Bug#1035829: frr: CVE-2022-43681 CVE-2022-40318 CVE-2022-40302

2023-05-09 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Source: frr X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for frr. CVE-2022-43681[0]: | An out-of-bounds read exists in the BGP daemon of FRRouting FRR | through 8.4. When sending a malformed BGP OPEN message that ends

Bug#1034976: marked as pending in gensio

2023-05-09 Thread Marc Haber
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1034976 in gensio reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1034976 marked as pending in gensio

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1034976 [gensio-bin] gensio-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces for libgensio-dev when upgrading from bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 1034976: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034976 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1035764: libtsm-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)

2023-05-09 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this. The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru libtsm-4.0.2/debian/changelog libtsm-4.0.2/debian/changelog --- libtsm-4.0.2/debian/changelog 2022-04-29 21:18:06.0 +0200 +++ libtsm-4.0.2/debian/changelog 2023-05-09 17:47:55.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@

Bug#1034976: marked as pending in gensio

2023-05-09 Thread Marc Haber
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1034976 in gensio reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1034976 marked as pending in gensio

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1034976 [gensio-bin] gensio-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces for libgensio-dev when upgrading from bullseye Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1034976 to the same tags previously set -- 1034976:

Bug#1035833: cpptraj: autopkgtest failure everywhere except on amd64

2023-05-09 Thread Kiran S Kunjumon
Source: cpptraj Version: 5.1.0+dfsg-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fails-always Dear maintainer(s), You package cpptraj has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails everywhere except on amd64. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some

Processed: Re: android-libnativehelper: missing Breaks+Replaces for android-libnativehelper-dev when upgrading from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 29.0.6-27 Bug #1034982 {Done: Roger Shimizu } [android-libnativehelper] android-libnativehelper: missing Breaks+Replaces for android-libnativehelper-dev when upgrading from bullseye Marked as found in versions android-platform-tools/29.0.6-27; no longer

Bug#1034982: android-libnativehelper: missing Breaks+Replaces for android-libnativehelper-dev when upgrading from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1034982 Control: found -1 29.0.6-27 Hi, this bug was not fixed correctly, yet. The .so link actually moved from android-libnativehelper-dev to android-libnativehelper (that's the unusual direction, since usually the .so belongs to the -dev package). (Commit 306d8baf that

Bug#1034836: initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell

2023-05-09 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: tag -1 - unreproducible Control: reassign -1 lvm2 2.03.15-1 Control: forcemerge 1018730 -1 Control: affects -1 cryptsetup-initramfs Thanks for the the reproducer! Much appreciated. So the problem is that your VG spans over multiple PVs, but the LVs that are required at early boot stage

Processed: Re: Bug#1034836: initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - unreproducible Bug #1034836 [cryptsetup-initramfs] initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell Removed tag(s) unreproducible. > reassign -1 lvm2 2.03.15-1 Bug #1034836 [cryptsetup-initramfs] initramfs-tools: After

Bug#1035764: marked as done (libtsm-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 19:48:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035764: fixed in libtsm 4.0.2-0.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035764, regarding libtsm-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1034955: marked as done (slurm-wlm-influxdb-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces for slurm-wlm-basic-plugins when upgrading from bullseye)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2023 00:56:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034955: fixed in slurm-wlm 22.05.8-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034955, regarding slurm-wlm-influxdb-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces for slurm-wlm-basic-plugins when upgrading from bullseye to be

Bug#1034978: marked as done (slurm-wlm-jwt-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces for slurm-wlm-basic-plugins when upgrading from bullseye)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2023 00:56:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034978: fixed in slurm-wlm 22.05.8-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034978, regarding slurm-wlm-jwt-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces for slurm-wlm-basic-plugins when upgrading from bullseye to be marked

Bug#1034950: marked as done (slurm-wlm-hdf5-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces in multiple situations when upgrading from bullseye)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2023 00:56:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034950: fixed in slurm-wlm 22.05.8-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034950, regarding slurm-wlm-hdf5-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces in multiple situations when upgrading from bullseye to be marked as

