Bug#298267: foomatic-gui: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
Package: foomatic-gui Severity: serious Version: 0.7.4.6 From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp #rm -rf build # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. rm -f `find -name '*.py[co]' -o -name '*~'` ./setup.py clean -a /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory make: *** [clean] Error 127 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297918: Patch for FTBFS
Hi Esteban, Is this bug being investigated? Yes. It's already pending. I just haven't put the tag for the upload is ready and we're just holding the userland until all buildds have openh323. So, why don't you upload it to unstable and close this bug? Any reason? It will be later today. -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#298178: marked as done (rxvt-unicode: FTBFS: infocmp: couldn't open terminfo file /usr/share/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode.)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:02:07 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298178: fixed in rxvt-unicode 5.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2005 12:35:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 05 04:35:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7YVJ-0007AR-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 04:35:33 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id A18A22242CD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 13:35:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FD32241B8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 13:35:04 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id DFECE26136; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:35:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 13:35:03 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rxvt-unicode: FTBFS: infocmp: couldn't open terminfo file /usr/share/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: rxvt-unicode Verison: 5.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following error: infocmp -C rxvt-unicode etc/rxvt-unicode.termcap infocmp: couldn't open terminfo file /usr/share/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode. make[1]: *** [alldoc] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 298178-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 10:08:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 02:08:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7sg6-00083c-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:08:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7saN-0004y5-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:02:07 -0500 From: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298178: fixed in rxvt-unicode 5.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:02:07 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: rxvt-unicode Source-Version: 5.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rxvt-unicode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: rxvt-unicode-lite_5.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-lite_5.2-2_i386.deb rxvt-unicode-ml_5.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-ml_5.2-2_i386.deb rxvt-unicode_5.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode_5.2-2.diff.gz rxvt-unicode_5.2-2.dsc to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode_5.2-2.dsc rxvt-unicode_5.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode_5.2-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated rxvt-unicode package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:29:13 +0100 Source: rxvt-unicode Binary: rxvt-unicode-ml rxvt-unicode rxvt-unicode-lite Architecture: source i386 Version: 5.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium
Bug#298267: marked as done (foomatic-gui: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:32:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298267: fixed in foomatic-gui 0.7.4.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 08:00:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 00:00:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7qgo-0007v9-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:00:38 -0800 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1D7qgn-0003yS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 03:00:37 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D7qgn-0003tE-Bb for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:00:37 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: foomatic-gui: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:00:37 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: foomatic-gui Severity: serious Version: 0.7.4.6 From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp #rm -rf build # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. rm -f `find -name '*.py[co]' -o -name '*~'` ./setup.py clean -a /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory make: *** [clean] Error 127 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 298267-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 10:38:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 02:38:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7t9D-0005Cr-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:38:07 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7t3W-0007Nu-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:32:14 -0500 From: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298267: fixed in foomatic-gui 0.7.4.7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:32:14 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: foomatic-gui Source-Version: 0.7.4.7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of foomatic-gui, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: foomatic-gui_0.7.4.7.dsc to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/foomatic-gui_0.7.4.7.dsc foomatic-gui_0.7.4.7.tar.gz to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/foomatic-gui_0.7.4.7.tar.gz foomatic-gui_0.7.4.7_all.deb to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/foomatic-gui_0.7.4.7_all.deb printconf_0.7.4.7_all.deb to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/printconf_0.7.4.7_all.deb python-foomatic_0.7.4.7_all.deb to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/python-foomatic_0.7.4.7_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated foomatic-gui package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
Bug#288467: marked as done (magma-plugin-sm lacks dependencies)
Your message dated Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:54:42 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2005 22:30:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 03 14:30:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Claip-0005U7-00; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:30:44 -0800 Received: (qmail 12674 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 22:30:12 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 22:30:12 - Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 44904BBA7E; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:30:12 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: magma-plugin-sm lacks dependencies X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:30:12 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: magma-plugin-sm Version: 0.trunk20040913-1 Severity: grave magma lacks dependencies although at least a shlibs dependency on is required. BTW: lintian gives a warning for this bug. --- Received: (at 288467-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 10:54:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 02:54:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7tPI-kS-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:54:44 -0800 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EECF13C010; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:54:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:54:42 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This bug is fixed in 0.trunk20050206-1. --=20 Witch! Witch! They'll burn ya! -- Hag, Tomorrow is Yesterday, stardate unknown --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkIq4XIACgkQnw66O/MvCNEFPQCgkfpr5pRx7fdBCOHwpLRLKiW+ P6kAn1rIq8GYlbeF++yd2kpJwXiCxev+ =lfmY -END PGP SIGNATURE- --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291559: capi4hylafax: same problem with version 1:01.02.03-9
Package: capi4hylafax Version: 1:01.02.03-7 Followup-For: Bug #291559 The same problem occurs with version 1:01.02.03-9. For now I'll stick with 1:01.02.03-7 and use my wrapper script as workaround for bug #293808. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages capi4hylafax depends on: ii isdnactivecards 1:3.3.0.20041110-1 support for active ISDN cards and ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcapi20-2 1:3.3.0.20041110-1 libraries for CAPI support ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff4 3.7.1-3Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298289: gcjwebplugin: Gcjwebplugin makes Mozilla-firefox crash
Package: gcjwebplugin Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software When using gcjwebplugin, I can't run Mozilla-firefox, as I get an GLib-error** : The thread system is not yet initialized However, the same problem goes with Mozilla-1.7.5 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR) Versions of packages gcjwebplugin depends on: pn gij-3.4 Not found. ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6GCC support library pn libgcj5-awt Not found. ii libglib2.0-02.6.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:09:30 +0900 Hideki Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:35:02 +0100, Ricardo Mones Re: Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is released Thanks for reminding but I've already done it, just waiting for my sponsor to upload the packages. See http://sylpheed.mine.nu:9981/debian if you need updated packages. OK, Thanks. * urgency should be high to get it into testing as soon as possible. If it is low, it would be 10 days later. high is 2 days later. * please describe this is security fix version in changelog.Debian. There was no security bug at the time I made the packages (see their dates), that's the reason there are no references to this bug there. * Is fixed version in woody available? No, still not, sorry. That will take some time I currently lack, so patches are fully welcome :) regards, -- Ricardo Mones Lastra - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Centro de Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Oviedo en Gijon 33271 Asturias, SPAIN. - http://www.aic.uniovi.es/mones -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298289: gcjwebplugin: Gcjwebplugin makes Mozilla-firefox crash
Hi, On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:30:29PM +0100, Thibauld Manson wrote: Package: gcjwebplugin Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software When using gcjwebplugin, I can't run Mozilla-firefox, as I get an GLib-error** : The thread system is not yet initialized However, the same problem goes with Mozilla-1.7.5 I cant reproduce this nor on Sarge neither on Sid. What page have you accessed ? Is your Sarge (I assume you use mainly Sarge) up to date ? Michael -- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298298: libparse-recdescent-perl: dependencies incorrect, unusable on woody
