Bug#322510: watchdog: Modifies conffile in postinst

Package: watchdog Version: 5.2.4-4 Severity: serious The package's postinst may modify /etc/init.d/watchdog upon installation. This is forbidden by the Policy (section 10.7.3): The other way to do it is via the maintainer scripts. In this case, the configuration file must not be liste

Bug#104394: $1K a day part-time returning calls!

Hello Mariano , Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone calls? I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for this program. Give Us A Call 800-671-9012 algeria artificial bradbury fealty larkin quadrature carcinoma ilyu

Bug#319598: marked as done (wxvlc / vlc depends on libwxgtk2.4 (not installable) - see also wishlist)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319598: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#280673: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1] some translations not yet relicensed to GPL)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#280673: fixed in apt-howto 1.8.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#268459: marked as done (ghemical: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: `obj_loc_data* dummy_object::GetLocDataRW() const' is protected)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268459: fixed in ghemical 1.51-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#286784: marked as done (ghemical: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'obj_loc_data* dummy_object::GetLocDataRW() const' is protected)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#286784: fixed in ghemical 1.51-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#319292: marked as done (vlc is not sid installable because libwxgtk2.4 isn't.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319598: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#321461: marked as done (vlc is uninstallable)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319598: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#322166: marked as done (Dependency problem with libwxgtk2.4. Unable to install wxvlc.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319598: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#321311: marked as done (gthumb: depends on unavailable libexif10)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:41 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321311: fixed in gthumb 3:2.6.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#321461: marked as done (vlc is uninstallable)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322166: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#322166: marked as done (Dependency problem with libwxgtk2.4. Unable to install wxvlc.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322166: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#322383: marked as done (beagle daemon fails to start: BookFactory Error?)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321649: fixed in evolution-sharp 0.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#321649: marked as done (Not installable (e-d-s depends are outdated))

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321649: fixed in evolution-sharp 0.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#319598: marked as done (wxvlc / vlc depends on libwxgtk2.4 (not installable) - see also wishlist)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321461: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#321461: marked as done (vlc is uninstallable)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321461: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#319292: marked as done (vlc is not sid installable because libwxgtk2.4 isn't.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319292: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#265201: marked as done (sjog: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#265201: fixed in sjog 0.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#317055: marked as done (vlc: FTBFS w/ g++ 4)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317055: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#319598: marked as done (wxvlc / vlc depends on libwxgtk2.4 (not installable) - see also wishlist)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319292: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#321461: marked as done (vlc is uninstallable)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319292: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#322166: marked as done (Dependency problem with libwxgtk2.4. Unable to install wxvlc.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319292: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#320440: marked as done (blas-dev and lapack-dev beeing removed from unstable, rebuild using atlas3 needed)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320440: fixed in ghemical 1.51-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#321314: marked as done (epiphany-extensions: depends on unavailable libosp4)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321314: fixed in epiphany-extensions 1.6.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#319292: marked as done (vlc is not sid installable because libwxgtk2.4 isn't.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321461: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#322166: marked as done (Dependency problem with libwxgtk2.4. Unable to install wxvlc.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321461: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#321806: marked as done (beagle is uninstallable)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321649: fixed in evolution-sharp 0.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#319292: marked as done (vlc is not sid installable because libwxgtk2.4 isn't.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322166: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#319598: marked as done (wxvlc / vlc depends on libwxgtk2.4 (not installable) - see also wishlist)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322166: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: tagging 322467

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > tags 322467 security Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability Tags were: patch Tags added: security > End of message, stopping proce

Bug#322500: ifstat doesnt work with libsnmp 5.2.1.2

Package: ifstat Version: 1.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable ifstat doesnt work if you have libsnmp5 5.2.1.2-1 installed. It does work if you have 5.1.2-6.1 installed. $ ifstat -i FastEthernet3/1 -s [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifstat: snmpgetnext(interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex

Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: VLAN Oops fix for 2.6.8

Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp Followup-For: Bug #309308 Just noticed this bug in the testing-security list. I don't know if the below patch has been slurped into the Debian patches for 2.6.8, but the error posted looks like the same error I suffered when hitting this bug. Patch from http:

Bug#317098: Fix described earlier works

I too confirm this bug. When it crashes there is no output. Strace output also appeared to not be very useful. The fix mentioned above does work: If you are running Sid and have the kdelibs4 and kdelibs-bin version 3.3.2-7 installed: 1. go to snapshot.debian.net (http://snapshot.debian.net/arc

Bug#322089: openldap2: Please switch to libgnutls12

Hi, Torsten Landschoff: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:44:42AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > Sigh. This is not supposed to happen... > > > > Do you have a build log? > > Attached. > OK, I have looked at the sources. The problem is that the X509 data structures and functions have been moved t