Bug#1034992: marked as done (slurm-wlm-rrd-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces for slurm-wlm-basic-plugins when upgrading from bullseye)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2023 00:56:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034992: fixed in slurm-wlm 22.05.8-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034992, regarding slurm-wlm-rrd-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces for slurm-wlm-basic-plugins when upgrading from bullseye to be marked

Processed: Re: Bug#1018730: lvm2: Initramfs does not activate root LVs if VG is incomplete since 2.03.15 or 2.03.16, boot failure

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1018730 [lvm2] lvm2: Initramfs does not activate root LVs if VG is incomplete since 2.03.15 or 2.03.16, boot failure Bug #1034836 [lvm2] initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell Severity set to

Bug#1035839: jed-common: Fails to upgrade: new jed-common package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2023-05-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Package: jed-common Version: 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Hi, I'm sorry to say, but it now fails elsewhere to upgrade from 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-1 to 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-3: Preparing to unpack .../01-jed_1%3a0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-3_amd64.deb ... Unpacking jed

Processed: tagging 1035841

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1035841 + patch Bug #1035841 [amavisd-new] amavisd-new fails to purge without adduser - userdel: not found Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1035841:

Bug#1018730: lvm2: Initramfs does not activate root LVs if VG is incomplete since 2.03.15 or 2.03.16, boot failure

2023-05-09 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey Guilhem. > There might be a better way to detect an initramfs-tools environment I once faced the same question when writing a (cryptsetup) keyscript, i.e. how to definitely find out whether one's "within" the initramfs. With crypsetup it may seem easy - check for e.g. /scripts/local-

Bug#1034987: marked as done (slurm-wlm-elasticsearch-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces for slurm-wlm-basic-plugins when upgrading from bullseye)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2023 00:56:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034987: fixed in slurm-wlm 22.05.8-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034987, regarding slurm-wlm-elasticsearch-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces for slurm-wlm-basic-plugins when upgrading from bullseye to

Bug#1035781: emacs-common: needs Breaks against incompatible elpa packages from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Rob Browning
Andreas Beckmann writes: > There are some elpa packages from bullseye that won't be in bookworm and > that are incompatible with emacs 28, i.e. upgrading emacs will fail if > these packages are still installed. > Therefore emacs-common needs to add Breaks against them s.t. they get > removed

Bug#1035781: emacs-common: needs Breaks against incompatible elpa packages from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > Rob Browning writes: > >> Right, I'm actually working on a release for this. I think I should be >> able to upload today or tomorrow, and not sure if we need to wait for >> preapproval aince we'd want this in any other future migrations from >> unstable to

Bug#1035839: marked as done (jed-common: Fails to upgrade: new jed-common package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2023 05:03:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035839: fixed in jed 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035839, regarding jed-common: Fails to upgrade: new jed-common package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit

Bug#1035781: emacs-common: needs Breaks against incompatible elpa packages from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > Right, I'm actually working on a release for this. I think I should be > able to upload today or tomorrow, and not sure if we need to wait for > preapproval aince we'd want this in any other future migrations from > unstable to testing/bullseye. Oh, and possibly cf.

Bug#1035841: amavisd-new fails to purge without adduser - userdel: not found

2023-05-09 Thread josch
Package: amavisd-new Version: 1:2.13.0-2 Severity: serious User: jo...@debian.org Usertags: adduserpurge Hi, the packages passwd and adduser are not part of the Essential:yes set. According to policy §7.2 maintainer scripts cannot assume them being installed when purging a package. If one

Bug#1035780: jed-common: Fails to upgrade: unable to install new version of '/usr/share/jed/doc/txt/abbrev.txt': No such file or directory

2023-05-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Package: jed-common Version: 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-2 Severity: serious jed-common fails to upgrade from 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-1 to 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-2 for me as follows: Preparing to unpack .../4-jed-common_1%3a0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-2_all.deb ... Unpacking jed-common

Bug#1035844: matrix-sydent fails to purge without adduser

2023-05-09 Thread josch
Package: matrix-sydent Version: 2.5.1-1.1 Severity: serious User: jo...@debian.org Usertags: adduserpurge Control: tag -1 + patch Hi, the packages passwd and adduser are not part of the Essential:yes set. According to policy §7.2 maintainer scripts cannot assume them being installed when

