Control: severity -1 important
haskell-cborg has been removed from armhf (see #968084). Lowering the
severity to allow it to migrate to testing.
--
Ilias
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #957170 in elpa reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #957170 [src:elpa] elpa: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957170: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957170
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/issues/8158
Bug #971618 [diaspora] diaspora: aspects membership list is broken
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/issues/8158'.
--
971618:
Package: diaspora
Version: 0.7.14.0-7
Severity: grave
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/issues/8158
Attaching screenshot of broken aspect selection list. This is possibly
caused by newer version of jquery in debian (upstream is still using
jquery 3.4.1 and we are
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #968157 [src:haskell-cborg] src:haskell-cborg: testsuite fails due to bus
errors on armhf
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
968157: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968157
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 09:49:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971519: fixed in node-locate-character 2.0.5+repack-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #971519,
regarding node-locate-character: Rebuild from sources
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 10:03:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957084: fixed in chemtool 1.6.14-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #957084,
regarding chemtool: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 10:03:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952356: fixed in php-sabredav 1.8.12-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #952356,
regarding php-sabredav: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 10:03:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943210: fixed in php-sabredav 1.8.12-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #943210,
regarding php-sabredav: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 06:13:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#834540: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #958579,
regarding cgmanager: Build-Depends on deprecated dh-systemd which is going away
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Source: golang-github-russellhaering-goxmldsig
Version: 0.0~git20180430.7acd5e4-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for
golang-github-russellhaering-goxmldsig.
CVE-2020-15216[0]:
| In
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #957084 in chemtool reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #957084 [src:chemtool] chemtool: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957084: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957084
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: block -1 by 951510
Control: block -1 by 951511
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:13:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So it would be good if those would get uploaded to the archive, given there
> is another package that build-depends on them.
The question
"Shall we re-submit, or is that
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 951510
Bug #971609 [src:r-cran-sna] r-cran-sna: Not build in Debian, unsatisfiable
build-deps
971609 was not blocked by any bugs.
971609 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 971609: 951510
> block -1 by 951511
Bug #971609 [src:r-cran-sna]
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 07:05:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970903: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #887635,
regarding dms binary-any FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 07:05:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970903: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #904297,
regarding dms-core: fails to install: calls /etc/init.d/procps incorrectly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 11:03:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957170: fixed in elpa 2019.11.001-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #957170,
regarding elpa: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #969788 [nextcloud-desktop] nextcloud-desktop: Upgrade removed part of
configuration
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
969788: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 important
Somehow this message didn't reach the BTS...
Forwarded Message
Von: Sandro Knauß
An: Tobias Frost , 969...@bugs.debian.org, Markus Frosch <
lazyfro...@debian.org>, Erwan David
Betreff: Re: Bug#969788: nextcloud-desktop: Upgrade removed part of
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #957168 in elkcode reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #957168 [src:elkcode] elkcode: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957168: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957168
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 10:48:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957168: fixed in elkcode 6.3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #957168,
regarding elkcode: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #971611 in fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #971611 [fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact] fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact:
upgrade to version 5.000-3 fails trying to overwrite directory
Added tag(s) pending.
--
971611: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971611
Debian Bug Tracking
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:18:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971618: fixed in diaspora 0.7.14.0-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #971618,
regarding diaspora: aspects membership list is broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 14:34:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971541: fixed in astroquery 0.4.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #971541,
regarding astroquery: autopkgtest failure on armhf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package src:astroplan
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'src:astroplan'
Limit currently set to 'package':'src:astroplan'
> retitle 971120 astroplan: FTBFS: AssertionError in test_schedule_insert_slot
Bug #971120
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 14:50:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963798: fixed in srt 1.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963798,
regarding srt: empty documentation package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 971611 5.000-3
Bug #971611 [fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact] fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact:
upgrade to version 5.000-3 fails trying to overwrite directory
Marked as found in versions fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact/5.000-3.
> notfound 971611
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:33:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966950: fixed in espresso 6.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #966950,
regarding espresso: FTBFS: Error: Rank mismatch between actual argument at (1)
and actual argument at (2) (rank-1 and scalar)
to be
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 15:03:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971195: fixed in ceres-solver 1.14.0-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #971195,
regarding ceres-solver: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove
'debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/ceres/html/_static/js/modernizr.min.js': No such
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 15:18:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971611: fixed in fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact 5.000-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #971611,
regarding fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact: upgrade to version 5.000-3 fails
trying to overwrite directory
to be
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 15:33:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971120: fixed in astroplan 0.6-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #971120,
regarding astroplan: FTBFS: AssertionError in test_schedule_insert_slot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: elogind
Version: 243.7-1+debian1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Yay, I found another behavioural difference between just running Debian
(classic, that is, sysvinit withOUT elogind) and Debian with elogind (to
satisfy certain
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:13:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969422: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #945718,
regarding owncloud-client: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:13:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969422: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #933290,
regarding BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and isn't in
bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hello,
The fix to fix qpxtool 0.8.0 compilation under Bullseye is trivial, it's just
missing an #include.
