On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:33:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
fixed both bugs in -10, uploaded to unstable. It looks like other ruby
modules may be fail to build as well, the configury of ruby1.8 was
changed in ruby1.8-1.8.2-4.
Approved for sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is final patch, taken from Debian xfree86 svn repository.
Thanks,
- --
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/
Package: snort
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Hello Javier,
When attempting a woody to sarge upgrade, dpkg fails with:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/snort_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/etc/ppp/ip-down.d/snort', which is also in package
snort-common
Package: libsem-dev
Version: 0.0.1-3
Severity: grave
hi,
since hurd got a native semaphores implementation, both hurd-dev and
libsem-dev ship semaphore.h and therefore conflict:
Unpacking libsem-dev (from .../libsem-dev_0.0.1-3_hurd-i386.deb) ...
dpkg - warning, overriding problem because
On Sun, 29 May 2005 23:42:52 +0900 (JST)
Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: courier-authlib
Severity: serious
Version: 0.56-0.1
Tags: experimental
Experimental arm buildd failed to build your package (forget
openssl?).
This appears to be a relict of the Courier package build.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 303200 kernel,kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#303200: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/file.c:534!
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `kernel,kernel-source-2.6.8'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: kwiki
Version: 0.36-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
# apt-get install kwiki
[...]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kwiki: Depends: libkwiki-perl (= 0.36-2) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
I think the subject together with the
Package: snort-rules-default
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Hello Javier,
When upgrading a pristine woody chroot with snort installed, and no
snort conffiles modified manually, upgrading snort-rules-default cause
dpkg to prompt conffiles handling for thirty-four (34) files. This is
more than
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 230875
Bug#230875: libpam-pgsql: Some notes about pam_pgsql security
Bug#307366: libpam-pgsql: new package misses features/fixes from NMUs
Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags 230875 +sarge
Bug#230875:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-05-2005 21:43, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jonas Smedegaard]
It is a violation of Debian Policy to mess with conffiles of other
packages, and http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt section
3 adds this:
Debian policy section 10.7.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 308413 serious
Bug#308413: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on groff
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 307683
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags 307683 -sarge
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge
severity 307683 serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 311203 + confirmed patch pending
Bug#311203: libvcp-dest-svk-perl: FTBFS: Paragraph 2: field `enchances' not
recognised for binary packages.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, patch, pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 308250
Bug#308250: broxen dependency?
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags 308250 +sarge
Bug#308250: broxen dependency?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hello,
Make your ordinary 56k modem go speeds of upto 250k+!
(Average increased speeds of 195 - 200K!)
Download music/programs in seconds, not minutes!
This hardware is compatible with EVERY Dialup ISP!
Check it out:
http://1stopcentral.info
Best Regards,
Roxanne Peel
Never Again : :
tags 311203 + confirmed patch pending
thanks
The following patch is the diff of the non-maintainer upload made to
correct this RC bug. Please apply and acknowledge this patch in your
next maintainer upload.
Thanks,
Roger
--- libvcp-dest-svk-perl-0.28.old/debian/changelog 2005-05-30
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 311264 + sid
Bug#311264: kwiki 0.36-1 uninstallable due to missing libkwiki-perl
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-05-2005 10:17, Steve Langasek wrote:
I realize that debian-edu-config is something of a special case, because of
its narrow application. I don't think that Debian-Edu should get a free
pass for violating policy, but I also don't think that
Package: ttthreeparser
Followup-For: Bug #311202
Hi,
building this package also fails here, but the error is different:
[...]
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/ttthreeparser/ttthreeparser-1.4'
Translating TTCN3Lexer.g
ANTLR Parser Generator Version 2.7.2 1989-2003 jGuru.com
Translating
On Mo, Mai 30, 2005 at 07:40:53 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
the version of the locale package has to match the version of the Mozilla
package. The latest version of Mozilla is 1.7.8 and thus the
mozilla-locale-de-at
package is just deinstalled once you install Mozilla. The prefered solution
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 311203 + sarge
Bug#311203: libvcp-dest-svk-perl: FTBFS: Paragraph 2: field `enchances' not
recognised for binary packages.