Processed: matrix-sydent fails to purge without adduser

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #1035844 [matrix-sydent] matrix-sydent fails to purge without adduser Added tag(s) patch. -- 1035844: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035844 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#967144: marked as done (gpaint: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 9 May 2023 12:15:42 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: closing as invalid has caused the Debian Bug report #967144, regarding gpaint: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1035798: libphp8.2-embed: does not ship SONAME link /usr/lib/libphp.so -> libphp8.2.so

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libphp8.2-embed Version: 8.2.5-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package does not ship the SONAME link for its library (Policy 8.1). That link got created later by ldconfig. >From the attached log

Bug#1034694: gnome-core: Cannot install due to pipewire-audio dependency

2023-05-09 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi Witold, The friendly people in #debian-apt proposed to run: sudo apt install -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true -o Debug::pkgDepCache::Marker=1 -o Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall=1 gnome-core And could you also send your /var/lib/dpkg/status file? More information on this:

Processed: Bug#1035598 marked as pending in kanboard

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1035598 [kanboard] /var/lib/dpkg/info/kanboard.postinst: 24: lighty-enable-mod: not found Added tag(s) pending. -- 1035598: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035598 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1035598: marked as pending in kanboard

2023-05-09 Thread Joseph Nahmias
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1035598 in kanboard reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: user debian...@lists.debian.org ...

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was a...@debian.org). > found 1035713 google-android-ndk-r23b-installer/23.1.7779620+1675172737 Bug #1035713 [google-android-ndk-r23b-installer]

Processed: tagging 1031874

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1031874 + pending Bug #1031874 [src:upx-ucl] upx-ucl: CVE-2023-23457 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1031874 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1031874:

Processed: tagging 1033258

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1033258 + pending Bug #1033258 [src:upx-ucl] upx-ucl: CVE-2023-23456 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1033258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033258

Bug#1035805: node-source-map: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: node-source-map Version: 0.7.0++dfsg2+really.0.6.1-13 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright file after an upgrade, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:

Bug#1035780: marked as done (jed-common: Fails to upgrade: unable to install new version of '/usr/share/jed/doc/txt/abbrev.txt': No such file or directory)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 12:18:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035780: fixed in jed 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035780, regarding jed-common: Fails to upgrade: unable to install new version of '/usr/share/jed/doc/txt/abbrev.txt': No such

Bug#1035795: libricohcamerasdk: does not ship SONAME link /usr/lib//libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so -> libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1.1.0

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libricohcamerasdk Version: 1.1.0-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package does not ship the SONAME link for its library (Policy 8.1). That link got created later by ldconfig. The SONAME of this

Bug#1035782: nuitka: Nuitka should hard-depend on an earlier python version and thus be uninstallable

2023-05-09 Thread Salvo "LtWorf" Tomaselli
Package: nuitka Version: 1.3.5+ds-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: tipos...@tiscali.it Dear Maintainer, this is what happens when I tried to run nuitka on localslackirc nuitka3 --standalone localslackirc Nuitka-Options:INFO: Used command

Bug#1035782: nuitka: Nuitka should hard-depend on an earlier python version and thus be uninstallable

2023-05-09 Thread Kay Hayen
The later versions of Nuitka with less problems didn't make it to unstable yet, they would only give an error. However, I expect to make an upload in the next 2 weeks that will then close this bug. Yours, Kay

Processed: user debian...@lists.debian.org, usertagging 1012464, affects 1012464, affects 1013153 ...

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was a...@debian.org). > usertags 1012464 piuparts Usertags were: piuparts edos-uninstallable. Usertags are now: piuparts edos-uninstallable. > affects 1012464 +

Bug#1035793: retroarch-assets: missing Depends: fonts-droid-fallback

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: retroarch-assets Version: 1.7.6+git20221024+dfsg-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) a broken symlink. 0m19.4s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:

Bug#1035781: emacs-common: needs Breaks against incompatible elpa packages from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: emacs-common Version: 1:28.2+1-14 Severity: serious There are some elpa packages from bullseye that won't be in bookworm and that are incompatible with emacs 28, i.e. upgrading emacs will fail if these packages are still installed. Therefore emacs-common needs to add Breaks against them