Package: libparse-recdescent-perl Version: 1.94-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 The package currently depends on perl = 5.6something, but doesn't include the Text::Balanced module anymore. The package is thus unusable on woody systems. If this is intentional, please depend on perl 5.8. If it ain't, please reintroduce Text::Balanced. regards az -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux CFT 2.4.28 #1 Thu Jan 6 13:09:38 EST 2005 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT Versions of packages libparse-recdescent-perl depends on: ii perl 5.6.1-8.8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298298: marked as done (libparse-recdescent-perl: dependencies incorrect, unusable on woody)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:02:03 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298298: fixed in libparse-recdescent-perl 1.94-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 14:14:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 06:14:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from heffalump.snafu.priv.at (cft.snafu.priv.at) [202.173.190.30] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7wWw-0005k8-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 06:14:50 -0800 Received: from cft.snafu.priv.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cft.snafu.priv.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j26EEmxC020051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Mar 2005 00:14:48 +1000 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by cft.snafu.priv.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j26EEm6A020049; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 00:14:48 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Alexander Zangerl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libparse-recdescent-perl: dependencies incorrect, unusable on woody X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:14:48 +1000 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libparse-recdescent-perl Version: 1.94-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 The package currently depends on perl = 5.6something, but doesn't include the Text::Balanced module anymore. The package is thus unusable on woody systems. If this is intentional, please depend on perl 5.8. If it ain't, please reintroduce Text::Balanced. regards az -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux CFT 2.4.28 #1 Thu Jan 6 13:09:38 EST 2005 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT Versions of packages libparse-recdescent-perl depends on: ii perl 5.6.1-8.8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --- Received: (at 298298-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 15:08:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 07:08:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7xMl-0005Hb-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 07:08:23 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7xGd-0005KN-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:02:03 -0500 From: Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298298: fixed in libparse-recdescent-perl 1.94-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:02:03 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: libparse-recdescent-perl Source-Version: 1.94-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libparse-recdescent-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libparse-recdescent-perl_1.94-4.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libparse-recdescent-perl/libparse-recdescent-perl_1.94-4.diff.gz libparse-recdescent-perl_1.94-4.dsc to pool/main/libp/libparse-recdescent-perl/libparse-recdescent-perl_1.94-4.dsc libparse-recdescent-perl_1.94-4_all.deb to pool/main/libp/libparse-recdescent-perl/libparse-recdescent-perl_1.94-4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libparse-recdescent-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format:
Bug#298294: marked as forwarded (non-free icons)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:12:45 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #298294, regarding non-free icons to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Received: (at 298294-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 15:13:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 07:13:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (quark.amimatica.com) [213.139.24.154] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7xRm-0005f3-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 07:13:34 -0800 Received: from [213.100.42.181] (c213-100-42-181.swipnet.se [213.100.42.181]) by quark.amimatica.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E479D23424; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 16:12:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:12:45 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Tall=F3n?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#298294: non-free icons References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Daniel Baumann wrote: Package: baghira Version: 0.6a-1 Severity: serious The license of the icons are not clearly dfsg-compliant. Please clear the situation with upstream and get a proper license statement. Otherwise, the package must go to non-free. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#249234: marked as done (libxtm-perl: conflicts with current perl, not installable)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:47:50 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#249234: fixed in libxtm-perl 0.36-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2004 08:38:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 16 01:38:42 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BPHAP-0003EQ-00; Sun, 16 May 2004 01:38:42 -0700 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1BPHAM-0004w7-00; Sun, 16 May 2004 09:38:38 +0100 Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1BPHAL-0002mj-00; Sun, 16 May 2004 09:38:37 +0100 Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 09:38:37 +0100 From: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libxtm-perl: conflicts with current perl, not installable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libxtm-perl Version: 0.36-1 Severity: grave libxtm-perl conflicts with perl 5.8, which means that it can't be installed on current testing/unstable. I see the last changelog entry and the bugs it references, but we can't release it this way; if no version that works with current perl is available we'll just have to pull it from sarge. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 249234-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 15:53:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 07:53:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7y4k-0005N3-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 07:53:50 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7xyw-0008FH-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:47:50 -0500 From: Alexander Zangerl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#249234: fixed in libxtm-perl 0.36-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:47:50 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: libxtm-perl Source-Version: 0.36-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libxtm-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libxtm-perl_0.36-2.diff.gz to pool/main/libx/libxtm-perl/libxtm-perl_0.36-2.diff.gz libxtm-perl_0.36-2.dsc to pool/main/libx/libxtm-perl/libxtm-perl_0.36-2.dsc libxtm-perl_0.36-2_all.deb to pool/main/libx/libxtm-perl/libxtm-perl_0.36-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Zangerl [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libxtm-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 00:49:32 +1000 Source: libxtm-perl Binary: libxtm-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.36-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Alexander Zangerl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Alexander Zangerl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libxtm-perl - Perl module for reading/writing Topic Maps Closes: 249234 Changes: libxtm-perl (0.36-2) unstable; urgency=high . * applied patch
Bug#196400: marked as done (flwm: FTBFS: `fl_filename_name' undeclared)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#196400: fixed in flwm 1.00-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2003 18:30:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 06 13:30:51 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19OLzH-0003Bh-00; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 13:30:51 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by smtp6.mindspring.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19OLzG-0006HC-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 14:30:50 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19OLzG-bz-2k for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 11:30:50 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: flwm: FTBFS: `fl_filename_name' undeclared From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 11:30:49 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: flwm Version: 1.00-5 Severity: serious From my build log: ... /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/flwm-1.00' g++ -g -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-return-type -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -c main.C main.C: In function `int main(int, char**)': main.C:354: error: `fl_filename_name' undeclared (first use this function) main.C:354: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/flwm-1.00' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 (This is with g++-3.3.) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 196400-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 16:38:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 08:38:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7ylb-0003Ho-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 08:38:07 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7yfm-00037F-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500 From: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#196400: fixed in flwm 1.00-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: flwm Source-Version: 1.00-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of flwm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: flwm_1.00-6.diff.gz to pool/main/f/flwm/flwm_1.00-6.diff.gz flwm_1.00-6.dsc to pool/main/f/flwm/flwm_1.00-6.dsc flwm_1.00-6_i386.deb to pool/main/f/flwm/flwm_1.00-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated flwm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:35:49
Bug#191982: marked as done (flwm: Uninstallable in sid)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#191982: fixed in flwm 1.00-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2003 10:59:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 05 05:59:35 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (yellowpig.yi.org) [212.11.35.143] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19Cdh0-jI-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 05:59:35 -0500 Received: from seventeen ([127.0.0.1] helo=yellowpig.yi.org ident=mail) by yellowpig.yi.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19CdfU-0003H3-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 12:58:00 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 12587 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 05 May 2003 10:57:58 - Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 12:57:57 +0200 From: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: flwm: Uninstallable in sid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: flwm Version: 1.00-5 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello Tommi, flwm is no more installable on sid. It Depends on libfltk1.1c102 (= 1.1.3) but libfltk1.1c102 1.1.3-2.1 Conflicts with flwm (= 1.0.0-5). Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux seventeen 2.4.20 #1 Mon Apr 14 16:02:08 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=french, LC_CTYPE=french Versions of packages flwm depends on: ii libc62.3.1-17GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfltk1.1c102 1.1.3-2.1 The Fast Light Toolkit (shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.3-0pre7 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3-0pre7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii xlibs4.2.1-6 X Window System client libraries --- Received: (at 191982-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 16:38:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 08:38:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7yla-0003Hb-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 08:38:06 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7yfm-00037D-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500 From: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#191982: fixed in flwm 1.00-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: flwm Source-Version: 1.00-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of flwm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: flwm_1.00-6.diff.gz to pool/main/f/flwm/flwm_1.00-6.diff.gz flwm_1.00-6.dsc to pool/main/f/flwm/flwm_1.00-6.dsc flwm_1.00-6_i386.deb to pool/main/f/flwm/flwm_1.00-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated flwm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:35:49 +0100 Source: flwm Binary: flwm Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.00-6