Tags were: fixed pending patch confirmed
Tags added: sarge
tags 311203 - fixed
Bug#311203: libvcp-dest-svk-perl: FTBFS:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:28:54AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
(And yes, I believe we need to find a better way to handle
configuration in debian-edu, but while we wait, I see no better way to
do it than the current mechanism. And I believe it is not breaking
policy as it is written
I assume, that this bug does not exist in the current ttthreeparser
package, which is in unstable since 2005-01-04. Unfortunately, it
depends on a newer ANTLR version, but the state of ANTLR is unclear
to me. Could the ANTLR maintainers please comment? Thanks.
Cheers, W. Borgert
RM: If this
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:28:54AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-05-2005 21:43, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jonas Smedegaard]
It is a violation of Debian Policy to mess with conffiles of other
packages, and
Hi James,
The following patch is a little cleaner than the original (it will
work with both the old and new jadetex versions).
--- gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/gph/db2any 2005-05-30 13:24:33.540408728 +0100
+++ gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/gph/db2any 2005-05-30 13:18:55.790754480 +0100
@@ -231,7 +231,7
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: snort-rules-default
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Hello Javier,
When upgrading a pristine woody chroot with snort installed, and no
snort conffiles modified manually, upgrading snort-rules-default cause
dpkg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# sarge-version is ok
tags 311264 + sid
Bug#311264: kwiki 0.36-1 uninstallable due to missing libkwiki-perl
Tags were: sid
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Jamie == Jamie L Penman-Smithson
Re: Bug#311216: logcheck: mails egrep: Invalid content of \{\}
Mon, 30 May 2005 00:43:57 +0100
Jamie On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 19:06 -0400, John A. Martin wrote:
Mail sent by logcheck
,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 308819 + fixed
Bug#308819: openmotif: affected by vulnerabilities in libxpm
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
The following patch seems to clear the problem
--- ignore.d.server/squid~ Sun May 29 00:32:18 2005
+++ ignore.d.server/squid Mon May 30 09:24:44 2005
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ squid\[[0-9]+\]: +[0-9]+ entries written so
far\.$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 09:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#308624: fixed in gdb 6.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 09:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#308624: fixed in gdb 6.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Stefan Strasser wrote:
What error messages does xine-ui show when trying to play something?
no input plugin available to handle XYZ
This is very weird. According to your listing, the plugins for both file
and DVD input are available...
(There should be a dialog
Am Montag, 30. Mai 2005 15:53 schrieb Siggi Langauf:
(There should be a dialog showing a more button that takes you to the
engine log. The information there is usually quite helpful for
debugging...)
there is a more button. which I can't use because xine has locked up in
the
severity 303200 important
tags 303200 moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005, Pau Capdevila wrote:
*** Please type your report below this line ***
When the following occurs:
Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 {
DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
Apr 3
Package: libomniorb4
Version: 4.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Concurrent threads may conflict when destroying individual POAs.
The patch originated from Duncan Grisby (= upstream).
poa.diff
Description: Binary data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 303200 important
Bug#303200: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/file.c:534!
Severity set to `important'.
tags 303200 moreinfo
Bug#303200: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/file.c:534!
There were no tags
Package: kwiki
Version: 0.36-1
Severity: whishlist
Justification: kwiki is not in testing
kwiki is not in testing, therefor, bug should be important.
see here http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kwiki .
package is not, and will not be in testing.