Bug#1035792: qt6-charts-dev: Missing dependecy on qml6-module-qtcharts

2023-05-09 Thread Christian Marillat
Package: qt6-charts-dev Version: 6.4.2-2 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, When trying to build pyside6 I see : , | CMake Error at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Qt6Qml/QmlPlugins/Qt6qtchartsqml2Targets.cmake:96 (message): | The imported target "Qt6::qtchartsqml2" references the file

Bug#1035791: qt6-datavisualization-dev: Missing dependency on qml6-module-qtdatavisualization

2023-05-09 Thread Christian Marillat
Package: qt6-datavisualization-dev Version: 6.4.2-2 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, When trying toi build pyside6 I see : , | CMake Error at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Qt6Qml/QmlPlugins/Qt6DataVisualizationQmlpluginTargets.cmake:96 (message): | The imported target

Bug#1035786: cpl-plugin-xshoo-calib: xshoo-kit-3.5.3*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: cpl-plugin-xshoo-calib Version: 3.5.3+dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the

Bug#1034443: python3-brial: uninstallable on arcitectures where sagemath is unavailable

2023-05-09 Thread Tobias Hansen
On 5/8/23 21:22, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Tobias, On Sat,  6 May 2023 10:24:41 + Tobias Hansen wrote: Note that we could also just remove python3-sage and the autopkgtest. I assume you mean python3-brial here. Yes indeed. Nothing in Debian depends on it Not true (and it's too

Bug#1034443: marked as done (python3-brial: uninstallable on arcitectures where sagemath is unavailable, breaks building of singular)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 14:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034443: fixed in brial 1.2.11-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034443, regarding python3-brial: uninstallable on arcitectures where sagemath is unavailable, breaks building of singular to be marked as

Bug#1035820: 9base: leaves entries in /etc/shells after upgrade from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: 9base Version: 1:6-13 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package leaves modifications in /etc/shells after upgrading from bullseye to bookworm and purging the package. 9base/bullseye called

Bug#978237: marked as done (xfce4-equake-plugin: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: xfce4-panel (= 4.14.4-1))

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 14:56:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035752: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #978237, regarding xfce4-equake-plugin: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: xfce4-panel (= 4.14.4-1) to be marked as done. This

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#1035820: 9base: leaves entries in /etc/shells after upgrade from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forcemerge 1033167 -1 Bug #1033167 [usrmerge] usrmerge: messes with /etc/shells Unable to merge bugs because: package of #1035820 is '9base' not 'usrmerge' Failed to forcibly merge 1033167: Did not alter merged bugs. > affects 1033167 + 9base Failed to mark 1033167

Bug#965490: marked as done (dbmix: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 14:59:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035774: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965490, regarding dbmix: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1035820: 9base: leaves entries in /etc/shells after upgrade from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 09/05/2023 16.55, Helmut Grohne wrote: 9base/bookworm no longer does, because it now uses dpkg-triggers to Good to know that there is a better way nowadays ... >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): 0m45.2s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have been modified: /etc/shells

Processed: Re: Bug#1034836: initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug #1034836 [cryptsetup-initramfs] initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 1034836:

Bug#1034836: initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell

2023-05-09 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo On Tue, 09 May 2023 at 17:10:03 +0200, Pásztor János wrote: > The machine and the disks are having two snapshots named 'good' and 'bad' so > it is easy to jump between the states. > I am willing to share with you the VM(disks + virsh dump) via a

Bug#1035820: 9base: leaves entries in /etc/shells after upgrade from bullseye

2023-05-09 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: forcemerge 1033167 -1 Control: affects 1033167 + 9base Hi Andreas, On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 04:39:21PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package leaves modifications > in /etc/shells after upgrading from bullseye to bookworm and purging the >

Bug#965536: marked as done (gbase: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 14:58:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035755: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965536, regarding gbase: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#998989: marked as done (gbase: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 14:58:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035755: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #998989, regarding gbase: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#998988: marked as done (dbmix: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 14:59:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035774: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #998988, regarding dbmix: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1034836: {Spam?} Bug#1034836: {Spam?} Bug#1034836: initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell

2023-05-09 Thread Pásztor János
Control: tag -1 - unreproducible - moreinfo Dear Dennis, On 2023-05-05 18:10, Dennis Filder wrote: X-Debbugs-CC: Pásztor János On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:20:07PM +0200, Pásztor János wrote: I have checked #902943 and the fine print from