Bug#256156: marked as done (gorm: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:45:18 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gorm: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2004 08:22:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 25 01:22:39 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bdlyp-0003O9-00; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 01:22:39 -0700 Received: from mirrorlynx.com ([68.82.164.103]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id 20040625082228012008a343e (Authid: cwizard13); Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:22:28 + Received: from dan by mirrorlynx.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BdlyV-0004Wx-Ty for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 04:22:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dan Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: Dan Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 04:22:19 -0400 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: locally generated X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: gorm: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mirrorlynx.com) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gorm Version: 0.7.7-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 As posted on debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, all GNUstep packages are in violation of Section 9.1.1. of the Debian Policy and can not be released until fixed. A reference to debian-devel shows the place where more information can be found http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg01143.html Dan Weber -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-mm1 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages gorm depends on: ii gnustep-back0.9.2-2 The GNUstep GUI Backend ii gnustep-base1 1.9.1-2 GNUstep Base library package ii gnustep-gui00.9.2-1 The GNUstep Gui Library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libobjc11:3.4.0-2Runtime library for GNU Objective- -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 256156-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 16:45:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 08:45:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7ysl-0005j7-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 08:45:31 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [82.230.27.192]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7181317353D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:45:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:45:18 +0100 From: Eric Heintzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gorm: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Close this old bug (already tagged as fixed). Gorm has a wrapper. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259484: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:50:15 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2004 01:05:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 18:05:25 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoon.lafn.org [206.117.18.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bkugf-0003vO-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:05:25 -0700 Received: from localhost (host-66-81-179-231.rev.o1.com [66.81.179.231]) by zoon.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i6F154jw011398 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:05:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.32) id 1Bkqyg-LO-Ao for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:07:46 -0700 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:07:45 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Sender: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: gorm Version: 0.7.7-1 Severity: important Tags: patch This package fails to build from source: ... - Considering gnustep-base1-dev (= 1.9.0) Tried versions: - Does not satisfy version, not trying E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed. ... It needs to build-depend on libgnustep-base1-dev (and libgnustep-gui0-dev) instead. -- Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/ --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch diff -Nru gorm-0.7.7-old/debian/control gorm-0.7.7/debian/control --- gorm-0.7.7-old/debian/control 2004-07-14 13:19:08.0 -0700 +++ gorm-0.7.7/debian/control 2004-07-14 13:19:49.0 -0700 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.7), gnustep-make (= 1.9.0), gnustep-base1-dev (= 1.9.0), gnustep-gui0-dev (= 0.9.1), tetex-bin (= 2.0.2), texi2html (= 1.66), texinfo (= 4.6) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.7), gnustep-make (= 1.9.0), libgnustep-base1-dev (= 1.9.0), libgnustep-gui0-dev (= 0.9.1), tetex-bin (= 2.0.2), texi2html (= 1.66), texinfo (= 4.6) Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: gorm --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu-- --- Received: (at 259484-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 16:50:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 08:50:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7yxP-0006a2-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 08:50:20 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [82.230.27.192]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20442D5476 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:50:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:50:15 +0100 From: Eric Heintzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Close this old bug (already tagged as fixed). Gorm now build-depends on libgnustep-base1.10-dev (and libgnustep-gui0.9-dev). Package: gorm Version: 0.7.7-1 Severity: important Tags: patch
Bug#295310: patch: compatible with special printer names?
gksu gnome-cups-manager -p D1_HPColor - authenticates gnome-cups-manager -p D1_HPColor, then - /usr/bin/env -u XAUTHORITY=/tmp/libgksu1.2-zWXKDc/.Xauthority gnome-cups-manager -p D1_HPColor - this is the right one ! Are you sure that this doesn't break special printer names like $TERMtt? cups doesn't refuse to create a printer with that name. Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 291500
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 291500 - unreproducible sarge sid Bug#291500: cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS Tags were: unreproducible sid Tags removed: unreproducible, sarge, sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental
Hello On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.203-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=util-vserver for the full build log I actually think this is a bug in gcc or libc. Because these lines are basic math things (/, *) at those lines. What can be the problem. Broken linker or compiler? Regards, // Ola Cheers, Andi Automatic build of util-vserver_0.30.203-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 1.170.5 Build started at 20050302-1903 ** [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-20 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 g++-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.5-8 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.5-8 -- [...] /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/chroot-rm src/chroot-rm.o diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/chroot-rm src/chroot-rm.o depbase=`echo src/fakerunlevel.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/|;s|\.o$||'`; \ if diet sparc-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I ./lib -I ./ensc_wrappers -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -MT src/fakerunlevel.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o src/fakerunlevel.o src/fakerunlevel.c; \ then mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po; else rm -f $depbase.Tpo; exit 1; fi /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/fakerunlevel src/fakerunlevel.o diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/fakerunlevel src/fakerunlevel.o depbase=`echo src/filetime.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/|;s|\.o$||'`; \ if diet sparc-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I ./lib -I ./ensc_wrappers -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -MT src/filetime.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o src/filetime.o src/filetime.c; \ then mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po; else rm -f $depbase.Tpo; exit 1; fi /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/filetime -static src/filetime.o lib/libvserver.la diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/filetime src/filetime.o lib/.libs/libvserver.a src/filetime.o(.text+0x13c): In function `main': src/filetime.c:76: undefined reference to `.div' src/filetime.o(.text+0x14c):src/filetime.c:77: undefined reference to `.rem' src/filetime.o(.text+0x158):src/filetime.c:78: undefined reference to `.div' src/filetime.o(.text+0x168):src/filetime.c:79: undefined reference to `.rem' src/filetime.o(.text+0x170):src/filetime.c:79: undefined reference to `.div' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [src/filetime] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.203' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.203' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.203' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20050302-1906 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298325: cryptsetup FTBFS
Package: cryptsetup Version: 20050111-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Cryptsetup fails to build (tested on mipsel), caused by a follow-on error to: configure.in: 5: required file ./config.h.in]' not found Makefile.am:1: AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in' but intl' not in SUBDIRS automake: Makefile.am: AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in' but ALL_LINGUAS' not defined lib/Makefile.am:4: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_LIBADD' lib/Makefile.am:5: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_SOURCES' lib/Makefile.am:6: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_CFLAGS' lib/Makefile.am:12: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_SHLIB' lib/Makefile.am:16: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_LIBADD' lib/Makefile.am:17: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_SOURCES' lib/Makefile.am:18: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_CFLAGS' lib/Makefile.am:24: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_SHLIB' lib/Makefile.am:50: bad macro name _STATIC_LIBRARY' lib/Makefile.am:16: invalid unused variable name: _LIBGCRYPT_LIBADD' lib/Makefile.am:5: invalid unused variable name: _LIBDEVMAPPER_SOURCES' lib/Makefile.am:17: invalid unused variable name: _LIBGCRYPT_SOURCES' lib/Makefile.am:4: invalid unused variable name: _LIBDEVMAPPER_LIBADD' This is apparently caused by invoking automake instead of automake-1.8, which can break depending on the local installation. The build system should explicitly invoke automake-1.8, which corresponds to the requirement of automake1.8 in the build-dependencies. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297806: [Vserver] Re: Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental
