Bug#957555: marked as done (mocassin: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 12:35:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957555: fixed in mocassin 2.02.73-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #957555, regarding mocassin: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: Bug#966938 marked as pending in ruby-devise

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #966938 [src:ruby-devise] ruby-devise: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: ruby-bson-ext Added tag(s) pending. -- 966938: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966938 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#966938: marked as pending in ruby-devise

2020-08-06 Thread Praveen Arimbrathodiyil
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #966938 in ruby-devise reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#966972: [in-toto-dev] Bug#966972: in-toto: FTBFS: ValueError: SSH supports only 1024 bit DSA keys

2020-08-06 Thread Lukas Puehringer
FYI: https://github.com/secure-systems-lab/securesystemslib/pull/264 fixes the issue upstream. On 04.08.2020 3:11 PM, Lukas Puehringer wrote: > Thanks for the report! > > It looks like a recent update to pyca/cryptography v3.0 causes our test code > (only) to break. I just filed an issue

Bug#957379: debdiff with the fix for Unstable

2020-08-06 Thread Leonidas S. Barbosa
Please test it. diff -Nru isc-dhcp-4.4.1/debian/changelog isc-dhcp-4.4.1/debian/changelog --- isc-dhcp-4.4.1/debian/changelog 2020-01-22 18:35:14.0 -0300 +++ isc-dhcp-4.4.1/debian/changelog 2020-08-05 23:08:47.0 -0300 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +isc-dhcp (4.4.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium

Processed: Bug#967965 marked as pending in astropy

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #967965 [src:astropy] astropy: FTBFS with scipy 1.5: [doctest] astropy.stats.funcs.binom_conf_interval failed Added tag(s) pending. -- 967965: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967965 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#967965: marked as pending in astropy

2020-08-06 Thread Ole Streicher
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #967965 in astropy reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#936146: archivemail - Python 3 porting

2020-08-06 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi! I used this frequently enough to be hesitant to let apt dist-upgrade remove it on my system currently. But I understand it may not make sense to port it as its hard and upstream is not active anymore. Is there an alternative in Debian repository? Best, -- Martin

Bug#967991: glirc, build-depends on package which is not in testing

2020-08-06 Thread peter green
notfound 967991 2.35-1 found 967991 2.32-1 close 967991 2.35-1 thanks On 06/08/2020 13:20, Clint Adams wrote: On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 11:20:00AM +0100, peter green wrote: glirc can no longer be built in testing because haskell-regex-tdfa is no longer present in testing. Ilias Tsitsimpis has

Bug#966938: marked as done (ruby-devise: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: ruby-bson-ext)

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:22:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966938: fixed in ruby-devise 4.7.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #966938, regarding ruby-devise: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: ruby-bson-ext to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#954684: marked as done (ant-contrib: FTBFS: tests failed)

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:48:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954684: fixed in ant-contrib 1.0~b3+svn177-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #954684, regarding ant-contrib: FTBFS: tests failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#957622: marked as done (oasis3: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:41:38 +0100 with message-id <8bf644e3-2f05-eb8c-5559-124834730...@debian.org> and subject line Close has caused the Debian Bug report #957622, regarding oasis3: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#963443: marked as pending in apache-curator

2020-08-06 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #963443 in apache-curator reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: bug 966889 is forwarded to https://github.com/java-native-access/jna/issues/1244

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 966889 https://github.com/java-native-access/jna/issues/1244 Bug #966889 [src:libjna-java] libjna-java: FTBFS: [exec] dispatch.c:1770:23: error: ‘alloca’ bound is unknown [-Werror=alloca-larger-than=] Set Bug forwarded-to-address

Bug#966765: marked as done (obs-build: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 08:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966765: fixed in obs-build 20180831-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #966765, regarding obs-build: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#964541: flatpak: Wrong argument order for clone syscall seccomp filter on s390x

2020-08-06 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 05 Aug 2020 at 16:28:50 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > clone() is a mad syscall with about 4 different argument orders. While > most of them agree that argument 0 is flags, s390 and s390x have the > flags argument second - A0 is the child stack pointer there. It looks as though

Processed: severity of 937009 is serious

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 937009 serious Bug #937009 {Done: Sandro Tosi } [src:mercurial] mercurial: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 937009 to the same value. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#963385: marked as done (airlift-airline: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:compile (default-compile) on project airline: Compilation failur

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:18:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963385: fixed in airlift-airline 0.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #963385, regarding airlift-airline: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:compile

Bug#957074: cdrkit: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-06 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Fedora has a patch for gcc-10 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cdrkit/blob/master/f/cdrkit-1.1.11-gcc10.patch

Bug#964150: marked as done (petsc: autopkgtest regression: mpiexec was unable to launch the specified application)

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:48:53 +0800 with message-id <51821f06f2134c07a730dfc53328c...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#964150 petsc: autopkgtest regression: mpiexec was unable to launch the specified application has caused the Debian Bug report #964150, regarding petsc:

Bug#968008: carettah: Removal notice: unmaintained

2020-08-06 Thread Ilias Tsitsimpis
Package: carettah Version: 0.5.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package appears to be unmaintained (last upstream upload in 2016). It depends on deprecated software (gtk2 #967282 and highlighting-kate #963737), is not part of Stackage and has no rev dependencies.

Bug#963396: jimfs: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:compile (default-compile) on project jimfs: Compilation failure

2020-08-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > [ERROR] > /build/jimfs-1.1/jimfs/src/main/java/com/google/common/jimfs/PathService.java:[290,30] > error: is not abstract and > does not override abstract method test(Object) in Predicate Change apply to test in line 292 (or let the IDE convert it

Bug#957818: marked as done (smstools: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:40:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957818: fixed in smstools 3.1.21-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #957818, regarding smstools: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#957463: marked as done (libosmo-sccp: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:48:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957463: fixed in libosmo-sccp 0.10.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #957463, regarding libosmo-sccp: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

<    1   2