Processed: Re: {Spam?} Bug#1034836: {Spam?} Bug#1034836: initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - unreproducible - moreinfo Bug #1034836 [cryptsetup-initramfs] initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell Removed tag(s) unreproducible. Bug #1034836 [cryptsetup-initramfs] initramfs-tools: After bullseye ->

Bug#1029201: openbox-menu: do not release with bookworm

2023-05-09 Thread Bastian Germann
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:17:26 +0100 mat...@linuxmint.pl wrote: openbox-menu should not be shipped in bookworm. Will you also file a RM bug or are you going to update the package for later releases?

Processed: tagging 1035793

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1035793 + pending Bug #1035793 [retroarch-assets] retroarch-assets: missing Depends: fonts-droid-fallback Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1035793:

Bug#1034836: initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell

2023-05-09 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Tue, 09 May 2023 at 18:39:33 +0200, Pásztor János wrote: > I have attached the machine definition and already sent the vm images for > you (via filesender.hu). Many thanks! Will have something to put teeth into once the images have been downloaded :-) -- Guilhem.

Processed: Re: Bug#1034836: initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #1034836 [cryptsetup-initramfs] initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1034836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034836 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#886052: ogmrip: GSettings migration happened upstream

2023-05-09 Thread Bastian Germann
On Sun, 11 Sep 2022 20:06:18 -0400 Jeremy Bicha wrote: ogmrip is basically the last package keeping gconf in Debian. There has been plenty of notice and ogmrip was already removed from Testing months ago. Unfortunately, alarm-clock-applet reentered Debian, which also depends on gconf. In

Bug#1023267: marked as done (sc-im: scopen fails with gvim not found (if it is not installed))

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 17:19:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023267: fixed in sc-im 0.8.3+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023267, regarding sc-im: scopen fails with gvim not found (if it is not installed) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1029559: marked as done (sc-im FTBFS: link error)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 17:19:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029559: fixed in sc-im 0.8.3+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029559, regarding sc-im FTBFS: link error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1029570: marked as done (sc-im: debian/copyright file seems to be inaccurate)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 17:19:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029570: fixed in sc-im 0.8.3+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029570, regarding sc-im: debian/copyright file seems to be inaccurate to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1035445: marked as done (libopenvlbi-dev: missing Depends: libopenvlbi1 (= ${binary:Version}))

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 17:19:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035445: fixed in openvlbi 1.23.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035445, regarding libopenvlbi-dev: missing Depends: libopenvlbi1 (= ${binary:Version}) to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1035793: marked as done (retroarch-assets: missing Depends: fonts-droid-fallback)

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2023 16:03:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035793: fixed in retroarch-assets 1.7.6+git20221024+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035793, regarding retroarch-assets: missing Depends: fonts-droid-fallback to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Bug#1035713 marked as pending in google-android-installers

2023-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1035713 [google-android-ndk-r23b-installer] google-android-ndk-r23b-installer: broken symlinks: /usr/lib/android-sdk/ndk/23.1.7779620/toolchains/llvm/prebuilt/linux-x86_64/*/bin/as -> /buildbot/src/android/... Added tag(s) pending. --

Bug#1035713: marked as pending in google-android-installers

2023-05-09 Thread bastif
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1035713 in google-android-installers reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: bla bla

2023-05-09 Thread Michael Biebl
On Fri, 5 May 2023 13:38:52 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: Am 05.05.23 um 11:14 schrieb Luca Boccassi: > On Fri, 05 May 2023 11:04:29 +0200 Andreas Beckmann >> This is a new systemd unit in package e2fsprogs. It's not, both bullseye and bookworm ship this file in e2fsprogs. The difference is

Bug#1034836: initramfs-tools: After bullseye -> bookworm upgrade boot stuck in the initramfs shell

2023-05-09 Thread Pásztor János
Dear Guilhem, On 2023-05-09 17:34, Guilhem Moulin wrote: Control: tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo On Tue, 09 May 2023 at 17:10:03 +0200, Pásztor János wrote: The machine and the disks are having two snapshots named 'good' and 'bad' so it is easy to jump between the states. I am willing to