Hello On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:20:06AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:56:43PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hello On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.203-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=util-vserver for the full build log Thanks a lot. This is interesting to know. I'll cc the vserver list so they may help me to fix this bug. well, looks like the used gcc/ld is not able to do basic math ... at least if I look at the mentioned lines: 76int days= since / (24*60*60); 77int today = since % (24*60*60); 78int hours = today / (60*60); 79int minutes = (today % (60*60)) / 60; so maybe somebody could look into that and either fix-up the gcc/ld arguments (which are probably supplied by the distro/autoconf) or get the gcc/ld working ... (IIRC those things are defined somewhere in libgcc*) You are right. I'm forwarding this to gcc. Regards, // Ola HTH, Herbert Regards, // Ola Cheers, Andi Automatic build of util-vserver_0.30.203-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 1.170.5 Build started at 20050302-1903 ** [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-20 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 g++-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.5-8 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.5-8 -- [...] /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/chroot-rm src/chroot-rm.o diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/chroot-rm src/chroot-rm.o depbase=`echo src/fakerunlevel.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/|;s|\.o$||'`; \ if diet sparc-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I ./lib -I ./ensc_wrappers -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -MT src/fakerunlevel.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o src/fakerunlevel.o src/fakerunlevel.c; \ then mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po; else rm -f $depbase.Tpo; exit 1; fi /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/fakerunlevel src/fakerunlevel.o diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/fakerunlevel src/fakerunlevel.o depbase=`echo src/filetime.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/|;s|\.o$||'`; \ if diet sparc-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I ./lib -I ./ensc_wrappers -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -MT src/filetime.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o src/filetime.o src/filetime.c; \ then mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po; else rm -f $depbase.Tpo; exit 1; fi /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/filetime -static src/filetime.o lib/libvserver.la diet sparc-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/filetime src/filetime.o lib/.libs/libvserver.a src/filetime.o(.text+0x13c): In function `main': src/filetime.c:76: undefined reference to `.div' src/filetime.o(.text+0x14c):src/filetime.c:77: undefined reference to `.rem' src/filetime.o(.text+0x158):src/filetime.c:78: undefined reference to `.div' src/filetime.o(.text+0x168):src/filetime.c:79: undefined reference to `.rem' src/filetime.o(.text+0x170):src/filetime.c:79: undefined reference to `.div' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [src/filetime] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.203' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.203' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.203' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20050302-1906 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- ___ Vserver mailing list
Processed: tagging 291500
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 291500 sarge sid Bug#291500: cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge, sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: xserver-xfree86: X server crashes when compiling a program from gnat-gps
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 297985 important Bug#297985: xserver-xfree86: X server crashes when compiling a program from gnat-gps Severity set to `important'. tag 297985 = upstream moreinfo Bug#297985: xserver-xfree86: X server crashes when compiling a program from gnat-gps Tags were: help Tags set to: upstream, moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298339: rake: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'rdoc'
Package: rake Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'rake' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: ruby -I ./lib bin/rake rdoc rm -r debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html rdoc -o debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html --line-numbers --inline-source --main README --title 'Rake -- Ruby Make' -T 'doc/jamis' README MIT-LICENSE TODO CHANGES lib/rake.rb lib/rake/clean.rb lib/rake/tasklib.rb lib/rake/packagetask.rb lib/rake/rdoctask.rb lib/rake/runtest.rb lib/rake/testtask.rb lib/rake/gempackagetask.rb doc/glossary.rdoc doc/proto_rake.rdoc doc/rational.rdoc doc/rakefile.rdoc doc/release_notes/rake-0.4.14.rdoc (in /rake-0.4.15) Package Target requires RubyGEMs sh: rdoc: command not found rake aborted! Command failed with status (127): [rdoc -o debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html --line-numbers --inline-source --main README --title 'Rake -- Ruby Make' -T 'doc/jamis' README MIT-LICENSE TODO CHANGES lib/rake.rb lib/rake/clean.rb lib/rake/tasklib.rb lib/rake/packagetask.rb lib/rake/rdoctask.rb lib/rake/runtest.rb lib/rake/testtask.rb lib/rake/gempackagetask.rb doc/glossary.rdoc doc/proto_rake.rdoc doc/rational.rdoc doc/rakefile.rdoc doc/release_notes/rake-0.4.14.rdoc] Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'rdoc' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/rake-0.4.15/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/rake-0.4.15/debian/control 2005-03-06 22:38:24.776677496 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-06 22:38:14.342691448 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libtest-unit-ruby (1.8), ruby (1.8) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libtest-unit-ruby (1.8), ruby (1.8), rdoc Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: rake -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293079: marked as done (aolserver4-nsd does not run on Alpha)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:32:13 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293079: fixed in aolserver4 4.0.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2005 00:26:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 31 16:26:54 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from airborne.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.182.112]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cvlsc-00036F-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:26:54 -0800
Received: from airborne.nrl.navy.mil (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by airborne.nrl.navy.mil (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-0woody4) with ESMTP id
j110QMEu011784
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:26:22 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by airborne.nrl.navy.mil (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-0woody4) id
j110QMx6011781;
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:26:22 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:26:22 -0500
From: A. Maitland Bottoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aolserver4-nsd does not run on Alpha
X-Mailer: VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.2.1
X-Attribution: Maitland
X-Face: #_Z/6E$=iDx1F]P+Ihzq7Av$oCzxp*t+AV4bAbTX:5Ksc|%b.ptGp'9^{lq:).f}z;/C~
TS*Y?KNb=~^*%0FWY#8tyl]O')dv!Y:s~a#BK?fuo;~J8u,SHZ|o9gi~'@woChY;)#|)vr+
9Zd,@,)F[7)5O!Ry2BJC%N.ALz7)FHAt-t.eSF$Z{j'*vE
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: aolserver4
Version: 4.0.10-1
Severity: serious
(Severity: grave on Alpha)
Seems not to like the size of int and long:
~# aolserver4-nsd -u www-data -t /etc/aolserver4/aolserver4.tcl
NsTclInitObjs: sizeof(int) sizeof(long)
-Maitland
---
Received: (at 293079-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 20:38:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 12:38:06 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D82Vq-0006s5-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:38:06 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D82Q9-0004Bf-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:32:13 -0500
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#293079: fixed in aolserver4 4.0.10-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:32:13 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: aolserver4
Source-Version: 4.0.10-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
aolserver4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
aolserver4-dev_4.0.10-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/aolserver4/aolserver4-dev_4.0.10-3_i386.deb
aolserver4-doc_4.0.10-3_all.deb
to pool/main/a/aolserver4/aolserver4-doc_4.0.10-3_all.deb
aolserver4_4.0.10-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/aolserver4/aolserver4_4.0.10-3.diff.gz
aolserver4_4.0.10-3.dsc
to pool/main/a/aolserver4/aolserver4_4.0.10-3.dsc
aolserver4_4.0.10-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/aolserver4/aolserver4_4.0.10-3_i386.deb
aolserver4_4.0.10.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/aolserver4/aolserver4_4.0.10.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated aolserver4
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date:
Processed: tagging 298339
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 298339 sid Bug#298339: rake: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'rdoc' Tags were: patch Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298343: request-tracker3.2: Apache2 forks leek memory
