Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 08:24:32 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing; fixed in NMU upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 08:24:32 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing; fixed in NMU upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 293710 debconf
Bug#293710: extranious quote in dpkg-preconfigure kills package configuration
Bug#293733: python2.2-iconvcodec: Install reports compilation errors
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `debconf'.
severity 293710 grave
severity 290916 important
thanks
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:33:55AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
Do you use XDMCP?
It is used at my site.
Thank you; now that I have this all-important piece of information, I agree
that the bug should be downgraded.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
tags 291603 sid
Bug#291603: zapping: FTBFS: Using static non fPIC lib to make a shared lib.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
close 189552
Bug#189552: [DPKG] some files from xlibs_4.2.1-6_i386.deb and
magicfilter_1.2-53_i386.deb not installed
'close' is deprecated; see
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 293568 libgtk2.0-0
Bug#293568: gnome-themes-extras: no compressed archive icon in Nuvola theme
Bug reassigned from package `gnome-themes-extras' to `libgtk2.0-0'.
severity 293568 serious
Bug#293568: gnome-themes-extras: no compressed archive
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 206796 grave
Bug#206796: /usr/bin/distributed-net has wrong endianness on mips-linux
Severity set to `grave'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
reopen 293574
retitle 293574 clearsilver-dev depends on unavailable package clearsilver
thanks,
Hi again :)
Unfortunately, it seems that this bug it's not solved by changing
clearsilver-dev to depends on clearsilver, as clearsilver package is
not built by any source package anymore.
I've built
Package: openmcl
Version: 0.14.2.p1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Installing openmcl causes the following error on my system:
--- snip ---
(#:~)- aptitude install openmcl
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 293353 pending
Bug#293353: preview-latex: preview-latex does not preserve local configuration
changes during upgrade
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
tags 293353 pending
thanks
Hi.
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#293353: preview-latex: preview-latex does not preserve local
configuration changes during upgrade
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:54:35 +0100
When the configuration file /etc/emacs/site-start.d/51preview-latex.el
is
replying to myself to add more info:
the problem seems to go away, if i apt-get source openmcl, build the
package locally and install that one. as far as i can tell, things
work fine now. let me know if i can do anything to help you reproduce
this.
cheers
fabian
--
.''`. fabian linzberger
tags 206796 +woody
thanks
Andreas Barth wrote:
severity 206796 grave
thanks
Hi,
that a package has wrong endianness is at least grave, as the package
cannot be used at all. Another issue is that the information on which
platforms the package should be built is contradictory. Please decide on
which
Subject: FTBFS: Should disable mono bindings.
Package: clearsilver
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
tags +patch
Hi!
I tried to build clearsilver on my host, and got a FTBFS:
gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -fPIC -I../
Why not use last version instead of downgrade ?
Yep... mdadm 1.9 is there near your at
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/source/mdadm/
Regards,
--
Jean-Yves LENHOF [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 293872 + unreproducible
Bug#293872: /usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/openmcl.sh segfaults on installation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
End of message, stopping
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 11:33:06 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#211341: fixed in synopsis 0.5.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
This problem is fixed in the new upstream version (0.92).
Please, upload a new package in order to fix this problem.
--
Bruno Barrera C.
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:28:54 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line The bug didn't work?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 266044
Bug#266044: php4-gd2 is obsoleted by php4-gd, see #261186
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
close 264828
Package: postfix
Version: 2.1.5-4
Severity: serious
On fresh installation postfix _silently_ does not write alias for root.
That is, it installs with /etc/aliases like
# /etc/aliases
mailer-daemon: postmaster
postmaster: root
nobody: root
hostmaster: root
usenet: root
news: root
webmaster: root
tag +patch
thanks,
Hi, I've made an install file for clearsilver-dev, but I think it's not
ok, because you only package the python bindings:
--- /dev/null 2005-02-06 11:13:22.673574392 +0100
+++ clearsilver-dev.install 2005-02-06 18:19:48.597010136 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 12:47:35 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#245440: fixed in libopengl-perl 0.54.alan1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
i installed hotplug-utils and rebooted, and now it works. so i guess you may
close the bug please.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:28:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:26:51 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:27:16 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:25:57 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line lsbdev removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:25:57 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line lsbdev removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:25:57 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line lsbdev removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:28:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:27:39 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:30:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:49:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:47:27 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:48:17 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:35:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:43:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:42:48 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:41:27 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:33:26 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:30:57 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:35:48 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: firehol
Version: 1.214-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
I'm afraid that recent fixes still missed some unsafe temporary
directory uses in firehol. In firehol-lib.sh I see:
${CAT_CMD} /proc/config /tmp/kcfg.$$
Upstream patched this here:
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:38:17 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:32:39 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293091: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:37:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:47:20 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293406: fixed in mdadm 1.9.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:30:57 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:42:24 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:52:36 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:30:57 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:56:25 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:42:24 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:43:34 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: libzip-ocaml-dev
Version: 1.01-13
Severity: grave
Files /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08/zip/zip.cmxa and /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08/unix.cmxa
make inconsistent assumptions over implementation Unix
Although interesting enough, this only occurs with the native code, not
byte code.
:-(
-- System
Package: phpgroupware
Version: 0.9.16.003-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
CAN-2004-1385 describes multiple security holes in phpgroupware:
phpGroupWare 0.9.16.003 and earlier allows remote attackers to gain sensitive
information via (1) unexpected characters in the session ID such as shell
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:35:07 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293834: fixed in quodlibet 0.8.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: squid
Version: 2.5.7-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
CAN-2005-0174 describes some security holes in squid:
Squid 2.5 up to 2.5.STABLE7 allows remote attackers to poison the cache or
conduct certain attacks via headers that do not follow the HTTP specification,
including (1)
Package: isoqlog
Version: 2.2-0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
the recent isoqlog upgrade is uninstallable on my system. I get as far
as answering the debconf questions, then it enters an infinite loop.
