33 +0200
with message-id <20180610201133.ga9...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#901252: vlc: Fail to launch, QPainter not active
has caused the Debian Bug report #901252,
regarding vlc: Fail to launch, QPainter not active
to be marked as done.
This
2018-06-10 20:14 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard :
> Hi Jérémy,
>
> Quoting Jérémy Lal (2018-06-10 16:51:14)
> > 2018-06-10 10:26 GMT+02:00 Andreas Beckmann :
> > > The 8 -> 10 upgrade path does not work either:
> > >
> > > Selecting previously unselected package libnode64-dev.
> > > Preparing to
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 19:53:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901113: fixed in pyro 1:3.16-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #901113,
regarding pyro: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 19:54:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901119: fixed in yodl 4.02.00-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #901119,
regarding yodl: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi Jérémy,
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2018-06-10 16:51:14)
> 2018-06-10 10:26 GMT+02:00 Andreas Beckmann :
> > The 8 -> 10 upgrade path does not work either:
> >
> > Selecting previously unselected package libnode64-dev.
> > Preparing to unpack .../libnode64-dev_10.3.0~dfsg-1_amd64.deb ...
> >
[Please keep the bug in CC]
On 2018-06-10 17:50:20, John Hendricks wrote:
> I apologize, this is the first bug report I've ever filed. I'm not sure where
> VLC keeps the log file, so I will attach the output of vlc -vvv in a text
> file.
> I am unable to produce output from the given reportbug
Hi,
積丹尼 wrote:
Be sure the package passes Checkbashisms!
>
Which package? Is there a particular bashism you noticed?
Please keep in mind that these reports appear as emails in a crowded inbox,
where a little context in the subject line can go a long way.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 17:50:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#899486: fixed in electrum 3.1.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #899486,
regarding electrum: Invalid maintainer address
pkg-bitcoin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 12:32:11 -0500
with message-id <874liar1ic@trouble.defaultvalue.org>
has caused the report #900652,
regarding guile-2.2: FTBFS on armhf: FAIL: gc.test: gc: after-gc-hook gets
called
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s)
It looks like gc.test may be failing intermittently in Debian (see below).
Searching around I saw at least one other report of this in the #guile
logs from last year.
For now, I'm wondering if if would be plausible to mark the test as
unresolved to avoid guile-2.2's removal from Debian testing,
severity 895482 important
thanks
Dropped severity to allow testing migration.
--
Michael
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 895482 important
Bug #895482 [ca-certificates] Fails to upgrade: installed ca-certificates
package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 4
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 16:50:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901106: fixed in eccodes 2.7.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #901106,
regarding eccodes: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unpreoducible
Hi
On 2018-06-10 11:52:47, John Hendricks wrote:
> Source: vlc
> Version: 3
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I upgraded to VLC3 from Synaptic's Mark All Updates option, the bug
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo unpreoducible
Unknown tag/s: unpreoducible.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream
pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed
fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato
Source: vlc
Version: 3
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I upgraded to VLC3 from Synaptic's Mark All Updates option, the bug started
here.
I ran a complete purge of all VLC packages and reinstall via rebuild from
source.
No results, bug
2018-06-10 10:26 GMT+02:00 Andreas Beckmann :
> Followup-For: Bug #898024
> Control: found -1 10.3.0~dfsg-1
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> The 8 -> 10 upgrade path does not work either:
>
> Selecting previously unselected package libnode64-dev.
> Preparing to unpack
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 901243 mate-indicator-applet got removed from buster due to ido build
> dependency
Bug #901243 [src:mate-indicator-applet] mate-indicator-applet got removed from
buster due to (spurious?) ido build dependency
Changed Bug title to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 901185 exim4-config
Bug #901185 [bash] exim4-config: fails to install
Added indication that 901185 affects exim4-config
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
901185:
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 07:28:23PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 05:27:20PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Where is the attachment?
>
> Here you go.
>
> Helmut
> From: Helmut Grohne
> Subject: make sh/autoconfall.sh work somewhat
>...
>
On 2018-06-10 Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 03:03:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> I have tried debugging the issue to get a minimal testcase. I have had
>> some success. The issue is triggered by debconf.
>> /usr/share/debconf/confmodule changes IFS to \n and with bash5 this
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 13:50:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901107: fixed in grib-api 1.26.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #901107,
regarding grib-api: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> tags 896726 + patch
Bug #896726 [src:gedit-source-code-browser-plugin]
gedit-source-code-browser-plugin: missing build dependency on dh-python
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 896726 + pending
Bug #896726 [src:gedit-source-code-browser-plugin]
Control: tags 896726 + patch
Control: tags 896726 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gedit-source-code-browser-plugin (versioned as
3.0.3-5.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if
I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of
Processing control commands:
> tags 828866 + pending
Bug #828866 [doxyqml] doxyqml: Please mark doxyqml multi-arch: foreign
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #828866 to the same tags previously set
> tags 896754 + patch
Bug #896754 [src:doxyqml] doxyqml: missing build dependency on
Processing control commands:
> tags 828866 + pending
Bug #828866 [doxyqml] doxyqml: Please mark doxyqml multi-arch: foreign
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 896754 + patch
Bug #896754 [src:doxyqml] doxyqml: missing build dependency on python3-distutils
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 896754 + pending
Bug
Control: tags 828866 + pending
Control: tags 896754 + patch
Control: tags 896754 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for doxyqml (versioned as 0.3.0-1.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise
Source: mate-indicator-applet
Version: 1.20.0-1
Severity: serious
mate-indicator-applet was removed from buster when
ido was removed due to #895039.