Package: request-tracker3.2 Version: 3.2.2-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Apache2 MPM prefork begins to leek memory at an alarming rate - forks reach around 35MB each at start up expanding to around 50MB in some cases in a few minutes even when request-tracker is not in use. This causes severe problems (obviously) -- Package-specific info: Changed files: etc/request-tracker3.2/RT_Config.pm etc/request-tracker3.2/RT_SiteConfig.pm usr/share/doc/request-tracker3.2/INSTALL.Debian.gz usr/share/doc/request-tracker3.2/README.Debian.gz usr/share/doc/request-tracker3.2/README.gz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-bf2.4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages request-tracker3.2 depends on: ii apache2-mpm-prefork [apache2 2.0.52-3Traditional model for Apache2 ii libapache-dbi-perl 0.94-2 Connect apache server to database ii libapache-mod-perl 1.29.0.3-4 integration of perl with the Apach ii libapache-request-perl 1.1-0.1 Generic Apache Request Library ii libapache-session-perl 1.60-2 Perl modules for keeping persisten ii libapache2-mod-perl2 1.999.20-1 Integration of perl with the Apach ii libcache-cache-perl 1.03-1 Managed caches of persistent infor ii libclass-returnvalue-perl0.52-1 A return-value object that lets yo ii libdbd-mysql-perl2.9003-3A Perl5 database interface to the ii libdbi-perl 1.46-6 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu ii libdbix-searchbuilder-perl 1.22-1 Encapsulate SQL queries and rows i ii libexception-class-perl 1.20-1 a module that allows you to declar ii libfcgi-perl 0.67-1 FastCGI Perl module ii libfreezethaw-perl 0.43-2 converting Perl structures to stri ii libhtml-mason-perl 1:1.26-1HTML::Mason Perl module ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.45-1 A collection of modules that parse ii libhtml-scrubber-perl0.08-1 Perl extension for scrubbing/sanit ii liblocale-maketext-fuzzy-per 0.02-1 Maketext from already interpolated ii liblocale-maketext-lexicon-p 0.47-1 Lexicon-handling backends for Loc ii liblog-dispatch-perl 2.10-1 Dispatches messages to multiple Lo ii libmailtools-perl1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs ii libmime-perl 5.417-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libmldbm-perl2.01-1 Store multidimensional hash struct ii libmodule-versions-report-pe 1.02-1 Report versions of all modules in ii libparams-validate-perl 0.76-1 validate parameters to Perl method ii libregexp-common-perl2.119-1 Provide commonly requested regular ii libterm-readkey-perl 2.21-1.3A perl module for simple terminal ii libtest-inline-perl 0.16-1 Embed tests and code examples in P ii libtext-autoformat-perl 1.12-3 Perl module for automatic text wra ii libtext-quoted-perl 1.8-1 Extract the structure of a quoted ii libtext-template-perl1.44-1.1Text::Template perl module ii libtext-wrapper-perl 1.000-2 Simple word wrapping routine ii libtime-modules-perl 2003.1126-2 Various Perl modules for time/date ii libtree-simple-perl 1.14-1 A simple tree object ii perl 5.8.4-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii postfix [mail-transport-agen 2.1.5-9 A high-performance mail transport ii rt3.2-clients3.2.2-3 Mail gateway and command-line inte ii sysklogd [system-log-daemon] 1.4.1-16System Logging Daemon -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297661: marked as done (iso-codes: cus and mal codes are duplicate)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:02:21 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297661: fixed in iso-codes 0.45-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2005 06:02:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 01 22:02:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from natpreptil.rzone.de [81.169.145.163] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D6Mvr-0005dT-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:02:03 -0800 Received: from wr.rohdewald.de (p548FB6CC.dip.t-dialin.net [84.143.182.204]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j22620Z3014914 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:02:00 +0100 (MET) Received: by wr.rohdewald.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1D2FD270023; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:02:45 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wolfgang Rohdewald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: iso-codes: cus and mal codes are duplicate X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:02:45 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: iso-codes Version: 0.44-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software as the subject says... iso_639.tab:cus cus XX Cushitic (Other) iso_639.tab:cus cus XX Portuguese-based (Other) here the bibliographic code is duplicate: iso_639.tab:mal mal ml Malayalam iso_639.tab:msa mal ms Malay -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 297661-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 21:08:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 13:08:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D82yw-0005XX-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 13:08:10 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D82tJ-0006Ub-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:02:21 -0500 From: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#297661: fixed in iso-codes 0.45-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:02:21 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: iso-codes Source-Version: 0.45-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of iso-codes, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: iso-3166-udeb_0.45-1_all.udeb to pool/main/i/iso-codes/iso-3166-udeb_0.45-1_all.udeb iso-codes_0.45-1.diff.gz to pool/main/i/iso-codes/iso-codes_0.45-1.diff.gz iso-codes_0.45-1.dsc to pool/main/i/iso-codes/iso-codes_0.45-1.dsc iso-codes_0.45-1_all.deb to pool/main/i/iso-codes/iso-codes_0.45-1_all.deb iso-codes_0.45.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/i/iso-codes/iso-codes_0.45.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated iso-codes package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:16:56 + Source: iso-codes Binary: iso-3166-udeb iso-codes Architecture: source all Version:
Processed: severity of 271313 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 271313 normal Bug#271313: On ftp.debian.org ia64 has to be removed for all packages depending on xview Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 269523 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 269523 normal Bug#269523: RM: mono:mono-common [!i386 !powerpc !s390] -- RoM; NBS (ANAIS); unsupported upstream Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298257: tetex-bin: [ARM] FTBFS on experimental?
Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental I put tetex-bin 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 to my arm buildd queue. Thank you for trying! As you mentioned ago, I installed tetex-base 2.99.9.20050111-beta-2. Unfortunatelly build process looked go infinite loop. test -e ../../tetex-common/common.variables \ test ../../tetex-common/common.variables -nt debian/common.variables \ touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.variables | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'` debian/common.variables_newer || true test -e ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in \ test ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in -nt debian/common.functions.in \ touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'` debian/common.functions_newer || true eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in test -e ../../tetex-common/common.variables \ test ../../tetex-common/common.variables -nt debian/common.variables \ touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.variables | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'` debian/common.variables_newer || true test -e ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in \ test ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in -nt debian/common.functions.in \ touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'` debian/common.functions_newer || true eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in ... Full log (before I killed) is: http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=tetex-binver=2.99.12.20050203-beta-1arch=armstamp=1110038196file=logas=raw Hmm, Is this buildd's time problem? buildd is working with UTC clock. I'm not sure, but in fact it seems it must have something to do with timestamps. As you probably noticed, debian/rules is re-made via Makefile-remaking from debian/rules.in, and after this make starts over. But on my system, it does it only once. I'll investigate this, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#297096: adonthell: FTBFS: Link errors
For what it's worth, with 0.3.3.cvs.20031022-3, on i386 with current sid, I see the problem with pbuilder (i.e., the build fails), but not when building directly outside pbuilder or any chroot. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298339: marked as done (rake: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'rdoc')
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:17:17 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298339: fixed in rake 0.4.15-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 20:40:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 12:40:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D82Yb-0007dI-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:40:58 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D83Uw-0007ZF-15; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 22:41:14 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rake: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'rdoc' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 22:41:14 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: rake Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'rake' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: ruby -I ./lib bin/rake rdoc rm -r debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html rdoc -o debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html --line-numbers --inline-source --main README --title 'Rake -- Ruby Make' -T 'doc/jamis' README MIT-LICENSE TODO CHANGES lib/rake.rb lib/rake/clean.rb lib/rake/tasklib.rb lib/rake/packagetask.rb lib/rake/rdoctask.rb lib/rake/runtest.rb lib/rake/testtask.rb lib/rake/gempackagetask.rb doc/glossary.rdoc doc/proto_rake.rdoc doc/rational.rdoc doc/rakefile.rdoc doc/release_notes/rake-0.4.14.rdoc (in /rake-0.4.15) Package Target requires RubyGEMs sh: rdoc: command not found rake aborted! Command failed with status (127): [rdoc -o debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html --line-numbers --inline-source --main README --title 'Rake -- Ruby Make' -T 'doc/jamis' README MIT-LICENSE TODO CHANGES lib/rake.rb lib/rake/clean.rb lib/rake/tasklib.rb lib/rake/packagetask.rb lib/rake/rdoctask.rb lib/rake/runtest.rb lib/rake/testtask.rb lib/rake/gempackagetask.rb doc/glossary.rdoc doc/proto_rake.rdoc doc/rational.rdoc doc/rakefile.rdoc doc/release_notes/rake-0.4.14.rdoc] Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'rdoc' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/rake-0.4.15/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/rake-0.4.15/debian/control 2005-03-06 22:38:24.776677496 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-06 22:38:14.342691448 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libtest-unit-ruby (1.8), ruby (1.8) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libtest-unit-ruby (1.8), ruby (1.8), rdoc Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: rake --- Received: (at 298339-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 22:23:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 14:23:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D849T-0007k7-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:23:07 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D843p-0005EJ-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:17:17 -0500 From: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298339: fixed in rake 0.4.15-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:17:17 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: rake Source-Version: 0.4.15-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rake, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: rake_0.4.15-2.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rake/rake_0.4.15-2.diff.gz rake_0.4.15-2.dsc to pool/main/r/rake/rake_0.4.15-2.dsc rake_0.4.15-2_all.deb to pool/main/r/rake/rake_0.4.15-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the
Processed: reassign 241497 to kernel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 241497 kernel Bug#241497: sarge needs upgrade-i386 directory which gives us upgrade-path for real i386 architecture Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `kernel'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render system unusable or mostly so
Package: udev
Version: 0.053-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After boot, udev creates all device nodes with owner and group root, and
permissions rw-rw, so noone can read nor write in any device. Thus
it is impossible to login to KDE (screen disappears and then KDM comes
back) and login in tty[1-6] is possible, but one see a bunch of errors
on trying to write to /dev/null (and then bash completion triggers
plenty of them).