regards,
Luis Matos ... debian
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 17:18:48 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in last upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 17:20:56 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line cloning 308680, retitle -1 to RM: mysql-nonfree/woody -- RoM;
License does not permit redistribution ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 311175 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#311175: courier-authlib: [FTBFS] missing dependency
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi John,
Mail sent by logcheck
,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED]if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then
nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:02:09 -0400 (EDT)
egrep: Invalid content of \{\}
`
I
Package: php-cgiwrap
Version: 3.9-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30-vs1.20-sata-cel-nosmp-omserver-5.1
Locale:
Jamie == Jamie L Penman-Smithson
Re: Bug#311216: logcheck: mails egrep: Invalid content of \{\}
Mon, 30 May 2005 17:58:30 +0100
Jamie Hi John,
Mail sent by logcheck
,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED]if [ -x
Hi Roberto,
[resending, so it goes to the b.d.o as well; sorry for the dup]
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 14:59, you wrote:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:22:18PM +, Lee Braiden wrote:
Package: rhdb-admin
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
rhdb-admin
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 21:01:39 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Experimental bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 311108 RM: xgobi,xgobi-doc -- RoM; non-free, dead upstream,
superseded by ggobi
Bug#311108: ftp.debian.org: Please remove xgobi and xgobi-doc from all
distributions
Changed Bug title.
retitle 308680 RM: mysql-nonfree,mysql-nonfree-4.1 --
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 09:13:20PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
And, as with #311257, this is an upgrade from a really buggy version. Funny
that no one has complained until know (maybe because people are not running
the buggy 1.8 release from Debian?)
The previous maintainer
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:11:02PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
kwiki is not in testing,
Yes, it is.
therefor, bug should be important.
That is not how bug severities are defined.
see here http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kwiki .
That page shows that kwiki 0.18-2 is in testing.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 307683 sid
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:12:56PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Reading [EMAIL PROTECTED], that doesn't really read as the
intention and how it might end up with upstream. The attached statement
only mentions that Stefan Hinz misunderstood in his last mail, but
doesn't imply as far as I
Forgot to cc bugs.d.o.
- Forwarded message from W. Borgert [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 22:08:43 +
From: W. Borgert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#311202:
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 15:47:29 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed mysql-nonfree, mysql-nonfree-4.1 from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On 5/30/05, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
reopen 307683
tags 307683 -sarge
severity 307683 serious
thanks
On i386, both the package in unstable and the package in unstable fail
if mawk is not installed.
If you use mawk, you have to add a build dependency.
It seems to me that the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 311203 - pending
Bug#311203: libvcp-dest-svk-perl: FTBFS: Paragraph 2: field `enchances' not
recognised for binary packages.
Tags were: sarge pending patch confirmed
Tags removed: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 16:32:20 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#311062: fixed in liblscp 0.2.cvs20050530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package logcheck
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: logcheck
severity 311216 important
Bug#311216: logcheck: mails egrep: Invalid content of \{\}
Severity set to `important'.
tags 311216 = pending
Bug#311216: logcheck: mails egrep: Invalid content of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 307683 -sid
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
package logcheck
severity 311216 important
tags 311216 = pending
thanks
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 14:28 -0400, John A. Martin wrote:
Jamie == Jamie L Penman-Smithson
Re: Bug#311216: logcheck: mails egrep: Invalid content of \{\}
Mon, 30 May 2005 17:58:30 +0100
egrep: Invalid
tags 307683 -sid
thanks
Yes I was able to reproduce this bug with the package in sarge and yes,
I explicitely mentioned this in my email to the BTS.
Is there any way to stop Steve from blindly adding wrong sid tags to
bugs only for letting his RC bugs metric look better?
On Mon, May 30, 2005
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:01:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 30 May 2005 at 15:02, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| On 5/30/05, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| reopen 307683
| tags 307683 -sarge
| severity 307683 serious
| thanks
|
| On i386, both the package in unstable
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:03:16PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 30 May 2005 at 22:45, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| Why do you call a system without mawk installed seriously broken?
|
| That's a perfectly legal setup (and it works fine on my computer since
| more than 5 years).
No it's
On 5/30/05, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 307683 -sid
thanks
Yes I was able to reproduce this bug with the package in sarge and yes,
I explicitely mentioned this in my email to the BTS.