Bug#321093: NMU diff for several mpich bugs; please ack or nack

tag 320891 +pending tag 321052 +pending tag 321093 +pending tag 321158 +pending thanks > As the diff is sort of big, I will wait a bit before making the upload > despite being in 0-day NMU policy; I'd really like to upload (or not) > after having heard from you, but note that I can't wait in

Processed: Re: NMU diff for several mpich bugs; please ack or nack

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 320891 +pending Bug#320891: libmpich1.0: libpmpich++.so.1.0 is not linked against the libraries it depends on Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tag 321052 +pending Bug#321052: mpich: clean target does not undo all the effects of build Tags we

Bug#318012: revelation is still uninstallable

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:00:23PM -0400, John McCutchan wrote: > Package: revelation > Followup-For: Bug #318012 > Please mark this bug as unfixed. Indeed, a correction is in order, Revelation > can't > be installed because python2.3-crypto can't be installed. This is using > sid. And that is n

Processed: severity of 322423 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 322423 grave Bug#322423: $servers[$i]['disable_anon_bind'] = true doesn't prevent anonymous to access ldap directory Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping pro

Bug#322472: marked as done (gksu: segfault)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:15:38 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line problem was already fixed in the upload done today has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#322472: gksu: segfault

Package: gksu Version: 1.3.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After the latest upgrade gksu has stopped working. It gives a segfault when called with a command to run specified -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (9

Bug#314344: netperf: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Failed to get size of sin_port in struct sockaddr_in

Tags: unreproducible ---snip--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/netperf-2.4.0$ ls -lrt .. total 1664 -rw-r--r-- 1 erik Debian 1136837 May 29 19:47 netperf_2.4.0.orig.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 erik Debian 566 Aug 10 22:24 netperf_2.4.0-2.diff.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 erik Debian 359 Aug 10 22:24 netperf_2.4.0-2.d

Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability

Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.0.2-31 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: can result in disk consumption and ultimately lead to a denial of service condition. Just a reminder, http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14529/info Ubuntu^1 already fixed the xpdf packages. I guess we're affected too,

Bug#322448: libapache-request-perl: Apache::Request fails with unresolved dynamic load

Ok. I'm going to presume the best course of action here is to get 1.33 uploaded, which I would hope also fixes it. I think Ivan Kohler is already looking into doing that at present... cheers, Ron On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:07:03PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 04:27 +

Processed: tagging grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 321832 grave Bug#321832: Applications linked to libpango1.0-0 SIGSEGV Severity set to `grave'. > tags 321832 experimental Bug#321832: Applications linked to libpango1.0-0 SIGSEGV There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental > thanks Stopp

Processed: merging 322383 321649

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > merge 322383 321649 Bug#321649: Not installable (e-d-s depends are outdated) Bug#322383: beagle daemon fails to start: BookFactory Error? Bug#321806: beagle is uninstallable Merged 321

Processed: reassign 322383 to libevolution-cil

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > reassign 322383 libevolution-cil Bug#322383: beagle daemon fails to start: BookFactory Error? Bug reassigned from package `beagle' to `libevolution-cil'. > End of message, stopping pr

Processed: severity of 322383 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > severity 322383 serious Bug#322383: beagle daemon fails to start: BookFactory Error? Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#322300: wrong Architecture line in control file

This package only works on ppc as it contains ppc assembler code. The architecture field in debian/control should therefor be Architecture: powerpc Cheers, Peter (p2). signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#322448: libapache-request-perl: Apache::Request fails with unresolved dynamic load

Hi, You'll have to forgive my initial incredulity here, but this patch appears to be some 2+ years old. Why exactly has no one run into this and/or reported it before now? thanks, Ron On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:34:26AM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > Package: libapache-request-perl > Version

Bug#322456: snes9x: FTBFS missing build dependencies

Package: snes9x Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, there are two missing build dependencies from snes9x: libxxf86dga-dev and libxxf86vm-dev thanks, filippo -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable

Bug#322455: snes9x: FTBFS on powerpc (maybe every !i386), works with --without-assembler

Package: snes9x Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, current snes9x (1.43-1) fails to build on powerpc, however adding --without-assembler to ./configure does the trick. also, dpkg --print-gnu-architecture is no longer supported, please consider this debian/rules snipp

Bug#322452: python-cherrypy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

Package: python-cherrypy Version: 2.0.0f-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'python-cherrypy' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: cd . && python setup.py build --build-base="./build" /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 Please

Bug#321690: backtrace

I found http://wiki.debian.net/?HowToGetABacktrace and did a backtrace. --- # MALLOC_CHECK_=2 gdb synaptic GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome t

Bug#258581: marked as done (config-manager: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: `errno' undeclared (first use this function))

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:32:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#258581: fixed in config-manager 0.1p83-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#322448: libapache-request-perl: Apache::Request fails with unresolved dynamic load