I could use the system by stopping udev and use ./MAKEDEV generic to
restore a usable /dev.
I attach my local rules (they shouldn't be the source of the problem
since they didn't change for a long time).
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 277 2005-02-22 12:16 10local
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2004-12-05 16:27 50udev - ../udev.rules
-- /sys/:
/sys/block/dm-0/dev
/sys/block/dm-1/dev
/sys/block/dm-2/dev
/sys/block/dm-3/dev
/sys/block/dm-4/dev
/sys/block/dm-5/dev
/sys/block/fd0/dev
/sys/block/hda/dev
/sys/block/hdd/dev
/sys/block/hdd/hdd1/dev
/sys/block/hdd/hdd2/dev
/sys/block/hdd/hdd3/dev
/sys/block/ram0/dev
/sys/block/ram10/dev
/sys/block/ram11/dev
/sys/block/ram12/dev
/sys/block/ram13/dev
/sys/block/ram14/dev
/sys/block/ram15/dev
/sys/block/ram1/dev
/sys/block/ram2/dev
/sys/block/ram3/dev
/sys/block/ram4/dev
/sys/block/ram5/dev
/sys/block/ram6/dev
/sys/block/ram7/dev
/sys/block/ram8/dev
/sys/block/ram9/dev
/sys/block/sda/dev
/sys/block/sdb/dev
/sys/block/sdb/sdb1/dev
/sys/block/sdb/sdb2/dev
/sys/block/sdb/sdb3/dev
/sys/block/sr0/dev
/sys/class/drm/radeon/dev
/sys/class/input/event0/dev
/sys/class/input/event1/dev
/sys/class/input/event2/dev
/sys/class/input/event3/dev
/sys/class/input/event4/dev
/sys/class/input/event5/dev
/sys/class/input/mice/dev
/sys/class/input/mouse0/dev
/sys/class/input/mouse1/dev
/sys/class/input/ts0/dev
/sys/class/input/ts1/dev
/sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev
/sys/class/misc/device-mapper/dev
/sys/class/misc/psaux/dev
/sys/class/misc/rtc/dev
/sys/class/printer/lp0/dev
/sys/class/sound/adsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/audio/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev
/sys/class/sound/dsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1p/dev
/sys/class/sound/timer/dev
/sys/class/usb/hiddev0/dev
-- Kernel configuration:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-17 Linux Hotplug Scripts
ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-1 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii makedev 2.3.1-75Creates device files in /dev
ii sed 4.1.2-8 The GNU sed stream editor
-- debconf information excluded
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
BUS=ide, KERNEL=hda, NAME=dvdrom
KERNEL=fd*, NAME=floppy%e
BUS=scsi, SYSFS{model}=jaz 1GB*, KERNEL=sd*, NAME{all_partitions}=jaz
BUS=scsi, SYSFS{model}=CD-W516EB*, NAME=cdrw
BUS=usb, SYSFS{manufacturer}=M-Sys, SYSFS{product}=DiskOnKey, NAME=key
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassign 241497 to module-init-tools,modutils,initrd-tools
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 reassign 241497 module-init-tools,modutils,initrd-tools Bug#241497: sarge needs upgrade-i386 directory which gives us upgrade-path for real i386 architecture Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `module-init-tools,modutils,initrd-tools'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298114: marked as done (Nvi: Improved init.d recover file that fixes security bugs)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:47:03 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298114: fixed in nvi 1.79-22 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2005 19:36:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 04 11:36:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7Ib1-0005V4-00; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:36:23 -0800 Received: (qmail 24334 invoked by uid 1013); 4 Mar 2005 19:36:21 - Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:36:21 +0100 From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Nvi: Improved init.d recover file that fixes security bugs Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: nvi Version: 1.79-21 Priority: grave Tags: security patch woody sid Justification: local DoS (Note: The bugs I talk about in this report have been present in Debian's nvi for ages. Actually, OpenBSD provides an alternate 'recover' implementation (attached) written in Perl that fixes most of this stuff in probably a better way since it includes additional cheks than my patch to the init.d file (also attached).) Doing a security audit review of /tmp usage I've found that the /etc/init.d/nviboot (it is also provided with other names in woody in the nvi-m17n source package) is not coded in order to prevent some situations that could be forced by local users to generate unexpected events. The fact that this script runs as root on startup makes the bugs serious even if a direct attack is not self evident. The script has the following issues: - Will run even if the binary and directory it uses are not available - Will interpret any file even if it has been created by non-interactive=20 users that do not normally create vi.recover files - Will follow symlinks - Will work with directories, even if this generates errors later on (when= =20 trying to read from them) - PATH is unset All of these are fixed in the attached patch. If you think that the patch is not worth it, consider the following=20 hypotheses: - A local user symlinks recover.test to /dev/zero: will cause a DoS when the system whenever the system starts up. This is a local attack. - A remote user compromises a service server in which mail use is restricted to a given group (this is non-standard configuration, can be=20 implemented through capabitities or just chmoding 660 /usr/sbin/sendmail=20 or whatever it points to) and creates a recover.test file with: =2E To: hacker =46rom: root X-vi-recover-path: /etc/passwd System rebooted! =2E =2E He will get a mail whenever the system is rebooted. This can also be used= =20 by local users to play tricks on other users (I just got a mail from=20 root saying I should change my password to '11' :-) - A bug is found in exim's implementation of sendmail -t (buffer overflow when parsing headers?). When 'sendmail -t' is run with a rogue 'recover.hackme' file a local user can attempt a privilege escalation when the server is rebooted since 'sendmail -t' will be run on whatever is in=20 /var/tmp/vi.recover as root. - A local user creates a recover.test directory: error on startup The patch: - will delete any symlink files found in /var/tmp/vi.recover - will refuse to work with directories that resemble recover files - will call the sendmail binary with lower (nobody) privileges to prevent a= =20 bug in sendmail from becoming a privilege escalation possibility. - will delete any files found if they don't below to a Joe user. It has= =20 the cavea that root nvi recover sessions will also be removed (probably=20 one of the few admin user which will use nvi often). This
Bug#297149: aspell-bn: FTBFS: Cannot find is13194-bn.cset
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote: jaldhar: I'm cc'ing you since you've made the last couple of versions/uploads and might have a clue about finding the missing is13194-bn.cset file. Not knowing any Bengali whatsoever, I don't know if this is helpful, but ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/ has a tarball that contains u-beng.cmap and u-beng.cset that can be copied to the aspell-bn source directory as is13194-bn.cmap and is13194-bn.cset (the latter may need to be edited to contain = is13194-bn instead of = u-beng at the top). With these files, the package will build, but I don't know if it works. (Hoping to be helpful here, sorry if I'm on a wild goose chase.) Actually this file should be created by the build process. Unfortunately neither Soumyadip nor I know a lot about aspell. Our working theory is that it was the recent API change in aspell which caused the file to stop being created. Soumyadip is following up with Brian Nelson about all this. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297149: aspell-bn: FTBFS: Cannot find is13194-bn.cset
jaldhar: I'm cc'ing you since you've made the last couple of versions/uploads and might have a clue about finding the missing is13194-bn.cset file. Not knowing any Bengali whatsoever, I don't know if this is helpful, but ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/ has a tarball that contains u-beng.cmap and u-beng.cset that can be copied to the aspell-bn source directory as is13194-bn.cmap and is13194-bn.cset (the latter may need to be edited to contain = is13194-bn instead of = u-beng at the top). With these files, the package will build, but I don't know if it works. (Hoping to be helpful here, sorry if I'm on a wild goose chase.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render system unusable or mostly so