The patch is attached to this mail.
Best regards,
Stéphane.
qpxtool-bullseye-fix.patch
Description: Binary data
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:24:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970257: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938331,
regarding rainbow: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:24:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970257: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938331,
regarding rainbow: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:26:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970280: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967168,
regarding lysdr: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 965219 bullseye sid
Bug #965219 [dbconfig-common] dbconfig-common: Write file error (wrong owner)
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
965219:
Hi
Quotes from IRC for documentation purposes
[19:47:41] -*- elbrus is looking into bug #965219
[19:47:44] [zwiebelbot] Debian#965219: dbconfig-common: Write file error
(wrong owner) - https://bugs.debian.org/965219
[19:48:18] does anybody know why root can't "exec > $file"
anymore in
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:11:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969323: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937296,
regarding pjproject: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:11:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969323: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #925263,
regarding Do not release with Buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:11:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969323: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937296,
regarding pjproject: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:18:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969583: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #835591,
regarding tcpcopy: FTBFS: xcopy.h:14:43: fatal error:
linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_queue.h: No such file or directory
to be marked
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #965219 [dbconfig-common] dbconfig-common: Write file error (wrong owner)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #965219 [dbconfig-common] dbconfig-common: Write file error (wrong owner)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 17:33:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971106: fixed in vips 8.10.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #971106,
regarding vips: FTBFS: ValueError: Namespace conflict: DocSection('interpolate')
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree: wget tries to download old version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #889804,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Does not work anymore because adobe site have
moved to https and script does not hanlde
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Unable to update to the last flash version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Flashplugin-nonfree cannot download flash plugin
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree has 33 severe security flaws, orphaned?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree fails update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding ERROR: wget failed to download
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding cannot upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #946889,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Update build-depends and depends on libpango1.0-0
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Mismatch between detected and available versions
(Download file not available at
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969117: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #961116,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-suspend-button: Not suitable for next release:
Does not work with gnome 3.36
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding cannot upgrade from 24 to 25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:01:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #851066,
regarding ERROR: wget failed to download http://people.debian.org/~bartm/...
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:17:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969582: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #839785,
regarding am-utils: broken shutdown: amq -p causes abort, results in complete
hang due to stale /net mount
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:20:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970107: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #935209,
regarding servefile: Please port to Python 3 and/or drop Python 2 package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:20:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970107: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #935209,
regarding servefile: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:21:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970108: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936988,
regarding mandrill: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:17:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969582: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #889148,
regarding am-utils: incorrect installation installs scripts instead of
executables
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:17:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969582: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #959451,
regarding am-utils: Build-Depends on obsolete package linux-kernel-headers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:22:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970110: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938248,
regarding python-versuchung: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:21:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970108: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936988,
regarding mandrill: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:17:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969582: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #889070,
regarding am-utils silently drops gdbm support with libgdbm-dev 1.14.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:22:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970112: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937288,
regarding piggyphoto: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:18:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969583: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #952570,
regarding tcpcopy: build-depends on removed package iptables-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 22:48:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#936581: fixed in ganglia 3.7.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #936581,
regarding ganglia: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 22:48:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#964399: fixed in ganglia 3.7.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #964399,
regarding Should ganglia be removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 22:48:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#936581: fixed in ganglia 3.7.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #936581,
regarding ganglia: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 22:48:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#967135: fixed in ganglia 3.7.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #967135,
regarding ganglia: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: php-lua
Version: 2.0.5+1.1.0-3
Severity: grave
Hello,
after install php-lua I get:
> php -v
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'lua.so' (tried:
/usr/lib/php/20180731/lua.so (/usr/lib/php/20180731/lua.so: undefined symbol:
ZEND_HASH_GET_APPLY_COUNT),
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 21:18:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925509: fixed in netbeans 12.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #925509,
regarding netbeans: Netbeans not usable with java in Buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 21:18:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#929561: fixed in netbeans 12.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #929561,
regarding libnb-ide14-java: broken symlink:
/usr/share/netbeans/ide14/modules/ext/gson-2.7.jar -> ../../../../java/gson.jar
to be
Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2020 21:18:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925509: fixed in netbeans 12.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #925509,
regarding netbeans: Netbeans not usable with java in Buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 4 Oct 2020 00:04:27 +0200
with message-id <5f78f56c.1c69fb81.2e904.c...@mx.google.com>
and subject line Re: [Debichem-devel] Bug#957443: libint2: ftbfs with GCC-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #957443,
regarding libint2: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This
83 matches
Mail list logo