Package: libapache-request-perl Version: 1.1-0.1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable The package is unusable because it is linked incorrectly. The error message is: Can't load '/usr/lib/perl5/auto/Apache/Request/Request.so' for module Apache::Request: libapreq.so

Bug#294288: marked as done (config-manager: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): control may reach end of non-void function 'std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> std::operator+(const std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>&, _CharT) [with _CharT = char, _Traits = std::char_traits, _Alloc = std::allocator]' being inlined)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:32:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294288: fixed in config-manager 0.1p83-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#322423: marked as done ($servers[$i]['disable_anon_bind'] = true doesn't prevent anonymous to access ldap directory)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:32:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322423: fixed in phpldapadmin 0.9.6c-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#319929: marked as done (nsis: Included DLLs and stubs leads to crashes on Windows)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:15:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line nsis bugs fixed in 2.08-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#322316: marked as done (uninstallable; depends on non-existing glibc)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:17:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322316: fixed in lsb 3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Processed: nsis bugs fixed-in-experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 319929 fixed-in-experimental Bug#319929: nsis: Included DLLs and stubs leads to crashes on Windows Tags were: pending experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 320557 fixed-in-experimental Bug#320557: nsis: Modern UI with languagefile Lu

Processed: Fixed in NMU of allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-5.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 285080 + fixed Bug#285080: allegro4.1: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 'shutdown_single_menu' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 317177 + fixed Bug#317177: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required Tag

Bug#318633: Fix in new upstream

Hi there, This is now fixed in the new upstream version (1.2.20050306) Could you please package this version? If it's not been done with a week, I'll prepare an NMU. Cheers, Neil McGovern -- __ .Ž `. [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' ! `. `Ž gpg: B345BDD3 `- Please don't c

Bug#322423: $servers[$i]['disable_anon_bind'] = true doesn't prevent anonymous to access ldap directory

Il giorno mer, 10/08/2005 alle 19.35 +0400, Alexander Gerasiov ha scritto: > Package: phpldapadmin > Version: 0.9.6c-4 > Severity: critical > Tags: security > > Even if you deny anonymous login with disable_anon_bind anyone could > access your LDAP server. > > As I can see this option only hide c

Bug#318055: python2.3-crypto: please upload NOW

Package: python2.3-crypto Followup-For: Bug #318055 Bastian, Please just upload this now. I have had this bug open for almost a month without even a response from the maintainer. That is more than enough time for the maintainer to express interest in fixing this bug. -- System Information: Debia

Processed: Fixed in NMU of sdlperl 1.20.3-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 320548 + fixed Bug#320548: libsdl-perl: dependency problem There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#318012: revelation is still uninstallable

Package: revelation Followup-For: Bug #318012 Please mark this bug as unfixed. Indeed, a correction is in order, Revelation can't be installed because python2.3-crypto can't be installed. This is using sid. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT pol

Bug#321313: marked as done (FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#320473: marked as done (isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-dev.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#319410: marked as done (imake assumes availability of selinux)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#319121: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#318692: marked as done (xlibs-dev: compat package doesn't depend on libs formerly in xlibs-static-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#320218: marked as done (bookmarkbridge: FTBFS: Missing build dependency?)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#321819: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-depends on libselinux1-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#322423: $servers[$i]['disable_anon_bind'] = true doesn't prevent anonymous to access ldap directory

Package: phpldapadmin Version: 0.9.6c-4 Severity: critical Tags: security Even if you deny anonymous login with disable_anon_bind anyone could access your LDAP server. As I can see this option only hide checkbox from the input page, but anyone can create workaround hack: ==example form t

Bug#320457: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-dependency on libxinerama-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#322070: marked as done (gksu: sigsegv at startup with -u root option)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322280: fixed in gksu 1.3.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#322280: marked as done (gksu gives Segfault)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322280: fixed in gksu 1.3.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#322280: marked as done (gksu gives Segfault)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322070: fixed in gksu 1.3.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#322070: marked as done (gksu: sigsegv at startup with -u root option)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322070: fixed in gksu 1.3.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: reassign 322367 to lambdacore, severity of 322367 is normal, reassign 322370 to jhcore ... ... ... ... ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > # reassign these back with lesser severity until we're sure that was an > intentional change in dpkg-dev > reassign 322367 lambdacore Bug#322367: lambdacore: FTBFS: unpacking fails B

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

> >>Confirmed. We are passing a function pointer with a value of -2 into > >>__cffc, which should not happen... > > > > > > Is -2 a special signal number? > > I don't think so. in any case, others have observed that if they use an > older glibc, this problem does not happen. Not sure this is r

Processed: retitling

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 320048 SECURITY: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl (CAN-2005-1268) Bug#320048: Security: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl Changed Bug title. > retitle 316173 SECURITY: HTTP proxy responses with both Transfer-Encoding and > Content-Length headers (CAN

