Jose,
While running the strace I noticed the non-root user could not create the
file in /tmp. Indeed the file permissions on /tmp were 755 in stead of 1777.
I changed the permissions and it works like a charm.
Sven
-Original Message-
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [mailto:[EMAIL
Package: perl
Version: 5.8.4-5
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Hello
Quoting Ubuntu USN-72-1:
===
Ubuntu Security Notice USN-72-1 February 02, 2005
perl vulnerabilities
CAN-2005-0155, CAN-2005-0156
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:48:00PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Package: hasciicam
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
tags 293125 pending
Bug#293125: postgresql: LOAD security issue
Tags were: woody security
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 231924 - fixed
Bug#231924: oops_1.5.23.cvs-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags removed: fixed
merge 231924 231923
Bug#231923: oops_1.5.23.cvs-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: links with ld
Bug#231924:
tags 231924 - fixed
merge 231924 231923
thanks
This doesn't seem like it was fixed and still failed to build in
the same way.
It looks like the --disable-static-modules wasn't used at all.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: rhythmbox-applet
Version: 0.1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all 64 bit arches (ia64,
alpha, amd64) with the following error:
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./GNOME_Rhythmbox_Applet.server
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 293112 serious
Bug#293112: on ppc x0rfbserver is linked against libxclass.so.0.6.2 but 0.8.3
is installed
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:52:48 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Turbine has been removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:56:43 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#266116 acknowledged by developer
(Bug#266116: fixed)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 292226 patch
Bug#292226: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 292226 patch
thanks
Hello,
Please find attached a patch which adds the necessary legal incantations to
debian/copyright and debian/crack-attack-manpage.xml that allow us to
continue to distribute it. While it may be better in the long term if the
author would be willing to relicense his
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:42:39 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package db4.0 has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package db4.0 has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package db4.0 has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package db4.0 has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package db4.0 has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package db4.0 has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package db4.0 has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
I just subscribed to this list, read the archives from last summer, esp.
http://albatross.madduck.net/pipermail/gammu-legal/2004-October/000112.html
and would like to hear your comments regarding the solution of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266566.
If I understood the
Apparently, bash's line number count is confused by the EOF
statements, so I have absolutely no idea what's going wrong.
Can you reproduce teh error by doing dpkg --configure mantis?
If so, please try to add a set -x at the beginning of
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mantis.postrm, do another dpkg
Hi Ola,
This probably mean that I just have to upload a new version.
Please also remember to change the xclass library package name the next time
its SONAME changes.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: eric
Version: 3.6.1-2
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/eric3
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
I assume it is only a glitch, but it renders the package unusable. eric
tries to look for python in /usr/local/bin and not it /usr/bin.
This patch should fix it:
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-02-2005 13:57, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
I just subscribed to this list, read the archives from last summer, esp.
http://albatross.madduck.net/pipermail/gammu-legal/2004-October/000112.html
and would like to hear your comments regarding
Hi
On Thu 3. 2. 2005 13:57, Holger Levsen wrote:
I just subscribed to this list, read the archives from last summer, esp.
http://albatross.madduck.net/pipermail/gammu-legal/2004-October/000112.html
This is patch for gammu and it is already applied in gammu.
and would like to hear your
Hi,
This is a followup for Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/292290.
Joost van Baal [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed, Jan 26, 2005:
`./lib/modules/2.6.10-1-k7/kernel/drivers/atm/zatm.ko': Unknown error 990
I've heard of one other victim of this problem with this kernel.
Wessel Dankers [EMAIL
tags 293091 +patch
thanks
Not sure how that happened (incomplete conversion from another layout of
some kind?) Anyway here's a patch.
--- lirc.config.old 2005-02-03 15:19:08.0 +
+++ lirc.config 2005-02-03 15:20:31.0 +
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@
ConfigDriver ()
{
-
Package: sysv-rc
Version: 2.86.ds1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I got the following mesage from Synaptic when I tried to upgrade sys-rc:
(Reading database ... 141191 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking sysv-rc (from .../sysv-rc_2.86.ds1-1_all.deb)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Maier schrieb:
| Package: eric
| Version: 3.6.1-2
| Severity: grave
| File: /usr/bin/eric3
| Tags: patch
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| I assume it is only a glitch, but it renders the package unusable. eric
| tries to look for
More communication on the issue.
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:10:38PM +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
jeroen That doesn't matter in Debian, you should just upload with the same
jeroen source package name unless there's a very good reason not to. I don't
jeroen see
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:47:24PM +0100, Torsten Marek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Maier schrieb:
| Package: eric
| Version: 3.6.1-2
| Severity: grave
| File: /usr/bin/eric3
| Tags: patch
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| I assume it is
Only to the bug, just to sort things out:
T. V. Raman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The references to DEC and Adobe are legcy.
Each lisp file clearly states it's not part of Emacs but the same
licensing rules apply --as far as I am concerned that's GPL.
Not in fact each lisp file.
$ export
Hi Jonas,
On Thursday 03 February 2005 17:56, you wrote:
Holger: This ends on gammu-legal only, not the bugreport. Deliberate?
aehmmm, yes - on purpose - but on a wrong mission after reading two answers
pointing me wrong on topic gnokii ;-)
Re-including the bugreport now, as it turned out to
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:37:50 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#279199: fixed, Bug#278197: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Quoting Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
tags 231924 - fixed
merge 231924 231923
thanks
This doesn't seem like it was fixed and still failed to build in
the same way.
Well, at least I attempted. As this NMU wasn't targeted at that
specific bug, I guess I have to leave it to someone
Your message dated Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:47:10 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#292086: fixed in postfix 2.1.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:47:10 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#292086: fixed in postfix 2.1.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
diff -u blinkd-0.4.7/debian/changelog blinkd-0.4.7/debian/changelog
--- blinkd-0.4.7/debian/changelog
+++ blinkd-0.4.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+blinkd (0.4.7-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU.