Is there any way to stop Steve from blindly adding wrong sid tags to
bugs only for letting
On 30 May 2005 at 15:02, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| On 5/30/05, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| reopen 307683
| tags 307683 -sarge
| severity 307683 serious
| thanks
|
| On i386, both the package in unstable and the package in unstable fail
| if mawk is not installed.
|
| If you
On 30 May 2005 at 22:45, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| Why do you call a system without mawk installed seriously broken?
|
| That's a perfectly legal setup (and it works fine on my computer since
| more than 5 years).
No it's not as mawk is Priority: required. So if you remove it, your
problem, and you
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:01:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 30 May 2005 at 15:02, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| On 5/30/05, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| reopen 307683
| tags 307683 -sarge
| severity 307683 serious
| thanks
|
| On i386, both the package in unstable and
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 17:32:08 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#311008: fixed in asterisk-spandsp-plugins 0.0.20050203-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:10:11PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On 5/30/05, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 307683 -sid
thanks
Yes I was able to reproduce this bug with the package in sarge and yes,
I explicitely mentioned this in my email to the BTS.
Is there any way to
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 17:32:08 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#311008: fixed in asterisk-spandsp-plugins 0.0.20050203-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Could we not come to a working compromise for sarge no the basis that a
propper solution is found for etch... something along the lines of this.
debian-edu-config could use debconf to ask the admin somthing like:
Do you wish to apply the debian-edu configuation?
Doing so will alter the
Package: rivet
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge
rivet in sarge lacks a dependency on apache.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 262395 - experimental
Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work
Tags were: patch experimental
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Tags removed: experimental
tags 306595 -
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:28:54AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
It would be interesting to know which packages conffiles we affect, to
have a work list of packages we need to make more configurable.
The following was extractedx manually from looking at links and
editfiles entries of
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:56:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 30-05-2005 10:17, Steve Langasek wrote:
I realize that debian-edu-config is something of a special case, because of
its narrow application. I don't think that Debian-Edu should get a free
pass for violating policy, but I
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:14:34PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
Package: libomniorb4
Version: 4.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Concurrent threads may conflict when destroying individual POAs.
The patch originated from Duncan Grisby (= upstream).
And why is this bug marked 'serious'? I
Hi,
Looking at the backtrace, this bug seems to be a (fairly) well-known
segfault pattern of PPC architecture: missing va_end call and/or abuse
of va_list type (only the first part is relevant). I believe the patch
attached might fix the issue, but since I don't have an access to a PPC
box, I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 311280 important
Bug#311280: POA destroy race condition
Severity set to `important'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:16:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
And why is this bug marked 'serious'? I don't see any reference to policy
Sorry, serious is not the right severity. I'll downgrade
to important, as data loss or security impact are not very
likely (IMHO).
violation here. There
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 308413 - sarge
Bug#308413: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on groff
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge
close 308413
Bug#308413: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on groff
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 306595 sarge
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Tags were: patch
Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work
Tags
On 30 May 2005 at 14:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
| Don't think so. Mawk is priority required. It can be assumed to be present.
|
| No, it cannot. You are only ever allowed to assume that packages that are
| Essential: yes (or in the case of build-dependencies, part of
| build-essential) are
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 311203 = fixed patch
Bug#311203: libvcp-dest-svk-perl: FTBFS: Paragraph 2: field `enchances' not
recognised for binary packages.
Tags were: sarge patch confirmed
Tags set to:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
severity 311165 important
Bug#311165: cannot find a plugin for anything
Severity set to `important'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
AFAICT, this report is about a historical bug in the woody version of
snort-rules-default, not about a bug in the current sarge version of the
package. If the sarge package is not also modifying its own conffiles, this
bug should either be tagged woody (if this is about the behavior of the
woody
Ah, hmm. Reading more closely -- ok, the reason for the conffile prompts is
that these files changed location between woody and sarge... I agree, the
sarge package needs to either handle unmodified conffiles, or use ucf.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 311188 sarge-ignore
Bug#311188: debian-edu-config: Messes programmatically with conffiles of
other packages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
End of message,
86 matches
Mail list logo