The changelog says:
mate-indicator-applet (1.18.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
...
* debian/control:
+ Alternatively B-D on libido3-0.1-dev
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 03:03:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I have tried debugging the issue to get a minimal testcase. I have had
> some success. The issue is triggered by debconf.
> /usr/share/debconf/confmodule changes IFS to \n and with bash5 this
> change is persistent and breaks the
Hello bash maintainers (debconf Cced),
I have tried debugging the issue to get a minimal testcase. I have had
some success. The issue is triggered by debconf.
/usr/share/debconf/confmodule changes IFS to \n and with bash5 this
change is persistent and breaks the maintainerscript. i.e. installing
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:42:35AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> Hi Ghislain,
>
> I intended to fix this (low hanging fruit ;-) ) bug but when I noticed
> that you are carrying an explicit *-dbg package I was wondering whether
> this is needed. I would remove it in
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 12:20:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#900826: fixed in sabnzbdplus 2.3.4+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #900826,
regarding sabnzbdplus does not start due to python cheetah version error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
This issue is long closed. I will not comment on that last email.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
On 2018-06-10 Eric Valette wrote:
> On 6/10/18 11:57 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
>> On 6/10/18 11:35 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> exports both dc_directives and any variable listed in dc_directives,
>>> i.e. any external command will see both ${dc_directives} and
>>> ${dc_eximconfig_configtype}
Processing control commands:
> tags 896298 + patch
Bug #896298 [python-cluster] python-cluster: cluster fails to import
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 896298 + pending
Bug #896298 [python-cluster] python-cluster: cluster fails to import
Added tag(s) pending.
--
896298:
Control: tags 896298 + patch
Control: tags 896298 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for python-cluster (versioned as 1.3.3-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked
On 2018-06-10 Eric Valette wrote:
> On 6/10/18 11:35 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > exports both dc_directives and any variable listed in dc_directives,
> > i.e. any external command will see both ${dc_directives} and
> > ${dc_eximconfig_configtype} et al.
> right but did you intent that?
Yes
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:05:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901129: fixed in timidity 2.14.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #901129,
regarding timidity: removes conffile belonging to timidity-daemon
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:05:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901141: fixed in timidity 2.14.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #901141,
regarding timidity,timidity-el: both packages ship the manpages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:05:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901141: fixed in timidity 2.14.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #901141,
regarding '/usr/share/man/ja/man1/timidity.1.gz' is also in package timidity
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Control: tags 896208 + patch
Control: tags 896208 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pysurfer (versioned as 0.7-2.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly
Processing control commands:
> tags 896208 + patch
Bug #896208 [python-surfer] python-surfer: surfer fails to import
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 896208 + pending
Bug #896208 [python-surfer] python-surfer: surfer fails to import
Added tag(s) pending.
--
896208:
Hi again,
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 01:51:09PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> You undeniably have the best understanding of SBT among the Debian
> developers. Even if you don't have the time to tackle all of this by
> yourself, do you think you could sketch a plan we could follow to
> achieve
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 10:49:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#868617: fixed in golang-github-dnephin-cobra
1.5.1+git20170113.0.0e9ca70-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #868617,
regarding golang-github-dnephin-cobra FTBFS: test failures
to be marked as done.
This
On Sunday, 10 June 2018 8:12:53 PM AEST Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> FYI, released mc-4.8.21 about a week ago...
Thanks, I've already uploaded it:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mc.html
--
Cheers,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
Good luck happens when preparedness meets opportunity.
signature.asc
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #868617 in golang-github-dnephin-cobra reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #868617 [src:golang-github-dnephin-cobra] golang-github-dnephin-cobra
FTBFS: test failures
Added tag(s) pending.
--
868617: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868617
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Be sure the package passes Checkbashisms!
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 901185
Bug #901185 {Done: Andreas Metzler } [bash] exim4-config:
fails to install
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #901185 to the same values
previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 901185 bash 5.0~alpha1-1
Bug #901185 {Done: Andreas Metzler } [exim4-config]
exim4-config: fails to install
Bug reassigned from package 'exim4-config' to 'bash'.
No longer marked as found in versions exim4/4.91-5.