+ * Added complete GFDL license to debian/copyright, pointing to
+
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 291603 serious
Bug#291603: zapping: FTBFS: Using static non fPIC lib to make a shared lib.
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:01:06 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#292938: speedy-cgi-perl: Running /usr/bin/speedy as non
root result in Segmentation fault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:25:37 +0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:24:14 +0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:31:31 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293423: security bugs (perlsuid PERLIO_DEBUG:
CAN-2005-0155, CAN-2005-0156)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 291027
Bug#291027: knoda fails to start because of undefined symbol
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:41:03PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 03-02-2005 19:27, Holger Levsen wrote:
/me has just talked with the author on #gnokii - he said he'll fix the
issue in the next release of gnokii.
Great!
As per my previous posts to the bug report, I've already
contacted
I reopened this bug because of the following:
[beth] debian# dpkg -s knoda
Package: knoda
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: kde
Installed-Size: 696
Maintainer: Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.7.2-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 266566 upstream
Bug#266566: gnokii: licence violations
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 114948 + fixed
Bug#114948: New: 6.25 Making the package apt-getable
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
tag 128077 + fixed
Bug#128077: Please mention native source packages in maint-guide
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
tag 138575 +
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 10:35 -0500, Edward C. Jones wrote:
trying to overwrite /etc/init.d/rc', which is also in package sysvinit
What version of sysvinit did you have installed when this happened?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi Daf,
Today at 18:34, Dafydd Harries wrote:
Is this problem only with Nimbus Mono? Perhaps you could provide a
screenshot with a font that isn't broken for comparison purposes.
Yes, this is a problem only with Nimbus Mono, and only with Oblique,
Bold and Oblique Bold. I've checked Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity #272191 critical
Bug#272191: bacula-director-pgsql postinst fails if half-installed
Severity set to `critical'.
severity #289838 critical
Bug#289838: postinst script unusable due to serious errors
Severity set to `critical'.
thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:11:19 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line maint-guide: Closing bugs as done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 287899 +sid
Bug#287899: vdr: run as non-root user
Tags were: sarge security
Tags added: sid
close 287899
Bug#287899: vdr: run as non-root user
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further
Your message dated Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:02:08 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#292606: fixed in uw-imap 7:2002edebian1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:32:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#292224: fixed in discover1 1.7.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:32:58 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#264115: fixed in grub2 0.6+20050203-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
I had a look at Debian bug 284875, wget: Arbitrary file
overwriting/appending/creating and other vulnerabilities, specifically
about points (1) and (2) therein. I set up the proof of concept Perl
script to run via inetd, which I think is a working way of setting it
up. The script responds to HTTP
Package: anon-proxy
Version: 00.02.39-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.3.2
/etc/init.d/anon-proxy restart is more or less a fancy no-op.
When the daemon is running, it does neither stop nor start anything, and
if the daemon is not running, it doesn't start one either.
restart should
Hi David,
looks like you forgot to close this bug? It was fixed by an NMU.
lg,
Peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 293378 +pending
Bug#293378: hdparm not turning off write caching
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 293378 +upstream
Bug#293378: hdparm not turning off write caching
Tags were: pending
Tags added: upstream
tags 293378 +patch
Hi.
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#293471: xemacs21: XEmacs 21.4.16 withdrawn by upstream, 21.4.16
will be released Feb 6
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:34:02 +0100
Quoting Vin Shelton:
,
| From: Vin Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: Need some bug/version info
|
tags 293378 +pending
tags 293378 +upstream
tags 293378 +patch
forwarded [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
This one time, at band camp, john said:
The command
hdparm -W 0 /dev/hda
does not disable write caching on my hard disk. There is no error
message, but a subsequent
hdparm -I /dev/hda
reports
Here goes a user report regarding this bug
- Forwarded message from David Siegal [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: David Siegal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:34:27 -0500 (EST)
Subject: PDF::Report
Hi Gunnar,
I'm fairly amateurish about Debian, so forgive me
Thanks for the patch, works perfectly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi David,
I'm emailing you because I understand you're the maintainer of the
PDF::Report package, libpdf-report-perl.
As you know it depends on libpdf-api2-perl. Unfortunately it only works
with libpdf-api2-perl version 0.3x. I've verified this with the author.
But doing an apt-get install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 289025 patch
Bug#289025: debmirror needs a NEWS file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
I ran into similar breakage, and I agree that this should happen by default.
I also agree that a NEWS file is in order.
I don't think it is release critical that it contains all changes since
woody.
I've attached a simple news file. Be sure to change the (version) part if
you're going to use
tags 299225 patch
thanks
+blinkd (0.4.7-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU.
+ * Added complete GFDL license to debian/copyright, pointing to
+/usr/share/doc/blinkd/copyright in blink.dbk and blinkd.dbk
+(closes: #292225)
+ * Further clarified debian/copyright, including copyright
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
# oops, wrong number
tags 292225 patch
Bug#292225: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
tags 292176 + sid
Bug#292176: knetfilter: icons in wrong directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 291027 sarge
Bug#291027: knoda fails to start because of undefined symbol
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 291027 sarge
thanks
Matt,
I reopened this bug because of the following:
[beth] debian# dpkg -s knoda
Package: knoda
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: kde
Installed-Size: 696
Maintainer: Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:02:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293318: fixed in quantlib 0.3.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 293458 important
Bug#293458: sysv-rc: Trys to overwrite /etc/init.d/rc
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
severity 293458 important
thanks
It is, of course, not an RC bug for our packages to fail to install on
non-Debian systems.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
76 matches
Mail list logo