reopen 298351 thanks Please don't close bugs without even waiting to know if the solution you give is helpful! mv /etc/udev/udev.rules.dpkg-dist /etc/udev/udev.rules [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /etc/udev/udev.rules.dpkg-dist ls: /etc/udev/udev.rules.dpkg-dist: No such file or directory Quickly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render system unusable or mostly so
On Mar 07, Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please don't close bugs without even waiting to know if the solution you give is helpful! It was a very good bet. Please report the content of /etc/udev/udev.rules of the /etc/udev/ directory. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of dcraw 5.88-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 297992 + fixed Bug#297992: dcraw: No longer installable. Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#222664: marked as done (signing-party: gpg-key2ps generates a broken ps file)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:47:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#222664: fixed in signing-party 0.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2003 00:19:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 01 18:19:13 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 173.red-217-125-143.pooles.rima-tde.net (gaia.roncero.org) [217.125.143.173] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AQyG0-dE-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:19:13 -0600 Received: from terminus.roncero.org (terminus [172.26.0.2]) by gaia.roncero.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613733328A; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 01:19:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by terminus.roncero.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EF9FE1594E3; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 01:19:08 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1738956439== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Jes=FAs_Roncero?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: signing-party: gpg-key2ps generates a broken ps file X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 01:19:08 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_80,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1738956439== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Package: signing-party Version: 0.2.3-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid patch Justification: renders package unusable Executing gpg-key2ps generates a invalid postscript file. I've been investigating the script itself and the output from gnupg and I believe it's a problem with the output from gpg itself. If you run gpg as the script does, if you have gnu pgp 1.2.3 (as I have) the output you get is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --list-keys --with-colons jesus tru::0:1030556672:0 pub:u:1024:17:0DB9F19A863B90A4:2002-06-23:::u:Jesus Roncero Franco jesus _AT_ roncero.org::scESC: uid:uJesus Roncero Franco (HispaLinux) jesus.roncero _AT_ hispalinux.es: uid:uJesús Roncero Franco (yahoo) jroncero _AT_ yahoo.com: sub:u:2048:16:55EFCAD9861A910B:2002-06-23::e: [Note that I did changed the @ sign for _AT_ to bug spammers. So, If you look carefully, there's this line at the very beginning: tru::0:1030556672:0 which is explained in the DETAILS file of the gnupg documentation. This line, which happens not to be in the output of gnupg 1.0.6 (the one I tested) is what is making the ps file unusable. So, what I did is just change the line in the script and make it go through a grep -v 'tru:' to avoid that line. This way it should work with any version of gnupg, I believe. I am sending you an attachment with the patch. I am not very used to diff and patch, I hope it helps to you, although it's only a line to change. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux terminus 2.6.0-test10 #1 Mon Nov 24 13:46:29 CET 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages signing-party depends on: ii gnupg 1.2.3-1GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep -- no debconf information --===1738956439== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=/tmp/gpg-key2ps.patch --- /usr/bin/gpg-key2ps 2003-12-02 00:35:58.0 +0100 +++ gpg-key2ps 2003-12-02 00:36:33.0 +0100 @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ TMPFILE=`mktemp /tmp/gpg-key2ps.XX` -if ! gpg --fingerprint --with-colons $KEYIDS 2/dev/null $TMPFILE; then +if ! gpg --fingerprint --with-colons $KEYIDS | grep -v 'tru:' 2/dev/null $TMPFILE; then echo 2 Key not found. Try \'gpg --list-keys\' rm $TMPFILE exit 1 --===1738956439==-- --- Received: (at 222664-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 00:53:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 16:53:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from
Processed: retitle 241497 to need upgrade directories for hppa64, sparc sun4m and 80386
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 retitle 241497 need upgrade directories for hppa64, sparc sun4m and 80386 Bug#241497: sarge needs upgrade-i386 directory which gives us upgrade-path for real i386 architecture Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Actually, more information required
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 294163 = moreinfo Bug#294163: libdb4.3: build failed on hppa Tags were: patch Tags set to: moreinfo -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298233: marked as done (PaX privilege elevation security bug)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:02:35 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298233: fixed in kernel-patch-adamantix 1.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2005 21:46:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 05 13:46:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7h6T-0006No-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:46:29 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (n195-212.wireless.ubc.ca [128.189.195.212]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33B817F9A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:46:28 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C91346E0D3; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 13:49:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 13:49:17 -0800 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PaX privilege elevation security bug Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: kernel-patch-adamantix Version: 1.6 Severity: grave Tags: security PaX is included in kernel-patch-adamantix. - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - =46rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 01:43:44 +0100 To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Cc: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Subject: PaX privilege elevation security bug Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PaX privilege elevation security bug Severity: critical Description:unprivileged users can execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the target in any program they or other users can execute it is definitely exploitable for local users, remote exploitability depends on how much control one can have over executable file mappings in the target Affected versions: all releases since 2003 September (when vma mirroring was introduced) Affected configurations: anyone having SEGMEXEC or RANDEXEC (vma mirroring) in the kernel's .config file Fixed versions: patches released today, see http://pax.grsecurity.net Mitigation: echo 0 0 /proc/sys/vm/pagetable_cache this will eliminate the obvious exploit vector only, patching is still unavoidable Technical details will be posted to the dailydave mailing list, probably early next week. This is a spectacular fuckup, it pretty much destroys what PaX has always stood and been trusted for. For this and other reasons, PaX will be terminated on 1st April, 2005, a fitting date... Brad Spengler offered to take it up but if you're interested in helping as well, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQikAPJVtI2Y58IG/EQJbjQCfe0KzZvFRQhzIImxBsbaOBvmQOTcAoIwk 0mFNuwmsx2F3efahYd3bU3mT =3DyPeF -END PGP SIGNATURE- - End forwarded message - --=20 see shy jo --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCKildd8HHehbQuO8RAqFrAJ9Fh/5aZiTQhklXwy4+en2F8u5b1wCeNiGk 2w2t7lMK1YDIk01zVKVpBP0= =OV7Y -END PGP SIGNATURE- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- --- Received: (at 298233-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 02:09:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 18:09:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render system unusable or mostly so