Ignoring request to
On Wed, 30 May 2018, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 06:32:53PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
On Friday, 25 May 2018 9:44:46 PM AEST Andreas Tille wrote:
Uh, somebody did not answer the call to salvage this list
Should we try to ask alioth-lists admins? Any other idea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 873027 serious
Bug #873027 [libclamunrar] libclamunrar: FTBFS with zlib 1.2.10 and newer
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> tags 898705 + sid buster
Bug #898705 [src:android-platform-libcore] android-platform-libcore FTBFS with
On 6/10/18 11:57 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
On 6/10/18 11:35 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
exports both dc_directives and any variable listed in dc_directives,
i.e. any external command will see both ${dc_directives} and
${dc_eximconfig_configtype} et al.
right but did you intent that? The rest of
On 6/10/18 11:35 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
exports both dc_directives and any variable listed in dc_directives,
i.e. any external command will see both ${dc_directives} and
${dc_eximconfig_configtype} et al.
right but did you intent that? The rest of the script seems not to use
explicitly
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source nodejs
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'nodejs'
Limit currently set to 'source':'nodejs'
> tags 898024 + pending
Bug #898024 [nodejs-dev] trying to overwrite '/usr/include/nodejs/common.gypi',
which
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 09:49:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901191: fixed in libfabric 1.6.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #901191,
regarding libfabric-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces: libfabric1 (<< 1.6)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:44:45 +0200
with message-id <20180610094445.gd4...@argenau.bebt.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#901185: closed by Andreas Metzler
(Re: Bug#901185: me too)
has caused the Debian Bug report #901185,
regarding exim4-config: fails to install
to be marked as done.
On 2018-06-10 Eric Valette wrote:
> On 6/10/18 10:51 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
>> On 6/10/18 10:34 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
>>> line 330 :export dc_directives ${dc_directives}
>> Shodul be export dc_directives=${dc_directives} as far as I understand.
[...]
> and it worked. But I still think there
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #901191 in libfabric reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #901191 [libfabric-bin] libfabric-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces: libfabric1
(<< 1.6)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
901191: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 2018-06-10 Eric Valette wrote:
> On 6/10/18 10:59 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
> > On 6/10/18 10:51 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
> > 2) mv /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
> > /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf.old
exactly what I wrote ;-)
"installs/configures successfully once the broken
Package: libell-dev
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
Your package is lacking a dependency on libell0 (= ${binary:Version}),
without it dynamic linking is not going to work:
,
| $ sudo aptitude install libell-dev
| [...]
| $ file
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:56:31AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> libreoffice-dictionaries/experimental FTBFS:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice-dictionaries=all=1%3A6.1.0%7Ebeta1-1=1527247064=0
Yes, I have seen this. I *do* look at buildlogs after uploads.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 901220 + pending
Bug #901220 [src:libreoffice-dictionaries] libreoffice-dictionaries: FTBFS:
can't cd to /<>/debian/hunspell-es/usr/share/hunspell
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 901129 + pending
Bug #901129 [timidity] timidity: removes conffile belonging to timidity-daemon
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
901129:
Source: gitaly
Version: 0.96.1+debian-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
gitaly/experimental FTBFS:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gitaly=amd64=0.96.1%2Bdebian-4=1528128434=0
...
On 6/10/18 10:59 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
On 6/10/18 10:51 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
2) mv /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
/etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf.old
On 6/10/18 10:51 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
On 6/10/18 10:34 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
line 330 :export dc_directives ${dc_directives}
Shodul be export dc_directives=${dc_directives} as far as I understand.
To fix I did :
1) use dash temporarilly
2)
Source: libreoffice-dictionaries
Version: 1:6.1.0~beta1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
libreoffice-dictionaries/experimental FTBFS:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice-dictionaries=all=1%3A6.1.0%7Ebeta1-1=1527247064=0
debian/rules
On 6/10/18 10:34 AM, Eric Valette wrote:
line 330 :export dc_directives ${dc_directives}
Shodul be export dc_directives=${dc_directives} as far as I understand.
-- eric
Package: libgrpc-dev
Version: 1.12.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 901141 901189
Bug #901141 [timidity-el] '/usr/share/man/ja/man1/timidity.1.gz' is also in
package timidity
Bug #901189 [timidity-el] timidity,timidity-el: both packages ship the manpages
Marked as found in versions timidity/2.14.0-2.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 901189 timidity-el
Bug #901189 [timidity,timidity-el] timidity,timidity-el: both packages ship the
manpages
Bug reassigned from package 'timidity,timidity-el' to 'timidity-el'.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.14.0-2.
Ignoring
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 901185
Bug #901185 {Done: Andreas Metzler } [exim4-config]
exim4-config: fails to install
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #901185 to the same values
previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Package: libosmocoding0
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 901141 901189
Bug #901141 [timidity-el] '/usr/share/man/ja/man1/timidity.1.gz' is also in
package timidity
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #901189 is 'timidity,timidity-el' not 'timidity-el'
Failed to forcibly merge 901141:
On 6/10/18 10:33 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the exim4-config package:
But now how do we fix the problem? I will reopen until I have a fix.
Putting dash as /bin/sh does fix anything BTW.
-- eric
On 6/10/18 7:07 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2018-06-10 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
Oops. I mean just:
Setting up exim4-config (4.91-5) ...
/etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf: line 26: dc_eximconfig_configtype: command
not found
Hello,
Are you running bash (or other stuff) from experimental?
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 08:35:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#898976: fixed in openjdk-7 7u181-2.6.14-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #898976,
regarding openjdk-7: 2018 Q2 security update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