Bug#321902: fails to rmmod usbnet

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:22:39AM +0800, 肖盛文 Faris Xiao wrote: > Andres Salomon wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:54:46PM +0900, Horms wrote: > >[...] > >If this does happen w/ 2.6.12, then a backtrace would be useful. > >Hit ctrl-alt-sysrq-t to get a dump of all processes on the system; tha

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

Confirmed. We are passing a function pointer with a value of -2 into __cffc, which should not happen... Is -2 a special signal number? I don't think so. in any case, others have observed that if they use an older glibc, this problem does not happen. randolph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Bug#322359: gnats: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number ending with '-0'

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:18:50PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-Aug-10 15:29, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > > dpkg-source: error: unrecognised file suffix `-0.diff' > > > Unpack command 'dpkg-source -x gnats_4.1.0-0.dsc' f

Bug#322359: gnats: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number ending with '-0'

On 05-Aug-10 15:29, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > dpkg-source: error: unrecognised file suffix `-0.diff' > > Unpack command 'dpkg-source -x gnats_4.1.0-0.dsc' failed. > > E: Child process failed > > > > This is because the new dpkg

Processed: merging 322361 322359 322362, severity of 322361 is important, severity of 317760 is important ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > merge 322361 322359 322362 Bug#322359: gnats: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number ending with '-0' Bug#322361: alltraxclock: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

> > no, it's not fakeroot, it's make segfaulting ... > [...] > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 16911)] > > 0x4091fd20 in __canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare () from > > /lib/libpthread.so.0 > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x4091fd20 in __canonicalize_

Bug#322359: gnats: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number ending with '-0'

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > dpkg-source: error: unrecognised file suffix `-0.diff' > Unpack command 'dpkg-source -x gnats_4.1.0-0.dsc' failed. > E: Child process failed > > This is because the new dpkg does not accept a version ending with '-0'. Which is a b

Processed: reassign 322361 to dpkg-dev, reassign 322362 to dpkg-dev, reassign 322367 to dpkg-dev ... ... ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > reassign 322361 dpkg-dev Bug#322361: alltraxclock: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number ending with '-0' Bug reassigned from package `alltraxclock' to `dpkg-dev

Bug#302608: acknowledged by developer (Bug#302608: fixed in siptoolbox 0.3.99rc2alpha3-1)

reopen 302608 thanks > Changes: > siptoolbox (0.3.99rc2alpha3-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* new upstream version >* added Build-Depends: scilab-doc, closes: #302608 There is still no Build-Depends on scilab-doc and the bug is still there. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#318200: marked as done (FTBFS: Undeclared symbol FRIBIDI_CHARSET_CAP_RTL)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:02:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318200: fixed in mailutils 1:0.6.90-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: reassign 322359 to dpkg-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > reassign 322359 dpkg-dev Bug#322359: gnats: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number ending with '-0' Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `dpkg-dev'. > End of me

Processed: Re: Bug#302608 acknowledged by developer (Bug#302608: fixed in siptoolbox 0.3.99rc2alpha3-1)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 302608 Bug#302608: siptoolbox: FTBFS: Build stops with "!--error 241" usr/lib/scilab/man/eng/programming/whatis.htm does not exist Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#321312: marked as done (eog: depends on unavailable libexif10)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:47:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321312: fixed in eog 2.10.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#322368: libbakery-2.3-dev is uninstallable

severity 322368 grave reassign 322368 libbakery-2.3-11 thanks On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:54:28PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Package: libbakery-2.3-dev > Severity: serious Hmm, all of libbakery-2.3-dev's direct dependencies are present in unstable -- I think it's more appropriate to assign t

Processed: Re: Bug#322368: libbakery-2.3-dev is uninstallable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 322368 grave Bug#322368: libbakery-2.3-dev is uninstallable Severity set to `grave'. > reassign 322368 libbakery-2.3-11 Bug#322368: libbakery-2.3-dev is uninstallable Bug reassigned from package `libbakery-2.3-dev' to `libbakery-2.3-11'. > th

Bug#322383: beagle daemon fails to start: BookFactory Error?

Package: beagle Version: 0.0.12-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing beagle and all it's dependencies (including libmono0), I get the following error message when starting beagled: (beagled:13581): libebook-WARNING **: Can't find installed BookFactory that h

Processed: Re: Bug#322371: Acknowledgement (crossfire-client-images: FTBFS: unpacking fails)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 322371 1.7.0 Bug#322371: crossfire-client-images: FTBFS: unpacking fails Bug marked as found in version 1.7.0. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#322361: alltraxclock: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number ending with '-0'

merge 223904 322361 thanks I somehow did not recognize #223904 before I filed my report. Please also s/gnats/alltraxclock/ in the first line of my report. Sorry for the confusion. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

  1   2   >