Package: ceph-common
Version: 18.2.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + radosgw
ceph-common has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an
unpack error from dpkg.
The files
* /usr/bin/rgw-gap-list
*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1052729 cogl: FTBFS if Mesa is currently a release candidate
Bug #1052729 [src:cogl] cogl: FTBFS: ../config.h:20:25: error: missing binary
operator before token "~"
Changed Bug title to 'cogl: FTBFS if Mesa is currently a release
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1052746 + pending
Bug #1052746 [src:loadlin] loadlin: FTBFS: cc1: error: ‘-fcf-protection’ is not
compatible with this target
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1052746:
Source: gradle
Version: 4.4.1-19
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: masakari-dashboard
Version: 8.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: chafa
Version: 1.12.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../../libtool
Source: psqlodbc
Version: 1:15.00.-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash
Source: med-fichier
Version: 4.1.0+repack-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for
Source: singular
Version: 1:4.3.2-p7+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: binutils-mipsen
Version: 10+c5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: ruby-ruby-magic-static
Version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ruby-guard
Version: 2.18.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error:
Source: mpi4py
Version: 3.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ortp
Version: 1:5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: loadlin
Version: 1.6f-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -m32 -Wdate-time
Source: libhamcrest-java
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: snek
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory
Source: fastdds
Version: 2.11.2+ds-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: astroplan
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: graphite2
Version: 1.3.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: extension-helpers
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: mkdocs-material-extensions
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: groovy
Version: 2.4.21-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: autoradio
Version: 3.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ruby-delayed-job-active-record
Version: 4.1.6-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: r-cran-rstan
Version: 2.21.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -std=gnu++14
Source: notus-scanner
Version: 22.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: clazy
Version: 1.11-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: ruby-delayed-job
Version: 4.1.9-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gdb-mingw-w64
Version: 12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: cogl
Version: 1.22.8-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../libtool
Source: altos
Version: 1.9.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ruby-xmlrpc
Version: 0.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby3.1
Source: pqmarble
Version: 1.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: u-boot
Version: 2023.07+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: polybar
Version: 3.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/build/bin &&
Source: node-undici
Version: 5.22.1+dfsg1+~cs20.10.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ruby-puppetserver-ca-cli
Version: 2.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-djantic
Version: 0.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:50:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052672: fixed in faust 2.68.1+ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052672,
regarding libfaust-static has an undeclared file conflict
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:node-shiny-server
Bug #1052707 [node-glob] node-glob has an unsatisfiable dependency on
node-mismatch (>= 9)
Added indication that 1052707 affects src:node-shiny-server
--
1052707: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052707
Debian
Package: node-glob
Version: 8.0.3+~cs8.4.15-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: affects -1 + src:node-shiny-server
node-shiny-server FTBFS, because one of its build-depends, node-glob has
an unsatisfiable dependency on node-mismatch (>= 9). It does not seem
like this resolves itself. Thus
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1052672 [libfaust-static] libfaust-static has an undeclared file conflict
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1052672: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052672
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1052672 in faust reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:23:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1037602: fixed in ceph 16.2.11+ds-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037602,
regarding ceph: ftbfs with GCC-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:49:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052649: fixed in flann 1.9.2+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052649,
regarding libflann-dev: Stray semicolon in pkg-config file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 unreproducible
Bug #1052458 [elpa-ess] elpa-ess: ESS mode in Emacs fails with many errors on
startup
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> severity -1 important
Bug #1052458 [elpa-ess] elpa-ess: ESS mode in Emacs fails with many errors on
startup
Severity set to
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Control: severity -1 important
Dear Hugh,
Le vendredi 22 septembre 2023 à 14:27 +0100, Hugh Pumphrey a écrit :
> Package: elpa-ess
> Version: 18.10.2+git20220915.f45542e-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> X-Debbugs-Cc:
301 - 348 of 348 matches
Mail list logo