I purged the package and tried a fresh install, with the same
The new upstream release also fixes lots more security holes, which have
CAN numbers CAN-2004-1384 and CAN-2004-1383. Please reference all three
CAN numbers in your changelog.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 293889 normal
Bug#293889: postfix: Fresh installation does not write alias for root
Severity set to `normal'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:59:33PM +0100, tahiti_bob wrote:
Package: ifp-line
Version: 0.2.4.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
ifp ls gives the following message when not root
Device is busy. (I was unable to claim its interface.)
It works perfectly as root.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 293924 normal
Bug#293924: ifp-line: ifp does not work when not root
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: python
Severity: serious
The license for the Python profiler[0] does not allow it to be copied or
modified independently of other Python programs. This is a violation of
DFSG #3 (and also is just stupid). This bug affects likely every version
of Python in Debian (and that ever was in
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 16:47:24 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293568: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.6.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tag 290773 +security
tag 293906 +pending
merge 290773 293906
Joey Hess wrote:
The new upstream release also fixes lots more security holes, which have
CAN numbers CAN-2004-1384 and CAN-2004-1383. Please reference all three
CAN numbers in your changelog.
Sorry, I'm just doing an upload as I'm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 290773 +security
Bug#290773: phpgroupware: forum, polls, preferences, projects, tts, wiki: HTML
and SQL insertio
Tags were: pending
Tags added: security
tag 293906 +pending
Bug#293906: multiple security holes (CAN-2004-1385)
Tags were: security
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:27:41 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:17:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#290773: fixed in phpgroupware 0.9.16.005-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.3.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: security hole
Aptitude does not seem to use the features of apt 0.6 (aka apt-secure).
Although running an update in the GUI does throw up a warning if a
package repository could not be verified, there is no later
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:17:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#290773: fixed in phpgroupware 0.9.16.005-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 293937 important
Bug#293937: aptitude: apt-secure features not enabled
Severity set to `important'.
severity 293935 normal
Bug#293935: aptitude: Segfault when pressing '?'
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
On Sunday 06 February 2005 05:25 pm, Sam Morris wrote:
Although running an update in the GUI does throw up a warning if a
package repository could not be verified, there is no later warning if
the user attempts to install a package from an unverified repository.
It seems to work fine for me
severity 293937 important
severity 293935 normal
thanks
On Sunday 06 February 2005 05:25 pm, Sam Morris wrote:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.3.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: security hole
Please try to exercise a little judgement about severity levels...if this is
a
severity 293937 important
severity 293935 normal
thanks
On Sunday 06 February 2005 05:25 pm, Sam Morris wrote:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.3.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: security hole
Please try to exercise a little judgement about severity levels...if this is
a
Ok, so I saw the new email to this bug and downloaded the
upstream 0.9.2 version and tried that.
It still fails in cpu detection, this time the
error message _is_ printed and it says:
Error : cannot open '/home/bjb/.pmk/pmkcpu.dat' : No such file or directory.
Error : failure in cpu detection.
Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:17:25 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293281: fixed in squirrelmail 2:1.4.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: perlpanel
Version: 1:0.9.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just installed perlpanel on a machine without Gnome or similar stuff, in
particular a machine without hicolor-icon-theme installed. When starting up
perlpanel I just get the following error message,
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:17:14PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote:
Package: libzip-ocaml-dev
Version: 1.01-13
Severity: grave
Files /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08/zip/zip.cmxa and /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08/unix.cmxa
make inconsistent assumptions over implementation Unix
Although interesting enough, this only
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:55:25 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: qtparted
Version: 0.4.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
qtparted depends on libparted1.6-0, which is not available in unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel:
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
tag 290773 +security
tag 293906 +pending
merge 290773 293906
Joey Hess wrote:
The new upstream release also fixes lots more security holes, which have
CAN numbers CAN-2004-1384 and CAN-2004-1383. Please reference all three
CAN numbers in your changelog.
Sorry, I'm
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 05:58:05PM -0500, Brenda J. Butler scribbled:
Ok, so I saw the new email to this bug and downloaded the
upstream 0.9.2 version and tried that.
It still fails in cpu detection, this time the
error message _is_ printed and it says:
Error : cannot open
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
submitter 262490 !
Bug#262490: tdb_1.0.6-8_mips: FTBFS: opcode not supported on this processor:
mips1
Changed Bug submitter from Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED].
submitter 262512 !
Bug#262512:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 293945 sid
Bug#293945: qtparted: Not installable in unstable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
gst-plugins will shortly be removed from Debian. Since this was
marked fixed in NMU, I'm closing.
dave...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 282873 sarge
Bug#282873: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
There were no tags set.
Bug#289150: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
Tags added: sarge
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tags 282873 sarge
thanks
The sparc binary packages for nhc98 have been removed from unstable;
unfortunately, the version of nhc98 in unstable doesn't build on m68k, so
this package cannot progress to testing. We may need to have the sparc
binaries manually removed from testing as well before
Package: python-libgmail
Version: 0.0.8+cvs20041108-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following error occurs on access to a gmail mount.
ERROR:gmailfs:Exception getting
query:subject:path=__startpathfsendpath__
ERROR:gmailfs:Exception getting
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:25:05AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
The solution then is to make a directory below var/run/ and run the
daemon as a dedicated user (or daemon). for instance
var/run/anon-proxy/foo.pid
A patch to do this is attached.
Cheers,
--
[ Todd J. Troxell
Oops. Clean version attached.
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat`. `'
`-
Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:59:34 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line dpkg correctly does not reinstall conffiles if they are
missing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
94 matches
Mail list logo