Please report the content of /etc/udev/udev.rules of the /etc/udev/ directory. I attach a bzipped tarball of /etc/udev. Quickly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#295877: gauche-gtk: FTBFS: /bin/sh: m: command not found
With regard to bug #295877: gauche-gtk is missing versioned build dependencies on gauche-dev (= 0.8.3-1) and possibly on gauche (= 0.8.3-1). gauche has been split into several packages and is waiting for NEW package processing (see http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html). I've verified that those two packages are sufficient to get gauche-gtk to build (but since I don't know the package, I can't test they work). gauche-gtk's control file must be updated to add those build dependencies, and a new package uploaded. Preferably this should be done, I think, before gauche gets out from the NEW queue so that buildds can rebuild gauche-gtk as soon as things are ready. Happy hacking. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296509: kxdocker: FTBFS: No rule to make target `xeplugin_dcop_skel.h'
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `xeplugin_dcop_skel.h', needed by `all-am'. Stop. Debian (including kxdocker package) doesn't seem to contain a file named like that. Removing the reference to it in src/Makefile.am and src/Makefile.in allows the package to be built. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#286905: marked as done (perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:47:15 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#286905: fixed in perl 5.8.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2004 22:11:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 22 14:11:05 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from talus.maths.usyd.edu.au [129.78.68.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ChEhE-00048l-00; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:11:04 -0800
Received: from pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [129.78.69.136]
by siv.maths.usyd.edu.au via smtpdoor V18.4
id 309156 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:10:31 +1100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au (8.12.3/8.1/Submit)
id iBMMAV7n010381; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:10:31 +1100
From: Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:10:31 +1100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,WEIRD_PORT autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: perl-modules
Version: 5.6.1-8.7
Severity: critical
File: /usr/share/perl/5.6.1/File/Path.pm
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Noting USN-44-1 e.g. in
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-12/0385.html
I looked in perl-N.N.N/lib/File/Path.pm and noticed that rmtree contains
a race condition, allowing creation of setuid files:
170 (undef, undef, my $rp) = lstat $root or next;
171 $rp = 0; # don't forget setuid, setgid, sticky bits
172 if ( -d _ ) {
...
209 if (rmdir $root) {
210 ++$count;
211 }
212 else {
213 carp Can't remove directory $root: $!;
214 chmod($rp, ($Is_VMS ? VMS::Filespec::fileify($root) :
$root))
215 or carp(and can't restore permissions to
216 . sprintf(0%o,$rp) . \n);
217 }
218 }
...
Example of attack: suppose we know that root uses rmtree to clean up
/tmp directories. Attacker prepares things:
mkdir -p /tmp/psz/sh
perl -e 'open F, /tmp/psz/sh/$_ foreach (1..1000)'
chmod 4777 /tmp/psz/sh
While root is busy working on /tmp/psz/sh (and this can be made as slow
as we like), attacker does:
mv /tmp/psz/sh /tmp/psz/dummy
ln -s /bin/sh /tmp/psz/sh
Root would have recorded the permissions of /tmp/psz/sh, but would
restore it to /bin/sh.
I am not sure if things can almost be fixed (for those architectures
without $force_writeable) by enclosing the chmod($rp,...) line within
if(!safe|$force_writeable){...}. Maybe it should be documented that
rmtree must only be used if you can be sure to have exclusive access to
the tree.
(A few minutes ago I emailed the File::Path authors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tim.Bunce bounced.)
Cheers,
Paul Szabo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au:8000/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney 2006 Australia
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au 2.4.22-smssvr1.5.3 #1 SMP Wed Jun 23
13:01:39 EST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages perl-modules depends on:
ii perl 5.6.1-8.7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
---
Received: (at 286905-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 06:53:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 22:53:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D8C6y-XC-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 22:53:04 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D8C1L-0001OJ-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:47:15 -0500
From: Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#286905: fixed in perl 5.8.4-7
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Bug#286922: marked as done (perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree removes arbitrary)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:47:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#286905: fixed in perl 5.8.4-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2004 23:00:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 22 15:00:05 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from talus.maths.usyd.edu.au [129.78.68.1] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ChFSe-0001bR-00; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:00:04 -0800 Received: from pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [129.78.69.136] by siv.maths.usyd.edu.au via smtpdoor V18.4 id 310557 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:00:01 +1100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au (8.12.3/8.1/Submit) id iBMN00bf011682; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:00:00 +1100 From: Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree removes arbitrary X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:00:00 +1100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,WEIRD_PORT autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: perl-modules Version: 5.6.1-8.7 Severity: critical File: /usr/share/perl/5.6.1/File/Path.pm Tags: security Justification: root security hole Following on from the File::Path::rmtree makes setuid issue, I notice that rmtree may be tricked into removing arbitrary files. Example of attack: suppose we know that root uses rmtree to clean up /tmp directories. Attacker prepares things: mkdir /tmp/psz perl -e 'open F, /tmp/psz/$_ foreach (1..1000)' touch /tmp/psz/passwd While root is busy working on /tmp/psz (and this can be made as slow as we like), attacker does: mv /tmp/psz /tmp/dummy ln -s /etc /tmp/psz Root will then remove /etc/passwd. Maybe it should be documented that rmtree must only be used if you can be sure to have exclusive access to the tree. Cheers, Paul Szabo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au:8000/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney 2006 Australia -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au 2.4.22-smssvr1.5.3 #1 SMP Wed Jun 23 13:01:39 EST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages perl-modules depends on: ii perl 5.6.1-8.7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --- Received: (at 286905-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 06:53:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 22:53:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8C6y-XC-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 22:53:04 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8C1L-0001OJ-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:47:15 -0500 From: Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#286905: fixed in perl 5.8.4-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:47:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 11 Source: perl Source-Version: 5.8.4-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libcgi-fast-perl_5.8.4-7_all.deb to pool/main/p/perl/libcgi-fast-perl_5.8.4-7_all.deb libperl-dev_5.8.4-7_i386.deb to pool/main/p/perl/libperl-dev_5.8.4-7_i386.deb libperl-dev_5.8.4-7_powerpc.deb to pool/main/p/perl/libperl-dev_5.8.4-7_powerpc.deb libperl-dev_5.8.4-7_sparc.deb to pool/main/p/perl/libperl-dev_5.8.4-7_sparc.deb libperl5.8_5.8.4-7_i386.deb to pool/main/p/perl/libperl5.8_5.8.4-7_i386.deb libperl5.8_5.8.4-7_powerpc.deb to pool/main/p/perl/libperl5.8_5.8.4-7_powerpc.deb libperl5.8_5.8.4-7_sparc.deb to
